Tag Archives: Biographies

Minor Pieces 19: Sydney Meymott

You saw this result in my recent article about the Coward family. There are some other names of interest in this Twickenham team.

On board 5 for Twickenham was Sydney Meymott. Many players, like Arthur and Randulph Coward, only play competitive chess for a few years before moving on to another stage in their lives. There are others for whom chess is a lifelong obsession: the Complete Chess Addicts (now that would make a great book title!), and Sydney was one of those, with a chess career lasting almost half a century.

He came from a distinguished family. His grandfather, John Gilbert Meymott was a prominent lawyer, and his father Charles Meymott a doctor whose other interests included cricket and chess.

Charles played two first class cricket matches for Surrey, but without success. Against the MCC in 1846 he was dismissed without scoring in the first innings and made 4 not out in the second innings. Against Kent the following year he failed to trouble the scorers in either innings. He also failed to take any wickets in either match.

In 1848 he submitted a ‘beautiful study’ to Bell’s Life, as you can see below.

 

Bell’s Life 3 September 1848

A few weeks later the solution was published, failing to provide any moves but just saying that White will win a pawn and the game.

But as you can demonstrate for yourself (or verify using tablebases) this is complete nonsense: the position is drawn with best play.

A celebrated cricketer who composed a beautiful study? I think not.

Earlier in 1848, he’d submitted a mate in 4 to the Illustrated London News, which was at least sound, if not very interesting. You can solve it yourself if you want: the solution is at the end of the article.

Problem 1:

[fen]7r/3RBk1b/1r2p3/4p1p1/3PNPR1/7P/2n5/5K2 w – – 0 0[/fen]

#4 Illustrated London News 12 Feb 1848

In about 1859 Charles, his wife Sarah (née Keene, no relation, as far as I know, to Ray) and their three daughters (a son had died in infancy) emigrated to Australia, where his brother Frederick was a judge. The family must have been well regarded there. If you visit the suburb of Randwick today, not far from Coogee Beach, you’ll find a residential road there named Meymott Street, with Frederick Street running off it.

From there Charles submitted another mate in 4, slightly more sophisticated this time.

Problem 2:

[fen]8/1n6/Nrb1B1p1/1R1p1p2/1N1k1Pp1/1p3P2/2PKPP2/b7 w – – 0 0[/fen]

#4 Illustrated London News 26 Nov 1859

The following year, Sarah gave birth to a son, who was given the name of his home city: Sydney.

Charles Meymott had started out in conventional medicine but at some point he had converted to homeopathy. You can find out a bit more here, although some of the links no longer work.

Charles died in 1867 at the age of 54, and his widow and children decided to return to England. I wonder if he’d been able to teach his young son how the pieces moved.

In 1871 Sarah and young Syd were living in Queen Street (now Queen’s Road) Twickenham: perhaps the girls only returned to England later.

By 1881 the oldest girl had married and moved to Scotland, but Sarah and her three youngest children were now at 4 Syon Row, Twickenham, right by the river.

The road is so well known that a rather expensive book has been written about it.

Photo copyright Richard James 2021

It was from there, then that, at some point in 1883 or 1884, the 23-year-old Sydney Meymott joined Twickenham Chess Club.

Here he is again, in a match played in October, now on Board 2 against Brixton. You’ll see George Ryan on top board, with Wallace Britten and the Coward brothers lower down. Young Edward Joseph Line (not Lyne), born in 1862, who had played for Isleworth against Twickenham earlier in the year, was on Board 3, although he was one of only two Twickenham players to lose.

Surrey Comet 11 October 1884

If you’re interested in this part of the world, you might want to check out my good friend Martin Smith’s new book Movers and Takers, a history of chess in Streatham and Brixton. A review will be appearing on British Chess News shortly.

Syd had decided on a career as a bank manager, and his training would have involved working at different branches gaining more experience before managing a larger branch himself. This was perhaps to be his last appearance for Twickenham, but we’ll follow the rest of his life in this article.

Just a couple of weeks later he wrote to the Morning Post:

Morning Post 27 October 1884

Disraeli Road is conveniently situated just round the corner from Putney Station, with its frequent trains to Waterloo. Impressive houses they are too: young Syd was doing well for himself.

The new chess club in Putney rapidly became very successful. Inevitably, they invited Blackburne to give a blindfold simul in February 1886: Meymott was the only player to draw.

In December the same year, Sydney issued a challenge to his old club, with Putney winning by 5 games to 3.

Here’s what happened in the return match in the new year.

Source: Surrey Comet 15 January 1887

He was soon on the move again, leaving the good chess players of Putney to their own devices. Without their leading light the club struggled on for a few years before apparently folding. This time, Syd’s work took him to Honiton, Devon, where again he started a chess club. By now he was writing regularly to the Morning Post, solving their problems and sometimes submitting problems of his own – which were not considered suitable for publication.

In this game he demonstrated his knowledge of Légal’s Mate. (In this and other games in this post, click on any move to obtain a pop-up board and play through the game.)

[pgn]

[Event “Honiton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1888.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Meymott, Sydney”]
[Black “Mr A”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C62”]
[PlyCount “19”]
[SourceVersionDate “2021.11.27”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 d6 4. O-O Bg4 5. h3 Bh5 6. Nc3 a6 7. Bc4 Nd4 8. Nxe5
Bxd1 9. Bxf7+ Ke7 10. Nd5# 1-0

[/pgn]

Source: Morning Post 17 Dec 1888

Here, he was able to show off his attacking skills in the Evans Gambit, giving rook odds to another semi-anonymous opponent.

[pgn]

[Event “Honiton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1891.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Meymott, Sydney”]
[Black “C”]
[Result “1-0”]
[Annotator “Richard”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/1NBQKBNR w Kkq – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “49”]
[SourceVersionDate “2021.11.27”]

{[#]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Bc5 6. O-O d6 7. d4 exd4
8. cxd4 Bb6 9. Nc3 Na5 10. Bd3 Bg4 11. Qa4+ Bd7 12. Qd1 Nf6 13. e5 dxe5 14. Ba3
e4 15. Re1 Bf5 16. Nh4 Qxd4 17. Bb5+ c6 18. Qxd4 Bxd4 19. Nxf5 Bxc3 20. Rd1 Nd7
21. Nd6+ Kd8 22. Nxf7+ Kc8 23. Be2 b6 24. Bg4 Nc4 25. Rxd7 1-0

[/pgn]

Source: Western Morning Post 26 Feb 1891

By now it was time for Sydney to move on again, this time back to West London, to Ealing the Queen of the Suburbs, where he’d remain for the next 40 years. He’d eventually become the Manager of the Ealing Broadway branch of the London and South Western Bank.

This time he didn’t need to start up a chess club: there already was – and still is – one there, founded in 1885. As a bank manager, he was soon cajoled, as bank managers usually are, into taking on the role of Honorary Treasurer.

In this game from a local derby against Acton, Black’s handling of the French Defence wasn’t very impressive,  allowing Meymott to set up a Greek Gift sacrifice.

[pgn]

[Event “Ealing v Acton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1895.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Meymott, Sydney”]
[Black “Connor, J”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C14”]
[Annotator “Richard”]
[PlyCount “29”]
[SourceVersionDate “2021.11.27”]

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. Bxf6 Bxf6 6. Nf3 c6 7. Bd3 O-O 8. e5
Be7 9. h4 f5 10. exf6 Bxf6 11. Bxh7+ Kxh7 12. Ng5+ Bxg5 (12… Kh6 13. Qd3 Bxg5
14. hxg5+ Kxg5 15. Qg3+ Kf6 16. O-O-O Rh8 17. Ne2 Nd7 18. Nf4 g5 19. Nd3 Kf7
$16) (12… Kg8 13. Qh5 Re8 14. Ne2 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nf8 16. Qf7+ Kh8 17. Ng6+ Nxg6
18. Qxg6 Kg8 19. O-O-O Bd7 $11) 13. hxg5+ Kg8 14. Qh5 Qd7 (14… Re8 15. g6 Kf8
16. Qh8+ Ke7 17. Qxg7+ Kd6 18. Qe5+ Kd7 19. Rh7+ Re7 20. O-O-O (20. Rxe7+ Qxe7
21. Qh8 {1-0 (21) Al Khelaifi,S-Karhanyan,A Kemer 2007}) 20… Qg8 21. Rxe7+
Kxe7 22. Qg5+ Kd7 23. Rh1 Kc7 24. g7 {1-0 (24) Capablanca,J-Davis,A Chicago
1910}) 15. g6 1-0

[/pgn]

Source: London Evening Standard 25 Nov 1895

Meymott commented: … it may interest some of the younger readers and stimulate them to ‘book’ learning, the game being a forcible example of the utility of ever being alert to the well-known mating positions… Sixteen years later, the young Capablanca played the same sacrifice in the same position. Perhaps he’d read the Evening Standard. Learning and looking out for the well-known mating positions is still excellent advice today.

In May 1896 Sydney made the headlines in the local press for reasons unconnected with either chess or banking. He was one of those stuck for 16 hours on the Great Wheel at Earl’s Court, and was interviewed at length about his experiences by the Middlesex County Times (30 May 1896 if you want to check it out). Fortunately, a lady in his car managed to let down a reel of cotton, so that they were able to receive refreshments, in the shape of stale buns and whisky and soda, from the ground.

A match against Windsor in 1897, where he was described as a ‘bold dashing player’ saw him pitted against an illustrious opponent in Sir Walter Parratt, organist and Master of the Queen’s Musick, and a possible subject of a future Minor Piece.

Windsor and Eton Express 20 February 1897

Life at Ealing chess club continued with a diet of inter-club matches, internal tournaments and simultaneous displays, with Syd often successful in avoiding defeat against the visiting masters.

In 1899, approaching his forties, he married Annie Ellen Nash. They stayed together for the rest of his life, but had no children.

In this 1902 match against Richmond, Ealing scored an emphatic victory helped by the non-appearance of Richmond’s board 2. A future series of Minor Pieces will introduce you to some of the Richmond players from that period in the club’s history.

Middlesex & Surrey Express 09 April 1902

As he settled into comfortable middle age, life continued fairly uneventfully for Sydney and Annie. The 1911 census found them at 18 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, which seems to have been in the town centre, possibly above the bank.

Many clubs closed down during the First World War, but Ealing, with Sydney Meymott still balancing the books, kept going. Electoral rolls from the 1920s record Syd and Annie at 23 Woodville Road, Ealing, and very nice it looks too. A spacious detached house just for the two of them. In 1921, he was in trouble with the law, though, receiving a fine for not having his dog muzzled.

At some point in the 1920s, Sydney would have retired from his job as bank manager, giving him more time for chess, and time to resume submitting games for publication. In his sixties, when many players would be thinking about hanging up their pawns, Syd, always the chess addict, took up tournament chess.

Hastings 1922-23 was what might have been Meymott’s first tournament. Unfortunately he had to retire ill with 1½/6 in First Class B section.

In 1925 he visited Scarborough, playing in the Major A section. He won a few games but didn’t finish among the prizewinners.

In 1926, using his favourite French Defence, he managed to beat Fred Yates in a simul. The complications towards the end are intriguing: do take a look.

[pgn]

[Event “Simultaneous Display: Ealing Chess Club”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1926.01.12”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Yates, Fred Dewhirst”]
[Black “Meymott, Sydney”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C14”]
[Annotator “Richard”]
[PlyCount “92”]
[SourceVersionDate “2021.11.28”]

1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e5 Nfd7 6. Bxe7 Qxe7 7. Nb5 Nb6 8.
c3 a6 9. Na3 c5 10. Nc2 Nc6 11. f4 Bd7 (11… cxd4 12. cxd4 Bd7 13. b3 Rc8 14.
Qd2 O-O 15. Nf3 f5 16. Bd3 Rc7 17. O-O Kh8 18. Kh1 Be8 19. h3 Na7 20. a4 Nc6
21. g4 g6 22. a5 Nc8 23. Rg1 N6a7 24. Rg3 fxg4 25. hxg4 Bb5 26. f5 Bxd3 27. f6
Qe8 28. Qxd3 Nb5 29. Ng5 Rc3 30. Qxc3 Nxc3 31. Rxc3 h6 32. Rh3 Qc6 33. Rxh6+
Kg8 34. Rxg6+ Kh8 35. Ne1 Ne7 36. Rh6+ Kg8 37. Ng2 Qc3 38. Re1 Nc6 39. Rg6+ Kh8
40. Re3 Qxe3 41. Nxe3 {1-0 (41) Tarrasch,S-Schiffers,E Vienna 1898}) (11… Na4
12. Rb1 b5 13. Nf3 Bd7 (13… c4 14. Be2 Bd7 15. Ne3 f5 16. O-O h6 17. h4 O-O
18. Qe1 b4 {0-1 (18) Schwarz,A-Walbrodt,C Vienna 1898}) 14. Qd2 Rc8 15. Bd3 Nb6
16. O-O Nc4 17. Qe1 Nb6 18. Qg3 g6 19. Qe1 h5 20. a3 c4 21. Be2 a5 22. h3 Rb8
23. Ne3 Kd8 24. Bd1 Kc7 25. Qd2 Rb7 26. Ng5 Kb8 27. Be2 Bc8 28. b3 Qxa3 29.
bxc4 Nxc4 30. Nxc4 bxc4 31. Nxf7 Rh7 32. Rxb7+ Bxb7 33. Nd6 Na7 34. Rb1 Nc8 35.
Nxc8 Kxc8 36. Bd1 Bc6 37. Bc2 Rb7 38. Bxg6 Rxb1+ 39. Bxb1 Qa1 40. Qe1 a4 41.
Kf2 a3 42. f5 Qb2+ 43. Kf3 exf5 44. Bxf5+ Kc7 45. Bb1 a2 46. Bxa2 Qxa2 47. e6
Qc2 48. Qe5+ Kb7 49. Kf4 Qxg2 50. Qxh5 Qe4+ 51. Kg5 Qxe6 52. Qh7+ Kb6 53. h4
Qe3+ 54. Kf6 Qxc3 55. h5 Qxd4+ 56. Ke6 Qe3+ 57. Kf6 c3 {0-1 (57) Lasker,
E-Lilienthal,A Moscow 1936}) (11… O-O 12. Nf3 f5 13. Be2 Na4 14. Rb1 cxd4 15.
cxd4 Bd7 16. Qd2 b5 17. O-O b4 18. Rfc1 a5 19. Nce1 Rfc8 20. Rc2 Qd8 21. Nd3
Qb6 22. Nf2 Rc7 23. Kh1 Rac8 24. Rbc1 h6 25. Nd3 Na7 26. Rxc7 Rxc7 27. Bd1 Bb5
28. Rxc7 Qxc7 29. Bxa4 Bxa4 30. Nc5 Qc6 31. a3 bxa3 32. bxa3 Qb5 33. Qc1 Bb3
34. Nxe6 Bc4 35. Qe1 Qb6 36. Nc5 Nc6 37. e6 Qc7 38. Qh4 Be2 39. Qe1 Bxf3 40.
gxf3 Qxf4 41. e7 Qxf3+ 42. Kg1 Qg4+ 43. Kh1 Qf3+ {1/2-1/2 (43) Thomas,
G-Spielmann,R Margate 1938}) 12. Nf3 h6 $16 (12… f6 13. Bd3 fxe5 14. fxe5
cxd4 15. cxd4 Nc4 $11) 13. Bd3 c4 14. Be2 Rc8 15. O-O g6 16. Ne3 Kd8 17. Ng4
Kc7 18. b3 Na7 19. bxc4 Nxc4 20. Bxc4 dxc4 21. Nf6 (21. a4 Nc6 22. Nd2 Na5 23.
Qe2 $18) 21… Bc6 22. d5 (22. a4 $18) 22… Qc5+ 23. Kh1 (23. Qd4 Qxd4+ 24.
Nxd4 Bxd5 25. f5 g5 26. fxe6 Bxe6 $15) 23… exd5 (23… Bxd5 $19) 24. Nd4 Nb5
25. f5 (25. Nxc6 bxc6 26. f5 Nxc3 27. Qc2 d4 28. fxg6 fxg6 29. Qxg6 Qe7 30. e6
$13) 25… Nxc3 26. Qd2 Ne4 27. Nxe4 dxe4 28. fxg6 Rcd8 29. Rxf7+ (29. g7 Rhg8
30. e6 Rxg7 31. exf7 Kc8 32. Ne6 Rxd2 33. Nxc5 Rxf7 34. Rxf7 e3 35. Rg1 e2 36.
Re7 Kd8 37. Re3 Rxa2 38. Ne6+ Kd7 39. Nf4 $18) 29… Kc8 30. g7 Rhe8 31. Ne6 (
31. Qf2 Qxd4 32. Qxd4 Rxd4 33. Rf8 Rdd8 34. g8=Q Rxf8 35. Qxc4 e3 $17) 31…
Rxd2 (31… Qxe5 32. Qc1 Rxe6 $19) 32. Nxc5 e3 33. Rf8 e2 34. Rg1 Bxg2+ 35.
Rxg2 Rd1+ (35… e1=Q+ 36. Rg1 Qe2 37. Rxe8+ Kc7 38. Rc8+ Kb6 39. Rb1+ Ka5 40.
Nxb7+ Ka4 41. Rxc4+ Qxc4 42. Nc5+ Ka3 43. Rb3+ Kxa2 44. g8=Q Qxg8 45. Rg3 Qf8
46. Nd3 Qf1+ 47. Rg1 Qf3+ 48. Rg2 Qxg2#) 36. Rg1 Rxg1+ 37. Kxg1 e1=Q+ 38. Kg2
Qd2+ 39. Kf1 Qd8 {White resigned here, but he could have played on with 40.
Ne6. The game might have continued:} ({An easier way to win was} 39… Qd1+ 40.
Kg2 Qd5+ 41. Kh3 (41. Kf1 Kc7) 41… Rd8 42. g8=Q Qxg8 43. Rxg8 Rxg8) 40. Ne6
Qd3+ 41. Kf2 Qg6 42. Nf4 Qb6+ 43. Kg3 Qd8 44. Ne6 Rxf8 45. gxf8=Q Qxf8 46. Nxf8
c3 0-1

[/pgn]

Source: Middlesex County Times 23 Jan 1926

That Easter Syd took part in one of the First Class sections of the West of England Championship at Weston-Super-Mare, finishing in midfield.

Later the same year, representing the Rest of Middlesex against Hampstead, he played this game against Ernest Montgomery Jellie. White’s 11th move looked tempting but turned out to be a losing mistake: Jellie’s knight was very shaky on d6 and his position soon wobbled.

[pgn]

[Event “Hampstead v Rest of Middlesex”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1926.10.09”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Jellie, Ernest Montgomery”]
[Black “Meymott, Sydney”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C14”]
[Annotator “Richard”]
[PlyCount “64”]
[SourceVersionDate “2021.11.27”]

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e5 Nfd7 6. h4 c5 7. Qg4 cxd4 8. Bxe7
Qxe7 9. Qxg7 Rf8 10. Nb5 Kd8 11. Nd6 (11. O-O-O $16) 11… Nc6 $19 12. f4 f6
13. Qxe7+ Kxe7 14. Nxc8+ Raxc8 15. exf6+ Rxf6 16. O-O-O Nb4 17. Bd3 Rxf4 18.
Nf3 Nc5 19. Bxh7 d3 (19… Ne4 20. Nxd4 Nxa2+ (20… Nf2 21. Rhf1 Rcf8 22. Bf5
Nxd1 23. Rxf4 Ne3 24. Nxe6 Rxf5 25. Rxf5 Nxf5 $19) 21. Kb1 Nac3+ 22. bxc3 Nxc3+
23. Kb2 Nxd1+ 24. Rxd1 Rxh4 25. Bg6 Kf6 $19) 20. c3 Ne4 21. Bxe4 (21. Kb1 Nc2
22. Ne5 Na3+ 23. Ka1 Nc2+ 24. Kb1 Na3+ $11) 21… dxe4 $19 22. Ne5 Rf5 23. Ng6+
Kf6 24. g4 Rf2 25. h5 e3 26. Rhf1 d2+ 27. Kb1 Nd3 28. Kc2 Rd8 29. Nh4 e2 30.
Rxf2+ Nxf2 31. Rxd2 e1=Q 32. Rxd8 Nxg4 0-1

[/pgn]

Source: Middlesex County Times 16 Oct 1926

At this point it’s worth taking a slight detour to consider Meymott’s opponent. Ernest Montgomery Jellie and his wife Emily, who sadly died young, had three Jellie babies. Their daughter Dorothy married Sidney Stone, and one of their sons, Chris, inherited his grandfather’s love of chess.

I knew Chris very well back in the day, when he was involved with Pinner Junior Chess Club, where his son Andrew was one of their star players.  Chris was an enthusiast rather than a strong player himself,  but Andrew is both. He’s been a 2200 strength player for many years, representing Streatham in the London League as well as his local club, Watford.

You can read much more about the Jellie-Stone connection here (Martin Smith again).

After Christmas 1926, Sydney went down to Hastings where he took second prize in the Major C section with a score of 7/9. Well played, Syd!

On his return, he played this game. This seems to have been in a handicap tournament, where, instead of giving knight odds, the players agreed that Meymott would play blindfold.

[pgn]

[Event “Ealing Chess Club (W blindfold)”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1927.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Meymott, Sydney”]
[Black “Mr X”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C30”]
[Annotator “Richard”]
[PlyCount “57”]
[SourceVersionDate “2020.10.20”]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 (4. fxe5 Nxe4 5. d4 $16) 4… Nc6 5. Bc4 (
5. fxe5 Ng4 6. d4 Bb6 7. h3 Nh6 $18) 5… O-O 6. fxe5 Ng4 $18 (6… d5 7. exf6
dxc4 $11) 7. d4 Nxd4 8. Nxd4 Nxe5 9. Be2 d6 10. O-O a6 11. Kh1 h6 12. Na4 Ba7
13. b3 c5 14. Nf3 Nxf3 15. Bxf3 Qf6 16. Bb2 Qg5 17. Qe1 b5 18. Nc3 Re8 19. Rd1
Bb7 20. Nd5 Bxd5 21. Rxd5 Qd8 22. Qg3 g6 23. Rh5 Kh7 24. Rxh6+ Kxh6 25. Qh3+
Kg5 26. Bd1 Rxe4 27. Bc1+ Rf4 28. Rxf4 Qd7 29. Rf5# 1-0

 

[/pgn]

Source: Acton Gazette 14 Jan 1927

At Hastings 1927-28 he scored 50% in the First Class B section. Easter 1928 saw him back at the West of England Championships, held that year in Cheltenham, where he galloped to victory in the Class IIB section, scoring 7½/9.

The British Championships in July 1928 took him further west, to Tenby, where he played in the First Class A section, sharing third prize with the aforementioned Ernest Montgomery Jellie on 6½/9, but again beating him in their individual game.

Source: Britbase ( https://www.saund.co.uk/britbase/pgn/192807bcf-viewer.html)

He was back at Hastings 1929-30, where he scored a respectable 5/9 in the First Class B section.

In September 1931 he did what many chess players of that period did: he retired to Hastings, after four decades living and playing chess in Ealing. He was soon playing for his local club.

In a match against Brighton in 1932 his opponent was Kenneth Gunnell, who would much later become, briefly, a rather controversial member of both Richmond and Twickenham Chess Clubs.

That would be one of his last games. On 7 February 1933 Sydney Meymott died at the Warrior House Hotel, St Leonards on Sea.

Writing about Ernest Montgomery Jellie, Martin Smith summed him up beautifully:

But who is he, and why should we be interested? There two reasons that come to mind.

One is that he turns out to be an exemplary specimen of an ordinary decent chesser, the sort often overlooked in histories of the game. He and other enthusiasts like him, then and now, are the body-chessic upon which the chess bug spawns and beneficently multiplies. Stir E.M. Jellie together with the rest and you get the thriving chess culture that we all know: the one that germinates the few blessed enough to rise to the top.

Replace E.M. Jellie with Sydney Meymott, and the same sentiments apply. A good player, but not a great player. For almost half a century a stalwart of club, county, and, later, congress chess. A club treasurer for many years, but in his younger days also a founder and secretary of two clubs.

In these days of chess professionalism, even at primary school level, of obsession with grandmasters, prodigies and champions, we’re at risk of losing the likes of Jellie and Meymott. We should be developing chess culture in order to develop champions, not the other way round. And that celebration of chess culture is one of the reasons why I’m writing these Minor Pieces. My friends at Ealing Chess Club today should certainly raise a glass to Sydney Meymott.

Solutions:

1.

1. Bxg5+ Kg6 2. Bf6+ Kh5 3. Ng3+ Kh6 4. Bg7#

2.

1. Nxd5 gxf3 (1… Rxb5 2. e3+ Kc4 3. Nb6#) (1… Bc3+ 2. Nxc3 Bd5 3. e3+ Kc4 4. Bxd5#) (1… Bxb5 2. e3+ Kc4 3. Nxb6#) 2. e3+ Ke4 (2… Kc4 3. Ndc7+ (3. Nc3+ Bd5 4. Bxd5#) 3… Bd5 4. Bxd5#) 3. c3 Rxb5 (3… Bxd5 4. Bxd5#) 4. Nf6#

 

Genna Remembers

Genna Remembers, Genna Sosonko, Thinkers Publishing, 5th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9464201192
Genna Remembers, Genna Sosonko, Thinkers Publishing, 5th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9464201192

From the author’s lengthy introduction:

Half a century ago I left a country, the red color of which dominated a large portion of the world map. One way or another, the fate of almost every single person described in this book is forever linked with that now none-existent empire. Many of them ended up beyond its borders too. Cultures and traditions, and certainly not least of all a Soviet mentality, couldn’t have just left them without a trace. Having been transplanted into a different environment, they had to play the role of themselves apart from certain corrections with regard to the tastes and customs of a new society. Nevertheless, every one of them, both those who left the Soviet Union, and those who stayed behind, were forever linked by one common united phenomenon: they all belonged to the Soviet school of chess.

This school of chess was born in the 20’s, but only began to count its true years starting in 1945, when the representatives of the Soviet Union dominated an American squad in a team match. Led by Mikhail Botvinnik, Soviet Grandmasters conquered and ruled the world, save for a short Fischer period, over the course of that same half century. In chess as well as ballet, or music, the word “Soviet” was actually a synonym for the highest quality interpretation of the discipline.

The Soviet Union provided unheard of conditions for their players, which were the sort of which their colleagues in the West dare not even dream. Grandmasters and even Masters received a regular salary just for their professional qualifications, thereby raising the prestige of a chess player to what were unbelievable heights.

It was a time when any finish in an international tournament, aside from first, was almost considered a failure when it came to Soviet players, and upon their return to Moscow they had to write an official explanation to the Chess Federation or the Sports Committee.

The isolation of the country, separated from the rest of the world by an Iron Curtain, was another reason why, talent and energy often manifested themselves in relatively neutral fields.

Still if with music, cinematography, philosophy, or history, the Soviet people were raised on a strict diet, that contained multiple restrictions, this did not apply to chess. Grandmasters, and Masters, all varied in terms of their upbringing, education, and mentality and were judged solely on their talent and mastery at the end of the day. Maybe that’s why the Soviet school of chess was full of such improbable variety not only in terms of the style of play of its representatives, but also their different personality types.

Built was a gigantic chess pyramid, at the base of which were school championships, which were closely followed by district ones. Later city championships, regions, republics, and finally-the ultimate cherry on top-the national event itself. The Championships of the Soviet Union were in no way inferior to the strongest international tournaments, and collections of the games played there came out as separate publications in the West.

That huge brotherhood of chess contained its very own hierarchy within. Among the millions, and multitudes of parishioners-fans of the game-there were the priests-candidate masters. Highly respected were the cardinals-masters. As for Grandmasters though well…they were true Gods. Every person in the USSR knew their names, and those names sounded with just as much adoration, and admiration as those of the nation’s other darlings-the country’s best hockey players. In those days the coming of the American genius only served to strengthen the interest and attention of society towards chess, never mind the fact that by that point it had already been fully saturated by it.

The presence of tons of spectators at a chess tournament in Moscow as shown in the series “The Queen’s Gambit” is in no way an exaggeration. That there truly was the golden age of chess.

Under the constant eye, and control of the government, chess in the USSR was closely interwoven with politics, much like everything else in that vanished country. Concurrently, the closed, and isolated society in which it was born only served to enable its development, creating its very own type of culture-the giant world of Soviet chess.

I was never indifferent to the past. Today, when there is that much more of it then the future, this feeling has become all the sharper. The faster the twentieth century sprints away from us, and the thicker the grass of forgetting grows, soon enough, and under the verified power of the most powerful engines that world of chess will be gone as well.

It was an intriguing, and colorful world, and I saw it as my duty to not let it disappear into that empty abyss. Genna Sosonko – May 2021

Gennadi Borisovich Sosonko
Gennadi Borisovich Sosonko

“Gennadi Sosonko was born in Troitsk in the Chelyabinsk region and learned to play chess at the age of ten in Leningrad, to which his family returned after the war. He trained in the Pioneers’ Palace, where he was mentored by Vladimir Zak, Vladimir Kirillov, Vasily Byvshev and Alexander Cherepov. Later he was taught by Semyon Furman in the Chigorin Chess Club. Genna emigrated from the USSR in 1972 and settled in the Netherlands. Genna became an international master in 1974 and a grandmaster in1976. He played for the Netherlands from 1974; in eleven Olympiads he had the superb overall score of +28 -4 =64. In the 1990s and 2000s, he was the Dutch team captain. Genna Sosonko is a two-time Dutch champion (1973 and 1978), a two-time winner of the tournament at Wijk aan Zee (1978 and 1981), winner of tournaments in Barcelona and Lugano in 1976, Nijmegen in 1978 and Polanica-Zdrój in 1993, and a prizewinner in Tilburg, New York, Bad Lauterberg, São Paulo, London and Reykjavik. From 1975 to 1982 he was one of the top twenty players in the world, achieving his highest rating of 2595 in January 1981. He has made a significant contribution to opening theory, especially to his favourite Catalan. In 2004 he stopped competing to focus on journalism and literature. He is the author of wonderful memoirs which were published in several languages. In recent years he has often worked as a commentator on tournaments featuring the world’s leading grandmasters, describing their battles in English, Dutch and Russian.”

 

Anyone with an interest in chess culture will be aware that Genna Sosonko has published a number of collections of essays on a variety of chess topics over the years.

More recently, he’s written three books of memoirs concerning Smyslov, Bronstein and Korchnoi, which received mixed reviews here and elsewhere. Now, published for the first time by Thinkers Publishing, Sosonko returns with another essay collection.

A look at the topics covered will give you a pretty good idea as to whether or not this book is for you.

The first five chapters are broadly historical. Chapter 1 is about the history of pre-arranged draws. Chapter 2 takes as its starting point a recent discovery from the KGB archives: a 1950 review by Vasily Panov of a Keres book on open games.

P. Keres couldn’t handle this task. What’s worse is that he used the platform offered for the purposes of unbridled glorification of foreign theoreticians, up to and including Nazi hirelings and those greatest of traitors of the Soviet people, the theoretical efforts of which don’t present any value whatsoever.

And so on, for two pages. Sosonko puts this into historical perspective and tells us a lot more about Panov.

Chapter 3 concerns, in general, the difficulties Soviet players faced in travelling abroad. Chapter 4 is about Sosonko’s experiences seconding Korchnoi in his 1971 Candidates match against Petrosian. In Chapter 5 he recalls buying a collection of Korchnoi’s possessions at an auction because he particularly wanted an unused plane ticket from 1976: unused because Viktor decided to remain in the West rather than return from the Netherlands to the Soviet Union.

The rest of the book is mostly devoted to pen pictures of a variety of players, mostly well known to Sosonko.

Chapter 6 is about Igor Ivanov (1947-2005), a Soviet émigré who defected to Canada and then moved to the United States. Ivanov was an exceptionally talented player whose life was blighted by his addiction to alcohol. There are some great stories here. In 1985 he won the Canadian Closed and Open Championship at the same time. They were taking place in different rooms in the same venue and he’d make a move in one tournament, then run to the other room to make another move. Sosonko clearly liked Ivanov and treats his problems with sympathy here, although you might find his tendency to psychoanalyse his subjects (something he does in all his books) rather annoying.

Sosonko also demonstrates a few of Ivanov’s games, such as this.

[pgn]

[Event “New York Kavkasian”]
[Site “New York”]
[Date “1983.09.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Ivanov, Igor Vasilievich”]
[Black “Zaltsman, Vitaly F”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D34”]
[WhiteElo “2530”]
[BlackElo “2395”]
[PlyCount “87”]
[EventDate “1983.09.21”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “15”]
[EventCountry “USA”]
[EventCategory “10”]
[SourceTitle “MCD”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. Nf3 d5 2. c4 e6 3. d4 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. g3 Nc6 6. Bg2 Nf6 7. O-O Be7 8. Nc3
O-O 9. Be3 c4 10. Ne5 Qa5 11. Bg5 Rd8 12. e3 h6 13. Bxf6 Bxf6 14. f4 Bxe5 15.
fxe5 Be6 16. Qh5 Rd7 17. Rad1 Rf8 18. a3 Qd8 19. h4 a6 20. Rd2 b5 21. Rdf2 Qe7
22. g4 Qd8 23. g5 Ne7 24. Ne2 g6 25. Qxh6 Nf5 26. Rxf5 Bxf5 27. Rxf5 gxf5 28.
Ng3 f6 29. Nxf5 Rh7 30. Qg6+ Kh8 31. gxf6 Rg8 32. h5 Rxg6 33. hxg6 Qd7 34. e4
dxe4 35. Bxe4 Kg8 36. Kg2 a5 37. d5 Qc7 38. d6 Qc5 39. gxh7+ Kxh7 40. f7 Qxe5
41. f8=Q Qxe4+ 42. Kg3 Qd3+ 43. Kf4 Qd2+ 44. Ke4 1-0

[/pgn]

Another Soviet émigré, Leonid Shamkovich (1923-2005), is featured in Chapter 7. This is a rather shorter chapter: perhaps Sosonko knew him less well than Ivanov, and we don’t get to see any of his games.

Chapter 8 is very different indeed: Everyone’s Favourite Uncle, Arnfried Pagel. Unlike Sosonko’s other subjects, he wasn’t a strong player, but his story is rather remarkable and one that I was unaware of, so I was very interested to find out more.

Pagel was a German born concrete magnate and rather weak amateur chess player who moved to the Netherlands where he sponsored a very strong chess team, the King’s Club, in the early 1980s, recruiting a lot of grandmasters, many of whom were Soviet émigrés, to play for him. After a few years the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration became suspicious of his financial dealings: Pagel ended up bankrupt and in prison. He later spent seven years in prison in England after one of his shipments there was found to contain drugs.

This is a highly entertaining chapter, and one with some salutary lessons concerning chess sponsorship. You might consider the book worth buying for this alone.

Chapter 9 is the longest – and saddest – chapter of the book. It tells the story of Yakut IM Sergey Nikolaev, who was born in 1961, and was murdered in 2007 by a gang of teenage neo-Nazi thugs because of his Asian appearance. This is a fine tribute to a much-loved man with a complex personality, at the same time both reclusive and searching for recognition. It’s also a savage indictment of racism and bigotry in today’s Russia. Again, you may well think this chapter is worth the price of the book.

And yet, as so often in Sosonko’s works, it would have been enlivened by a few games so that we could see how he played chess as well as learning about him as a person.

Here’s one example of his play.

[pgn]

[Event “St Petersburg White Nights op”]
[Site “St Petersburg”]
[Date “1997.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Nikolaev, Sergey”]
[Black “Petrov, Anton”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “A80”]
[WhiteElo “2375”]
[BlackElo “2375”]
[PlyCount “39”]
[EventDate “1997.??.??”]
[EventType “swiss”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “RUS”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 2000”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. d4 f5 2. Nc3 d5 3. Bg5 c6 4. e4 fxe4 5. f3 exf3 6. Nxf3 Bg4 7. h3 Bxf3 8.
Qxf3 Nf6 9. Bd3 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Qc7 11. Rhe1 O-O-O 12. Bf4 Qb6 13. Re6 g6 14.
Nb5 Ne8 15. Be2 a6 16. Qa3 g5 17. Na7+ Qxa7 18. Rxc6+ bxc6 19. Bxa6+ Qb7 20.
Qa5 1-0

[/pgn]

Chapters 10 and 11 are short chapters about GMs Yuri Razuvaev (1945-2012) and Viktor Kupreichik (1949-2017). We do get to see a few of the latter’s games, such as this.

[pgn]

[Event “Sochi GM vs Young Masters”]
[Site “Sochi”]
[Date “1970.10.26”]
[Round “9”]
[White “Kupreichik, Viktor D”]
[Black “Tal, Mihail”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B82”]
[PlyCount “61”]
[EventDate “1970.10.15”]
[EventType “team-schev”]
[EventRounds “14”]
[EventCountry “URS”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 2015”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2014.11.20”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2014.11.20”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[BlackTeam “GM”]
[BlackTeamCountry “URS”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nc3 Nf6 6. Bc4 Qb6 7. Nb3 e6 8.
Be3 Qc7 9. f4 a6 10. Bd3 b5 11. a3 Be7 12. Qf3 Bb7 13. O-O Rc8 14. Rae1 O-O 15.
Qh3 b4 16. Nd5 exd5 17. exd5 Nb8 18. Bd4 g6 19. Rf3 Bxd5 20. Rfe3 Bd8 21. Qh4
Nbd7 22. Qh6 Qb7 23. Rg3 Nc5 24. Nxc5 dxc5 25. f5 cxd4 26. fxg6 fxg6 27. Bxg6
Kh8 28. Qxf8+ Ng8 29. Bf5 Rb8 30. Re8 Qf7 31. Rh3 1-0

[/pgn]

Chapter 12 is a brief look at Mark Taimanov, which brings us on to the last three chapters, which give the impression they might have been added to sell the book. Their subjects: Karpov, Kasparov and Carlsen.

There’s a lot to admire here. Sosonko, as always, writes beautifully and knows how to manipulate his readers’ emotions. He’s at his best when writing about lesser-known players, and, for me, the highlights are the chapters on Pagel and Nikolaev. The book is well illustrated with many, often poignant, photographs which add to the book enormously. If you’ve read and enjoyed this author’s previous collections of essays you’ll want to add this to your bookshelves.

At the same time, I’d have liked some more games. It seems rather arbitrary that only two of the chapters include examples of their subjects’ play. Apart from adding value to the book, they’d help to flesh out the personalities of the players involved.

A casual reader might, understandably, see it as a rather random collection of articles with no very obvious coherent theme. To appreciate it fully you need to put it within the context of Sosonko’s other writings.

If you’re only looking for books which will improve your rating, this isn’t the book for you, but if you have a genuine interest in chess culture you might want to give it a try, and then move on to the author’s previous essay collections.

There’s a very strange mistake at the start of the book. The games, few as they are, use figurine notation and the publishers decided to print a table of piece letters and their equivalent figurine. However, the letters, rather than the figurines, appear in both columns. There are also a few typos but, by and large, the production values are good.

Not for everyone, then, but if the content appeals, you’ll enjoy this book.

Richard James, Twickenham 12th November 2021

Richard James
. Richard James

Book Details :

  • Softcover: 260 pages
  • Publisher: Thinkers Publishing; 1st edition (5 July 2021)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10:9464201193
  • ISBN-13: 978-9464201192
  • Product Dimensions: 16.99 x 2.21 x 23.6 cm

Official web site of Thinkers Publishing

Genna Remembers, Genna Sosonko, Thinkers Publishing, 5th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9464201192
Genna Remembers, Genna Sosonko, Thinkers Publishing, 5th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9464201192

Smyslov, Bronstein, Geller, Taimanov and Averbakh: A Chess Multibiography with 220 Games

Smyslov, Bronstein, Geller, Taimanov and Averbakh: A Chess Multibiography with 220 Games, Andrew Soltis, McFarland Books, February 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1476677934
Smyslov, Bronstein, Geller, Taimanov and Averbakh: A Chess Multibiography with 220 Games, Andrew Soltis, McFarland Books, February 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1476677934

From the publisher’s blurb :

“A crucial decision spared chess Grandmaster David Bronstein almost certain death at the hands of the Nazis—one fateful move cost him the world championship.

Russian champion Mark Taimanov was a touted as a hero of the Soviet state until his loss to Bobby Fischer all but ruined his life.

Yefim Geller’s dream of becoming world champion was crushed by a bad move against Fischer, his hated rival.

Yuri Averbakh had no explanation how he became the world’s oldest grandmaster, other than the quixotic nature of fate.

Vasily Smyslov, the only one of the five to become world champion, would reign for just one year—fortune, he said, gave him pneumonia at the worst possible time. This book explores how fate played a capricious role in the lives of five of the greatest players in chess history.”

GM Andrew Soltis
GM Andrew Soltis

“Grandmaster Andy Soltis, eight times champion of the Marshall Chess Club, New York Post editor and Chess Life columnist, is the author of dozens of chess books. He lives in New York City. He is the author of many books, including Pawn Structure Chess, 365 Chess Master Lessons and What it Takes to Become a Chess Master”

 

From the author’s preface:

In this book I explored the interlocking careers of five men with a focus on the prime years when they might have become champion. Only one succeeded. But they represented an extraordinary class. All five men were ranked among the world’s top 11 players when Vasily Smyslov became champion. All five players were ranked in the world’s top 20 players for the next decade.

This book is a companion to my Tal, Petrosian, Spassky and Korchnoi and, like it, it pays tribute to the remarkable personal lives of great players during a remarkable era. They were not only competing with one another for the highest reward chess can offer. They were trying to survive in a brutal Soviet system. They lived through the Great Terror – which directly touched the lives of David Bronstein, Yuri Averbakh, Vasily Smyslov and Mark Taimanov – and World War II, which deeply affected them all.

Here, then, we have a group biography of five leading Soviet grandmasters, all born between 1921 and 1926. As Soltis explains, this was both a good time and place, and a bad time and place to be born. They grew up within a strong chess culture, where their talents were, albeit with deprivations during World War II and many restrictions in the brutal Soviet regime, allowed to flourish.

Smyslov became world champion, and Bronstein came very close. The other three were all world championship candidates, and, had things worked out slightly differently, Taimanov and Geller might have come closer to the title than they did.

Perhaps Smyslov, whose father was a strong player, would always have discovered chess, although, had his life turned out differently, he could have had a career as an opera singer. Taimanov, as is well known, did in fact have a parallel career as a pianist, performing with his first wife, Lyubov Bruk.

In another life, Bronstein would have been a mathematician and Averbakh a scientist. Geller was, in several ways, the outlier of the group. Unlike the others, he was a late developer, so only joins the story after several years and chapters have passed. Unlike the others, also, he seems to have had, apart from sports, no interests outside chess, even though he worked as an aircraft engineer and studied political economy at university.

As you’d expect, there’s a lot of high quality and instructive chess within these pages. Here are a few, fairly random, examples.

[fen]8/6k1/R5p1/4K2n/5P2/8/8/8 w – – 0 1[/fen]

Taimanov and Bronstein adjourned this position, with White to move, in a 1946 Soviet Championship Semi-Final. Bronstein and Averbakh were staying at the same hotel, and set up the position on a board.

Soltis takes up the story.

Taimanov was so sure of victory that he told Bronstein he had sealed 1. Ra7+ and showed him how he would win after 1… Kh6 2. Rb7!. That looked convincing: 2… Ng3 3. Rb3 Nh5 (3… Nf5 4. Kf6) 4. Rh3! and then 4… Kg7 5. f5 Kf7 6. f6! wins. “But what if I retreat the king to f8?” Bronstein asked Averbakh. 

The next day was free from play so they analyzed 1… Kf8 during it. They realized that if White traded pawns too quickly the result would be a position know  to be drawable since an ancient game Neumann – Steinitz, Baden-Baden 1870. White did not seem to have a forcing win after 1… Kf8. But 2. Rd7! was a good waiting move. Then 2… Ke8 3. Rh7 Kf8 4. f5 would lose. So would 2… Ng7 3. Kf6 Nh5+ 4. Kg5! or 2… Ng3 3. Kf6.

This was discouraging. Bronstein and Averbakh looked at 2… Kg8 and unfortunately found 3. Ke6! Nf4+ 4. Kf6!. The clever king triangulation wins after 4… Nh5+ 5. Kxg6 Nf4+ 6. Kg5 Ne6+ 7. Kf6! Nf4 8. Rd4 Nh5+ 9. Kg6. Or 8… Ne2 9. Rg4+ Kf8 10 .Ra4 Kg8 11. Kg6 Kf8 12. Rc4 Ng3 13. Rc3 and so on. They kept analyzing  and found that 3… Kf8 was no better than 3… Nxf4+ because of 4. Rf7+! Ke8 5. Rf6! or 4… Kg8 5. Ke7.

It was all so elegant and, simultaneously, depressing. “David didn’t know what to do, to be happy or sad,” Averbakh remembered. “Of course, it’s painful to know you have a forced loss. But what an interesting path to victory!” And, besides, they were both proud to have solved such a mysterious endgame.”

When the game was resumed, Taimanov played 1. Ra7+ Kf8! 2. f5? gxf5 and drew along the lines of the Neumann – Steinitz game. 

As a result of this experience, Averbakh decided that he could combine his interests in science and chess by conducting research into technical endings such as this – and he would later become known as perhaps the world’s leading authority on endgames.

The games are expertly chosen, for their excellence, excitement, historical or sporting significance, and annotated in Soltis’s signature narrative style.

Some of them will be familiar to readers with a prior knowledge of games of the period, but others will be unfamiliar to most.

Look, for instance, at a couple of games from a secret training tournament held in the Georgian town of Gagra in 1953.

[fen]3rr1k1/pp2b1pp/1q2P3/2pBB1N1/bnP5/4R2P/3RQP2/6K1 b – – 0 26[/fen]

This is the game between Geller and Smyslov. Geller had outplayed the future world champion in the opening and early middle game, but his last move was an oversight. The last moves had been 25. Bb2-e5? Qc7-b6 26. Nf3xg5?.

Here’s Soltis:

This would have won after 25… Qa5? because of Qh5; e.g., 25… Qa5? 26. Nxg5! Nxd5 27. Qh5! and mates. In the diagram Geller must have expected to win after, for example, 26… Bxg5 27. Qh5! Bh6 28. Rg3!. Or 27… Re7 28. Be4! g6 29. Bxg6 Rxg2 30. Bf7+ Kf8 31. Bg7+!. 26… Nxd5! 27. cxd5  But he had overlooked 27. Qh5 Qb1+ 28. Kg2 Qg6!. No recovery is possible.

I have a couple of small issues with this. I find the back-referencing – something Soltis often does – slightly confusing. I’d have preferred the variation given in the first sentence here as a note to Black’s 25th move. He also fails to mention that Geller would still have been better in the game after 26. Rb2!, when a nice variation is 26… h6 27. Nh4! gxh4 28. Qh5!, with a winning attack.

Smyslov went on to win a few moves later.

[fen]2q3k1/5p1p/1p1P1p2/8/P1r5/2pQPP2/1p2K1P1/7R b – – 0 38[/fen]

Here, from the same tournament, is a position from the exciting game between Taimanov and Averbakh, with Black to make his 38th move.

Now 38… b1Q would make a draw likely, after 39. Rxb1 Rxa4 (40. Rh1?? Ra2+ and 39. Qxb1 c2!). 38… f5?? 39. d7! c2 40. d8Q+! (The final shift would have been 40. dxc8Q+? Rxc8 41. Qxf5 c1Q and Black wins. 40… Qxd8 41. Qxd8+ Kg7 42. Qg5+ Black resigns

(Taimanov, in his notes to this game, claimed White was winning the diagrammed position, failing to mention the draw after b1Q or to query 38… f5.)

Soltis, as so often, has an anecdote at hand to add colour and context.

The secrecy surrounding these training tournaments was deeply felt. Alexey Suetin recalled how one of the Gagra players showed him a remarkable game but “outright refused to give the names of the players” or the tournament results. “Such was the Stalist regime,” he said. Even when he wrote this, in 1993, Suetin refused to say who showed him the game. It was too dangerous.

In 1957 Bronstein was invited to a major tournament in Dallas, with the highest prize fund of any US tournament since New York 1927, but, according to Soltis, the State Department refused him a visa, apparently in retaliation for Soviet treatment of U.S. citizens seeking to travel in the USSR.

Instead, he had to make to with a weaker tournament in East Germany, where he reached this position with white against Bilek.

[fen]6k1/1q2r1b1/pr3pQ1/3p1B2/P2P4/2P5/3B1PP1/5RK1 b – – 0 33[/fen]

Soltis, again:

Bronstein has a deliciously subtle threat: 34. a4 would force the b6-rook to make a choice. Then 34… Rc6 would allow 35. Bf4 and Rb1-b8+. And 34… Rb3 would weaken f6 so that 35. Bh6! threatens 36. Qh7+ (35… Kf8 36. Qxf6+). 33… Kf8 34. g3 Re2 35. Bc1 Qe7 36. Kg2! There is no defence to 37. Rh1, 38. Rh7 and Bh6. The game could also end with 36… Re1 37. Rxe1 Qxe1 38. Ba3+. 36… Rc6 37. Rh1 Rxc3 38. Bf4 Ra3 39. Rc1! Black resigns.

(Bronstein has other threats in the diagrammed position: g3, Kg2 and Rh1 as happened later in the game, and also Bc1-a3. It takes older engines some time to realise White has anything more than a slight advantage, but Stockfish 14 immediately tells you almost any reasonable move is crushing.)

The narrative stops rather suddenly at the end of 1973, at which point our protagonists were in middle age and starting an inexorable decline. Unexpectedly, though, Smyslov would make another challenge for the world championship in his sixties. The remainder of their lives is chronicled relatively briefly.

What we have here is, as anyone familiar with this publisher will expect, a handsome hardback which will look good on any bookshelf. It covers an important and endlessly fascinating period of chess history, and is full of interesting (for all sorts of reasons) games, well researched and sourced history, entertaining and enlightening anecdotes and evocative photographs.

At the end of the book we have some useful appendices and other material. First, a chronology taking us through almost a century from Smyslov’s birth in 1921 through to Averbakh (still alive as I write this at the age of 99) playing a 4-year-old in 2017. Then, the rankings (from Chessmetrics) of the players between January 1939 and January 1979. We have chapter notes and a bibliography: everything is fully sourced, using Russian and English language periodicals and a wide range of books. There are frequent contradictions between sources, and the players also contradicted themselves from time to time: all this is explained in the text. Finally indexes of opponents and openings, and a general index.

It would have been ideal if the games had been presented more spaciously and with a lot more diagrams to enable readers to follow them from the page. It would also have been preferable to print the photographs on glossy rather than matt paper. Of course, given the nature of the book, such luxuries are inevitably out of the question. It would, however, have benefitted from another run through to pick up typos, of which there are more than should be expected in a scholarly work of this nature. I suspect, for example, that Keres told Taimanov he was playing like Liszt rather than List.

Nevertheless, this is an outstanding book which can be highly recommended to anyone interested in this period of chess history. If you’ve read Soltis’s earlier book on Tal, Petrosian, Spassky and Korchnoi you’ll need no hesitation to add this title as well. Likewise, once you’ve read this book, you’ll want to read the earlier work if you haven’t already done so.

In my opinion, Andrew Soltis is a very much underrated author. It’s understandable that we all tend to be suspicious of the quality of books produced by prolific authors, and in many cases these suspicions are justified. In the case of Soltis, though, even his more popular works are well written and, for their target audience, worth reading. His more serious and scholarly works such as this one are uniformly excellent. Soltis, with many years journalistic experience, knows how to write, and, most importantly, knows how to tell a story. Whether annotating a game or writing about chess history, he keeps his readers on the edge of their seats, eager to turn the page and find out what happens next. This book, like everything he writes, is extremely readable as well as rigorously sourced.

It’s not the last word on the subject. There is without doubt a wealth of interesting information lurking within currently sealed Soviet archives. Although this book might not be flawless, it will more than suffice for the moment. There’s nobody better qualified than Andrew Soltis to write on this subject.

This book doesn’t come cheap, but, if you can afford it, it will be money well spent. I see it has just made the shortlist for the English Chess Federation book of the year, and rightly so as well.

 

Richard James, Twickenham 2 September 2021

Richard James
Richard James

Book Details :

  • Format: Hardback
  • Pages: 380
  • Bibliographic Info: photos, diagrams, games, bibliography, indexes
  • Copyright Date: 28th February 2021
  • pISBN: 978-1-4766-7793-4
  • eISBN: 978-1-4766-4053-2
  • Imprint: McFarland & Company Inc.

Official web site of McFarland

Smyslov, Bronstein, Geller, Taimanov and Averbakh: A Chess Multibiography with 220 Games, Andrew Soltis, McFarland Books, February 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1476677934
Smyslov, Bronstein, Geller, Taimanov and Averbakh: A Chess Multibiography with 220 Games, Andrew Soltis, McFarland Books, February 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1476677934

Chess Board Options

Chess Board Options, Larry Kaufman, New in Chess, 15th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919337
Chess Board Options, Larry Kaufman, New in Chess, 15th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919337

From the publisher:

“Larry Kaufman can safely be called an exceptional chess grandmaster

Larry Kaufman started out as a prodigy, however not in chess but as a whizz kid in science and math. He excels at shogi (Japanese chess) and Go, and is also a world-famous computer programmer and a highly successful option trader. Remarkably, as a chess player he only peaked at the weirdly late age of fifty.

Yet his victories in the chess arena are considerable. Over a career span of nearly sixty years Kaufman won the state championships of Massachusetts, Maryland, Florida, Virginia, D.C. and Pennsylvania. He was an American Open Champion and won the U.S. Senior Championship as well as the World Senior Championship.

‘Never a great chess player’ himself (his words), he met or played chess greats such as Bobby Fischer, Bent Larsen, Walter Browne, Boris Spassky, Viktor Kortchnoi and many others. He worked as a second to legendary grandmaster Roman Dzindzichashvili, and coached three talented youngsters to become International Master, one of them his son Raymond.

This engrossing memoir is rife with stories and anecdotes about dozens of famous and not-so-famous chess players. In one of the most remarkable chapters Larry Kaufman reveals that the American woman chess player that inspired Walter Tevis to create the Beth Harmon character of Netflix’s The Queen’s Gambit fame, is his former girlfriend. You will learn about neural networks, material values and how being a chess master helps when trading options. And find lots of memorable but little-known annotated games.

Larry Kaufman is an American Grandmaster. He has been involved in computer chess since 1967, when he worked on ‘MacHack’, the first computer that competed in tournaments with human players. More recently he has been working on the programs Rybka and Komodo.

Praise for the best-selling opening manual Kaufman’s New Repertoire for Black and White:

“Kaufman’s book is a pleasure to read.” — Miguel Ararat, Florida Chess Magazine

“Kaufman does an outstanding job.” — IM Gary Lane, Chess Moves Magazine”

GM Larry Kaufmann
GM Larry Kaufman

The memoirs of a relatively obscure grandmaster might not be at the top of your wish list, I guess.

The title might be considered slightly odd as well, referring in part to his career as an options trader, with perhaps also some reflections on options for the further development of chess.

Nevertheless, Larry Kaufman has some interesting stories to tell, and much to say about the future of our favourite game. You’ll also find, appropriately enough, 64 games, some played by the author, some by players he knew, and some by computers against grandmasters, all with brief but pertinent annotations. I’d urge you to stop and take a look inside rather than just pass it by.

The introduction provides some background biographical information concerning his 60 year chess career.

Here’s an early game: the book provides annotations as far as move 20.

[pgn]

[Event “USA Annual op-ch69”]
[Site “Aspen”]
[Date “1968.08.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Kaufman, Larry C”]
[Black “Tarjan, James Edward”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B73”]
[PlyCount “111”]
[EventDate “1968.08.11”]
[EventType “swiss”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “USA”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 1999”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be2 Bg7 7. Be3 Nc6 8.
O-O O-O 9. Qd2 Ng4 10. Bxg4 Bxg4 11. Nd5 Be6 12. c4 Qd7 13. Rad1 Bxd5 14. exd5
Nxd4 15. Bxd4 Qf5 16. Bxg7 Kxg7 17. Rfe1 Rfe8 18. b3 b6 19. Re3 Rac8 20. Rde1
Rc7 21. Rf3 Qd7 22. Rh3 Rh8 23. Qh6+ Kg8 24. Rhe3 f6 25. h4 Qe8 26. Re6 Kf7 27.
Rxd6 exd6 28. Rxe8 Kxe8 29. Qf4 Rd7 30. Qxf6 Rf8 31. Qd4 Re7 32. Qd2 Kd7 33. f4
Kc7 34. g3 Rfe8 35. Kf2 h5 36. Qd3 Re1 37. Kf3 a5 38. a3 Kb7 39. b4 axb4 40.
axb4 Kc7 41. Qa3 Rf1+ 42. Kg2 Rb1 43. Qa7+ Kc8 44. Qa8+ Kd7 45. Qb7+ Kd8 46.
Qxb6+ Kd7 47. Qc6+ Ke7 48. Qc7+ Kf8 49. Qxd6+ Kf7 50. f5 Rb2+ 51. Kh3 gxf5 52.
Qd7+ Re7 53. Qxf5+ Ke8 54. Qxh5+ Kd7 55. Qf5+ Ke8 56. d6 1-0

[/pgn]

In Part 1, Kaufman introduces us to some of the 20th century champions he has known, with plenty of anecdotes and a few games along the way. We meet Fischer, Spassky and Kasparov, Korchnoi, Larsen, Gligoric and others. For me, though, the most interesting chapters here are about the lesser known players. We go all the way back to Harold Phillips (1874-1967), a family friend, who had played Steinitz in simuls back in 1894. I guess this must make Kaufman one of the youngest players to have a shared opponent with Steinitz. In 1961 or 1962 there was a kindly old man who ‘gave generous and valuable free chess lessons to the kids’. This was the notorious Norman Whitaker: of course they knew nothing of his background at the time.

Then there was Steve Brandwein (1942-2015), a new name to me. ‘Although he retired from tournament play at only 22 years of age, … he … was a very strong player … and probably taught me more about the finer points of chess than any other individual.’ Kaufman compares him to Bernie Sanders, and describes him as ‘perhaps the best-liked chess master I’ve ever known’, who could, if he’d wanted have become a grandmaster, or perhaps, had he been prepared to compromise, a US President.

Even more interesting (although readers of New in Chess might have read about this before), is Diana Lanni, who, according to Kaufman, may have been the major inspiration behind the character of Beth Harmon in The Queens Gambit. He also sees himself as the closest match to Harry Beltik, and Walter Browne as Benny Watts.

Part 2 looks at Larry Kaufman’s life outside chess: his time as an options trader and his interest in Shogi, Go and other games.

In Part 3, he shows us some of his most memorable games and talks about his chess students, including his son Ray.

This was his first win against a grandmaster, and helped him towards his first IM norm.

[pgn]

[Event “Marshall op”]
[Site “New York”]
[Date “1979.??.??”]
[Round “2”]
[White “Ostojic, Predrag”]
[Black “Kaufman, Larry C”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C91”]
[WhiteElo “2410”]
[PlyCount “48”]
[EventDate “1979.03.??”]
[EventType “swiss”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[EventCountry “USA”]
[SourceTitle “MCD”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. d4
d6 9. c3 Bg4 10. Be3 d5 11. dxe5 Nxe5 12. exd5 Bxf3 13. gxf3 Qd7 14. Bf4 Ng6
15. Bg3 Rad8 16. c4 h5 17. h4 Qh3 18. Qd3 Bc5 19. Re3 Bxe3 20. Qxe3 Rfe8 21.
Qd2 Nxh4 22. Bxh4 Qxh4 23. cxb5 Re5 24. Nc3 Rg5+ 0-1

[/pgn]

This game helped propel him to a shared first place and the grandmaster title in the 2008 World Seniors.

[pgn]

[Event “Wch Seniors 18th”]
[Site “Bad Zwischenahn”]
[Date “2008.11.03”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Kaufman, Larry C”]
[Black “Butnorius, Algimantas”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E32”]
[WhiteElo “2391”]
[BlackElo “2438”]
[PlyCount “97”]
[EventDate “2008.10.28”]
[EventType “swiss”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “GER”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 2009”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2008.11.26”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2008.11.26”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 O-O 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Qxc3 b6 7. Bg5 Bb7 8.
f3 h6 9. Bh4 d5 10. e3 Nbd7 11. cxd5 exd5 12. Bd3 Re8 13. Ne2 c6 14. Bf2 Qc8
15. Ng3 Ba6 16. Nf5 Bxd3 17. Qxd3 Re6 18. O-O c5 19. b4 c4 20. Qc2 b5 21. Rae1
Qa6 22. e4 Qxa3 23. e5 Ne8 24. Ra1 Qb3 25. Qxb3 cxb3 26. Rfb1 Nb6 27. Rxb3 Nc4
28. f4 Kf8 29. g4 Rc6 30. Bh4 f6 31. Re1 Re6 32. Bg3 a5 33. bxa5 Rxa5 34. Nh4
Nd2 35. Rd3 Ne4 36. f5 Rea6 37. Ng6+ Kg8 38. Ne7+ Kh7 39. Nxd5 Nxg3 40. hxg3 b4
41. Nxb4 Rb6 42. Nc2 Rc6 43. Re2 Nc7 44. Kf2 Nd5 45. e6 Ra7 46. Ne3 Nc3 47. Rb2
Ra1 48. Kf3 Na4 49. Rb8 1-0

 

[/pgn]

Part 4 is about computer chess. Kaufman has been involved in this since 1967, when, as a student at MIT, he had a part-time job working on MacHack. Today, he’s part of the Komodo team. After a brief résumé of his career in computer chess, we see some recent games between engines and grandmasters. These days, the engines give the GMs considerable odds.

Particularly interesting here is a 2020 16-game match (15’+10″) between Komodo and GM Alex Lenderman. In every game, Komodo played White without a knight. In half the games, Lenderman played without a pawn, in four games he had all his pieces but without castling rights, and four games were played using Fischerrandom rules, but with kings and rooks on their usual squares. On the first day, using its standard version, Komodo lost three games, with just one draw. It then switched to the Monte Carlo Tree Search version, which seeks the best practical chances rather than the objectively best moves. In the remaining twelve games, all of which are published here, Komodo scored three wins, seven draws and only two losses.

Here’s a Komodo win. Kaufman’s brief annotations don’t mention a significant improvement for Komodo pointed out by Stockfish 14.

[pgn]

[Event “Komodo v Lenderman”]
[Site “chess.com”]
[Date “May 2020”]
[Round “10”]
[White “PlayKomodo”]
[Black “Lenderman, Alex”]
[Result “1-0”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “rnbbknqr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/R1BBKNQR w KQkq – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “87”]

{[#]} 1. f4 d5 2. d3 Nc6 3. e4 dxe4 4. dxe4 e5 5. f5 Be7 6. Ne3 Nd7 7. c3 Nf6
8. Nd5 Bd6 9. Nxf6+ gxf6 10. Qf1 Bd7 11. Be3 O-O-O 12. Qe2 Kb8 13. O-O h5 14.
b4 Bf8 15. Rf3 h4 16. Bf2 Qg5 17. Be3 Qg4 18. h3 Qg8 19. Bf2 Ne7 20. Rd3 Nc8
21. a4 Be7 22. Kh1 Nd6 23. b5 b6 24. Bb3 Bc8 25. Bd5 Bb7 26. c4 Bxd5 27. cxd5
Nb7 28. a5 bxa5 29. Rc1 Qg5 30. Qc2 Bd6 31. Rc3 Rd7 32. Be3 Qg7 33. Rb1 Rg8 34.
Rc1 a4 35. g4 (35. Bxa7+ Kc8 36. b6) 35… hxg3 36. Qxa4 g2+ 37. Kg1 Bc5 38.
Rxc5 Nxc5 39. Bxc5 Rdd8 40. Qxa7+ Kc8 41. b6 Kd7 42. bxc7 Ke8 43. Rb1 Rc8 44.
Qa4# *

[/pgn]

Part 5 comprises short essays on various topics such as: ratings, openings and piece values, along with suggestions for the reform of competitive chess and thoughts about the future.

Kaufman is perhaps best known, at least in the USA, for a 1999 Chess Life article about the values of the pieces. As someone involved in teaching beginners, this is of considerable interest to me. I’d really like to stop my pupils trading BN for RP on f7 and thinking they have an advantage because points are equal and they’ve exposed the enemy king. He suggests that, while the traditional values (1, 3, 3+, 5) are reasonable for positions without queens, in the presence of queens we should teach 1, 4, 4+, 6, 11. That will resolve my problem: the trade on f7 will now win 7 points but lose 8+ points.

I found this book a riveting read, especially parts 4 and 5, but then it covers a number of topics which are of particular interest to me. If the topics appeal to you too, or if you have a general love of chess culture, I’d give it a very strong recommendation. Fascinating, well written, and, as usual with New in Chess, well produced.

 

Richard James, Twickenham 19th August 2021

Richard James
. Richard James

Book Details :

  • Softcover: 224 pages
  • Publisher: New In Chess (27 May 2021)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10:9056919334
  • ISBN-13:978-9056919337
  • Product Dimensions: ‎17.02 x 23.11 cm

Official web site of New in Chess

Chess Board Options, Larry Kaufman, New in Chess, 15th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919337
Chess Board Options, Larry Kaufman, New in Chess, 15th July 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919337

The Unstoppable American: Bobby Fischer’s Road to Reykjavik

The Unstoppable American : Bobby Fischer’s Road to Reykjavik, Jan Timman, New in Chess, 17th May 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919788
The Unstoppable American : Bobby Fischer’s Road to Reykjavik, Jan Timman, New in Chess, 17th May 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919788

From the publisher:

“Initially things looked gloomy for Bobby Fischer. Because he had refused to participate in the 1969 US Championship, he had missed his chance to qualify for the 1970 Interzonal Tournament in Palma de Mallorca. Only when another American, Pal Benko, withdrew in his favour, and after the officials were willing to bend the rules, could Bobby enter the contest and begin his phenomenal run that would end with the Match of the Century in Reykjavik against World Champion Boris Spassky.

Fischer started out by sweeping the field at the 23-round Palma Interzonal to qualify for the next stage of the cycle. In the Candidates Matches he first faced Mark Taimanov, in Vancouver. Fischer trounced the Soviet ace, effectively ending Taimanov’s career. Then, a few months later in Denver, he was up against Bent Larsen, the Great Dane. Fischer annihilated him, too. The surreal score in those two matches, twice 6-0, flabbergasted chess fans all over the world. In the ensuing Candidates Final in Buenos Aires, Fischer also made short shrift of former World Champion Tigran Petrosian, beating the hyper-solid “Armenian Tiger” 6½-2½.

Altogether, Fischer had scored an incredible 36 points from 43 games against many of the world’s best players, including a streak of 19 consecutive wins. Bobby Fischer had become not just a national hero in the US, but a household name with pop-star status all over the world. Jan Timman chronicles the full story of Fischer’s sensational run and takes a fresh look at the games. The annotations are in the author’s trademark lucid style, that happy mix of colourful background information and sharp, crystal-clear explanations.”

GM Jan Timman
GM Jan Timman

Where does history start? I’ve always thought history is what happened before you were born. For those of us, like Jan Timman and myself, who learnt our chess in the 1960s, perhaps chess history is what happened before World War 2. The events of the late forties were full of names familiar to us from tournaments of our time.

This book covers Bobby Fischer’s career in the years 1970 and 1971. More like current affairs than history for our generation. We all remember it well: we were around at the time and some of us will be familiar with many of the games. But, for younger readers, Fischer’s games from half a century ago will be ancient history. If we turn the clock back another five decades we reach 1921 and the Lasker – Capablanca World Championship match. Now that really does feel like ancient history, even to me.

Fifty years on, it seems like a good time to revisit the games with the aid of today’s powerful engines and greater knowledge. Jan Timman is ideally qualified to do just that.

Readers of Timman’s other recent books will know what to expect: clear annotations based on explanations rather than variations, along with entertaining anecdotes and background colour to put the games into context.

We have all 43 games (44 if you include a win by default) from the 1970 Interzonal and 1971 candidates matches, along with a selection of 19 games from earlier in 1970.

After withdrawing from the 1967 Interzonal, Fischer played in two relatively minor tournaments the following year, and, in 1969, played only one serious game, in a New York league match. The chess world was uncertain whether or not he’d ever play again, let alone fulfil what appeared to be his destiny and become world champion. Exciting, but also worrying times.

After an 18 month absence, Bobby agreed to take part in the 1970 match between the USSR and the Rest of the World, even ceding top board to Larsen. Chapter 1 takes us from this event, via Rovinj/Zagreb, the Herceg Novi blitz and Buenos Aires, to the Siegen Olympiad.

In round 7 of Rovinj-Zagreb, Fischer was black against one of the tournament’s lesser lights, the Romanian master Ghitescu.

Timman informs us: It has never been brought up before, but Fischer was demonstrably lost in this game, after having taken too much risk.

Here’s the critical position with Ghitescu to play his 23rd move. Where would you move your rook?

[fen]r4r2/pb5k/1p1p1p2/2pPbP2/2P3pP/2N2R2/PP2N1P1/R5K1 w – – 0 23[/fen]

The exchange sacrifice 23. Rf4! would have been very strong. Black cannot accept the sacrifice, because he would have been strategically losing. Also after 23… Rg8 24. Re4 Rae8 25. Rf1, White is winning.

I may be wrong but I would have thought Rf4 would be automatic for master strength players today. Wouldn’t it also have been automatic for, say, Petrosian, back in 1970?

Instead, the game continued 23. Rd3 Rad8 24. Ng3 (24. b3 would have maintained the advantage) 24… Ba6, when Fischer took control of the game, eventually bringing home the full point. If he’d lost that game, perhaps chess history would have been very different.

Here’s the complete game.

[pgn]
[Event “Rovinj/Zagreb”]
[Site “Zagreb”]
[Date “1970.04.20”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Ghitescu, Theodor”]
[Black “Fischer, Robert James”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “E82”]
[PlyCount “94”]
[EventDate “1970.04.12”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “17”]
[EventCountry “CRO”]
[SourceTitle “MCD”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 O-O 6. Be3 b6 7. Bd3 Bb7 8. Nge2
c5 9. d5 e6 10. O-O exd5 11. exd5 Nbd7 12. Bg5 h6 13. Bh4 Ne5 14. f4 Nxd3 15.
Qxd3 Qd7 16. Bxf6 Bxf6 17. f5 g5 18. Qh3 Be5 19. Qxh6 f6 20. Rf3 Qh7 21. Qxh7+
Kxh7 22. h4 g4 23. Rd3 Rae8 24. Ng3 Ba6 25. b3 b5 26. cxb5 Bxb5 27. Nxb5 Bxa1
28. Nxd6 Bd4+ 29. Kf1 Re5 30. Nc4 Rxd5 31. Ne3 Rd7 32. Nxg4 Rg7 33. Nf2 Rfg8
34. Nfe4 Kh6 35. h5 Rg4 36. Ke2 Be5 37. Kf2 R4g7 38. Rf3 Rg4 39. Rd3 a6 40. Rf3
Bd4+ 41. Kf1 Be5 42. Kf2 a5 43. a4 Rd8 44. Ke3 Rb8 45. Kf2 c4 46. bxc4 Rb2+ 47.
Kf1 Rb4 0-1

[/pgn]

The strategic insights Timman brings to positions like this are, for me, what makes this book so instructive. Here’s another example: Gligoric – Fischer from Siegen, with Gligoric to make his 39th move.

[fen]8/8/2pk1p1r/p1p2PpP/1r1bP3/1PNR2K1/P7/7R w – – 0 39[/fen]

It’s not dissimilar to the previous example, and indeed both positions arose from King’s Indian Defences. Here, a white knight is fighting against a dark-squared bishop outside the pawn chain.

White could have obtained a winning position with 39. Nb1!. The strategic plan is simple: White is going to bring his knight to c4 and install his king on g4. Black has nothing to offer in exchange; his doubled c-pawn will be blocked, and his pieces are barely able to display any activity.

Again, the complete game:

[pgn]

[Event “Olympiad-19 Final A”]
[Site “Siegen”]
[Date “1970.09.22”]
[Round “8”]
[White “Gligoric, Svetozar”]
[Black “Fischer, Robert James”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “E94”]
[PlyCount “130”]
[EventDate “1970.09.05”]
[EventType “team-tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “GER”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2001.11.25”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2001.11.25”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “Yugoslavia”]
[BlackTeam “US of America”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “YUG”]
[BlackTeamCountry “USA”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. d5 Nbd7 8. O-O
Nc5 9. Qc2 a5 10. Bg5 h6 11. Be3 Ng4 12. Bxc5 dxc5 13. h3 Nf6 14. Nxe5 Nxd5 15.
cxd5 Bxe5 16. f4 Bd4+ 17. Kh1 Qh4 18. Qd3 c6 19. Qf3 h5 20. f5 Bd7 21. Bc4 g5
22. Rad1 Rae8 23. dxc6 Bxc6 24. Bd5 Re5 25. Bxc6 bxc6 26. Rd3 Rfe8 27. Qg3 Qxg3
28. Rxg3 f6 29. Rd3 h4 30. b3 Rb8 31. g3 hxg3 32. Kg2 Rb4 33. Rc1 Kf7 34. Kxg3
Ke7 35. Re1 Kd6 36. Rh1 Re7 37. h4 Rh7 38. h5 Rh6 39. Kf3 Ke5 40. Ne2 a4 41.
Ng3 c4 42. bxc4 Rb2 43. Nf1 Rxh5 44. Rxh5 Rf2+ 45. Kg3 Rxf1 46. Rh8 Kxe4 47.
Ra3 Rg1+ 48. Kh2 Rc1 49. Rxa4 Rc2+ 50. Kh1 c5 51. Ra3 Kxf5 52. Rh2 Rc1+ 53. Kg2
g4 54. Rh1 Rc2+ 55. Kf1 Kg5 56. Rh8 f5 57. Rg8+ Kh4 58. Ke1 f4 59. Kd1 Rg2 60.
Ra6 f3 61. Rh6+ Kg3 62. Rhg6 Kf4 63. a4 Rg1+ 64. Kd2 f2 65. Rf8+ Kg3 0-1

[/pgn]

Chapter 2 covers the 1970 Interzonal at Palma, Mallorca. You won’t find very many brilliant miniatures in this book, but Fischer’s win against Rubinetti is an exception.

[pgn]

[Event “Interzonal-08”]
[Site “Palma de Mallorca”]
[Date “1970.12.02”]
[Round “17”]
[White “Fischer, Robert James”]
[Black “Rubinetti, Jorge Alberto”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B87”]
[PlyCount “47”]
[EventDate “1970.11.09”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “23”]
[EventCountry “ESP”]
[SourceTitle “IZT”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. Bc4 a6 7. Bb3 b5 8. O-O
Bb7 9. Re1 Nbd7 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bh4 Nc5 12. Bd5 exd5 13. exd5+ Kd7 14. b4 Na4
15. Nxa4 bxa4 16. c4 Kc8 17. Qxa4 Qd7 18. Qb3 g5 19. Bg3 Nh5 20. c5 dxc5 21.
bxc5 Qxd5 22. Re8+ Kd7 23. Qa4+ Bc6 24. Nxc6 1-0

[/pgn]

Chapters 3-5 offer Fischer’s 6-0 shutouts against Taimanov and Larsen, and the final match against former champion Tigran Petrosian.

[fen]r4k2/r2b1ppp/p4n2/2NpR3/1P6/3B1P2/P5PP/R5K1 w – – 0 22[/fen]

This position interested me. Any well-read player from my generation will recognise this as coming from the 7th Fischer – Petrosian game, where Bobby played 22. Nxd7+, a move garlanded with various numbers of exclamation marks by many commentators both at the time and later.

Here’s what Timman has to say.

The praise with which this move has been showered is unbelievable. Byrne commented: ‘This exchange, which wins the game, was completely overlooked by the press room group of grandmaster analysis. Najdorf, in fact, criticized it(!), suggesting the incomparably weaker 22. a4.’

Kasparov, too, was full of praise. ‘A brilliant decision, masterfully transforming one advantage into another (…) Petrosian was obviously hoping for the “obvious” 22. a4 Bc6 23. Rc1 Nd7 24. Nxd7+ Bxd7 with possibilities of a defence.

In Chess Informant 12, Petrosian himself and Suetin give two ‘!’s to the text move.

True, not all commentators were so pronounced in their praise. Spassky and Polugaevsky limited themselves to the conclusion that White exchanged one advantage for another and didn’t give an ‘!’ to the move.

However, the general drift was that Fischer had done something highly instructive, adding a new facet to strategic thinking in chess. I was very impressed at the time, but I also had doubts. There were no computers yet, and young players looked to the great players on the world stage as their examples. So, Fischer must have understood it better than I did.

Yet, I am almost certain that in this position, or a similar one, I would have opted for Najdorf’s move. And almost half a century after the event, it turned out that the Argentinian had simply been right!

Timman goes on to demonstrate that, indeed, 22. a4 is clearly winning, whereas Fischer’s 22. Nxd7+ Rxd7 23. Rc1 would have given Petrosian defensive chances if he’d chosen 23… d4 rather than the passive Rd6.

See for yourself:

[pgn]

[Event “Candidates f Fischer-Petrosian +5-1=3”]
[Site “Buenos Aires”]
[Date “1971.10.19”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Fischer, Robert James”]
[Black “Petrosian, Tigran V”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B42”]
[WhiteElo “2760”]
[PlyCount “67”]
[EventDate “1971.09.30”]
[EventType “match”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “ARG”]
[SourceTitle “Candidates”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “2”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. Nxc6 bxc6 7. O-O d5 8.
c4 Nf6 9. cxd5 cxd5 10. exd5 exd5 11. Nc3 Be7 12. Qa4+ Qd7 13. Re1 Qxa4 14.
Nxa4 Be6 15. Be3 O-O 16. Bc5 Rfe8 17. Bxe7 Rxe7 18. b4 Kf8 19. Nc5 Bc8 20. f3
Rea7 21. Re5 Bd7 22. Nxd7+ Rxd7 23. Rc1 Rd6 24. Rc7 Nd7 25. Re2 g6 26. Kf2 h5
27. f4 h4 28. Kf3 f5 29. Ke3 d4+ 30. Kd2 Nb6 31. Ree7 Nd5 32. Rf7+ Ke8 33. Rb7
Nxf4 34. Bc4 1-0

[/pgn]

What comes across from this book is the remorseless power and logic of Fischer’s play in this period, as well as his determination to play for a win in every game. Short draws were never on his agenda.

In the past, there was a tendency to annotate by result or reputation, and this seems to have been what happened here. These days, we can all switch on Stockfish and annotate by computer, while neglecting the human, the practical element.

Timman’s annotations, both here and in his previous books, strike me as getting the balance just about right. Call me old-fashioned, but I’d rather have verbal explanations than long engine-generated variations.

Older readers will enjoy reliving memories of the golden days of the Fischer era, while younger readers will learn a lot of chess history. Players of all levels will benefit from the annotations, which, because of their lucidity, are accessible to anyone from, say, 1500 upwards.

The many anecdotes add much to the book, although serious historians might feel frustrated that they’re not always sourced. There are also several pages of photographs: while their quality, as they’re printed on matt paper, isn’t perfect, they’re still more than welcome.

There are a few typos and mistakes regarding match scores and tournament crosstables which more careful proofing might have picked up, and the English, in one or two places (you may have noticed this from the extracts I quoted), might have been more idiomatic. Slightly annoying, perhaps,  but this won’t really impede your enjoyment of the book.

In spite of these slight reservations, this is an excellent book which is warmly recommended for players of all strengths. Next year will see the 50th anniversary of Fischer – Spassky. Might we hope that Timman will cover this match in a future volume?

One last thought: I wrote at the beginning of this review about how people of different ages have different perspectives of history. If Capablanca and Alekhine had been granted long lives, they would have lived to see these games. What would they have made of them? What would they have made of Bobby Fischer?

Richard James, Twickenham 10th August 2021

Richard James
. Richard James

Book Details :

  • Softcover: 256 pages
  • Publisher: New In chess (17 May 2021)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10:9056919784
  • ISBN-13:978-9056919788
  • Product Dimensions: ‎ 17.27 x 2.54 x 23.62 cm

Official web site of New in Chess

The Unstoppable American : Bobby Fischer’s Road to Reykjavik, Jan Timman, New in Chess, 17th May 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919788
The Unstoppable American : Bobby Fischer’s Road to Reykjavik, Jan Timman, New in Chess, 17th May 2021, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9056919788

Minor Pieces 5: Francis Ptacek

Continuing from my last article about Arthur Towle Marriott, I promised a series of articles on his Leicester opponents.

This is an interesting period in chess history, witnessing the start of inter-club competitions as we used to know them before Covid-19.

The two matches between Leicester and Nottingham in January and February 1877 seem to have been Leicester’s first matches against another club. Nottingham, however, had previous form: the earliest match I can find was against Derby in 1872. Train services from Nottingham to Derby started in 1839, with trains to Leicester available the following year, but by now rail transport had become more frequent and more affordable. It was the 3.35 servicethat took the Nottingham chess players to Leicester on 25 January 1877.

The following week the Leicester Journal reported:

An interesting event in connection with this club, took place on Thursday week, in the Mayor’s Parlour of the old Town Hall, kindly lent for the occasion by the Mayor, W. Winterton Esq., when the majority of the members assembled to welcome six gentlemen of the Nottingham Chess Club, who arrived by the 3.35 train, to spend, by invitation, a few hours in friendly contest at Chess. The high reputation of the Nottingham Club, caused considerable interest to be felt in the visit, and it was thought that the home players would have but little chance of maintaining a creditable stand. When, therefore, at the close of the contest, it was found that Nottingham had won the match by only one in their favour, considerable gratification was experienced at so favourable a result. The following gentlemen represented the Nottingham Club: S. Hamel Esq., President, Messrs. Stevenson, Marriott, Glendenning, Brown, and Kirk, while Rev. W. L. Newham, Mr W. Stanyon (president), Dr. Nuttall, Herr Ptacek, Messrs. Atkins and Withers did battle for Leicester, winning eight games to their opponent’s nine. The play of the Nottingham gentlemen was much admired for the skill and ingenuity evinced, and, as a consequence of their visit to Leicester, it may be safely asserted that the impetus given to the study of this most intellectual of games among the members of the Home Club, will not soon pass away. The return match we are given to understand will be played at Nottingham on Tuesday next, February 6th, at the Club Room, Long-row. In connection with the Leicester Chess Club we are pleased to learn that its members during the present session have almost doubled, and that new life and energy seem to pervade all its movements.

Chess matches in those days were always described as ‘interesting’ (see also below). Or if not ‘interesting’, then ‘pleasant’.

(Note that the Mr Atkins active at that time was seemingly not related to the great Henry Ernest Atkins, about whom more later.)

It’s not clear from this report whether Nottingham’s Mr Marriott was Arthur or one of his brothers. Zavatarelli assumes it was Arthur: it’s possible that other reports not available online will confirm this.

The week after next, a Leicester team took the train north. Here’s the report from the Nottinghamshire Guardian:

On Tuesday evening a most interesting and spirited match at chess took place between the clubs of Nottingham and Leicester, at the rooms of the former, which are at Mr. Bingham’s restaurant, Long-row. Seven members of the Leicester club took part in the game against eight of Nottingham. About nine o’clock in the evening the members of both clubs adjourned, and sat down to supper, when Mr. Hamel, president of the Nottingham society, occupied the chair. After the usual loyal toasts had been honoured, that of “Continued success and prosperity to the Nottingham Chess Club” was proposed by the chairman and enthusiastically drunk. In the course of his remarks, the chairman referred in very feeling terms to the death of Mr. Thomas Hill, one of the oldest and most respected members of the club, and whose lost he (the chairman) was sure, must be deeply regretted and mourned by all. The president next referred to the Cambridge match, which had resulted so successfully, and to the honour of Nottingham – (hear, hear) – they having won both games, and having declared in one game a mate in ten moves, a point which the Cambridge University could not see. (Applause.) Dr. Worth, the vice-president, after alluding to his thirty years’ connection with the club, proposed, in a complimentary manner, the “Health of the Visitors”, which was responded to by the Rev.  Mr. Newham, of Leicester, and Mr. Thompson, the celebrated problem composer of Derby, in very cordial terms. The health of the respected president (Mr. Hamel) having been proposed and drunk with due honours, the members left the supper table, and again proceeded with their games, which were carried on until a late hour. The following is a list of the players – Leicester, Messrs. Ptacek, Withers, Atkins, Latchmore, Stanyon, Nuttall, and the Rev. – Newham. Nottingham: Messrs. E. Marriott, T. Marriott, A. Marriott, Roe, Alderman W. G. Ward, Hugh Browne, T. A. Stevenson, and Mellors. At midnight, the contest was concluded, when it was announced that Nottingham had won six games, lost five, and drawn one. The match resulted in favour of Nottingham by one game.

We only have the names here, but, fortunately the Leicester Chronicle provided more details:

Leicester Chronicle 10 February 1877

Here, we’re told that Arthur Towle Marriott played on board 4 against Herr Ptacek, winning both his games.

Nottingham’s chess star Sigismund Hamel was present, but, for some reason, didn’t play in the match. However, he annotated (rather inaccurately, according to Stockfish 14) Arthur’s two games for the Nottingham Daily Express (not available online).

In the first game, Arthur’s opponent put up little resistance. This is why I often recommend the Ruy Lopez to novices. If Black isn’t familiar with the opening he can end up in a lost position very quickly. This is just the sort of game I like to use when introducing my pupils to this opening.

[pgn]

[Event “Nottingham v Leicester”]
[Site “Nottingham”]
[Date “1877.02.06”]
[Round “1”]
[White “Marriott, Arthur Towle”]
[Black “Ptacek, Francis”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C70”]
[Annotator “Richard James”]
[PlyCount “27”]
[SourceVersionDate “2020.10.20”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 b5 5. Bb3 Bc5 6. c3 d6 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4
Bb6 9. O-O Bb7 10. Re1 Nce7 11. e5 h6 12. e6 {Black played a poor opening:
simple development with Nc3 would have given White a winning advantage. But
instead his impetuous choice gave Black the opportunity for 12… f5 and 13…
Nf6.} f6 13. Nh4 g5 {Possibly the worst move on the board, allowing a mate in
3.} 14. Qh5+ 1-0

[/pgn]

But who was Herr Ptacek? What was someone with such an exotic name doing in Leicester?

It’s a very good question, with a very interesting answer.

I really need to introduce you to Robert Ralph Noel.

R R Noel (1802-1883) was born in Kirkby Mallory (as in Mallory Park race circuit), the son of a clergyman. He was very well connected: knowing, either directly or indirectly, almost everyone who was anyone in 19th century England: George Eliot, Charles Darwin, Lord Byron (Ada Lovelace, a distant relation, lived in Kirkby Mallory as a young girl). He married a German Baroness whose family had an estate in Bohemia, which gave him connections to the likes of Goethe right across Europe. He wrote a book on phrenology, which you can, if you so desire (but I wouldn’t bother if I were you), read today.

However, his day job involved running the Leicestershire Militia (the volunteer forces), and, like all forces in those days, they needed a good military band, with a good bandmaster to lead it. For much of the 19th century England was known as ‘the land without music’, so when a musician was required it was tempting to look abroad. Mrs Noel had heard good things about a young man from Prague called Franz Ptacek (he’d often be known as Francis in England), and, in 1854, he was engaged to run a military band in Leicester. It seems he was very successful and popular, but, after 12 years or so, following some sort of dispute, he felt obliged to resign his position.

He then set up a new orchestra and concert society, and resumed giving concerts in Leicester. He was also a composer, pianist and organist seemingly much in demand. Light classical music concerts (think the Strauss family: waltzes, polkas, marches, that sort of thing) were a very popular entertainment at the time. He was more ambitious than this, though, writing an opera and programming two of Handel’s great oratorios: Saul and Samson.

It’s time for some music. Ptacek was particularly renowned for his interpretation of the famous Dead March from Saul. I’d have liked to offer you the Leicester Militia playing this in 1860, but instead you’ll have to do with the next best thing: the Band of the Coldstream Guards recorded in 1910.

Band of the Coldstream Guards play Handel’s Funeral March – YouTube

He also found time to indulge in his (and our) favourite hobby: chess. He was selected to represent his adopted city in what was perhaps their first competitive match, where he met our hero, Arthur Towle Marriott.

His play in the first game wasn’t at all impressive, but he conducted his troops rather better in the return game. Perhaps the supper provided by Bingham’s Restaurant had some effect. His Scotch Gambit led to a winning position, only for him to throw away the win with one careless mistake.

[pgn]

[Event “Nottingham v Leicester”]
[Site “Nottingham”]
[Date “1877.02.06”]
[Round “2”]
[White “Ptacek, Francis”]
[Black “Marriott, Arthur Towle”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C44”]
[Annotator “Richard James”]
[PlyCount “48”]
[SourceVersionDate “2020.10.20”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Bc4 {Black usually transposes to a Two
Knights Defence with Nf6 or plays Bc5 here. Bb4+ is unpopular and unsuccessful
over the board, but Stockfish 14 likes it.} Bb4+ 5. c3 dxc3 6. O-O c2 {Black
usually plays d6 here, but Stockfish also likes 6… Nf6 7. e5 d5.} 7. Qxc2 d6
8. a3 Ba5 9. b4 Bb6 10. Bb2 Nf6 11. Qb3 O-O 12. Nbd2 Ng4 13. Qc3 Nce5 {Qf6
would have maintained his extra pawn.} 14. h3 Nxf3+ 15. Nxf3 Nf6 16. Rad1 Qe7 {
16… Be6 was better, when White has adequate compensation for the pawn.} 17.
Rfe1 Be6 18. e5 Bxc4 {A blunder: he had to play dxe5.} 19. Qxc4 d5 20. exf6 {
A fatal miscalculation, presumably missing Black’s reply. The obvious 20. Qh4
would have won easily.} Qxe1+ 21. Rxe1 dxc4 22. fxg7 Rfe8 23. Kf1 Rxe1+ 24.
Nxe1 Rd8 0-1

[/pgn]

Chess matches in those days served a social rather than a competitive purpose. The result, while eagerly anticipated, didn’t really matter that much. It was more an excuse for players from neighbouring towns or cities to meet for some enjoyable games, with a supper in between. Over the next decade or so there would be many changes, as you’ll see in future Minor Pieces.

A few years later, though, something went wrong. For a second time he lost his orchestra and had to resort to teaching the pianoforte, taking private pupils as well as acting as a peripatetic teacher at Miss Lomas’s school.

At Christmas 1885, Ptacek travelled to Chatham to spend the holiday period with his friend Rudolf Sawerthal, another Czech born military musician. He was just about to return to Leicester when he suffered a fatal heart attack, at the age of only 52.

The Leicester Chronicle published a lengthy obituary:

It is with feelings of sincere regret that we announce the death of Herr Ptacek, which took place at Chatham on Thursday morning. The death of this eminent local musician was totally unexpected, and the intelligence of his sudden decease was received with great surprise amongst his intimate friends. About ten days ago Herr Ptacek proceeded to Chatham on a visit to Herr Sawerthal, the accomplished master of the band of the Royal Engineers, whose performance in the Floral Hall during Christmas week gave such exceptional satisfaction to everyone who heard them. He contemplated returning to Leicester on Thursday morning, and had made every preparation for his departure, when he was suddenly seized with pain at the heart. A medical man was immediately summoned, but before he could arrive Herr Ptacek had expired. A telegram was shortly afterwards despatched to Mr. J. Herbert Marshall, of the Rutland-Street music depot, one of the deceased’s most intimate friends, and that gentleman communicated the sad intelligence to his friends in Leicester, all of whom heard the occurrence with much regret. To many the name Herr Ptacek will be unknown, but his name will not be forgotten by those ardent lovers of music who twenty years ago were charmed with the brilliant company of artistes he gathered around him. The deceased came to Leicester a comparative stranger, but his abilities soon won favourable recognition, and he speedily became possessed of a merited reputation for musical accomplishments, which was not confined to the limits of the borough. In 1855 Herr Ptacek was introduced to Leicester by Major and Mrs Noel, who were convinced of his sterling worth as an organiser and conductor. He left Prague, where he had been brought up under cultivating influences, and took charge of the militia band, which was in want of complete and thorough organisation. So well did Herr Ptacek succeed at his appointed task that before long the band was selected to play before the Queen at Aldershot, and the fine playing of the men under his control elicited warm expressions of Royal approval. The band subsequently played several times before a distinguished company at Belvoir Castle. Some disagreement ultimately took place between him and the officers of the regiment, in consequence of which – in order to maintain his self-respect – he felt it necessary to resign. The resignation was accepted, and he renounced the position of bandmaster, amid many expressions of regret. His efforts to improve the musical taste of the town were not, however, forgotten. On December 16, 1867, he was presented by Mr. T. T. Paget, M.P., at a largely-attended meeting of influential inhabitants, with a purse containing 150 guineas, as some acknowledgement of the efforts he had put forth for twelve years to cultivate musical taste and provide for the public enjoyment. The purse was worked by Mrs Noel, and, in accepting the gift, Herr Ptacek made a humorous and appropriate speech. Some time after his severance of the connection with the militia band, Herr Ptacek organised a band of his own, which he trained to an exceptional point of perfection, and also became the conductor of the New Orpheus Society, a  musical association partly, if not completely, antagonistic to the then Philharmonic Society. His charge of that society was marked by masterful activity, his abilities in controlling the resources of an orchestra being strikingly exhibited. Under the auspices of this society, Samson and Saul were given before large audiences in the chief hall of the town, and the magnificent way in which the “Dead March” was rendered has not yet faded from the recollection of those who heard it. Herr Ptacek also for about 14 years filled the position of organist at St. George’s Church, where his cultivated playing was greatly appreciated. He excelled more as a pianist than as an organist, although his skill in playing the more ponderous instrument was of no mean order. Upon his retirement from active musical life he was again the recipient of a testimonial subscribed for by his admiring friends. He lived in comparative retirement, and his name has not been connected with musical efforts in the town for many years past, although we believe he continued to take pupils who  wished to e instructed in the mysteries of the pianoforte. From the commencement of his labours in Leicester his energies had been invariably directed towards the education of the inhabitants, and in this respect he has probably never been excelled, although it would be idle to say he has not been equalled. He was uniformly courteous, and his geniality endeared him to all who came in contact with him. His life was arduous and self-sacrificing, and the news of his death will not fall to awaken feelings of sorrow. He was about 52 years of age. We understand that instructions have been given to have the deceased interred in the Leicester Cemetery.

His memorial unfortunately misspells both his names, making him Frances rather than Francis (‘i’ for ‘im, ‘e’ for ‘er, as my mother taught me).

The inscription reads, in part:

An accomplished musician he was endeared to his many pupils and to all who knew him, not more by his varied attainments than by his honesty and frankness and by the warmth of his attainments. Those who now sorrow over his grave may well say he came among us as a stranger and he departed leaving many warm and devoted friends.

This site provides more information: his date of birth is given as 1831, but this may be wrong: other records suggest it was 2 December 1832. It’s also incorrect in stating that his wife was Czech.

Further information, including from a source about Masonic Music and Musicians in Leicestershire and Rutland, can be found here.

As far as I can tell, none of his music has survived, but I did find a polka written by his friend Rudolf Sawerthal, arranged for accordion:

Polka Arlequín – YouTube

There you have it: Arthur Towle Marriott’s opponent Francis Ptacek leads us on a tour of chess and musical life in Leicester in the 1870s and 1880s. Who will we discover next? You’ll find out here soon enough.

And, by the way, if you’re interested in the sociology of chess in the English Midlands in the 19th century, you can read Rob Ensor’s 2016 Masters Thesis on Nottingham chess here. My thanks to Rob for making this available, and also to John Swain for bringing it to my attention.

 

Remembering Nancy Elder MBE (25-v-1915 04-iii-1981)

BCN remembers Nancy Elder MBE who passed away on Wednesday, March 4th 1981, i.e. forty years ago in Perth, Western Australia.

Nancy Conchar Gordon was born on Tuesday, May 25th 1915. On the same date was born Robin Day in High Wycombe who went on  to design the polypropylene stacking chair.

Nancy was born in Kirmabreck, Kirkcudbrightshire in the Dumfries and Galloway council area of Scotland.

In the 1939 register Nancy was living at 18 Thornton Avenue, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5DJ with a married couple, William Furnish (a railway time keeper) and Gertrude Furnish who performed unpaid domestic duties. Presumably Nancy was their lodger.

18 Thornton Avenue, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5DJ
18 Thornton Avenue, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5DJ

Her occupation was given as a teacher of music and physical training. At this time she was single at the age of twenty-four.

In the mid-1940s Nancy relocated from Manchester to Dundee where she continued her teaching career at Dundee High School. During that time she encouraged and coached a number of players some of whom represented Scotland.

In 1950 in Tealing, Angus, Scotland Nancy married David Livie Elder. They had a daughter Christine who played chess as a junior. Tealing has a strong connection with the Elder family.

According to Alan McGowan (Chess Scotland): “She was the main instigator in forming both the Schools’ and Primary League in Dundee, and she assisted in the organisation of the Dundee 1967 International Centenary Tournament.”

When she passed away Nancy was living at 39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, DD2 1RJ :

39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, DD2 1RJ
39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, DD2 1RJ

Her passing was reported in the Dundee Courier and Advertiser  on March 6th 1981 as follows :

Nancy Elder dies after heart attack on flight

Mrs Nancy Elder 39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, a former music teacher at Dundee High School and one of Scotland’s best known chess players, has died after taking ill on a flight to Australia.

She was off for a long holiday which she planned to spend with relatives and friends from the world of international chess, but, after suffering a heart attack on a plane from Singapore, had been in intensive care in Perth, Western Australia.

Her daughter Christine, a primary school teacher in Tighnabruaich, received daily telephone reports on her mother’s condition from a cousin and, at the weekend, heard that she was improving gradually.

The shock news of her mother’s death came late on Wednesday night.

Mrs. Elder, who went into semi-retirement recently, has been to the fore in chess for about 35 years at local, national and international levels.

Nancy Elder MBE. Source : Milos Petronic
Nancy Elder MBE. Source : Milos Petronic

She has represented her country five times, having taken part in the chess Olympiad in Yugoslavia in 1963 and 1973, in Israel in 1976, in Buenos Aires in 1978 and in Malta last year.

Buenos Aires Olympiad 1978. From left: Morag McGhee, Nancy Elder, Owen Hindle, Kathleen Hindle and Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Buenos Aires Olympiad 1978. From left: Morag McGhee, Nancy Elder, Owen Hindle, Kathleen Hindle and Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

She turned down the chance to take part on three other occasions.

Haifa Olympiad 1976 - Scotland v Switzerland. From left: Nancy Elder, Kathleen Hindle, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Haifa Olympiad 1976 – Scotland v Switzerland. From left: Nancy Elder, Kathleen Hindle, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

She was awarded the MBE for her services to chess in 1974.

She was President of Dundee Chess Club, chairman of the congress committee of the Scottish Chess Association and on the council of the Scottish Junior Chess Association.

Self-taught

She started playing chess during her school days with her brother and the two of them were more-or-less self taught.

It wasn’t until after the Second World War that she received any sort of coaching, by which time she had established her own style.

She retired on April 14th last year after 24 years in the music department of Dundee High School, where she specialised in teaching the oboe.

She continued to teach privately.

Dundee Courier and Advertiser, March 6th 1981
Dundee Courier and Advertiser, March 6th 1981

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CI (101, 1981), Number 6 (June), pp. 219-220 we have this obituary from Bernard Cafferty :

“Nancy C. Elder, MBE, died in Perth, Western Australia on March 4th 1981. Mrs. Elder had recently retired after a lifetime of teaching, her last post being in Dundee. I well remember her account of teaching under difficult conditions in World War 2 in Manchester. 15 Scottish Women’s Champion (the record for the event which she set-up at Troon in 1980).

Prizegiving at the 1966 Scottish Championships. From the left: Michael Fallone, Nancy Elder, W.P. McColl, President of Dundee Chess Club, Kathleen Patterson, Gerald Bonner. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Prizegiving at the 1966 Scottish Championships. From the left: Michael Fallone, Nancy Elder, W.P. McColl, President of Dundee Chess Club, Kathleen Patterson, Gerald Bonner. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

Mrs Elder was a regular competitor in the British Women’s Championship (sometimes in rivalry with her daughter Christine) and showed her playing strength with a score of 5.5/12 on board two for Scotland at the Women’s Chess Olympiad, Malta, 1980.

Malta Olympiad 1980 Left-right: Kathleen, Rosie Giulian, Owen Hindle (Team Captain), Nancy Elder, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Malta Olympiad 1980 Left-right: Kathleen, Rosie Giulian, Owen Hindle (Team Captain), Nancy Elder, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

I am sure she will be best remembered though for her decades of effort in the organising of chess in Scotland, particularly for juniors and in schools, in recognition of which she was awarded the MBE, the only such honour ever given for services to chess ‘north of the border’ as Alan Borwell puts it in his Newsflash obituary.”

[pgn]
[Event “British CF-53 Women”]
[Site “Sunderland/ Tyne and Wear”]
[Date “1966.08.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Elder, Nancy Conchar”]
[Black “Moore, Gillian A”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B73”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “71”]
[EventDate “1966.08.08”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “GBR”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 1999”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,71,19,31,72,53,51,40,38,35,42,42,41,21,45,40,44,31,38,44,43,35,37,37,
56,37,60,54,156,124,220,183,183,139,160,91,90,96,101,80,101,0,5,0,6,0,1,16,1,5,
21,25,38,2,28,0,37,8,42,20,45,6,202,261,285,366,920,931,29993,29994,29995,
29996,29997,29998]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2
g6 7. Be3 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. h3 {A choice of Smyslov and Kudrin.} ({A more
modern way to proceed is} 9. Nb3 Be6 10. f4 Qc8 11. Kh1 Rd8 12. Bf3 Bc4 13. Rf2
e5 14. Rd2 Qe6 15. fxe5 Nxe5 16. Nd4 Qe7 17. b3) 9… a6 (9… Bd7 10. Qd2 Rc8
11. f4 a6 12. Rad1 b5 13. a3 Qc7) 10. Qd2 Qc7 11. f4 Rd8 12. Rad1 Nxd4 13. Bxd4
e5 $2 $146 {[#] The only game to feature this position.} (13… Be6) 14. Bxe5
$18 Qb6+ 15. Kh2 (15. Bd4 {Appears more natural.}) 15… Be6 16. Bxf6 (16. Bd4)
16… Bxf6 17. Nd5 {White immediately seeks exchanges.} Bxd5 18. Qxd5 Rac8 19.
Bc4 Qc7 20. Bb3 (20. Bd3) 20… Bxb2 21. a4 Qe7 {Black has equalised after the
earlier blunder.} 22. Rf3 Rc5 23. Qd3 Rc3 24. Qe2 Rdc8 25. Rxc3 Bxc3 26. Rd3
Kf8 27. Qf3 Bb4 28. g4 Rc5 29. Kg2 h6 30. Kf1 {[#]} f5 $2 {after all of
Black’s efforts lashing out is not a good idea.} (30… b5 {was reasonable.})
31. gxf5 gxf5 32. Qh5 $1 {and Black is busted.} fxe4 33. Qxh6+ Qg7 34. Qxd6+
Qe7 35. Qh6+ Qg7 36. Rd8+ {and Black resigned.} 1-0
[/pgn]

Chess Scotland award the Nancy Elder Cup annually for an individual competition for “club level” players.

We are grateful to Helen Milligan who told BCN :

My most memorable incident was when I refused to play in the Scottish Ladies at the annual Congress, preferring to try to improve my chess by playing in the Open section (really the B-Grade, below the Championship proper). I got given a piece of Nancy’s mind for that – she did not approve!

Here are her playing records from the Olympiads.

Here is a potted biography from Chess Scotland.

Remembering CGM Adrian Hollis (02-viii-1940 26-ii-2013)

BCN remembers CGM Adrian Hollis who passed away in Wells, Somerset on Tuesday, February 26th 2013  at the age of seventy-two.

Adrian Swayne Hollis was born in Bristol, Avon on Friday, August 2nd 1940. During this critical period the Luftwaffe was wisely extending its Battle of Britain targets to include Britain’s airfields. Furthermore, Bristol was bombed heavily between June 1940 and May 1944. The longest period of regular bombing, known as the ‘Bristol Blitz’ began in autumn 1940 and ended the following spring. The first bombs of the Bristol Blitz fell at around 6 pm on Sunday 24 November 1940.

Adrian was the only child of MI5 director general Roger Henry Hollis KB CBE (later to become Sir Roger Hollis) and Evelyn Esme Hollis (née Swayne) who was Roger’s first wife. Roger was from Wells and Evelyn from Burnham-on-Sea and they were married on July 17th 1937 in Wells Cathedral with Evelyn’s father performing the ceremony.

Adrian won a scholarship in classics to Eton College and then went up to Keble College, Oxford where he took a first in mods and greats. Whilst at Keble Adrian represented Oxford in four varsity matches between 1959 and 1962. Indeed, his support for varsity matches was maintained for many years attending a large number into and beyond the Lloyds Bank era. Stalwart organiser Henry Mutkin would always be sure to extend an invitation.

In 1961 Adrian become the youngest ever West of England Champion at the age of 21.

Adrian met Margaret Mair Cameron Edwards in 1967 at St. Andrew’s University where he taught Classics and she taught German. They married in the parish of St. Leonards in St. Andrews and had two daughters, Jennifer Margaret M (b. 1974) and Veronica Swanye (b. 1977) and a son, Michael David C.

He was the Games Editor for the British Correspondence Chess Association (BCCA) resigning in 1969.

In 1984 Adrian was forced to endure allegations against his father by Chapman Pincher (in CPs book Too Secret too Long) that Sir Roger had been a Soviet spy / mole. These allegations were demonstrated to be false. He may well also have been aware of allegations against his friend and chess mentor Graham Mitchell earlier in 1963. Ironically, it was Adrian’s father who initiated the investigation into Graham. Again, the rumours were shown to be unfounded.

Adrian became a director of the company Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies Limited on the September 1st 1996 and resigned on May 12th 2007. He was also a Vice President of the West of England Chess Union (WECU).

Between 2003 and 2007 (according to the Electoral Roll) Adrian lived at 63, Bainton Road, Oxford, OX2 7AG :

63, Bainton Road, Oxford, OX2 7AG
63, Bainton Road, Oxford, OX2 7AG

and following his retirement (and the time of the 2008 electoral roll) Adrian had moved to Pound House, Southover, Wells, BA5 1UH :

Pound House, Southover, Wells, BA5 1UH
Pound House, Southover, Wells, BA5 1UH

Adrian has written many learned papers and has had two books published :

Fragments of Roman Poetry C.60 BC-Ad 20, AS Hollis, Oxford University Press, 2007
Fragments of Roman Poetry C.60 BC-Ad 20, AS Hollis, Oxford University Press, 2007

and

Ovid Metamorphoses VIII (Schools Edition): Bk. 8, AS Hollis. Oxford University Press, 2008
Ovid Metamorphoses VIII (Schools Edition): Bk. 8, AS Hollis. Oxford University Press, 2008

During his time at Keble College, Adrian engaged with and mentored many chess players including Jonathan Rowson (1996), David Norwood (1988), Julian Way, David Goodman (1977) and Dharshan Kumaran (1993).

CGM Adrian Hollis
CGM Adrian Hollis

Julian was a personal student of Adrian’s and was kind enough to tell us :

I do remember Adrian well. He could quote Latin verse ad infinitum. He was an expert on Ovid.
In terms of chess he had a huge pile of Informators in his study still in their cardboard packaging. He was very kind to me and insisted I play above him for Keble in the intercollegiate matches.

I gave him a copy of Developments in the Orthodox QGD which I had written in 1987. He was quite taken back when I didn’t want any money for it. He seemed to have quite a lot of respect for me.

I once asked him why he had given me a place at Oxford. He replied that he couldn’t have rejected someone with my passion and enthusiasm.
I kept in touch with Adrian until his passing. He gave me a lovely reference when I resumed my studies in 2007 at Kingston University.
I remember him as a kind and unassuming man. He became a lifelong friend.

CGM Adrian Hollis
CGM Adrian Hollis

From British Chess (Pergamon Press, 1983) Botterill, Levy, Rice and Richardson :

“I was born on August 2nd, 1940, educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford and now teach Classics at Keble College, Oxford. I learned the moves at the advanced age of thirteen from a cousin* who himself could have made a good chess player had he not been seduced by Philosophy and brain-teasers; all that remains in the mind from these encounters is a vision of perpetually losing my rooks to fianchettoed bishops.

*We are grateful to John Clarke who informed us that

“The cousin would have been Martin Hollis, who contributed the “Tantaliser” column to the New Scientist for many years. I always enjoyed his puzzles, which for me at any rate were at just the right level of difficulty – neither trivial nor totally impossible.”

Adrian Hollis. Source : The Potter Memorial
Adrian Hollis. Source : The Potter Memorial

My first ever tournament was the London Boys’ Championship 1956-7. In the opening round fate allotted me Black against David Rumens. As it happened, the brochure included a game of his from the previous year in which he had answered 1.d4 with 1…Nc6, quite enough, in my opinion, to condemn him utterly.

[fen]r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/8/3P4/8/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

(Ed: The above position did not impress Adrian hugely.)

This view seemed confirmed when within twelve moves of an advance French I was two pawns up. Then, however, aided by my over confidence he worked up a fierce attack, and I just escaped with a draw. Nevertheless, I won the tournament; an opponent remarked how quickly I played my moves.

Thereafter the game was never so easy, but I did reasonably, well, winning the championships of the British Universities, West of England and East of Scotland, and playing for England quite regularly during the 1960s (including 7.5/12 in six Anglo-Dutch matches).

Leonard Barden, Henry Mutkin, Adrian Hollis and Bob Wade observe Nick Ivell vs Ken Regan at the 1983 Varsity match
Leonard Barden, Henry Mutkin, Adrian Hollis and Bob Wade observe Nick Ivell vs Ken Regan at the 1983 Varsity match

The high spot of my over-the-board chess was the series of World Student team championships from 1960 to 1964 in glamorous places (Leningrad, Helsinki, Mariánské Lázně, Budva and Cracow); most enjoyable of these being Budva, 1963 where one could bathe every day in the Adriatic and I won the (?) gold medal on Board 1 with 7.5/9., the year after Spassky (this must look good in the records, unless they happen to reveal that for the first time in preliminary and final sections, and that England did not qualify for the top final).

[pgn]
[Event “Paignton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1966.09.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Black “Beach, Richard A”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E63”]
[Annotator “BCN”]
[PlyCount “35”]
[SourceTitle “BCM, 1966, page 289, game”]

{[%evp 0,25,61,14,28,-9,54,37,37,18,25,20,27,19,18,29,45,2,38,27,5,20,14,3,7,
-4,24,-17]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3 O-O 5. Bg2 d6 6. O-O Nc6 7. Nc3
a6 8. b3 Rb8 9. Bb2 b5 10. cxb5 axb5 11. d5 Na5 12. Nd4 b4 13. Nb1 $11 {[#]} (
13. Na4 e5 14. Nc2 Bd7 15. Ne3 Bh6 16. Bc1 Bxa4 17. bxa4 b3 18. Bd2) 13… e6 (
13… e5) 14. a3 bxa3 15. Rxa3 c5 $2 ({Correct was} 15… e5 16. Rxa5 exd4 17.
Ra3 $16) 16. dxc6 {[#]} {Black punted} Nc4 $2 {but had missed} 17. Qc1 $1 $18 (
{Black was hoping for} 17. bxc4 Rxb2 18. Nc3 $18) 17… Bh6 18. Qxc4 $1 {
and Black resigned} 1-0
[/pgn]

My best chess was probably played at Mariánské Lázně, 1962, where in successive rounds I had favourable draws with Radulov and Hort, coming close to beating the latter. Ironically, I was awarded the British Master title after I had virtually retired from over-the-board chess.

[pgn]
[Event “Paignton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1966.09.??”]
[Round “3”]
[White “Hartston, William Roland”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “A05”]
[Annotator “Hollis, Keene & BCN”]
[PlyCount “80”]
[SourceTitle “The Spectator, 20th April”]

{[%evp 0,18,19,-22,0,-31,-9,-5,9,-19,-25,-22,-34,-17,-10,5,21,21,31,5,13]} {
This game appeared in The Spectator, April 20th, 2013 as part of an obituary
from Ray Keene. The original source was British Chess Magazine, 1966, page 302,
game #14,225.} 1. g3 Nf6 2. Bg2 d5 3. Nf3 g6 4. b4 {ASH : This set-up, in fact
a primitive form of the Reti, has been patronised recently by Smyslov, among
others. RDK : This set-up, a form of the Reti, has been championed by,
amongst others, Vassily Smyslov.} Bg7 5. Bb2 O-O 6. O-O a5 ({BCN : Nowadays}
6… c6 7. d3 a5 8. a3 axb4 9. axb4 Rxa1 10. Bxa1 Qb6 11. c3 Nbd7 12. Nbd2 e5
13. e4 Re8 {is the modern (2020) continuation.}) 7. b5 ({ASH :} 7. a3 {, or}) (
{even} 7. c3 {came into consideration here.}) 7… c5 $146 {BCN : This was the
first game to feature this position.} 8. d3 (8. bxc6 {ASH: was quite possible.}
) 8… b6 $146 {BCN : This is the only recorded game with this move.} 9. c4 e6
{ASH : Black decides to maintain a pawn centre, without worrying if the pawns
should hang. RDK : Black decides to create a pawn centre without worrying if
the pawns will end up hanging.} 10. Qc2 Bb7 11. Nbd2 Nbd7 {[#]} 12. e3 {
RDK : White has to prevent … d4 and … e5.} Qc7 13. Rad1 ({ASH : Harston
later preferred RDK: Hartston later preferred} 13. Rac1 Rad8) 13… Rad8 14.
Qb1 e5 {ASH : Somewhat risky, but the only way to progress. RDK : Somewhat
risky, but the only way to make progress.} 15. cxd5 Nxd5 16. Nc4 Rfe8 17. Qa1
f6 18. Rc1 Nf8 19. d4 exd4 20. exd4 Ne6 21. Rfd1 {[#]} Ndf4 $1 $17 {ASH :
Seizing his chance. This sacrifice is necessary because the central position
is beginning to look rickety, and appears to be sound. White has terrible
weaknesses and his queen is marooned far away. RDK : Seizing his chance.
This sacrifice is necessary because the central position is beginning to look
rickety. The sacrifice looks sound as White has terrible weaknesses and his
queen is miles away.} 22. gxf4 Nxf4 23. Ne3 (23. Bh1 Qd7 {ASH : is too slow.})
(23. d5 {ASH : Might be a shade better – see next note.}) 23… Nxg2 $19 24.
Kxg2 Be4 $1 (24… Qf4 {ASH : is also possible but the win would not be so
easy after} 25. d5 Rxd5 26. Rxd5 Bxd5 27. Nxd5 Qg4+ {ASH : etc}) 25. Nf1 Qf4
26. Rc3 cxd4 27. Rcd3 Rd5 28. Qc1 Qg4+ 29. Ng3 Rf5 30. h3 {ASH : There is
nothing better} Bxf3+ 31. Kh2 Rh5 32. Rxf3 Qxf3 33. Nxh5 {ASH : The rest is
straightforward} Qxf2+ {RDK : Now it’s straightforward for Black.} 34. Kh1
Qf3+ 35. Kg1 gxh5 36. Bxd4 Qg3+ 37. Kh1 Qxh3+ 38. Kg1 Qg4+ 39. Kh1 Rc8 40. Qd2
Rd8 {and White resigned.} 0-1
[/pgn]

In 1964 I decided that henceforth for me ‘serious’ chess would mean correspondence, while OTB became a pleasant social activity. My introduction to the postal game had been made about 1955 by a colleague of my father’s, International Master Graham Mitchell, to whom I owe an enormous debt for the patience and kindness with which he played a series of games, bearing with me when I lost interest in worsening positions. The switch to postal play was caused by a number of factors, negative and positive : an impending move to Scotland, where there was less OTB chess, frustration at constantly spoiling good positions through mistakes in time pressure – on the other hand a feeling that correspondence chess should suit an academic temperament, and a particularly fascinating game played in 1963-4 with Michael Haygarth (see below) on which I spent so much time and energy that I almost feared it would ruin my post-graduate exams.

[pgn]
[Event “County Correspondence Championship”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1963.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Haygarth, Michael John”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B78”]
[Annotator “ASH & British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “106”]
[SourceTitle “British Chess, page 104”]
[WhiteTeam “Yorkshire”]
[BlackTeam “Somerset”]

{[%evp 0,20,19,38,40,41,66,77,66,55,55,20,70,53,40,34,30,28,47,32,47,-3,30]} 1.
e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Bc4 (
8. Qd2 Nc6 9. O-O-O d5 10. exd5 Nxd5 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Bd4 e5 13. Bc5 Be6 14.
Ne4 Re8 15. h4 h6 16. g4 Qc7 17. g5 h5 18. Bc4 Red8 19. Qf2 {is modern
practise.}) 8… Nc6 9. Qd2 Bd7 10. h4 (10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. h4 h5 13.
Bg5 Rc5 14. Kb1 b5 15. g4 hxg4 16. h5 Nxh5 17. Nd5 Re8 18. Rxh5 gxh5 19. Qh2
Rxd5 20. Bxd5 Qb6 21. Qxh5 e6 22. Bb3) 10… Rc8 {ASH : At that time people
always played the queen’s rook to c8. Later it became the custom to play …
Qa5 and …Rfc8. Later still fashion swung back.} 11. Bb3 Ne5 (11… h5 12.
O-O-O Ne5) 12. Bh6 {ASH : Of all the attacking possibilities, White chooses a
relatively ineffective one.} ({The modern way is} 12. O-O-O h5 13. Bg5 Rc5 14.
Kb1 b5 15. g4 hxg4 16. h5 Nxh5 17. Nd5 Re8 18. Rxh5 gxh5 19. Qh2 Rxd5 20. Bxd5
Qb6 {transposes to a previous line.}) 12… Nc4 {ASH : A nice little finesse.}
13. Bxc4 Bxh6 ({more usual is} 13… Rxc4 14. Bxg7 Kxg7 15. h5 Qa5 16. hxg6
fxg6 (16… hxg6 $4 17. Qh6+ Kg8 18. Qh8#) 17. O-O-O) 14. Qxh6 ({Believe it or
not,} 14. Bxf7+ $4 Kg7 $1 {ASH : Resigns, has actually occurred in an
international (over-the-board!) tournament. BCN : It was, in fact, Zuidema
– Lee, Zurich Junior, 1964.} (14… Kxf7 $2 15. Qxh6) (14… Rxf7 $2 15. Qxh6
$14)) 14… Rxc4 15. O-O-O Rxc3 16. bxc3 Qa5 {ASH : Black has carried out his
exchange sacrifice under unusually favourable circumstances.} 17. Kb2 Rc8 {[#]}
18. Rd3 ({ASH : In a later game (British Correspondence Championship 1965-6).
S.Milan played against me} 18. Qd2 Rc4 19. Nb3 {, keeping more active chances
(the game was drawnin 50 moves).}) 18… Bb5 19. Nxb5 {The exchange of minor
peices suite Black.} (19. Qg5 Rc5 {would be ingenious but not better.}) 19…
Qxb5+ 20. Ka1 Rc5 21. Rb1 Qa6 22. Qc1 Ra5 23. Rb2 b6 24. Qb1 Nd7 25. Rb4 Ne5
26. Re3 Nc4 {[#] ASH : Black’s knight has reached ideal squares, and for the
next few moves makes the White rooks dance to his tune.} 27. Rd3 Rc5 28. Qe1
Ra5 29. Qb1 Ne5 30. Re3 ({ASH : Not} 30. Rd5 Rxd5 31. exd5 Qe2 {and White’s
position collapses.}) 30… Rc5 31. Rb3 b5 32. Qd1 Qc6 33. Qd4 Nc4 34. Rd3 a5
35. g4 {ASH : Natural, but in the end providing a target.} a4 36. Rb4 Ne5 37.
Re3 Qc8 $1 38. Kb1 {[#] ASH : Something must fall so White decides to return
the exchange.} h5 $1 39. gxh5 Nc6 40. Qd3 Nxb4 41. cxb4 Rxh5 42. e5 {Unable to
protect his weaknesses, White tries to break out.} Rxe5 43. Rxe5 dxe5 44. Qxb5
Qc3 45. Qxa4 Qxf3 46. b5 e4 47. b6 e3 48. Qb3 Qf1+ 49. Kb2 e2 50. b7 e1=Q 51.
b8=Q+ Kh7 52. Q8b6 Qc1+ 53. Kc3 Qcf4 {White resigns. A remarkable position,
with four queens on the board. Material is level, but the exposed White king
is helpless. This game was played just before I left Oxford to teach in
Scotland (where, at that time, over-the-board chess was not so strong as it
has since become), and it was to a great extent responsible for turning my
main interest to postal chess.} 0-1
[/pgn]

In 1964-5 I qualified for the British Championship by winning a candidates’ section with 100%, and then competed three times in the British Championship itself (1965-6, 1966-7, 1970-71), winning on each occasion (the first time jointly with S. Milan) and remaining unbeaten. International play also proved successful, and I soon collected the two norms necessary for the IM title (Ed: awarded in 1970).

Linda Brownson (Newnham & Basildon), left, playing Maria Eagle (Pembroke & Formby) being observed by John Nunn, Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek posing for the obligatory "staring at the board" picture for the 1981 Varsity Match sponsored by Lloyds Bank.
Linda Brownson (Newnham & Basildon), left, playing Maria Eagle (Pembroke & Formby) being observed by John Nunn, Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek posing for the obligatory “staring at the board” picture for the 1981 Varsity Match sponsored by Lloyds Bank.

The first chance for the Grandmaster title came on Board 1 in the Seventh Olympiad final. Despite a rare loss with the White pieces(my only defeat with white for a stretch of 15 years), things went well, including a lucky win against the reigning World Champion, Horst Rittner, and the enticing prospect beckoned if only I could beat the Russian Moiseyev. He held a slight advantage since the opening, but I thought I saw the chance of tempting him to an incorrect sacrifice. Back came his move; he had indeed made the sacrifice and the envelope burnt a hole in my pocket during an important meeting (my mind was elsewhere). After a mere two days’ thought I sent my reply. The post between England and the USSR takes about a month for the return trip. Soon after posting my move, as I was walking from the Ashmolean Museum to Keble, just passing the front gate of St. John’s, the realisation of what I had overlooked hit me, and there followed an inexorable wait for the death blow which I now saw only too clearly.

[pgn]
[Event “olm7 fin B1 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1972.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Moiseev, Oleg Leonidovich”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E42”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “93”]
[EventDate “1972.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,93,19,-12,-10,-23,0,4,26,26,26,20,30,41,41,41,32,38,67,43,48,32,19,14,
28,16,17,9,46,57,71,70,67,56,71,42,26,27,26,31,36,23,32,33,40,21,37,38,47,34,
82,-2,4,-15,-7,-14,-5,-5,-10,-5,0,4,7,7,10,15,0,-92,13,19,44,45,144,110,106,91,
182,173,190,190,190,190,203,172,241,248,248,248,422,422,568,710,797,1015,29989,
29990]} 1. c4 Nf6 2. d4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. Nge2 d5 6. a3 Bxc3+ (6…
cxd4 7. axb4 dxc3 8. Nxc3 $11) 7. Nxc3 cxd4 8. exd4 dxc4 9. Bxc4 Nc6 10. Be3
O-O 11. O-O b6 12. Qd3 Bb7 13. Rad1 Qd7 (13… h6 $1) 14. Bg5 Nd5 {FS 239:
Taimanow: Schw. steht aussichtsreich Moissejew: +=} 15. Nxd5 exd5 16. Ba2 Rae8
17. Bb1 f5 {Taimanow: Schw. steht aussichtsreich~Moissejew: += B FS 239:
notwendig, aber schwaecht e5} 18. b4 Nd8 19. Bf4 (19. b5 Ne6 (19… Nf7) (19…
Nf7 {FS 239})) 19… Bc6 20. Rfe1 Bb5 21. Qd2 Bc4 22. Be5 Re6 (22… Nf7 23. f4
) 23. Re3 Rg6 24. Rf3 (24. f4 {notwendig, aber schwaecht e5}) 24… Nf7 25. Bf4
(25. Bxf5 Nxe5 {J 3c7, a6 ‘!’ FS 239.} 26. Bxd7 Nxf3+) (25. Rxf5 Nxe5 26. Rxe5
(26. Rxf8+ Kxf8 27. dxe5 Rxg2+) 26… Rxg2+ 27. Kxg2 Qg4+ $1) 25… Nd6 26.
Bxd6 $2 Rxd6 27. Re1 Re6 28. Rxe6 Qxe6 29. Re3 Qf6 30. f4 $1 {FS 239: gegen
f5-f4} g6 31. Re5 Kf7 32. Qe3 {FS 239: P g4} a5 {[#]} 33. g4 axb4 (33… fxg4 {
remis} 34. f5 $11) 34. gxf5 bxa3 35. Qxa3 Qh4 36. fxg6+ hxg6 37. Bxg6+ Kg7 {
‘?’ FS 239.} (37… Kxg6 {gegen f5-f4} 38. Rg5+ Qxg5+ (38… Kf7 39. Qa7+) 39.
fxg5) (37… Kg8 {J g4} 38. Qg3 Rxf4 (38… Qxf4 $6 39. Bf7+ $1) 39. Bf7+ Kxf7
40. Rf5+ Rxf5 41. Qxh4 Be2 {J 5e6}) 38. Qa7+ Kxg6 (38… Kg8 39. Qd7 $2) 39.
Rg5+ Qxg5+ (39… Kf6 40. Qg7+ Ke6 41. Re5+ Kd6 42. Qxf8+ $2) 40. fxg5 Rf4 41.
Kg2 Rg4+ 42. Kf3 Rxg5 43. Qxb6+ Kh5 44. Qe6 Bd3 45. Kf4 Be4 46. Qe8+ Rg6 (46…
Kh4 47. Qe7) (46… Kh6 47. Qh8+ Bh7 48. Qxh7+) 47. Qe5+ 1-0
[/pgn]

So no Grandmaster title, but Great Britain still took the bronze medals, and I scored 6/9 (+5=1-2).

Bob Wade, Harry Golombek and Adrian Hollis observe Penny Coxon (Newnam) and Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda's) during the 1983 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank
Bob Wade, Harry Golombek and Adrian Hollis observe Penny Coxon (Newnham) and Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda’s) during the 1983 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank

Another opportunity came when the British Postal Chess Federation organised a tournament (1974-6) in memory of its former secretary RJ Potter.  This started inauspiciously for me with a heavy defeat at the hands of Grandmaster Endzelins of Australia., a country which has so far provided my least favourite opposition (not only is the postage extremely expensive, but my score to date is 0/2).

Adrian Hollis (far right) as Club President of the 1985 Oxford team of Peter Wells, Karl Bowden, Anita Rakshit, Kenny Shovel, IM Colin McNab, IM Jon Levitt, FM Neil Dickinson and FM John Hawksworth
Adrian Hollis (far right) as Club President of the 1985 Oxford team of Peter Wells, Karl Bowden, Anita Rakshit, Kenny Shovel, IM Colin McNab, IM Jon Levitt, FM Neil Dickinson and FM John Hawksworth

From The Potter Memorial, Ken Messere, Chess (Sutton Coldfield), 1979 we have this potted biography from Ken Messere :

The Potter Memorial, Ken Messere, Chess (Sutton Coldfield), 1979
The Potter Memorial, Ken Messere, Chess (Sutton Coldfield), 1979

“Adrian Hollis is 36, was educated at Eton and Oxford, has written two books on the poet Ovid and is a Fellow and Tutor in Classics at Keble College, Oxford. He is a British Master at over the board chess and has been Champion of British Universities, West of England and East Scotland.

In 1964, he went to teach at St. Andrews University where his wife, Margaret, taught German. They were married and moved to Keble College in 1967 and now have two daughters. Jennifer is nearly five and Veronica is two.

Adrian began to concentrate on correspondence chess in 1964 and won the British Correspondence Chess Championship jointly in 1966 and outright in 1967 and 1971. He won the I.M. title in 1970 and his fine score of 6/9 on top board for Great Britain in the I.C.C.F. VIIth Correspondence Chess Olympiad Final contributed to the team’s winning the bronze medal in this event.”

and now back to Adrian’s British Chess article…

Thereafter my fortunes improved; one opponent accepted too trustingly some faulty analysis by Szabo in Informator (for a while it seemed that the Hungarian might earn me not one but two points). The East German Dr. Baumbach failed to find an improvement in a line with which I had been successful in the Seventh Olympiad Final.

Also, I had a win with the Black pieces against the Russian Kopylov. The result was a score of 9/12 (+8=2-2), which sufficed for the grandmaster title and first place half a point ahead of the Finn Kauranen.

Since then I have played quite well on second board behind Keith Richardson in the Eighth Olympiad Final (+5=7-0), and very badly indeed (scoring just about 50% in the Heilimo Memorial Tournament organised from Finland (I was much impressed by the strength of the Finnish players, most of whom I had not encountered before). Having twice narrowly failed, I would still like to qualify for the Final of the Individual World Championship. Of course life becomes increasingly busy, but the examples of Hugh Alexander and Graham Mitchell encourage me to believe that one can continue to play well at postal chess longer than over-the-board. So perhaps around the year 2000, when the children are grown up….”

Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek observer Andrew Dyson (Trinity) having played 1.d4 versus IM William Watson (Merton) during the 1984 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank
Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek observer Andrew Dyson (Trinity) having played 1.d4 versus IM William Watson (Merton) during the 1984 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank

[pgn]
[Event “olm7 fin B1 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1972.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Black “Florian, Tibor”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D76”]
[Annotator “Averbakh/Hollis/Howell & BCN”]
[PlyCount “121”]
[EventDate “1972.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,121,18,26,36,-22,54,32,37,19,27,28,30,3,26,19,17,42,20,13,27,31,31,31,
19,24,27,11,47,61,50,85,90,77,66,63,67,54,73,53,40,43,55,36,46,65,45,46,49,49,
48,54,48,69,83,93,102,102,103,112,98,89,114,100,99,91,98,98,94,79,79,82,90,87,
91,85,91,82,78,76,96,101,96,75,100,91,92,103,118,118,118,118,118,118,121,139,
179,182,206,240,191,212,205,205,205,192,192,192,192,183,192,104,155,96,96,96,
100,527,537,28911,29983,29984,29985,29986]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3
d5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Bg2 O-O ({ASH : It is rather more challenging for Black to
postpone castling, and to organise an immediate attack on White’s d-pawn with}
6… Nb6 7. Nc3 Nc6) 7. O-O Nb6 8. Nc3 Nc6 9. d5 Na5 ({ASH : I have never yet
found an opponent to accept the pawn with} 9… Bxc3 $6 {too risky to accept P}
10. dxc6 Bg7 11. Qc2 bxc6 12. Rd1 Bf5 13. Qb3 Qe8 14. Nd4 Bd7 15. Qc2 {BCN :
is a typical line.}) 10. Bf4 c6 11. dxc6 {ASH : Such are the subtleties of
transposition that, although occasionally played before, this line does not
appear in the Grunfeld books of Hartston or Richardson and Boyd.} Nxc6 ({
ASH : In Olympiad VIII Finals (1977) Dr. S. Aarseth (Norway) played against me
} 11… Qxd1 12. Rfxd1 Nxc6 13. Nd2 $1 Bf5 (13… Be6 {Hollis}) 14. Rac1 Rac8
15. Nde4 Nc4 16. b3 Na3 $6 (16… N4e5 {wastes two tempi}) 17. Nd5 Rfe8 (17…
Kh8 18. Nxe7 $1 Nxe7 19. Bd6) 18. Bg5 Kf8 (18… f6 $5 {although Hollis says
it “hardly appeals”}) 19. Nxe7 Nxe7 20. Nd6 b6 (20… Rxc1 21. Bxc1 {xNa3}) 21.
Nxc8 Bxc8 22. Bxe7+ Kxe7 23. Rc7+ Kf6 24. Bc6 Rf8 25. Rxa7 Nc2 26. Be4 $18 {
Hollis-Aarseth, corr-CCOL8 fin 1975-77}) 12. Qc1 e5 13. Be3 {13 Rd1 was theory
but why drive Black Q where she wants to go?} Nd4 {An outpost which cannot be
maintained.} 14. Rd1 Be6 15. Nxd4 exd4 16. Bxd4 Bxd4 17. e3 Bxe3 18. Qxe3 $14 {
[#] ASH : So White emerges with a small but clear advantage (better placed
pieces, pressure on the b-pawn and on the Black squares).} Qe7 19. Ne4 Bd5 20.
Qc5 Qxc5 21. Nxc5 Bxg2 22. Kxg2 Rac8 $6 {ASH : A difficult decision. Black
surrenders a pawn for some counterplay.} ({ASH : He might have had better
chances of a draw with the passive} 22… Rab8 {better drawing chance despite}
23. Nd7 Nxd7 24. Rxd7 {not sufficient to win}) 23. Nxb7 Rc2 24. b4 Re8 25. Rd8
Rxd8 26. Nxd8 Na4 27. a3 Rc3 28. Re1 Kf8 29. Re5 Rc7 30. h4 h6 31. Ra5 Nc3 32.
Ra6 {threat Nc6 forces play} Rd7 33. Nc6 Rd6 34. a4 Nxa4 35. Rxa4 Rxc6 36. Rxa7
Rc3 37. b5 Rb3 {See page 80 in Essential Chess Endings by Howell.} 38. Rb7 Kg7
39. b6 h5 {This move produces a model endgame as analysed by Hollis etc. [#]
cf ending in Portisch-Petrosian [INF 17-0568] after Portisch’s 47th move.
White plan is to play K to d-file, Black captures f-pawn but then K goes to
c-file and R cannot return behind passed P (only works with b-pawn)} ({Hollis
suspected Black should have played} 39… g5 $5 {not fearing h4-h5}) 40. Kf1 {
The general case of a draw is threatened but not overturned. Averbakh
“Comprehensive Chess Endings” vol 5 (Pergamon ed) analyses both the Hollis and
Portisch endgames (see pp291-292)} Rb2 41. Ke1 Kf6 {As White threatens to
support the advance of his passed P with his K, it is very important for Black
to seek counterplay on the other wing – Averbakh} 42. f3 Rb3 43. Kd2 Rxf3 44.
Kc2 {ASH : The idea is realized.} Rf5 $2 (44… Ke6 $2 45. Rc7 $1 (45. Re7+ $6
Kxe7 46. b7 Rf5 47. b8=Q {hard to see how White can win}) 45… Rf5 {see game})
(44… Rxg3 $6 45. Rc7 $1 {Howell wrongly attributes this move to Hollis but I
don’t find it in Hollis’ notes. Averbakh claims as his?} (45. Rxf7+ Kxf7 46. b7
{Hollis said this may win as Pg6 weak but Averbakh gives:} Rg2+ $1 47. Kc3 Rg3+
48. Kc4 Rg4+ 49. Kc5 Rf4 $1 50. b8=Q Rf5+ 51. Kd6 Kg7 $1 {“Black creates an
impregnable fortress” – Averbakh}) 45… Rg2+ $140 46. Kb3 Rg1 47. Kb2 Rg2+ 48.
Rc2 $1 Rg4 49. Rc3 Rxh4 50. Ka3 Re4 51. b7 Re8 52. Rc8 Re3+ 53. Kb2 Re2+ 54.
Kc3 Re3+ 55. Kc2 Re2+ 56. Kd3 Rb2 57. b8=Q Rxb8 58. Rxb8 Kf5 59. Rf8 f6 60. Ke3
g5 61. Kf3 $18 {Averbakh}) (44… Re3 $3 {is the right plan:} 45. Rc7 Re8 46.
b7 Rb8 {Hollis thought White could now win:} 47. Kd3 Kf5 $1 48. Rxf7+ Kg4 49.
Rf4+ $1 Kxg3 50. Rb4 {[#]} g5 $1 {The saving move not considered in Hollis
article, but later discovered by Russian analysts. Black creates a
countervailing passed pawn.} (50… Kh3 $2 51. Ke2 $1 Kg3 (51… Kg2 52. Rb3) (
51… Re8+ 52. Kf2 Rf8+ 53. Ke3 Rb8 54. Kf3 {as in main line}) 52. Ke3 Kh3 53.
Kf3 Rf8+ 54. Ke4 Rb8 55. Ke5 $18) 51. hxg5 h4 52. g6 (52. Ke2 h3 53. Kf1 h2 54.
Rb3+ Kf4 55. Kg2 Kxg5 $11) 52… h3 53. g7 h2 54. Rb1 Kg2 $11 {Averbakh}) 45.
Rc7 Rb5 46. b7 {“The outwardly active position of Black R prevents his K from
approaching the pawns” – Averbakh} Ke6 (46… Kf5 {according to Fine’s recipe
(idea 47 Rxf7+? Kg4) but..} 47. Kc3 $1 {threat 48 Rxf7+ Kg4 49 Rf4+ and 50 Rb4;
prevents …Kg4 by same idea} f6 $140 (47… Kg4 48. Rc4+ $1 Kxg3 49. Rb4 Rxb7
50. Rxb7 Kxh4 (50… f5 51. Rg7) 51. Rxf7 Kg3 52. Kd2 g5 53. Ke1 $18) 48. Kc4
Rb1 49. Rc5+ Kg4 50. Rb5) 47. Kc3 f6 48. Kc4 Rb1 49. Kc5 Kf5 50. Rd7 $1 $18 {
prevents Kg4 and threatens Rd5+ followed by either Rd6+ or Rd4+ and then
inserting R on b-file} Rc1+ 51. Kd6 Rb1 52. Kc7 Rc1+ 53. Kd8 Rb1 54. Kc8 Kg4
55. Rd6 g5 56. Rxf6 gxh4 57. gxh4 Kxh4 58. Rg6 $1 Kh3 59. Kc7 {According to
Howell, Black resigned here but Hollis gives further moves, see e.g. ‘British
Chess’ pp105-107} Rxb7+ 60. Kxb7 h4 61. Kc6 {ASH : It would be extremely rash
to claim this ending as a theoretical win. The outcome nearly always depends
on a single tempo, and may be swayed by secondary factors (e.g. it proved
vital in the above for White’s rook to be on the seventh rather than the
eighth). But at least this game can be added to the example for future
research. Perhaps this is the kind of problem that one day computers might be
able to solve.} 1-0
[/pgn]

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CXXXIII (133, 2013), Number 4 (April), pp.194-5 we have this obituary written by James Pratt :

Adrian Swayne Hollis (2 viii 1940 Bristol – 26 ii 2013 Wells), British Master and Correspondence Grandmaster (1976), three times British Correspondence Champion, has died. He played most of his OTB chess as a young man, finishing seventh equal at the British Aberystwyth, 1961, when he beat, amongst others, A.R.B. Thomas and former champion, Alan Phillips. He gave future champion, Jonathan Penrose, a tough fight in the last round before conceding the half-point. He played in the Hastings Premier, 1962/3 and emerged with a plus score in the Anglo-Dutch matches. He was an occasional reviewer for BCM.

From the 1985 Varsity Match : Laura Cohen (Newnham), Brian Reilly (BCM), Bill Hartston (Cambridge), Adrian Hollis (Oxford), Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda's), Leonard Barden (The Guardian etc) and Bob Wade (BCF)
From the 1985 Varsity Match : Laura Cohen (Newnham), Brian Reilly (BCM), Bill Hartston (Cambridge), Adrian Hollis (Oxford), Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda’s), Leonard Barden (The Guardian etc) and Bob Wade (BCF)

It was, of course, in the realm of postal player that he shone most brightly!

In 1966 we see him playing board two for England, below Slade Milan, and, two years later, Adrian scored 9/12 in a World Postal Qualifier, narrowly missing a place in the final. In 1971 he won the British Correspondence Championship, easily outdistancing a tough field. He played top board for England in the 1972-7 Olympiad. In 1974-6 he won the Reg Potter Memorial. In the ninth Olympiad – 1982-5 – Adrian Hollis was undefeated on board two. And England took the Gold Medal!

[pgn]
[Event “Alekhine mem-A corr9196”]
[Site “corr”]
[Date “1991.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Gipslis, Aivars P”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B81”]
[Annotator “Hawkes”]
[PlyCount “64”]
[EventDate “1991.??.??”]
[EventType “tourn (corr)”]
[EventRounds “12”]
[SourceTitle “Corr Nr. 1”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1997.09.01”]
[SourceVersion “2”]
[SourceVersionDate “2000.04.19”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,64,32,37,46,50,80,80,71,47,43,38,82,21,81,78,77,54,60,63,69,68,77,41,
27,22,70,6,6,3,12,33,18,-2,3,-47,-62,-45,-59,-59,-70,-53,-53,-108,-27,-27,-1,
-116,-143,-148,-88,-204,-180,-252,-271,-247,-199,-231,-468,-531,-562,-531,-638,
-660,-627,-704,-510]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. g4
a6 (6… Nc6 7. g5 Nd7 8. Be3 Nde5 9. Be2 a6 10. f4 Nxd4 11. Qxd4 Nc6 12. Qd2
b5 13. Bf3 Qa5 14. O-O Be7 15. Qf2 Rb8 16. Ne2 O-O 17. Bg2 Re8 18. c3 Bd7 19.
Rfd1 Qd8 20. Rd2 Bf8 21. Rad1 $14 {Haag-Penrose, 9 Olympiad}) (6… Be7 7. g5
Nfd7 8. Be3 Nc6 9. Rg1 Nb6 10. Qd2 O-O 11. f4 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 e5 13. Be3 d5 14.
fxe5 Bb4 15. O-O-O Be6 16. Rg3 Na4 17. Bd4 Bxc3 18. Bxc3 Nxc3 19. Rxc3 dxe4 20.
Qf4 Qb6 21. Qxe4 Rac8 22. Rxc8 Rxc8 23. Kb1 g6 24. Bd3 $6 Rd8 $1 {0-1 (43)
Palciauskas-Bang, Axelson mem.}) 7. g5 Nfd7 8. Bg2 (8. Be3 b5 9. a3 Bb7 10. h4
Be7 11. Qd2 Nc6 12. f4 h6 13. Bg2 hxg5 14. hxg5 Rxh1+ 15. Bxh1 Nxd4 16. Qxd4 e5
17. Qd2 exf4 18. Bxf4 Ne5 19. O-O-O Nc4 20. Qg2 Qa5 21. Nd5 b4 $1 {1/2-1/2 (44)
Franzen-Hollis, 10 Olympiad bd.2}) (8. h4 b5 9. a3 Nb6 10. Be3 N8d7 11. h5 Bb7
12. Rh3 $1 Ne5 13. g6 Nbc4 $2 14. Bxc4 Nxc4 15. gxf7+ Kxf7 16. Qg4 Qe7 $2 (
16… Qd7) 17. Bg5 Qd7 18. Nd5 $1 Ra7 19. Rf3+ Ke8 20. Nc7+ $1 {1-0
Kauranen-Estrin, 10 world ch. final}) 8… b5 (8… Nc6 9. f4 h6 10. h4 hxg5
11. hxg5 Rxh1+ 12. Bxh1 Qb6 13. Nf3 g6 14. Qd2 Qc7 15. b3 b5 16. Bb2 Bb7 17.
O-O-O O-O-O 18. Nh2 Nb6 19. Ng4 d5 20. e5 d4 21. Ne4 Nd5 22. Qf2 Qa5 23. Nd6+
Bxd6 24. Bxd5 Bc5 $1 {1/2-1/2 Khasin-Walter, 8 world ch. final}) 9. f4 b4 10.
Nce2 Bb7 11. h4 Nc5 12. Ng3 g6 13. b3 Bg7 14. Bb2 O-O 15. Qd2 Qb6 16. O-O-O a5
17. Nde2 Bxb2+ 18. Kxb2 a4 19. Nc1 axb3 20. cxb3 Nc6 21. h5 Qa5 22. Kb1 {[#]}
Na7 $1 23. Qb2 Nb5 24. Ka1 Nc3 25. Rd2 Ra7 26. Rh2 Rfa8 27. Bf3 Qc7 28. Rc2
Nxa2 29. Nxa2 Rxa2+ 30. Qxa2 Rxa2+ 31. Kxa2 Qa5+ 32. Kb1 Qa3 {Hawkes} (32…
Nxb3 $4 33. Ra2 Qc5 34. Rhc2 Qg1+ 35. Kb2 Qxg3 $4 36. Ra8+ $1 Bxa8 37. Rc8+ Kg7
38. h6# {(Hollis)}) 0-1
[/pgn]

Obituary from Raymond Keene in The Specatator

Obituary from Kenneth Shelton in The Independent

Obituary from ? in The Times

Obituary from John Rhodes in The Chess Improver

Obituary from Bob Jones of Keverel Chess.

Wikipedia article.

Remembering IM Čeněk Kottnauer (24-ii-1910 14-ii-1996)

BCN remembers IM Čeněk Kottnauer (24-ii-1910 14-ii-1996)

Čeněk (pronounced CHEnek) Kottnauer was born in Prague on Thursday, February 24th, 1910. Čeněk was employed in the Ministry of Education in Prague.

Whilst playing in the Lucerne International tournament (28-xii-1952 03-i-1953) he sought political asylum :

From the Milwaukee Journal, January 3, 1953 we have

Czech Chess Star Asks for Asylum

Lucerne, Switzerland – Cenek Kottnauer, 42, Czecho-Slovakian chess champion and an employee of the ministry of education in Prague, announced Saturday that he would not return to Czech-Slovakia and would request political asylum in Switzerland. Kottnauer had been participating in a chess tournament.

He said that the political situation in his country had grown “more and more critical” and he wanted “to leave before it is too late”. He said that he had been divorced recently and had no children in Czech-Slovakia”.

In a January 2009 post to the English Chess Forum Leonard Barden wrote :

“Cenek Kottnauer defected from Czechoslovakia during the Lucerne New Year tournament of 1952-3 (I am precise on this because I was present). His wife Daniela joined him there, having been smuggled from Prague in the boot of a diplomat’s car. Kottnauer had been a water polo player of international standard before 1939 so came into serious chess only his mid-30s. He made his name with his good showing in the Prague v Moscow match of 1946 and his Bxh7+ win then against Kotov. He competed in great tournaments like Groningen 1946 and Moscow 1947; his first visit to England was in 1947 when the Czech team came here.

Čeněk Kottnauer plays Friedrich Sämisch during the Duras Memorial in Prague. December 7th 1942, The game was a Slav drawn after 42 moves
Čeněk Kottnauer plays Friedrich Sämisch during the Duras Memorial in Prague. December 7th 1942, The game was a Slav drawn after 42 moves

In the 1940s he had a job in the Czech sports ministry but got implicated in the purges following the Slansky trial. He also believed that Pachman and Opocensky were involved in the campaign against him.”

Čeněk married Daniela (née Horska, also Czech, having met in Austria) and they had a son Daniel VR Kottnauer. Daniela was born in 1934 and was 24 years younger than Čeněk. She died on February 20th 2008 in a hospice in Essen, Germany close to where Daniel currently resides.  Daniel has been a pianist and singer for 30 years, an event manager for 19 years and a coach and VIP limousine driver for 5 years and may be found on LinkedIn.

Daniel Kottnauer
Daniel Kottnauer

We thank Daniel for providing photographs.

Čeněk  became a British citizen on 16th December 1960 when he obtained naturalisation certificate BNA64338.

In 1965 Čeněk and Daniela were living at Flat 2, 7-8 Bathurst Street, London, W2.

7-8, Bathurst Street, London, W2
7-8, Bathurst Street, London, W2

In Kings, Commoners and Knaves (Russell Enterprises, 1999), page 108, Edward Winter wrote :

“The obituaries of Čeněk Kottnauer (1910-1996) have, in common with all of the encyclopaedia entries on him, been strangely wanting in pre-1940s references to his chess career. Czech magazines of the 1930s contain occasional games by ‘Kottnauer’ (no forename or initial given), including the following :

[pgn]
[Event “Prague clock simul”]
[Site “Prague”]
[Date “1932.02.09”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Kottnauer, Cenek”]
[Black “Bogoljubov, Efim”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D47”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “63”]
[EventDate “1932.??.??”]
[SourceTitle “chessgames.com”]

{[%evp 0,63,19,31,19,-16,24,16,27,44,43,47,54,39,55,63,33,16,2,-2,4,-18,-15,
-35,-43,-46,-45,-45,-18,-23,-23,-33,-43,-49,-29,-29,-34,-88,-86,-86,-65,-107,
-71,-77,-56,-131,-77,-183,-156,-174,-199,-189,-96,-144,-117,-117,29,36,71,88,
138,132,409,422,436,443]} 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Nc3 Nbd7 6.
Bd3 dxc4 {The Meran Defence} 7. Bxc4 b5 8. Bb3 b4 $1 {Wells} 9. Ne2 Be7 {
has come back into fashion in 2020.} (9… Bb7 {is more common} 10. O-O Bd6 11.
Nf4 O-O 12. Ng5 Bxf4 13. exf4 c5 14. Be3) 10. O-O O-O (10… Bb7 {transposing})
11. Ng3 (11. Nf4) 11… c5 {Black has equalised.} 12. e4 Bb7 13. Re1 $146 (13.
e5) 13… cxd4 14. Nxd4 Nc5 $17 15. Bc2 Rc8 16. Bf4 Qb6 17. e5 Nd5 18. Qh5 $6 (
18. Qg4) 18… g6 19. Qh6 Nxf4 20. Qxf4 Rfd8 21. Rad1 {[#]} Rd5 (21… Nd3 $1
$19) 22. Nh5 Nd7 23. Ng3 Rc4 24. Nge2 Rxe5 25. Bb3 Re4 26. Bxc4 Rxf4 27. Nxf4
Bc5 $2 {[#]} (27… Nc5) 28. Nfxe6 $1 Ba6 (28… fxe6 29. Rxe6 {is crushing})
29. Bb3 Bxd4 $6 30. Rxd4 $1 Nf8 $4 31. Rd8 $1 fxe6 32. Rxe6 {and Bogoljubow
resigned.} 1-0
[/pgn]

Source : Československý šach, January, 1932, page 9. The score was also given, with notes, by Vera Menchik, on page 153 of the April 1932 issue of The Social Chess Quarterly. ”

From Šachový Týdeník, 25th February, 2010 we learnt that Čeněk was twice Prague lightning champion.

In 1943 Čeněk was a clear first overall with 10.5/13 in the Zlin tournament.

Crosstable for the Zlin (Czechoslovakia) 1943 tournament
Crosstable for the Zlin (Czechoslovakia) 1943 tournament
Čeněk Kottnauer plays Svetozar Gligorić during the Chigorin Memorial, Moscow, November 26th 1947.
Čeněk Kottnauer plays Svetozar Gligorić during the Chigorin Memorial, Moscow, November 26th 1947.

From Bronstein on the King’s Indian,  Everyman Chess, 1999, game 25 we have :

“This game is from our hisotoric match with the Czechoslovak team, which took place half in Prague and half in Moscow.

My opponent, an intelligent, clever, athletic man, also played water polo. Then at some point he travelled to a tournament in England, fell in love with a beautiful Englishwoman, and decided to settle down there.”

From The Oxford Companion to Chess (OUP, 1984), David Hooper & Ken Whyld :

International Master (1950), International Arbiter (1951), a Czech player who emigrated to England in 1953 and was naturalised in 1960. He played in Olympiads for Czechoslovakia (1950*, 1952), on the second occasion making the best score (+10=5) on the fourth board, and in two Olympiads for England (1964, 1968). In 1961 he won the Beverwijk Masters tournament (not the concurrent grandmasters event) with a clean score, a fine achievement.

*Ed : In fact, this is not true since Czechoslovakia did not send a team to Dubrovnik 1950.  This was the last year the event was limited to sixteen countries.

Incomplete crosstable for Beverwijk 1961
Incomplete crosstable for Beverwijk 1961

James Pratt, Basingstoke provides the full results from Gino de Felice, Chess Results, 1961 – 1963, Macfarland, 2013 :

Kottnauer 9/9, Wade 5/9, Langeweg 4.5/9, De Rooi 4.5/9, Tan 4.5/9, Kramer 4/9, Bink 3.5/9, Durao 3.5/9, Perez Perez 3.5/9, Bozic 3/9.

Consulting the 2nd edition (1992) of Hooper & Whyld may cause disappointment since there is no entry for CK.

Čeněk Kottnauer from Šachový Týdeník, 25th February, 2010
Čeněk Kottnauer from Šachový Týdeník, 25th February, 2010

From The Encyclopaedia of Chess (Robert Hale 1970 & 1976), Anne Sunnucks :

“International Master (1950) and International Judge (1951).

Born on 24th February 1910. Kottnauer represented Czechoslovakia in the 1952 Olympiad in Helsinki. In the years after the war his successes in international tournaments included 3rd at Beverwijk 1947, =2nd at Vienna 1947, 4th at Bad Gadstein 1948 and 1st at Lucerne 1953.

Crosstable for Lucerne 1952/1953
Crosstable for Lucerne 1952/1953

After the Lucerne tournament he sought political asylum in Switzerland. He later settled in England and became a naturalised British citizen. He played for the British Chess Federation in the Olympiads of 1964 and 1968.

Kottnauer has played in the British Championship twice. In 1961 he came =4th, and in 1962 he came =3rd.”

IM Čeněk Kottnauer
IM Čeněk Kottnauer

From The Encyclopaedia of Chess (Batsford, 1977), Harry Golombek OBE (entry written by Bill Hartston):

“Born in Czechoslovakia, Kottnauer played for that country in many events including the 1952 Olympiad. He emigrated in 1953 and subsequently took British nationality, representing England in the Olympiads of 1964 and 1968. Awarded FIDE titles of international master in 1950 and International Judge in 1951. Winner of Lucerne 1953 International tournament.

Čeněk Kottnauer plays Frans Kuijpers during the 1964 Anglo-Dutch match at Vlissingen on September 19th
Čeněk Kottnauer plays Frans Kuijpers during the 1964 Anglo-Dutch match at Vlissingen on September 19th

Co-author with TD Harding and GS Botterill of The Sicilian Sozin, Batsford, London, 1974.”

The Sicilian Sozin, TD Harding, GS Botterill, C. Kottnauer, Batsford, 1974
The Sicilian Sozin, TD Harding, GS Botterill, C. Kottnauer, Batsford, 1974

James Pratt, Basingstoke revealed : He would look through opening analysis often  proclaiming: ‘What will the master play now?’

From British Chess (Pergamon Press, 1983) we have this insight from Tim Harding :

“At a time when home-grown International Masters were thin on the ground in Britain (the 1950s and 1960s) this Czech-born IM brought a lot of valuable experience to BCF teams.

Amsterdam 1950, first day; Gideon Stahlberg versus Cenek Kottnauer Date: November 11, 1950
Amsterdam 1950, first day; Gideon Stahlberg versus Cenek Kottnauer Date: November 11, 1950

After emigrating to England in 1953, he became naturalized and subsequently represented the BCF in the Tel Aviv, 1964 and Lugano, 1968, Olympiads. On board one in 1964 he scored +8 =7 -3 (63.9%) on board two below Penrose in 1968 (with some board one games) he scored 41.7: +3 =5 -4.

Čeněk Kottnauer
Čeněk Kottnauer

When FIDE rating lists appeared in the early 1970s, Kottnauer was listed at 2370 but by this time had more or less retired from active play at the top level, although he took (and still takes) a keen interest in coaching promising young players, He was one of the most regular and most valuable coaches at the one-day junior training events organised by the London Chess Association at the Mary Ward Centre in Bloomsbury, London in the mid-1970s.

IM Čeněk Kottnauer, event unknown
IM Čeněk Kottnauer, event unknown

At this time he also wrote many articles for his friend Grandmaster Pachman, who had been freed to live in West Germany where he became editor of Schach-Archiv, and also made a major contribution to the Batsford opening theory work. The Sicilian Sozin, written in collaboration with George Botterill and Tim Harding, and published in 1974.

Lubomir Kavalek & Čeněk Kottnauer from Šachový Týdeník, 25th February, 2010
Lubomir Kavalek & Čeněk Kottnauer from Šachový Týdeník, 25th February, 2010

Kottnauer’s most active years as a player were however 1946-53; in the year that he came to England he took first prize in the Lucerne, 1953 International tournament. Had he been a professional player throughout the the 1950s, there is little doubt that he would have become a grandmaster.

[pgn]
[Event “Match/City Prague-Moscow 13,0-23,0”]
[Site “Moscow”]
[Date “1946.03.??”]
[Round “2”]
[White “Kottnauer, Cenek”]
[Black “Smyslov, Vassily V”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D18”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “111”]
[EventDate “1946.03.02”]
[EventType “team-match”]
[EventRounds “6”]
[EventCountry “URS”]
[SourceTitle “MCL”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,111,80,5,26,-10,34,32,31,31,44,-4,0,7,21,21,2,11,20,0,7,2,-15,-22,-22,
-34,-4,-8,-11,-18,-19,-8,-3,-2,17,5,0,17,57,11,69,10,17,5,16,0,14,7,30,35,106,
110,60,47,166,151,148,159,172,184,192,171,180,166,182,145,160,161,160,162,170,
161,183,139,195,172,185,158,149,113,201,132,214,170,273,187,199,154,223,245,
260,250,267,267,260,265,265,240,247,250,245,260,264,220,265,265,271,202,209,
217,338,378,385,401]} 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 dxc4 5. a4 Bf5 6. e3
e6 7. Bxc4 Nbd7 (7… Bb4 8. O-O Nbd7 9. Qe2) 8. O-O Bb4 9. Qe2 {transposes}
Bg6 10. e4 Bxc3 (10… O-O) 11. bxc3 Nxe4 12. Ba3 {The point of sacrificing
the e-pawn.} Qc7 13. Rfc1 O-O-O 14. a5 Nd6 (14… Rhe8 15. a6 b6 16. Nh4 Nd6
17. Bb3 e5 18. Nxg6 hxg6 19. Qg4) 15. a6 b6 16. Bb3 Bh5 $146 (16… Nf5) 17. h3
Kb8 18. c4 Nc8 (18… Bxf3 19. Qxf3 Nf5) 19. Qe3 Rhe8 20. Bb2 $11 (20. c5 $16)
20… h6 21. Ba4 Ne7 22. Ra3 g5 23. Rb3 Ka8 24. Ba3 Nb8 25. g4 Bg6 26. Ne5 $16
{[#]} f6 $2 (26… Ng8 27. Bb2) 27. Bxe7 fxe5 28. Bxd8 Rxd8 29. Qxe5 Qxe5 30.
dxe5 $18 Be8 31. Rf3 Nxa6 32. Rf8 Kb7 33. Rh8 Nc5 34. Bc2 Kc7 35. Rxh6 Rd4 36.
Rh7+ Bd7 37. Bg6 a5 38. Be8 a4 39. Bxd7 Nxd7 40. Re7 Kb7 41. Rxe6 Nc5 42. Re7+
Ka6 43. Re8 Kb7 44. e6 Re4 45. e7 Na6 46. Rg8 Rxe7 47. Rxg5 Nc5 48. Rxc5 bxc5
49. Ra1 Kc7 50. Rxa4 Kd6 $2 (50… Re4) 51. Ra3 Re1+ 52. Kg2 Rc1 53. Re3 Rxc4
54. g5 Rb4 55. g6 c4 56. h4 {and Black resigned.} 1-0
[/pgn]

As early as the end of the war, when regular play resumed, he was almost of that strength (as wins against Kotov and Smyslov in the February, 1946 Prague v Moscow match showed) but lacking in experience at the top level, which told against him at Groningen, 1946, when he was placed 13th with 9 points out of a possible 19 in a very strong field.  This was the first great post-war tournament, with nine Master and eleven Grandmasters (including Botvinnik and former world champion Euwe).

Players at the 1946 Groningen Tournament
Players at the 1946 Groningen Tournament

Also in 1946 Kottnauer scored wins against Simagin (in Prague) and Levenfish (in Leningrad) and was clearly one of the up-and-coming stars in a strong Czech team that included Filip and Pachman.  In 1950 he was one of the first players to be awarded the FIDE title of International Master.

The following year he was also made a FIDE International Judge (now known as FIDE Arbiter).

Unfortunately there was no Czech representation at the Dubrovnik, 1950 Olympiad, but in 1952, one of his last appearances for Czechoslovakia, Kottnauer achieved a remarkable record playing board four (below Filip, Pachman and Sajtar) at the Helsinki Olympiad. He went through unbeaten with ten wins and five draws (83.3%) and easily won the board prize.

Kottnauer shortly thereafter came to England where he eventually made a successful career as an executive with Trust House Forte’s hotel group; he has also helped with the BBC overseas service Czech-language broadcasts. He lives in West Central London with his wife and their son.

The following is undoubtedly Kottnauer’s most famous win.

[pgn]
[Event “Match/City Prague-Moscow 13,0-23,0”]
[Site “Moscow”]
[Date “1946.03.??”]
[Round “4”]
[White “Kottnauer, Cenek”]
[Black “Kotov, Alexander”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D49”]
[Annotator “British Chess News and Tim Harding”]
[PlyCount “55”]
[EventDate “1946.03.02”]
[EventType “team-match”]
[EventRounds “6”]
[EventCountry “URS”]
[SourceTitle “BCM, 1949. 193, game #96”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “Prague”]
[BlackTeam “Moscow”]

{[%evp 0,55,19,-12,7,-14,-4,-6,41,25,43,54,55,54,37,42,20,26,24,-1,1,-36,-25,
-38,-20,-4,0,6,12,-6,17,-5,-35,-39,0,-47,-47,-149,-60,-60,-60,-43,-27,-28,230,
-144,216,300,740,360,1161,1448,1448,1517,1517,1583,1664,1664]} {Source : BCM,
1946, page 193, game #9649.} 1. c4 ({Megabase 2020 has this as the move order
(which is incorrect).} 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Bd3
dxc4) 1… e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 c6 {The so-called Triangle Variation and a
potential prelude to the Abrahams-Noteboom Variation.} 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. e3 Nbd7 6.
Bd3 dxc4 {The Meran Defence} 7. Bxc4 b5 8. Bd3 a6 9. e4 c5 10. e5 ({TDH :
Nowadays (1983)} 10. d5 {is usually preferred but that move was little
analysed at the time. The text leads to a very sharp middle-game in which both
players followed up-to-date theory, which was changed by this game!}) 10…
cxd4 {[#]} 11. Nxb5 $1 axb5 ({TDH : Sozin’s} 11… Nxe5 {is now that approved
recipe for Black. BCM : The latest move is from Euwe v. Walthuis, Amsterdam.}
12. Nxe5 axb5 13. Bxb5+ Bd7 14. Nxd7 Qa5+ 15. Bd2 Qxb5 16. Nxf8 Kxf8 17. a4
Qxb2 18. O-O Ne4) 12. exf6 Qb6 13. fxg7 Bxg7 14. O-O O-O 15. Qe2 (15. Re1 Bb7
16. Bf4 Bd5 17. Ne5 Nxe5 18. Bxe5 Bxe5 19. Bxh7+ Kxh7 20. Qh5+ Kg7 21. Qg5+ {
is a well-known GM agreed draw variation}) 15… Nc5 $6 {[#] TDH : Probably
losing with best play.. White’s next may have surprised Kotov, or perhaps he
thought it was unsound.; Kottnauer says he played the sacrifice ‘without much
thinking’. Stockfish 12 gives this as the top move allowing the Greek gift.} (
15… Ba6 {is SF12’s next top move.}) ({TDH : A few months later, Kotov
reached the same position against Kottnauer at Groningen, varied with the
better move} 15… Bb7 {but went wrong later.} 16. Bxh7+ $2 Kxh7 17. Ng5+ Kg8
18. Qh5 Nf6 $19) 16. Bxh7+ $1 {At this stage SF12 sees no more than a draw for
White but cannot find anything better.} Kxh7 17. Ng5+ Kg6 ({TDH : A game by
Satjar in 1944 had gone instead} 17… Kg8 $2 18. Qh5 Rd8 19. Qxf7+ Kh8 20.
Qh5+ {with a draw} ({In fact} 20. Qg6 Kg8 21. Bf4 $1 $18 {is crushing}) ({
but Kottnauer intended to improve on this by} 20. Bf4 $1 {‘with an
irresistible attack’.})) 18. Qg4 f5 19. Qg3 {Now it is time to “pause the
video” as [#] we reach a critical position.} Kf6 {SF12 rates this as second
best.} ({SF12 gives} 19… Rg8 $1 {as the best defence for Black.} 20. Nxe6+
Kf7 21. Ng5+ Kf8 22. Nh7+ Ke8 23. Re1+ Be6 24. Bh6 Qb7 $11) ({After the game}
19… Rf7 {was recommended for Black, and tried the following year by Pachman
against Kottnauer in the Chigorin Memorial in Moscow.} 20. Bf4 {was played ,
leading to equality,} ({but Vukovic’s} 20. b4 {seems stronger.})) {Kottnauer
opted for ‘power play’ using the maximum activity of his pieces!} 20. Bf4 $1 ({
In the present game, both players had moved very quickly but now Kottnauer
thought for three quarters of an hour, rejecting the theoretical recommendation
} 20. Qh4 {(which at best draws,} {and would have been met by Keres’s idea} e5
$1 {which Kotov knew about).}) 20… Ke7 21. Rac1 Ra7 22. Rfe1 Bd7 (22… Bf6 {
loses to} 23. Nh7 Rf7 ({or} 23… Ne4 24. Rxe4) 24. Nxf6 Rxf6 25. b4 {but
after Kotov’s move ‘I saw in a flash the final breakthrough’, wrote Kottnauer.}
) 23. b4 $1 Na6 $2 ({Against} 23… Na4 {Kottnauer would have had to win in
the endgame, although this would not have been difficult.} 24. Nxe6 Bxe6 25.
Qxg7+ Rf7 26. Bg5+ Kd7 27. Qh8 {Black could then play here} Nc3 {when
Kottnauer gives as best} 28. Rxe6 Qxe6 29. Qxd4+ Kc8 30. Rxc3+ Rac7 31. Rxc7+
Rxc7 32. h4 {winning the ending.}) 24. Nxe6 Bxe6 25. Qxg7+ Rf7 26. Bg5+ Kd7 27.
Qh8 $1 {Now you can see why 23…Na4 was superior -} Qb8 ({Black cannot block
the c-file with} 27… Rc7 {because of} 28. Qd8#) (27… Nc7 28. Qd8#) 28.
Qxd4+ {Black resigned.} 1-0
[/pgn]

and here we have the same game analysed by Tryfon Gavriel :

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtPpdjZQWpg[/embedyt]

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CXVI (116, 1996), Number 4 (April), pp 202-203 we have this obituary by Bernard Cafferty :

Čeněk Kottnauer, the Czech/British IM, and the first chess defector died in St. Margaret’s Hospital, London, on 14th February after heart trouble and abdominal cancer.

A giant of a man, a fine athlete and swimmer, he was born on 24th February 1910 and came to prominence in the 1942 tournament in Prague in which Alekhine took part. He extended the great man to 70 moves before resigning. His wins against Kotov and Smyslov in the Moscow-Prague match of 1946 and his 13th place in the great Groningen tournament of the same year confirmed his status, as did his excellent showing for Czechoslovakia in the 1952 Olympiad at Helsinki (+10=5-0 on fourth board). He also took part in the 1947 Chigorin Memorial in Moscow, and won a tournament at Lucerne in early 1953, the same year in which he emigrated to Britain.

Hoogovens, Beverwijk, 1962. In the opening round (played 11th January), Theo van Scheltinga (Netherlands) faces Čeněk Kottnauer (England, formerly ČSSR). (Photo credit: W. van Rossem, ANEFO, via http://gahetna.nl. Courtesy of Douglas Griffin
Hoogovens, Beverwijk, 1962. In the opening round (played 11th January), Theo van Scheltinga (Netherlands) faces Čeněk Kottnauer (England, formerly ČSSR). (Photo credit: W. van Rossem, ANEFO, via http://gahetna.nl. Courtesy of Douglas Griffin

On this form he would have gained the GM title had he continued playing, but he had to take a full-time job (with Trusthouse Forte) to support his family.

Čeněk had met his much younger wife in Austria, though she too was Czech. They had a son. The master’s appearences were therefore limited to London League matches and other sporadic events. That he had lost none of his skill was shown when he played top board for England at the 1964 Tel-Aviv Olympiad (Penrose was not available) and made +8=7-3. His only other big event was the Lugano Olympiad of 1968 when he was on second board and made +3=5-4.

The 1964 England Olympiad (Tel Aviv) Team : Owen Hindle, Čeněk Kottnauer, Peter Clarke, Michael Franklin, Norman Littlewood & Michael Haygarth
The 1964 England Olympiad (Tel Aviv) Team : Owen Hindle, Čeněk Kottnauer, Peter Clarke, Michael Franklin, Norman Littlewood & Michael Haygarth

Čeněk (pronounced CHEnek) Kottnauer was one of the early professionals in the German Bundesliga; on a visit to his Bayswater flat in 1995 by Murray Chandler and myself, Čeněk told us about the great transport difficulties he had in those days. He mentioned that he had recently had a heart bypass operation and showed us the medication he had to take on a regular basis, opining that after Golombek and Milner-Barry he would be the next to go.

Hugh Alexander, Čeněk Kottnauer, Michael Franklin and Owen Hindle
Hugh Alexander, Čeněk Kottnauer, Michael Franklin and Owen Hindle

Čeněk was involved in junior coaching in London for many years, wrote extensively for the Dutch and German press and in recent years was a regular visitor to the Lloyds Bank Masters to see old friends and acquaintances. Amongst those he coached were Julian Hodgson, William Watson and Dharshan Kumaran, as well as Stuart Conquest.

IM Čeněk Kottnauer in Argentina during the 1984 World Under-16 Championship
IM Čeněk Kottnauer in Argentina during the 1981 World Under-16 Championship

In Stuart’s case he came regularly to Hastings to do the coaching which was financed by the Slater Foundation and by Lloyds Bank.

The fruit of his effort was Stuart’s 1981 World U-16 title in Argentina, where Čeněk’s great physical strength came in handy when the huge trophy had to be carried back to Britain.

IM Čeněk Kottnauer with Stuart Conquest during the World Under-16 Championship in Argentina.
IM Čeněk Kottnauer with Stuart Conquest during the World Under-16 Championship in Argentina.

All his pupils and friends will attest to his wonderful manner. A great personality has left us.”

According to Leonard Barden “Čeněk’s students included Demis Hassabis, then aged six.   He once told me that Dharshan Kumaran, then seven, was the more talented of the pair  but that Demis was also ‘very clever and tricky’ ”

Daniel tells us that Nigel Short visited his family home for coaching and we believe that both Anita and Mira Rakshit were CKs students. Doubtless there were many more…

[pgn]
[Event “Olympiad-10 Final A”]
[Site “Helsinki”]
[Date “1952.08.30”]
[Round “9”]
[White “Rellstab, Ludwig Sr”]
[Black “Kottnauer, Cenek”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B50”]
[Annotator “Tim Harding and British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “78”]
[EventDate “1952.08.21”]
[EventType “team-tourn”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “FIN”]
[SourceTitle “MCD”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “Germany”]
[BlackTeam “Czechoslovakia”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “GER”]
[BlackTeamCountry “CSR”]

{[%evp 0,78,19,28,40,40,81,18,33,-24,16,-13,2,-20,-43,-39,-34,-42,-42,-84,-66,
-47,-42,-64,-51,-46,-33,-50,-45,-46,-30,-34,-69,-70,-68,-68,-44,-89,-70,-91,
-68,-105,-144,-146,-155,-182,-182,-175,-175,-185,-177,-262,-282,-298,-314,-308,
-227,-236,-254,-267,-267,-337,-350,-361,-277,-280,-364,-338,-326,-373,-328,
-415,-425,-403,-416,-486,-479,-515,-495,-796,-819]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. c3
Nf6 4. Bd3 Bg4 5. Bc2 {TDH : Incorrect. BCN : In 2021 Bc2 is the most popular
move in Megabase 2020 but h3 scores slightly better among the top players.} ({
TDH : Pfeiffer-Kottnauer, earlier in the same event, went} 5. h3 Bh5 6. Bc2 {
when} d5 {would be met by} 7. e5 Nfd7 8. g4 Bg6 9. Bxg6 hxg6 10. e6 $1 fxe6 11.
Ng5 {with a promising attack, according to Kottnauer.}) 5… d5 $146 {was a
novelty in 1952 but has not really caught on since.} ({BCN : More usual is}
5… Nc6 6. d3 e6 7. Nbd2 {This position resembles a reversed Hanham Variation
with the bishop on c2 instead of e2.} Be7 8. h3 Bh5 9. Nf1 d5 10. Ng3 Bg6 11.
Qe2 Qc7 12. O-O Bd6) 6. e5 (6. d3) 6… Nfd7 7. d4 e6 8. Be3 Qb6 $15 {[#] TDH :
The position is similar to the 3.e5 variation of the French, except that
Black’s main worry in that line (his queen’s bishop) is here developed
satisfactorily.} 9. b3 cxd4 10. cxd4 Bb4+ 11. Kf1 ({TDH : Not} 11. Nbd2 Bc3 12.
Rc1 Bxf3 {when Black wins a pawn.}) 11… Nc6 $17 12. a3 Be7 13. Nc3 $6 (13.
Nbd2) 13… Rc8 14. Na4 $6 (14. Ne2) 14… Qc7 15. Bd3 f6 16. exf6 Bxf6 17. Rc1
Qd6 18. b4 O-O 19. Be2 a5 20. b5 $2 (20. Nc5) 20… Ne7 21. Nc5 {[#]} Nf5 22.
Nxd7 ({TDH : If} 22. Nxb7 Qxa3 {threatening Nxe3+}) 22… Qxd7 23. Rxc8 Rxc8
24. a4 Qd6 25. Ng1 Qa3 26. Bd2 {TDH : Black was threatening 26…Nxe3+ 27 fxe3
Rc1} Bxe2+ 27. Nxe2 Nxd4 28. Bxa5 Nb3 29. Be1 Qxa4 {TDH: The rest is just
mopping-up :} 30. g4 Qxb5 31. Kg2 Rc4 32. h3 d4 33. Ng3 Qd5+ 34. Qf3 d3 35. Nf1
Bg5 36. Qxd5 exd5 37. f4 Bxf4 38. Bg3 d2 39. Nh2 Bxg3 0-1
[/pgn]

Leonard added :

“After he retired he did chess coaching and, although never named in the BCF’s list of coaches, was the most successful of all in terms of achievements by those he taught. He normally did weekly sessions of a couple of hours and got results through his challenging and sceptical approach to ideas from his pupils.

Kottnauer pupils included Hodgson, Watson, and Kumaran, who all became grandmasters. When he came to our junior invitation tournaments in the mid-seventies I used to give a prize of a game and session with him to exceptional talents. So he played Nigel Short in spring 1975 (probably Short’s first one-to-one with an IM) and was enthusiastic about his promise.

In 1981 when Stuart Conquest was going to the the world U16 championship in Argentina Cenek coached him for several months beforehand and went with him to the event. No news reports were available during the tournament so the first I knew was when Cenek phoned me on his return to London and complained that he was tired having to carry this enormous trophy home (Stuart had broken his arm before the event and played in a sling) and how the food had been terrible but that Eliskases, who was involved in the organisation, had sworn him to secrecy.

IM Čeněk Kottnauer in Argentina during the 1984 World Under-16 Championship
IM Čeněk Kottnauer in Argentina during the 1981 World Under-16 Championship

I used to visit him a couple of times a month for talk and blitz sessions and have warm memories. A great guy, and a significant figure in the long departed English chess boom.”

Here is an excellent article from Tim Harding originally  on chesscafe.com but now via the Wayback Machine.

Here is an obituary from Bill Hartston

Here is his Wikipedia entry

And finally, according to chessgames.com :

“Cenek Kottnauer was born in Prague. He was awarded the IM title in 1950 and became an International Arbiter in 1951. Kottnauer played the Helsinki Olympiad 1952 on board 4 for Czechoslovakia, scoring +10 =5 -0. In 1953 he won the Lucerne international tournament. That same year, he emigrated to England, and eventually became a naturalized citizen and played for England in the Olympiads of 1964 and 1968. In the 1970s he became one of England’s top coaches of young players.”

Happy Birthday FM Jimmy Adams (07-ii-1947)

BCN sends Birthday wishes to FM Jimmy Adams

James Bernard Adams was born on Friday, February 7th, 1947 to James Adams and Ivy F Soule in Islington, London. He attended Highbury County Grammar School for Boys.

Jimmy was married to Sharon and they have a daughter, Charlotte.

In 1958 Jimmy at the age of 11 joined his local Islington Chess Club (at the time Islington & North London Chess Club) and soon afterwards became a London Junior Champion. Following this Jimmy played little chess and was working for John Lewis (echoes of CHO’D Alexander and Leonard Barden). Following John Lewis Jimmy worked as a Health and Safety Officer for Islington Council.

At this time Islington Chess Club was one of the strongest in England and included such members as Kenny Harman, Ron Harman, Danny Wright, Stewart Reuben and others. Its most famous member was probably IM Simon Webb

The Spassky-Fischer match of 1972 re-kindled his lapsed interest and he won with a 100% score the London Amateur Championship.

He joined and was a staunch member of London Central YMCA (CENTYMCA) chess club and he wrote a privately published history of the club entitled The CENTYMCA Story. This is now a much sought after publication. His membership continued during the 1970s until around 1979.

The CentYMCA Story by Jimmy Adams, 1976
The CentYMCA Story by Jimmy Adams, 1976
The CentYMCA Story by Jimmy Adams, 1976
The CentYMCA Story by Jimmy Adams, 1976

During this period Jimmy was extremely active at the Endell Street premises.

Here is Jimmy playing Viktor Korchnoi at Endell Street (in the Phase Two classrooms) :

Jimmy plays Viktor Korchnoi at the Endell Street premises of London Central YMCA on January 18th, 1976. Photographer potentially John Yeo
Jimmy plays Viktor Korchnoi at the Endell Street premises of London Central YMCA on January 18th, 1976. Photographer potentially John Yeo

In 1974 Jimmy embarked on a highly successful career as a writer and journalist. He contributed articles to both CHESS and the British Chess Magazine and authored a number of acclaimed books for BatsfordThe Chess PlayerCaissa Books and latterly, New in Chess. He also self-published the first book on Bobby Fischer’s successor entitled K is for Karpov! His books on Chigorin, Zukertort and Breyer are universally regarded  as some of the finest chess biographies published.

In 1979 Jimmy joined Metropolitan Chess Club to play in the London League A Division. He played top board and scored very highly with many significant scalps.

Jimmy gained his FM title in 2014 (at the age of 67!). 67 must be one of the most advanced ages to acquire an FM title. According to Felice his peak rating was 2300 in January 1981 aged 34.

Jimmy giving a simultaneous display
Jimmy giving a simultaneous display

He joined Metropolitan  Chess Club. He joined Barbican, as did many other CENTYMCA players, following the hiatus over their Tottenham Court Road venue loss.

Jimmy records a game between David Howell and Andrew Whiteley in 2000.
Jimmy records a game between David Howell and Andrew Whiteley in 2000.

In December 2009 Jimmy visited the London Chess Classic and was photographed with VIP guest Viktor Korchnoi :

Viktor Korchnoi in conversation with Jimmy Adams at the 2009 London Chess Classic. Photograph by Mark Huba
Viktor Korchnoi in conversation with Jimmy Adams at the 2009 London Chess Classic. Photograph by Mark Huba

Jimmy was Editor of Middlesex Chessletter and Bayswater Chess in the early 1970s and produced major bulletins on the hugely successful Islington Congresses of the same period. He then worked for Pergamon Chess Books which led to his editorship of CHESS / CHESS Monthly magazine from until 2010 although his name remained on the masthead until February 2012.

In 2012 Jimmy and Ray Cannon attended a meeting of the Ken Whyld Association in Norwich :

Jimmy Adams and Michael Negele at the 2012 meeting of the Ken Whyld Association
Jimmy Adams and Michael Negele at the 2012 meeting of the Ken Whyld Association
Jimmy and Ray Cannon at a 2012 meeting in Norwich of the Ken Whyld Association
Jimmy and Ray Cannon at a 2012 meeting in Norwich of the Ken Whyld Association

In January 2016 Jimmy (together with Josip Asik) became co-editors of British Chess Magazine taking over from James Pratt and John Upham.
Jimmy also jointly edited Chess Informants 109-132 up to 2017 before taking on the role of Deputy Editor of the newly created American Chess Magazine whilst continuing to work as editor for Batsford Chess which had changed ownership over the years and had now been taken under the umbrella of Pavillion Books.

In 2014 Jimmy and Ray attended an event organised by the father of Emma Bentley

Jimmy Adams and Ray Cannon at an event organised by Emma Bentley's father.
Jimmy Adams and Ray Cannon at an event organised by Emma Bentley’s father.

Here is an interview with Sarah Hurst from Kingpin Magazine

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oivIsVuygw[/embedyt]

[pgn]
[Event “Middlesex League”]
[Site “London”]
[Date “1975.10.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Goodman, David SC”]
[Black “Adams, James Bernard”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “E61”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “64”]
[EventDate “1975.??.??”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[WhiteTeam “YMCA Juniors”]
[BlackTeam “YMCA Tigers”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “ENG”]
[BlackTeamCountry “ENG”]

{[%evp 0,64,19,18,47,-16,43,38,38,37,50,22,20,30,11,18,24,34,64,37,60,61,70,59,
61,35,40,27,27,42,59,15,24,25,25,35,93,98,118,68,71,-28,5,11,41,30,32,11,3,-48,
-18,-93,-88,-82,-82,-82,-65,-45,-63,-83,-79,-70,-70,-130,-135,-222,-220]} 1. d4
Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 O-O 5. Bg5 c5 6. e3 d6 (6… cxd4) 7. Be2 Nc6 8.
d5 {[#]} Nb4 {a little unusual….} ({More common is} 8… Na5 9. Nd2 a6 10.
O-O Rb8 11. e4 Bd7) 9. Nd2 $146 (9. a3 Na6 10. O-O) 9… h6 10. Bh4 e5 11. e4
Bd7 12. g4 Qb6 13. a3 $16 Na6 14. Rb1 Rae8 15. Nf1 Qa5 16. f3 Nh7 17. Ne3 f5 $6
18. gxf5 gxf5 19. Qd2 (19. exf5 $18) 19… f4 20. Nc2 $6 {[#]} (20. Nf5 $1 Bxf5
21. exf5 Rxf5 22. Ne4 $18) 20… Bf6 $1 21. Bxf6 Rxf6 22. Rg1+ Kf7 23. Bd3 Ng5
24. Ke2 Qd8 $11 25. h4 Nh3 26. Rg2 Rg8 27. Rxg8 Qxg8 28. Rf1 Rg6 29. Kd1 Rg2
30. Qe1 Qg3 31. Qxg3 fxg3 32. Ne2 Rxe2 0-1
[/pgn]

The Games of Anatoly Karpov, Batsford, Jimmy Adams, 1974
The Games of Anatoly Karpov, Batsford, Jimmy Adams, 1974
The Complete Games of World Champion Anatoly Karpov, Jimmy Adams, 1976
The Complete Games of World Champion Anatoly Karpov, Jimmy Adams, 1976
The Complete Games of World Champion Anatoly Karpov, Jimmy Adams, 1976
The Complete Games of World Champion Anatoly Karpov, Jimmy Adams, 1976
Sicilian Defence Najdorf Poisoned Pawn, Jimmy Adams, The Chess Player, 1977
Sicilian Defence Najdorf Poisoned Pawn, Jimmy Adams, The Chess Player, 1977
Sicilian Defence 10 : Main Line Najdorf, Jimmy Adams, The Chess Player, 1977
Sicilian Defence 10 : Main Line Najdorf, Jimmy Adams, The Chess Player, 1977
Sicilian Najdorf Polugaevsky Variation, Jimmy Adams, The Chess Player, 1978
Sicilian Najdorf Polugaevsky Variation, Jimmy Adams, The Chess Player, 1978
The Richter Veresov System, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1978
The Richter Veresov System, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1978
Trompovsky Attack, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1979
Trompovsky Attack, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1979
Schliemann/Jaenisch Gambit, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1982
Schliemann/Jaenisch Gambit, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1982
Paris 1900, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1986
Paris 1900, The Chess Player, Jimmy Adams, 1986
ISAAC BOLESLAVSKY Selected Games, Caissa Books, Jimmy Adams, 1988
ISAAC BOLESLAVSKY Selected Games, Caissa Books, Jimmy Adams, 1988
Johannes Zukertort: Artist of the Chessboard, New in Chess, Jimmy Adams, 2014
Johannes Zukertort: Artist of the Chessboard, New in Chess, Jimmy Adams, 2014
Mikhail Chigorin, the Creative Genius: New in Chess, Jimmy Adams, 2016
Mikhail Chigorin, the Creative Genius: New in Chess, Jimmy Adams, 2016
Gyula Breyer : The Chess Revolutionary, Jimmy Adams, New in Chess, 2017
Gyula Breyer : The Chess Revolutionary, Jimmy Adams, New in Chess, 2017