<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Win with the Caro-Kann	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/</link>
	<description>We focus on the British Chess Scene Past &#38; Present!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Iron English &#124; British Chess News		</title>
		<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/#comment-17135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Iron English &#124; British Chess News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://britishchessnews.com/?p=15380#comment-17135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] would be advised to play 2.e4 and transpose into a Pseudo-Panov (called the Steiner Variation in Win with the Caro-Kann) rather than to a Slav. So, how did the &#8220;game&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] would be advised to play 2.e4 and transpose into a Pseudo-Panov (called the Steiner Variation in Win with the Caro-Kann) rather than to a Slav. So, how did the &#8220;game&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sverre Johnsen		</title>
		<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/#comment-15863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sverre Johnsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://britishchessnews.com/?p=15380#comment-15863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks!

Now everything looks good - at least from my author perspective. Feel free to remove my previous comment (and this one) if you like to.

Best regards,
Sverre]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Now everything looks good &#8211; at least from my author perspective. Feel free to remove my previous comment (and this one) if you like to.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Sverre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BCNWPWord		</title>
		<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/#comment-15814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BCNWPWord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://britishchessnews.com/?p=15380#comment-15814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/#comment-15760&quot;&gt;Sverre Johnsen&lt;/a&gt;.

Please send me an email to john.upham@zen.co.uk

John]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/#comment-15760">Sverre Johnsen</a>.</p>
<p>Please send me an email to <a href="mailto:john.upham@zen.co.uk">john.upham@zen.co.uk</a></p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sverre Johnsen		</title>
		<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/03/23/win-with-the-caro-kann/#comment-15760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sverre Johnsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://britishchessnews.com/?p=15380#comment-15760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear John,

Could you explain the claim &quot;the idea is for black to play a quick …c5 followed by …Nc6 at the cost of allowing Ne5 and Nxg6. This leaves white with an unopposed light squared bishop. Of course, black should only exchange his light squared bishop for whites [sic] and not for the knight&quot;? 

Did you find a line where Black allows this? 

Best regards,
Sverre Johnsen (author)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John,</p>
<p>Could you explain the claim &#8220;the idea is for black to play a quick …c5 followed by …Nc6 at the cost of allowing Ne5 and Nxg6. This leaves white with an unopposed light squared bishop. Of course, black should only exchange his light squared bishop for whites [sic] and not for the knight&#8221;? </p>
<p>Did you find a line where Black allows this? </p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Sverre Johnsen (author)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
