<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Modernized Philidor Defense	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://britishchessnews.com/2021/11/10/the-modernized-philidor-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/11/10/the-modernized-philidor-defense/</link>
	<description>We focus on the British Chess Scene Past &#38; Present!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James Pratt		</title>
		<link>http://britishchessnews.com/2021/11/10/the-modernized-philidor-defense/#comment-29720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Pratt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://britishchessnews.com/?p=18842#comment-29720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very good review. 

Harding points out that after 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 and now 3 ... Nf6! is an improvement attributed to Nimzowitsch. In Tartakower&#039;s &#039;Breviary&#039; what is written only confused me, though I rejoice that Major Hanham is mentioned, his rank somewhat diminished by Purdy&#039;s &#039;Mad Hanahm&#039;s Tea Party&#039; quip, not something likely to interest the current generation! Please give this book your time, as John indicates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good review. </p>
<p>Harding points out that after 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 and now 3 &#8230; Nf6! is an improvement attributed to Nimzowitsch. In Tartakower&#8217;s &#8216;Breviary&#8217; what is written only confused me, though I rejoice that Major Hanham is mentioned, his rank somewhat diminished by Purdy&#8217;s &#8216;Mad Hanahm&#8217;s Tea Party&#8217; quip, not something likely to interest the current generation! Please give this book your time, as John indicates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
