Category Archives: English

Minor Pieces 28: George Edward Wainwright Part 3

This is the third post in my series about George Edward Wainwright, sometime member of Twickenham, Guildford and Surbiton Chess Clubs, and one of the strongest English amateurs of his day.

You can read Part 1 here and Part 2 here.

American Chess Magazine 1898: taken from a public member tree on ancestry.co.uk

We left George in Surbiton in 1911, happily married, with four children and an important job in local government.

That summer he travelled abroad to play chess for the first time. He was playing top board for a team of members and friends of Hastings Chess Club who embarked on a tour of France and Switzerland, scoring 4½/5. I guess he was a friend, rather than a member.

Here’s a game from their match against the Union Amicale des Amateurs de la Régence, where he encountered the Russian diplomat Vassily Soldatenkov. (Click on any move of any game in this article and a Magic Pop-up Chessboard should, with any luck, appear.)

[pgn]

[Event “Paris v Hastings Café de la Régence”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1911.08.17”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Black “Soldatenkov, Vassily”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D55”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “103”]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Nbd7
5. e3 Be7 6. Qc2 O-O 7. Nf3 b6 8. cxd5 exd5 9. Rd1 Bb7 10. Bd3 h6 {D55:
Queen’s Gambit Declined: 4 Bg5 Be7: Lines without …h6 and 6…h6 7 Bxf6.} 11.
Bf4 c5 12. h3 {[#] White is much more active. Black has bad knights.} c4 $146 {
White is slightly better.} ({Predecessor:} 12… Re8 13. O-O Nf8 14. Bb5 N8d7
15. Ne5 Rc8 16. Nxd7 Nxd7 17. Qf5 Bc6 18. Bxc6 Rxc6 19. Nxd5 {1-0 (34)
Shoosmith,H-Mercer,A Shrewsbury/ Shropshire 1906}) 13. Be2 (13. Bf5 $14) 13…
a6 14. Ne5 (14. a4 $11) 14… b5 $1 $17 {[%cal Bb6b5,Bb5b4][%mdl 32] Hoping
for …b4.} 15. Bf3 (15. O-O $15) 15… b4 16. Ne2 Rc8 (16… a5 $17) 17. O-O {
[%cal Oa2a3] [#]} Re8 (17… a5 $1 $17) 18. Ng3 (18. a3 $11 {keeps the balance.
}) 18… c3 $2 (18… a5 $17) 19. b3 $2 {[%mdl 8192]} (19. Rc1 $14) 19… Nf8
$2 (19… Bf8 $19 {aiming for …a5.} 20. Nf5 Qb6) 20. Nf5 (20. Bxh6 $11 Ne6
21. Bh5) 20… Ne6 $1 $15 21. Bxh6 $1 Bf8 (21… gxh6 $2 22. Nxh6+ Kf8 23.
Nexf7 $18) 22. Bf4 Nxf4 ({Better is} 22… g6 $15 23. Nh6+ Bxh6 24. Bxh6 Ne4)
23. exf4 $14 g6 (23… a5 $14) 24. Ne3 $16 Ne4 25. Bxe4 (25. Rfe1 $16) 25…
dxe4 $14 26. f5 (26. d5 $14) 26… Qg5 $36 {[%mdl 2048] Black fights for an
advantage.} 27. fxg6 f6 28. N5g4 {[%cal Oa2a3]} Qxg6 29. Nc4 (29. f4 $1 $11)
29… Rc7 ({Black should try} 29… Qg5 $17) 30. Rfe1 $2 (30. f4 $1 $11 {
and White is okay.}) 30… Rg7 $19 {[%mdl 1024] Black has strong compensation.}
31. Nce3 {[#]} (31. g3 $142) 31… Bd6 $2 (31… Kh8 $1 $19 {And now …f5
would win.} 32. Qe2 Be7) 32. Nf5 $1 $14 {Pair of Knights!} Rd7 {[%mdl 8192]
Black is on the road to losing.} (32… Bf4 $1 $14 33. Nxg7 Kxg7) 33. f3 (33.
d5 $142) 33… Bf4 $2 (33… Kh8 {was necessary.} 34. fxe4 Bc7) 34. fxe4 $18
Bd2 35. Re2 Qxf5 {[#]} 36. Nh6+ $1 {[%mdl 512]} Bxh6 37. exf5 {[%mdl 64]
Discovered Attack} Rxe2 (37… Be3+ 38. Rxe3 Rxe3) 38. Qxe2 {Black must now
prevent Qe8+. White is clearly winning.} Rc7 39. Qe8+ Bf8 40. Qd8 Re7 41. d5 c2
42. Rc1 Re2 43. Qxf6 {Threatens to win with Qg6+.} Bc5+ 44. Kh2 Be3 45. Qg6+
Kf8 46. Qf6+ Kg8 47. Qd8+ Kf7 48. Qc7+ Kf6 49. Rxc2 Rxc2 50. Qxc2 Bxd5 51. Qd3
{[%csl LRa6,LRd5,LRe3]} Bf4+ 52. g3 {Weighted Error Value: White=0.65/Black=0.
76} 1-0

[/pgn]

At this point he took a break from tournament chess, not playing in either the 1911 British Championship in Glasgow or the 1911-12 City of London Championship.

He wasn’t inactive, though: in November he took part in a simul at the City of London Club against the up and coming young Cuban Capablanca, where he managed to win his game.

In 1912 he didn’t have far to go for the British Championship, which took place just up the road from him in Richmond – the Castle Assembly Rooms to be precise, down by the river and opposite the Town Hall. Again, he didn’t take part, but was there as a visitor. (I’m considering a future series of Minor Pieces about some of the chessers who descended on Richmond that year.)

Wainwright was back in action in the 1912-13 City of London Championship, but without success. A large entry that year required three qualifying sections, with three qualifiers from each section making the final pool. He was well down the field in his section.

Throughout his life he remained loyal to his home county of Yorkshire: in those days there was no problem representing both Surrey and Yorkshire in county matches.

In this game from a Yorkshire – Middlesex match played in Leicester (a neutral venue) he beat one of his regular London opponents and a future Kingston resident.

[pgn]

[Event “Yorkshire v Middlesex (Leicester)”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1913.10.11”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Black “Michell, Reginald Pryce”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C82”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “61”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 {[%cal Bf1b5,Bb5a4,Ba4b3,Bb3c2][%mdl 32]} a6
4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. c3 Be7 10. Nbd2 {
[%cal Bb1d2,Bd2b3,Bb3d4,Bd4f5][%mdl 32]} Nc5 11. Bc2 Bg4 12. h3 Bh5 13. Re1 O-O
{[#]} 14. Nb3 $146 {[%cal Oc2h7] [#] Inhibits d4. Hoping for Bxh7+! C82: Open
Ruy Lopez: 9 c3 without 9…Be7.} ({Predecessor:} 14. Nf1 Bg6 15. Bxg6 hxg6 16.
Ne3 Qd7 17. Nxd5 Rad8 18. Nxe7+ Qxe7 19. Qc2 Rd5 20. Bg5 Qd7 21. c4 bxc4 22.
Qxc4 {1/2-1/2 (45) Alekhine,A-Levenfish,G Karlovy Vary 1911}) 14… Ne6 15. g4
Bg6 16. Nfd4 (16. Bf5 $14) 16… Ncxd4 $17 17. Nxd4 {aiming for Bxg6.} Bg5 (
17… Bxc2 $15 {keeps the upper hand.} 18. Qxc2 c5 19. Nxe6 fxe6) 18. Nf5 $16
Qd7 $2 {[%mdl 8192]} (18… a5 $16) 19. Kh2 $2 ({Only move:} 19. Bxg5 $18 Nxg5
20. h4 Nh3+ 21. Kg2 Nf4+ 22. Kg3 Nh5+ 23. Kh2 (23. Kf3 Qe6 $16)) 19… Rad8 (
19… f6 $11 {remains equal.}) 20. Bxg5 Nxg5 21. f4 Ne6 22. Qf3 {White is more
active.} Rfe8 (22… h6 $16) 23. Rad1 Nf8 (23… c6 $142 24. Qf2 Qc7) 24. Rd2
Bxf5 $2 (24… a5 {keeps fighting.} 25. Qg3 a4) 25. gxf5 $18 {[%cal Bg4f5,
Bf5f6][%mdl 32]} c6 (25… Kh8 $142 26. Qh5 f6) 26. Rg1 Kh8 27. Qg3 {[%csl Gg1]
[%cal Rg3g7]} g6 28. Qh4 Qe7 29. f6 Qc7 30. Qh6 {[%csl Gf6][%cal Rh6g7]} Ne6 {
[#]} 31. Rg5 $1 {[%mdl 512] Weighted Error Value: White=0.44/Black=1.23} 1-0

[/pgn]

Just two days  later he took part in another simul against Capablanca, forsaking his usual tactical style and, after his opponent’s ill-advised queen trade, winning in the manner of – Capablanca.

[pgn]

[Event “Simul: City of London Chess Club”]
[Site “City of London CC, London ENG”]
[Date “1913.10.13”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Capablanca, Jose Raul”]
[Black “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C90”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “74”]
[EventDate “1913.??.??”]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6
8. c3 {[%cal Bc2c3,Bc3d4,Bd4d5][%mdl 32]} Na5 9. Bc2 c5 10. a4 {[#] Strongly
threatening axb5. C90: Closed Ruy Lopez with 7…d6: Early deviations.} Rb8
$146 ({Predecessor:} 10… b4 11. d4 Qc7 12. cxb4 cxb4 13. b3 Bb7 14. Bb2 Rc8
15. Bd3 Nd7 16. Nbd2 O-O 17. Rc1 Qb8 18. Qe2 Qa8 19. dxe5 dxe5 20. Rxc8 Rxc8
21. Nxe5 {1/2-1/2 (30) Balla,Z-Reti,R Temesvar 1912}) 11. axb5 axb5 12. d4 {
White is better.} cxd4 13. cxd4 Nc6 14. d5 Nb4 15. Bb3 O-O 16. Nc3 {[%cal
Bb1c3,Bc3e2,Be2g3][%mdl 32]} Na6 17. Bc2 b4 18. Ne2 Nd7 19. b3 Ndc5 20. Ng3 g6
21. Bh6 Re8 22. Qd2 Bf6 (22… Bg4 $11) 23. h4 Bg7 24. Bxg7 (24. Bg5 $16 Bf6
25. Be3) 24… Kxg7 $11 25. Ra2 Bg4 26. Qg5 $2 {Now White is beyond hope.} ({
White should try} 26. h5 $15) 26… Qxg5 $19 27. hxg5 Bxf3 28. gxf3 Nc7 {
[%cal Ba6c7,Bc7b5,Bb5a3][%mdl 32]} 29. Rea1 Nb5 30. Ne2 Na3 31. Bd1 (31. Kg2 {
keeps fighting.}) 31… h6 32. gxh6+ Kxh6 33. Kf1 Kg5 34. Nc1 Rh8 {[#] aiming
for …Rh1+. Black is clearly winning.} 35. Ke2 Nb5 {Pair of Knights!} 36. Ke3
Nc3 {[%csl LRa2,LRd1]} 37. Rd2 Rh3 {Weighted Error Value: White=0.62/Black=0.
21 (precise)} 0-1

[/pgn]

The following year, he did better in the City of London Championship, this time qualifying for the finals by winning this game against a young Dutch master who had crossed the Channel hoping to make money by beating rich Englishmen.

[pgn]

[Event “City of London Club Championship”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1914.02.07”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Davidson, Jacques”]
[Black “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C65”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “62”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 d6 5. c3 g6 6. h3 {
C65: Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defence (3…Nf6), unusual lines and 4 0-0 Bc5.} Bg7 7.
Be3 O-O 8. Nbd2 {[#] The position is equal.} Nd7 $146 ({Predecessor:} 8… Bd7
9. O-O a6 10. Ba4 h6 11. Re1 b5 12. Bc2 b4 13. d4 bxc3 14. bxc3 Ne8 {1/2-1/2
(46) Messemaker,C-Loman,R The Hague 1890}) 9. O-O f5 10. Bc4+ (10. exf5 {
seems wilder.} gxf5 11. Ng5 f4 12. Ne6 Qe7 13. Bc4) 10… Kh8 11. Bg5 {[#]} (
11. exf5 $1 $11 gxf5 12. Ng5) 11… Qe8 $1 $17 {Threatens to win with …f4.}
12. Nh2 $2 {[%mdl 8192]} (12. Bh4 $17) 12… h6 $19 13. exf5 hxg5 14. Ne4 gxf5
15. Nxg5 Nb6 16. Bb3 Qg6 17. f4 exf4 18. h4 Bd7 19. Rxf4 Be5 20. Rf3 Bxh2+ 21.
Kxh2 Ne5 22. Rg3 (22. Rf4 $142 a5 23. d4 Ng4+ 24. Kg1) 22… Ng4+ 23. Kg1 d5
24. d4 Rae8 25. Qd3 {[%cal Og3g4]} Re4 26. Rf1 Rfe8 27. Nxe4 dxe4 ({Weaker is}
27… fxe4 28. Qe2 $11) 28. Qe2 {[%cal Ob3f7]} c6 $2 (28… e3 $19 {And now …
Re4 would win.} 29. Rh3 Qh6) 29. Bf7 $1 $15 Qxf7 {Chess con chili.} 30. Rxg4 e3
{[#] …Qc4 is the strong threat. Black is more active.} 31. Rf3 $2 {[%mdl
8192]} (31. Rg3 $15) 31… Qc4 {Weighted Error Value: White=0.65/Black=0.18
(very precise)} 0-1

[/pgn]

By now it was 1914 and storm clouds were gathering over Europe. The London League kept going for one more season. Wainwright was representing the Lud Eagle club and won this game featuring a rather unusual sacrificial kingside attack in a match against West London. His opponent, William Henry Regan, was a stamp and coin dealer.

[pgn]

[Event “London League: Lud Eagle v West London”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1914.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Black “Regan, William Henry”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “A43”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “63”]

1. d4 c5
2. d5 Nf6 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 {[#]} a6 $146 ({Predecessor:} 4… g6 5. e4 Bg4 6.
h3 Bxf3 7. Qxf3 Bg7 8. Qe2 Nbd7 9. f4 Nh5 10. Qf3 a6 11. g4 Nhf6 12. Bg2 Qb6
13. Rf1 O-O-O {0-1 (60) Holmes,H-Blackburne,J Scarborough/ North Yorkshire 1909
}) 5. g3 g6 (5… b5 $1 $11 {remains equal.}) 6. Bg2 {A43: Schmid Benoni.} (6.
a4 $16) 6… Bg7 (6… b5 $1 $11) 7. O-O (7. e4 $16) 7… O-O (7… b5 $1 $11 {
keeps the balance.}) 8. Bf4 (8. a4 $16) 8… Nh5 9. Bd2 b5 10. Rb1 (10. a3 $11)
10… Bb7 {White must now prevent …b4.} 11. e4 Nd7 12. Ng5 h6 13. Nh3 Ne5 ({
Black should try} 13… Nhf6 $15) 14. Ne2 ({Better is} 14. g4 $11 Nf6 15. g5
hxg5 16. Nxg5) 14… b4 15. f4 {[%cal Bf2f4,Bf4f5][%mdl 32]} Nc4 16. b3 Na3 (
16… Nxd2 $15 {keeps the upper hand.} 17. Qxd2 Nf6) 17. Rc1 $16 {And now g4
would win.} Bb2 (17… e6 $16 {was called for.}) 18. f5 $18 Bxc1 $2 (18… g5
$16 {is tougher.}) 19. Bxc1 g5 20. Nef4 Nf6 (20… gxf4 21. Qxh5 e5 22. fxe6
fxe6 23. Qg6+ Kh8 24. Qxh6+ Kg8 25. Qxe6+ Rf7 26. Rxf4 $18) (20… Ng7 {
might work better.}) 21. Nh5 {[%cal Oh3g5] Nxg5! is the strong threat.} Nb5 $2
{[#]} (21… c4) 22. Nxf6+ $2 ({White must play} 22. Nxg5 $1 $18 {[%mdl 512]}
Nc3 23. Nxf6+ exf6 24. Ne6 Nxd1 25. Nxd8 Rfxd8 26. Rxd1) 22… exf6 $14 23. Qh5
Kg7 {[#] aiming for …Rh8.} 24. Bxg5 $1 {White is more active.} Rh8 {Loses
the game.} (24… fxg5 $2 25. f6+ Qxf6 26. Rxf6 Kxf6 27. Qxh6+ Ke7 28. Nxg5 $18
) (24… hxg5 $16 {keeps fighting.} 25. Nxg5 fxg5 26. f6+ {[#]} Qxf6 $1 {
[%mdl 512]} 27. Rxf6 Kxf6 28. e5+ dxe5 29. Qh6+ Ke7) 25. Bh4 {The board is on
fire. This bishop pair is nice.} Nd4 $2 (25… Qe7 26. Nf2 (26. Nf4 Rag8 $14)
26… Nc7) 26. Nf4 $18 {White is clearly winning.} Rg8 {[#]} 27. Ne6+ $1 {
[%mdl 576] Deflection} fxe6 28. Qg6+ Kf8 29. Qxh6+ Ke8 30. fxe6 {Qh5+ would
kill now.} Nxe6 31. dxe6 {Intending Qh5+ and mate.} Qe7 32. Qh5+ {Weighted
Error Value: White=0.71/Black=1.03} 1-0

[/pgn]

The City of London Championship managed to keep going for the duration, albeit with far fewer entries, giving George Edward Wainwright the opportunity to continue playing his favourite game.

He didn’t play in 1914-15 or 1915-16, but returned to the fray in 1916-17. Understandably rusty, he finished in last place behind Edward Guthlac Sergeant. The following year, fulfilling the prophecy from Matthew 20:16 (The last shall be first), later repeated by Bob Dylan (The loser now will be later to win) he shared first place with Philip Walsingham Sergeant (EG’s second cousin) and Edmund MacDonald, winning the play-off and so taking the title for the second time.

He was unsuccessful in defending his title in 1918-19, finishing in midfield behind the Latvian master Theodor Germann as chess started to wake up again following the end of hostilities.

In 1919 the British Chess Federation celebrated with a Victory Tournament in Hastings, where Capablanca won the top section ahead of Kostic. The Ladies’ Championship was included but the title of British Champion itself wasn’t awarded. While in the country, Capa gave a simul at the City of London Club, and, for a third time, lost against Wainwright.

Meanwhile, there were some important changes in Wainwright’s personal life. There was a major reconstruction of local government in 1919: the Local Government Board was abolished, its powers being transferred to the newly created Ministry of Health. It seems likely that at this point Wainwright, a wealthy gentleman whose children had now grown up, decided to retire. At some point in 1920 he and his wife moved to Alice’s home village of Box, Wiltshire. Box is situated in the beautiful Cotswolds, on the A4 between the city of Bath and the market town of Corsham.

The village’s previous claim to chess fame was as the birthplace of Thomas Bowdler (1754-1825), who, when he wasn’t expunging Shakespeare’s rude words, was one of the strongest English players of his day.

The Wainwright family settled in a cottage called Netherby, near the centre of the village, now a Grade 2 listed building. Very charming it looks too.

Source: Google Maps

The Reverend Vere Awdry and his family moved into Lorne House (now a Bed & Breakfast establishment), next to the railway station on the road to Corsham, also in 1920. They’d arrived in the village in 1917, and had lived at two previous addresses there. He and his young son Wilbert used to spend hours watching the steam trains pass by. Many years later, Wilbert, now the Reverend W Awdry, would be inspired by this memory to write the Thomas the Tank Engine books, much loved by generations of young children, including me. George and Vere, as prominent members of the village community, would surely have known each other, and George would have known young Wilbert as well.

By 1920 things were back to normal, and George Edward Wainwright, now retired, was one of those selected for the British Championship in Edinburgh: his first appearance for a decade. His address was given as London and Box in different newspapers, which suggests he’d just moved, or was in the process of moving.

Roland Henry Vaughan Scott was the slightly surprising winner, ahead of the hot favourite Sir George Alan Thomas. Wainwright scored a respectable 4½/11, not bad for a player in his late 50s.

In this game he launched a dangerous kingside attack in typical style, and his opponent wasn’t up to the defensive task. Scottish champion Francis Percival (Percy) Wenman, a former petty thief (of chess books) and later plagiarist, will be well worth a future Minor Piece.

[pgn]

[Event “British CF-13 Championship”]
[Site “Edinburgh”]
[Date “1920.08.11”]
[Round “3”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward Sr”]
[Black “Wenman, Francis Percival”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D40”]
[PlyCount “73”]
[EventDate “1920.08.09”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “SCO”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 2017”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2016.10.25”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2016.10.25”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e3 Nf6 4. c4 c5 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. O-O Bd6
7. Nc3 O-O 8. b3 b6 {D40: Queen’s Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch with 5 e3.} 9.
Bb2 Bb7 10. Qe2 Re8 $146 {Black is slightly better.} ({Predecessor:} 10… cxd4
11. exd4 Nh5 12. g3 Nf6 13. Rad1 Rc8 14. Nb5 Bb8 15. Ne5 a6 16. Na3 Nb4 {
1-0 (57) Janowski,D-Rosenthal,J New York 1916}) 11. Rad1 cxd4 12. exd4 Rc8 13.
Bb1 Bb8 14. Ne5 Ne7 15. Rd3 Ng6 {[#] Strongly threatening …Nf4.} 16. f4 Bc6
17. g4 {[%cal Bg2g4,Bg4g5][%mdl 32]} (17. Nxc6 Rxc6 18. g3 dxc4 19. bxc4 Rxc4
$15) 17… Rf8 18. g5 Bxe5 {[%mdl 8192]} (18… Ne4 $16 {was called for.}) 19.
dxe5 $18 Nd7 20. cxd5 exd5 21. Qh5 Re8 22. Nxd5 (22. Rh3 Ndf8 23. f5 Rxe5 $16)
22… Bxd5 23. Rxd5 Rc5 24. Rd3 Qc7 25. Qg4 Ndxe5 $2 (25… Ndf8 26. Rdd1 Rd8)
26. fxe5 Nxe5 27. Qe4 g6 28. Re1 $2 (28. Re3) 28… Nf3+ 29. Qxf3 $2 (29. Rxf3
$18 {[%cal Re4e8]} Rxe4 30. Bxe4) 29… Rxe1+ $11 30. Kf2 {[%cal Bg1f2,Bf2e1,
Be1e2][%mdl 32] Intending Qa8+ and mate.} Rf5 $2 {[%mdl 8192] [#]} 31. Qxf5 $1
$18 {Chess con chili.} ({Worse is} 31. Kxe1 Rxf3 32. Rxf3 Qe7+ 33. Kf1 Qxg5 $14
) 31… gxf5 ({Weaker is} 31… Rxb1 32. Rd8+ Qxd8 33. Qxb1) 32. Kxe1 {Bf6 is
the strong threat.} h6 $2 (32… f6) 33. Bf6 Qc1+ 34. Ke2 {White threatens
Rd8+ and mate.} ({And not} 34. Rd1 Qe3+ 35. Kf1 Qf3+ 36. Ke1 hxg5 $11) 34…
Qxb1 35. Rd8+ {White mates.} Kh7 36. Rh8+ Kg6 37. Rxh6# {Source: The Scotsman
13 Aug 1920. Weighted Error Value: White=0.56/Black=1.09} 1-0

[/pgn]

It was now 1921 and time for the census enumerator to pay a visit to the Wainwright residence in Box. George and Alice were there, along with a visitor from Bradford, possibly a family friend, and a general servant.

You’ll find out what happened in the latter stages of his life and chess career next time.

Sources:

ancestry.co.uk

findmypast.co.uk

Wikipedia

Google Maps

edochess.ca

chessgames.com

Britbase

Thanks to Gerard Killoran for information about Wainwright’s simul games against Capablanca.

 

 

Minor Pieces 26: George Edward Wainwright Part 1

The Field 19 March 1892

Here’s a match from 1892 between Twickenham Chess Club and the National Liberal Club Chess Club (sounds a bit like Battersea Power Station Station, doesn’t it?).

There are some familiar names among Twickenham’s successful players, but you’ll also see that their strongest player Mr G E Wainwright, an amateur champion of the British Chess Association, was absent.

A name we haven’t seen in other matches, but a very significant one. Players like Ryan, Britten and Fox were strong club players (round about 2000-2200 by today’s standards, I guess, but George Edward Wainwright was a genuine master standard player.

Here he is, from a few years later. Very few photographs seem to have survived.

American Chess Magazine 1898: taken from a public member tree on ancestry.co.uk

George Edward Wainwright was born in Redcar, a seaside resort in North Yorkshire, on 2 November 1861.  His father, David, was originally a chemist but later became an independent minister of religion. David sadly died before young George reached his first birthday, and the family moved to Bradford, where his mother Annie (Ann Eliza Tetley) worked as a schoolteacher. At some point before the 1891 census they moved north to the spa town of Ilkley, whose Moor is famous in song. (Ilkley is also famous for its splendid new chess centre, one of whose instigators is Andrew Wainwright. I have no idea at present whether or not he’s related.)

George was a pupil at Bradford Grammar School, where, I’d assume, he learnt chess. In June 1880 he represented his school in a match against the Old Boys. He won an exhibition to University College Oxford later that year, and, the following year was awarded a Classical Scholarship involving five years of study.

Oxford Men and Their Colleges 1880-1892

He was the Treasurer, and later President, of the chess club there and played five times in Varsity matches: on board 6 in 1881 and on board 2 in the subsequent four years. It looks like he improved very rapidly in his first year at Oxford. In March 1882, the University team played a series of matches in which he scored 8½/9, including two wins on top board against the Rev Charles Ranken in a match against former Oxford students.

This game comes from the 1883 Varsity Match. The analysis of all games in this article was produced using Stockfish 14 in ChessBase. Click on any move to display a pop-up board.

[pgn]

[Event “11th Oxford – Cambridge Varsity m”]
[Site “London ENG”]
[Date “1883.03.17”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Black “Raymond, Edward Lancelot”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C51”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “73”]
[EventDate “1883.??.??”]
[Source “The Field, 1883”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bb6 5. a4 a6 6. b5 $146 {C51: Evans Gambit: Declined and
Accepted without 5…Ba5.} ({Predecessor:} 6. O-O d6 7. a5 Ba7 8. b5 axb5 9.
Bxb5 Nge7 10. d4 exd4 11. Nxd4 Bd7 12. Nxc6 Nxc6 13. Bb2 O-O 14. Qd5 {1-0 (42)
Minckwitz/Chigorin/Wittek-Schottlaender/Schwarz,J/Schwe Berlin 1881}) 6… axb5
7. Bxb5 Nd4 8. Bb2 {Black is slightly better.} Nxb5 (8… c6 $5 {[%cal Rc6b5]}
9. Bc4 Nf6 10. Nxd4 Bxd4 11. Bxd4 exd4 $15) 9. axb5 (9. Bxe5 {looks sharper.}
Nf6 10. axb5 Rxa1 11. Bxa1 Nxe4 12. O-O) 9… Rxa1 10. Bxa1 d6 {…f5 is the
strong threat.} 11. d4 exd4 12. Nxd4 Ne7 13. O-O O-O 14. Qh5 f5 15. Nd2 Qe8 16.
Qg5 {[%cal Od4e6] Threatens to win with Ne6!} Qf7 {Against Ne6} 17. Nxf5 Nxf5 (
{Inferior is} 17… Bxf5 18. exf5 Nxf5 19. h3 $15) 18. exf5 Bxf5 19. c4 (19.
Nf3 {is more resistant.}) 19… Be6 (19… Bd3 $142 20. Rc1 Bxf2+ 21. Kh1 Re8)
20. Kh1 Qd7 $2 (20… Qg6 $19 21. Qxg6 hxg6) 21. Re1 {[%cal Oe1e6] And now
Rxe6! would win.} Rf7 22. Ne4 {aiming for Nf6+.} Kf8 (22… Bxc4 $2 23. Nf6+
Rxf6 24. Bxf6 $18) 23. Qh4 h6 {[#]} (23… Bf5 $11) 24. f4 $2 {White is more
active.} (24. Nf6 $1 $16 {[%mdl 512]} Qc8 (24… gxf6 25. Qxh6+) 25. f4) 24…
c6 $2 {[%mdl 8192] [#]} ({Don’t take} 24… Bxc4 25. Nf6 Qxb5 26. Ne8 $18) (
24… Ba5 $11 25. Rc1 Qe7) 25. Ng5 $2 (25. Nf6 $1 $18 gxf6 (25… Rxf6 26. Bxf6
gxf6 27. Qxf6+ Bf7 28. Qxh6+ Kg8 29. Qg5+ Kf8 30. f5) (25… Qc8 26. Nh5 Bd8
27. Qg3 Bf6 28. Bxf6 gxf6 29. Qg6) 26. Qxh6+ Kg8 27. Bxf6 Rh7 28. Qg6+ Kf8 29.
Ra1 Bf5 30. Ra8+ Bd8 31. Qg5) 25… Bxc4 $2 {This bishop pair is nice.} (25…
hxg5 $17 {and life is bright.} 26. Qh8+ Ke7 27. Bxg7 Rxf4) 26. Nxf7 $18 {
White is clearly winning.} Bxf7 27. Qg3 {[%csl Ga1][%cal Rg3g7]} Bh5 28. f5 Bd8
29. bxc6 bxc6 30. Re6 d5 31. Rd6 Qc7 {[#]} (31… Bh4 $142 32. Rxd7 Bxg3 33.
hxg3 Bg4 34. Bxg7+ Ke8) 32. Bxg7+ $1 {[%mdl 512]} Ke8 (32… Kf7 33. Bxh6) 33.
Be5 {White threatens Qg8+ and mate.} Qf7 {Inhibits Qg8+.} 34. Rxc6 (34. Bd4
$142 Bc7 35. Qe3+ Qe7 36. Re6 Qxe6 37. Qxe6+ Kf8 38. Qc8+ Be8 39. Qxc7) 34…
Qxf5 {[%cal Rf5f1]} 35. Qg8+ Qf8 36. Re6+ Be7 {[#]} 37. Rxe7+ $1 {[%mdl 512]
Weighted Error Value: White=1.01/Black=1.03} 1-0

[/pgn]

After Oxford, it was time for George to find a job – and a wife. On 7 September 1886 he married Alice Margaret Pictor, from the village of Box, in Wiltshire, six miles or so from the city of Bath. The young couple settled in Chiswick, where their first two children, George Edward junior (1887) and Philip Francis (1889) were born.

Here, from shortly before his marriage, is a game from a club match.

[pgn]

[Event “St George’s v City of London”]
[Site “London ENG”]
[Date “1886.04.04”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Lewis, Frederick Hyman”]
[Black “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[ECO “C42”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “113”]
[EventDate “1890.??.??”]
[Source “The Field, 29 May 1886”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5
d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. a3 {C42: Petroff Defence: 3
Nxe5 and unusual White 3rd moves.} Bg4 {[#]} 9. Be3 $146 ({Predecessor:} 9. Be2
O-O 10. Nc3 f5 11. Ne1 Bxe2 12. Nxe2 Bd6 13. f3 Ng5 14. Bxg5 Qxg5 15. f4 Qe7 {
1-0 (40) City Gouda-City Nijmegen corr 1851}) 9… O-O 10. h3 {The position is
equal.} Bh5 (10… Bxf3 $5 11. Qxf3 f5 $11) 11. Nbd2 $2 (11. c4 $11) 11… f5
$17 {[%cal Bf7f5,Bf5f4][%mdl 32]} 12. Nb3 f4 13. Bc1 Ng5 (13… Qd7 {feels
hotter.} 14. Re1) 14. Be2 Ne4 15. Nh2 Bxe2 16. Qxe2 Bd6 17. Nf3 {Prevents Qg5.}
Qd7 18. c4 (18. Qb5 $5 {[%cal Rb5d5]} Nf6 19. Qd3 $11 (19. Qxb7 $2 a6 $19))
18… dxc4 19. Qxe4 (19. Qxc4+ {looks sharper.} Qf7 20. Qb5 Rfe8 21. Qxb7 Qc4
22. Nc5) 19… cxb3 20. Qd5+ (20. Ng5 Qf5 21. Qe6+ Qxe6 22. Nxe6 Rf6 $17) (20.
Qd3 {is interesting.} Na5 21. Bd2 Qf5 22. Qe2 Nc6 23. Qc4+) 20… Qf7 21. Qxf7+
Rxf7 22. Bd2 a5 {[%cal Ba7a5,Ba5a4][%mdl 32]} 23. Rfe1 Rf5 24. Rac1 a4 25. Bc3
b5 26. Ne5 Bxe5 27. dxe5 Ne7 28. Rcd1 c6 29. Rd7 Nd5 30. Bd4 Re8 31. e6 Ne7 32.
Be5 f3 33. gxf3 {[%cal Bg2f3,Bf3f4][%mdl 32]} (33. h4 $5 {[%cal Rg2g4]}) 33…
Rg5+ 34. Kh2 Nd5 $2 {[%mdl 8192] [#]} (34… Rg6 $17 {and life is bright.
White must now prevent …Nf5.} 35. f4 Rxe6) 35. f4 $1 $18 Rg6 36. f5 Rg5 37.
Rg1 $2 (37. Bd4 $18) 37… Rxg1 $11 38. Kxg1 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRB-KRN} Ne7
$1 39. Rc7 ({But not} 39. f6 gxf6 40. Bxf6 Nf5 $17) 39… Nxf5 40. Rxc6 Nh4 {
[#] And now …Nf3+ would win.} 41. Bc3 Nf3+ 42. Kg2 (42. Kf1 $5 {[%cal Rc6c7]}
) 42… Ng5 43. Rb6 Nxe6 44. Rxb5 Nf4+ 45. Kf1 Rd8 46. f3 Rd1+ 47. Kf2 Rh1 48.
Ke3 Ne6 49. Ra5 Rxh3 50. Rxa4 {aiming for Ra7.} g5 51. Rb4 {Strongly
threatening a4.} h5 52. Kf2 {Threatens to win with Kg2.} ({Much weaker is} 52.
Rxb3 g4 53. Rb5 (53. Rb8+ Kf7 $11) 53… Rxf3+ 54. Ke4 h4 $11) 52… Rh2+ 53.
Kg1 Rc2 54. Rxb3 {White wants to play a4.} Nf4 55. Bf6 Kf7 56. Be5 {Hoping for
Bxf4.} Ne2+ 57. Kf1 {White used his chance. Weighted Error Value: White=0.37/
Black=0.40} 1/2-1/2

[/pgn]

George had obtained a clerical job in the Civil Service, working for the Local Government Board, which supervised public health, poor relief and local government, and was also responsible for the registration of births, marriages and deaths. There’s a suggestion in an obituary that he was working on Births, Marriages and Deaths at Somerset House for at least part of his career. I’d assume that some LGB employees would have been based within local government throughout the country, and, if we follow his movements, this might have been the case with George Edward Wainwright.

At some point round about 1890 the family moved to Teddington, and it’s there we find them in the 1891 census. They’re living in a house called St Ronan’s in Kingston Road. This seems to have been next door to the Catholic church close to the junction with Fairfax Road and opposite Normansfield Hospital. (The wonderful theatre is often used as a venue for operas and concerts, and the Museum of Learning Difficulties, well worth a visit, features an information board about Reginald Saunderson.)

As you’d expect, George junior and Philip are there, along with George’s mother Ann, a retired schoolmistress, a 21-year-old cousin named Nelly Fenton and two young servants, Annie Beauchamp and Emily Riley. Although he’s just described as a clerk, he’d already, because of his academic qualifications, be pretty high up and doing well for himself. Alice, of course, was also at home, heavily pregnant with the couple’s only daughter, who would be born that May and given the names Constance Margaret. A third son, David, would be born in 1894.

If George walked back up Kingston Road towards Teddington, he’d soon have what would later become Bushy Park Road on his left (an OS map from a few years later shows it under construction), where, some 40 years later, the Misses Ada and Louisa Padbury would sell ham and beef. A turning on the right a bit further up named Cornelius Road was not at that point built up, but in the 1900s would acquire houses and a new name in honour of the reigning monarch: King Edward’s Grove. It was there that, in the 1920s, one of his future opponents, Edward Guthlac Sergeant, would briefly make his home, and also where the Misses Padbury would move after retiring from their Ham and Beef Stores. Their great nephew would spend the first two years of his life there as well,  but that’s another story for another time and place.

George had been very active in chess circles through the later 1880s, most notably winning the British Amateur Championship in 1889. On moving to Teddington, he would have wasted no time joining Twickenham Chess Club. But with a growing family, and, you would imagine, increasing responsibility at work, he played less often during the 1890s, contenting himself with club and county matches.

On 7 April 1894, for example, he was on Board 19 in a 108-board match between the South and North of England, where he drew his game against our old friend (and possibly my distant relation by marriage) Edwin Marriott.

Lots of great names there on both sides, some of whom will be featured later in this series, but Wainwright’s position on board 19 suggests that he wasn’t regarded as any more than a strong amateur at that point. He was still, in 1894, representing Middlesex, but he was soon to move, and to leave Twickenham Chess Club.

By 1895 he was living in Guildford, joining the local club and now representing Surrey in county chess.

This game from a county match demonstrates that George was a player with an enterprising style and considerable tactical ability.

[pgn]

[Event “Surrey v Kent”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1896.12.12”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Black “Williams, Grantham”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C14”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “57”]
[Source “Pall Mall Gazette, 15 December 1896”]

1. e4 e6 2.
d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. Bxf6 Bxf6 6. Nf3 a6 7. Bd3 {[#] C14: French:
Classical System: 4 Bg5 Be7 main line.} h6 $146 {[%cal Oc7c5]} (7… c5 $5) ({
Predecessor:} 7… Be7 8. Qe2 dxe4 9. Nxe4 Nd7 10. O-O-O O-O 11. g4 Nf6 12.
Nxf6+ Bxf6 13. h4 Qd6 14. Qe4 g6 {1-0 (27) Mieses,J-Walbrodt,C Berlin 1894}) 8.
O-O c6 9. e5 {White is better.} Be7 {[%cal Bf6e7,Be7c5,Bc5b6][%mdl 32]} 10. a3
c5 11. dxc5 Bxc5 12. b4 Bb6 13. Qe2 Nc6 {And now …Nd4 would win.} 14. Rfd1
Qc7 15. Rac1 {Na4 is the strong threat.} Nd4 (15… Nxb4 {is more complex.} 16.
Nb5 axb5 17. axb4 O-O 18. c3 Bd7) 16. Nxd4 Bxd4 {[#]} 17. Nb5 Bxf2+ 18. Qxf2
axb5 19. Bxb5+ Kf8 $2 {[%mdl 8192] This costs Black the game.} (19… Bd7 $14
20. Bxd7+ Qxd7) 20. c4 $18 dxc4 (20… Kg8 $142 21. cxd5 Qxe5) 21. Rxc4 Qe7 22.
Qb6 {White threatens Rd8+ and mate.} g6 23. Rc7 Qg5 {[#]} 24. Rxf7+ $3 {
[%mdl 512] White mates.} Kxf7 25. Qc7+ Kg8 26. Rd8+ {[%mdl 64] Skewer} Qxd8 27.
Qxd8+ Kh7 28. Qe7+ Kg8 29. Bd3 {Weighted Error Value: White=0.28 (precise) /
Black=0.72} 1-0

[/pgn]

The administrative headquarters of Surrey County Council moved from Newington (Southwark) to the newly built County Hall in Kingston in 1893: perhaps he was involved in some way. It’s also possible his job might have then taken him to Guildford, which would explain the move. Perhaps, though, he was commuting to the capital from nearby London Road station, which had opened in 1885. A train would have taken him directly to Waterloo, from where Somerset House was a short walk across the bridge.

With his family now growing he seems to have had more time for chess, and in 1898, as a result of games like the one below, he had come to the attention of the national selectors, being picked as a reserve for the Great Britain team in their third annual cable match against the United States of America.

[pgn]

[Event “British Chess Club v St George’s CC”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1898.01.22”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wainwright, George Edward”]
[Black “Jones-Bateman, Ernest”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D00”]
[Annotator “Tactical Analysis 5.1 (1s)”]
[PlyCount “58”]
[Source “Westminster Gazette, 24 January 1898”]

1. d4 d5 2. e3 e6 3. Bd3 c5 4.
c3 Nc6 5. f4 f5 6. Nf3 Nf6 7. O-O {[#] D00: 1 d4 d5: Unusual lines.} Bd7 $146 (
{Predecessor:} 7… Bd6 8. Ne5 O-O 9. Nd2 Ne4 10. Ndf3 Bxe5 11. Nxe5 Nxe5 12.
fxe5 c4 13. Bxe4 fxe4 14. Rxf8+ Qxf8 {0-1 (60) Pillsbury,H-Halpern,J New York
1894}) 8. Ne5 Be7 9. Nd2 {Black is slightly better.} Nxe5 10. fxe5 Ng4 11. Qf3
cxd4 $2 (11… O-O $15 {stays ahead.}) 12. exd4 $16 Qb6 {aiming for …Nxe5.}
13. Re1 O-O-O 14. b4 {[%cal Bb2b4,Bb4c5][%mdl 32]} h5 {[%cal Oe7b4]} 15. Nb3 g5
16. Bd2 {a4 is the strong threat.} (16. h3 $6 Nh6 $14) 16… Bb5 17. a4 Bc4 {
Loses the game.} ({Black should play} 17… Bxd3 $14 18. Qxd3 Kb8) 18. Nc5 $18
Bxc5 19. bxc5 (19. dxc5 Qa6 $16) 19… Qa6 20. Bxc4 Qxc4 21. Reb1 (21. Bxg5
Rdg8 $16) (21. h3 Nh6 $16) (21. a5 $142) 21… Rdg8 $2 (21… f4 {is a better
chance.} 22. Rb4 (22. h3 Nh6 $16) 22… Qa6) 22. Rb4 {White is clearly winning.
} (22. h3 Nh6 $14) 22… Qa6 23. Rab1 ({Weaker is} 23. h3 Nh6 $16) 23… Rh7
24. c4 ({Not} 24. h3 Nh6 $16) 24… dxc4 25. c6 b6 26. a5 Qxa5 {[#]} 27. Rxb6
$3 {[%mdl 576] Deflection} Qxb6 28. Rxb6 axb6 29. Qa3 {Against Ra7. White
threatens Qa8+ and mate.} Rd8 {Weighted Error Value: White=0.20 (precise) /
Black=0.77} 1-0

[/pgn]

The following year, he was in the team facing a promising young tactician named Frank Marshall.

A long and exciting game ensued, in which our man was perhaps fortunate to escape into a fortress-like draw.

[pgn]

[Event “Match/Nation ENG-USA”]
[Site “Cable”]
[Date “1899.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Marshall, Frank James”]
[Black “Wainwright, George Edward Sr”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[ECO “D00”]
[Annotator “ChessBase II”]
[PlyCount “120”]
[EventDate “1899.??.??”]
[EventType “team”]
[EventRounds “1”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2001.11.25”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2001.11.25”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nd7 ({Predecessor:} 2… e6 3. c4 c6 4. Nc3 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bd6 6. Bd3 Nbd7 7. e4 dxe4 8. Nxe4 Nxe4 9. Bxe4 Nf6 10. Bc2 Bd7 11. O-O
Qc7 12. c5 Bf4 13. Bxf4 Qxf4 14. Ne5 Rd8 15. g3 Qh6 16. Qe2 Bc8 17. Rad1 Qh3
18. f4 {1-0 (38) Berger,J-Albin,A Cologne 1898}) 3. f4 e6 4. Nf3 Ngf6 5. Bd3 c5
6. c3 {D00: 1 d4 d5: Unusual lines.} b6 (6… Be7 7. Nbd2 Rb8 8. Qe2 Qa5 (8…
c4 $5 {[%cal Rc4d3]} 9. Bc2 b5 $11) 9. O-O b5 $2 {[%mdl 8192]} (9… O-O $14)
10. e4 $2 (10. dxc5 $18 b4 11. Nb3) 10… dxe4 $14 11. Nxe4 Nxe4 12. Bxe4 Nf6
$2 ({Black should try} 12… O-O $14) 13. Bd3 $2 (13. Bc6+ $18 Kf8 14. f5)
13… O-O 14. Bd2 (14. f5 $5) 14… Qb6 15. Kh1 b4 $11 {Just,G-Wagner Michel,A/
Erfurt 1973}) 7. O-O Bb7 8. Ne5 {The position is equal.} Bd6 9. Nd2 c4 (9…
cxd4) 10. Bc2 {[%cal Oe3e4]} Qc7 (10… O-O {/\ Re8, Nf8}) 11. Qe2 b5 12. e4
Nb6 {[#]} (12… O-O $2 {[%mdl 8192] 12…Nxe4 0.00}) (12… dxe4) (12… dxe4
$11 13. a4 e3) 13. Nxf7 $1 $18 {[%mdl 512]} Qxf7 14. e5 Bc7 {[%cal Of6e4] …
Ne4! is the strong threat.} (14… Be7 $2 {14…Bc7 1.44}) 15. exf6 gxf6 (15…
Qxf6 $2 {15…gxf6 1.50} 16. f5) 16. Bf5 {White is more active.} Kd7 17. Bh3
Rae8 18. Nf3 Rhg8 (18… Kd8 {/\ Bc8}) 19. Bd2 Bd6 $2 {[#]} ({Better is} 19…
Bc8 $14) 20. Rae1 $2 (20. Ne5+ $1 $18 {[%mdl 512] is the precise move to win.}
Bxe5 21. dxe5) 20… Nc8 $2 {[#]} (20… f5 $16) 21. Ne5+ $1 {[%mdl 512]} Bxe5
(21… fxe5 $2 22. fxe5 Qe7 23. exd6 Nxd6 24. Qh5) 22. fxe5 f5 {[#]} 23. Bg4 {
[%mdl 512] Inhibits h5.} Ne7 (23… Qg7 24. Bh5) 24. Bh5 Ng6 25. Bg5 {Inhibits
Qe7.} Rc8 $2 (25… Bc6 26. g4 Kc7 27. gxf5 exf5) 26. Bf6 {[%cal Of1f5] Hoping
for Rxf5!} Qf8 27. Qd2 {Inhibits Qh6.} Rc6 28. Kh1 Rb6 29. g4 fxg4 30. Bg5 {
[%cal Bf6g5,Bg5h6,Bh6f8,Bf8d6][%mdl 32]} (30. Bxg4 Ne7 $16) 30… Qe8 31. Bh6 {
And now Rf6 would win.} ({Less strong is} 31. Bxg4 Nf8 32. Rf3 Kc7 $16) 31…
Kc7 32. Rf6 ({Not} 32. Bxg4 Ne7 33. Bg5 b4 $16) 32… Bc8 33. Ref1 Kb8 34. Bf8
Rb7 (34… b4 $142 35. Bxb4 Qa4) 35. Bd6+ Ka8 {[#]} 36. Rf8 $3 {[%mdl 512]}
Rxf8 (36… Qxf8 37. Bxf8) 37. Rxf8 Qxf8 38. Bxf8 Nxf8 39. Qg5 Bd7 40. Qe7 Rb8
41. Bxg4 Kb7 {[#]} 42. Bxe6 $1 {[%mdl 512]} Nxe6 43. Qxd7+ {[%mdl 4096]
Endgame KQ-KRN} Nc7 44. Qxh7 Rf8 45. h4 (45. Kg2 $142) 45… Rf2 46. h5 Rxb2
47. h6 $2 (47. Qh6 $18 {and White stays clearly on top.}) 47… b4 $16 48. cxb4
{[%cal Ob4b5] Threatens to win with b5!} c3 49. Qd3 c2 50. Qxc2 Rxc2 51. h7
Rxa2 (51… Rc1+ $2 52. Kg2 $18) 52. h8=Q $11 {KQ-KRN} Re2 53. Qf8 a6 54. Qc5
Re4 55. Kg2 Rg4+ 56. Kf2 Rf4+ 57. Ke3 Re4+ 58. Kd3 Re1 59. Kd2 Re4 60. Kc2 Re2+
{Black escapes into a draw. Weighted Error Value: White=0.42/Black=0.45}
1/2-1/2

[/pgn]

It seems that, by now in his late 30s, George Edward Wainwright was approaching the peak of his powers over the chessboard.

The 1901 census located the family in the parish of Stoke next Guildford. George, described as a Principal for the Local Government Board, and Alice were at home, along with their three youngest children, George’s mother, a governess to help look after the youngsters, a cook and a housemaid. George junior, meanwhile, was boarding at Pilgrim House School, Westerham, Kent.

We’ll leave him there for the time being, a senior civil servant working for the Local Government Board, a family man, and an English international chess player renowned for his dashing attacks.

The story of George Edward Wainwright’s life and chess career will be continued in the next Minor Piece.

If you want more, and, if you enjoy attacking chess or British chess history you certainly should, historian Gerard Killoran, who lives in Wainwright’s home town, Ilkley, is currently working on a biography. I can’t wait to read it.

Sources:

ancestry.co.uk

findmypast.co.uk/British Newspaper Collection

MegaBase 2022

EDO historical chess ratings (Rod Edwards)

Yorkshire Chess History (Steve Mann)

chessgames.com

BritBase

Movers and Takers: A Chess History of Streatham and Brixton 1871-2021

From the Introduction:

Movers and Takers is the 150-year story of Streatham and Brixton Chess Club, and of chess in our neighbourhood.

It begins with two separate clubs in Victorian times – one in north Brixton, the other in Streatham – amid the outburst of enthusiasm for chess in the expanding suburbs. The two clubs amalgamated half way through the story. Movers and Takers charts the cycles of ups and downs, the periods of feast and famine, the championship victories, and the dismal defeats of these clubs over a century and a half up to the present day.

You will meet the characters who made up the club during its long journey. There have been strong players who changed the club’s fortunes before they moved on. And there have been many average ones, who have yet been the lifeblood of the club, devoted to their passion, who sustained it through thick and thin. You will also meet players who, though not members, have passed through our neighbourhood while leaving their footprint on the wider chess landscape. They may grab our attention for that they did off the board as much as on it.

 

Streatham and Brixton Chess Club celebrated its 150th birthday last year, and one of their members, Martin Smith, has written a history of chess in that part of South London, taking the club through the Victorian era, two world wars, the English Chess Explosion and into a global pandemic.

The book was written for The Streatham Society, a local amenity group whose publications include volumes on local history, so its target market is residents and historians as much as chess players. There is, however, a selection of games at the end, roughly one for each decade of the club’s history, featuring a wide range of players, from world champions down to small children.

The current club traces its history to a club in North Brixton, originally named Endeavour, which appears to have been founded in 1871. By 1875 it was already considered one of the strongest suburban clubs, although at the time, in the very early days of chess clubs outside city centres, it was very much weaker than those in central London. It then went into hibernation for a few years before starting up again in 1879 and, within a few years, dropping Endeavour and becoming just Brixton Chess Club.

The club thrived, and was, albeit with some ups and downs recorded here, a powerful force in Surrey chess up to the First World War and on into the 1920s and beyond.

Brixton’s more genteel suburban neighbour, Streatham, acquired its chess club in 1886, but for much of its history it was not as strong as its more northerly counterpart. But by the 1930s, while Brixton’s fortunes were fading, Streatham was flourishing. Both clubs suspended activities during the Second World War, and, once competitive chess resumed, they agreed to merge, becoming the Streatham and Brixton club well known today in Surrey, London and national chess circles.

Martin Smith’s book offers an engrossing whistle-stop tour of 150 years of South London chess history. We meet a lot of famous people who have pushed pawns in this part of our capital, whether as residents, club members or visiting simul givers, from the likes of Staunton and Lasker, through to Harry Golombek in the inter-war years and Ray Keene in the 1960s, and then the likes of Julian Hodgson and Daniel King from the club’s more recent glory days. We also meet a variety of colourful characters such as occultist Aleister Crowley and Broadmoor problemist Walter Stephens, as well as a whole host of devoted administrators and organisers, the often unsung heroes who are the backbone of any successful club.

The Felce dynasty were prominent as organisers in Surrey chess for three generations. Here’s Harold, their strongest player, defending coolly against an unsound sacrifice to score a notable victory against the great Sultan Khan. Click on any more to display the game in a pop-up window.

[pgn]

[Event “Lloyds Bank v Imperial CC”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1930.12.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Felce, Harold George”]
[Black “Sultan Khan, Mir”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B57”]
[PlyCount “73”]
[SourceVersionDate “2022.01.13”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e5 5. Nf3 Nf6 6. Bc4 Be7 7. Nc3 d6 8.
O-O Be6 9. Bxe6 fxe6 10. Qe2 O-O 11. Bg5 Nh5 12. Qe3 Nd4 13. Bxe7 Qxe7 14. Nxd4
exd4 15. Qxd4 Nf4 16. g3 Qg5 17. Kh1 Qh5 18. Qd1 Qh3 19. gxf4 Rxf4 20. f3 Raf8
21. Qe2 R8f6 22. Qg2 Qh5 23. Ne2 Rh4 24. Ng3 Qe5 25. Rf2 Rfh6 26. Qg1 Qf4 27.
Raf1 Qe5 28. f4 Qa5 29. f5 e5 30. f6 Rg6 31. fxg7 Rf4 32. Rxf4 exf4 33. Rxf4
Qe5 34. Qxa7 Kxg7 35. Qb8 Rf6 36. Rxf6 Kxf6 37. Qh8+ 1-0

[/pgn]

The author does an excellent job of placing the club within its local community. We learn about the changing role of chess in society through the Victorian era and how this was reflected in the growth of clubs such as Brixton and the development of leagues in London and Surrey. There’s also a lot about the girls and women who played chess in the area: there were a surprising number, from Vera Menchik through to 1960s girl star Linda Bott (seen, below, at the age of 8) and beyond. Junior chess in general, of course, plays a big part in the latter half of the story: we learn about the popularity of chess in local schools, the pioneering books for young children written by Ray Bott and Stanley Morrison, and the sterling work done by Nigel Povah (whose grandfather was a prominent Streatham administrator) in coaching top juniors and introducing them to the club.

[pgn]

[Event “Bognor Simul”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1961.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Bott, Linda”]
[Black “Wann, Peter”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C50”]
[PlyCount “53”]
[SourceVersionDate “2022.01.13”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. O-O d6 6. h3 Be6 7. d3 Qd7 8. b4
Bxb4 9. Bxe6 Qxe6 10. Nb5 O-O-O 11. a3 Bc5 12. c3 h6 13. d4 a6 14. d5 Qe7 15.
dxc6 axb5 16. a4 bxc6 17. axb5 cxb5 18. Qe2 c6 19. Qa2 Kc7 20. Qa7+ Bxa7 21.
Rxa7+ Kc8 22. Rxe7 Rdf8 23. Ba3 c5 24. Ra1 Nd7 25. Nxe5 dxe5 26. Bxc5 Nxc5 27.
Ra8# 1-0

[/pgn]

I wonder whether Linda’s 20th move in this game was an oversight (it’s very easy to miss backward diagonal moves) or a move displaying precocious tactical awareness. Only she would know.

Works like this are important in explaining the background behind club chess, and, if the subject appeals, this book won’t fail to please. You might see it as complementing my Minor Pieces articles, particularly those involved with Richmond and Twickenham players, and, given that Martin and I have discussed our respective ideas over several pints during the course of his research, you’ll understand where we’re both coming from. It’s very well written and copiously illustrated throughout: the expertly chosen photographs and press cuttings add enormously to the story.

I’m sure it would have been easy (perhaps even easier) for Martin to have written a book two or three times its length, and as a chess player you’d perhaps like to have seen more chess as well, but, given the limitations of writing primarily for a non-chess playing readership, he has done an outstanding job in compressing the story into a relatively short volume. Perhaps he might consider an expanded version for private publication.

I did spot a few minor mistakes: misspelt or incorrect names and incorrect dates, for example, but this won’t spoil your enjoyment of the book. Strongly recommended for anyone with any interest at all in the history of British – and London – chess over the past 150 years.

If you’d like to buy a copy, the book can be ordered by providing a postal address to SFChess@btinternet.com, who will provide a/c details for payment of £12.50 plus £2.50 P&P.

Richard James, Twickenham 14 January 2022

Richard James

  • Published: November 2021
  • Publisher: Local History Publications for The Streatham Society in association with Streatham and Brixton Chess Club.
  • Softcover 116 pages (A4)
  • ISBN 978 1 910722 17 6

Remembering GM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE (07-x-1933 30-xi-2021)

BCN remembers GM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE who passed away on Tuesday, November 30th, 2021.

In the 1971 New Years Honours List Jonathan was made an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) The citation read “For services to Chess.”

In 1993 following representations by Bob Wade and Leonard Barden FIDE granted the title of Grandmaster to Jonathan. Here is a detailed discussion of that process. Note that this was not an Honorary title (as received by Jacques Mieses and Harry Golombek).

From British Chess (Pergamon Press, 1983) by Botterill, Levy, Rice and Richardson : (article by George Botterill)

“Penrose is one of the outstanding figures of British chess. Yet many who meet him may not realize this just because he is one of the quietest and most modest of men. Throughout the late 1950s and the whole of the 1960s he stood head and shoulders above any of his contemporaries.

See caption below
See caption below
Press agency caption for photograph above
Press agency caption for photograph above

His extraordinary dominance is revealed by the fact that he won the British championship no less than ten times (1958-63 and 1966-69, inclusive), a record that nobody is likely to equal in the future.

At his best his play was lucid, positionally correct, energetic and tactically acute. None the less, there is a ‘Penrose problem’: was he a ‘Good Thing’ for British chess? The trouble was that whilst this highly talented player effectively crushed any opposition at home, he showed little initiative in flying the flag abroad. There is a wide-spread and justifiable conviction that only lack of ambition in the sphere of international chess can explain why he did not secure the GM title during his active over-the-board playing career.

See caption below
See caption below
Press agency caption for above photograph
Press agency caption for above photograph

It would be unjust, however, to blame Penrose for any of this. The truth is simply that he was not a professional chessplayer, and indeed he flourished in
a period in which chess playing was not a viable profession in Britain. But even if the material awards available had been greater Penrose would almost certainly have chosen to remain an amateur. For he was cast in that special intellectual and ethical tradition of great British amateurs like H. E. Atkins, Sir George Thomas and Hugh Alexander before him.

Travel Chess 2nd January 1951: British chess champions Jonathan Penrose and Leonard Barden ponder over a portable travel game in a restaurant. (Photo by Walter Bellamy/Express/Getty Images)
Travel Chess
2nd January 1951: British chess champions Jonathan Penrose and Leonard Barden ponder over a portable travel game in a restaurant. (Photo by Walter Bellamy/Express/Getty Images)

His family background indicates early academic inclinations in a cultural atmosphere in which chess was merely a game something at which one excelled through sheer ability, but not to be ranked alongside truly serious work. It is noteworthy that Penrose, unique in this respect amongst British chess masters, has never written at any length about the game. He has had other matters to concentrate on when away from the board, being a lecturer in psychology. (His father, Professor L. S. Penrose, was a distinguished geneticist.)

IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE
IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE

Being of slight physique and the mildest and most amiable of characters, it is probably also true that Penrose lacked the toughness and ‘killer instinct’ required to reach the very top. Nervous tension finally struck him down in a dramatic way when he collapsed during play in the Siegen Olympiad of 1970. We can take that date as the end of the Penrose era.

Jonathan Penrose Chess Grandmaster Jonathan Penrose pictured during a chess match, circa 1960. (Photo by Fox Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Jonathan Penrose
Chess Grandmaster Jonathan Penrose pictured during a chess match, circa 1960. (Photo by Fox Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images))

Since, then though he has not by any means entirely given up, his involvement in the nerve-wracking competitions of over-the-board play has been greatly reduced. instead he has turned to correspondence chess, which is perhaps the ideal medium for his clear strategy and deep and subtle analysis. So Penrose’s career it not over. He has moved to another, less stressful province of the kingdom of chess.

IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE
IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE

For the first game, however, we shall turn the clock right back to 1950 and the see the Penrose in the role of youthful giant killer.

[pgn]
[Event “Southsea”]
[Site “Southsea”]
[Date “1950.??.??”]
[Round “3”]
[White “Penrose, Jonathan”]
[Black “Bogoljubow, Efim”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B56”]
[Annotator “George Botterill & BCN”]
[PlyCount “61”]
[EventDate “1950.??.??”]
[EventType “swiss”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 1999”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,61,19,31,72,53,68,72,74,26,26,35,78,54,64,49,91,81,85,45,69,69,49,55,
46,30,64,74,93,97,132,124,124,98,152,152,152,76,65,59,51,64,64,64,20,20,38,14,
116,159,216,216,216,223,223,223,511,570,615,900,1224,2338,29993,29994]} {
Jonathan was 17 years old when this game was played.} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4
cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nbd7 {A pretty rare continuation, not hitting White’s
centre but maybe aiming for c5 at some point.} 6. g3 a6 7. Bg2 e6 8. O-O Be7 9.
b3 (9. Be3) 9… Qc7 10. Bb2 O-O 11. Kh1 $146 {This was a novelty in 1950} (11.
a4 Rb8 12. a5 b5 13. axb6 Qxb6 14. g4 {was Dubov – Korobov, 2017.}) 11… Rd8
12. Qe2 $146 (12. f4 Nc5 {was Rayner – Arakhamia Grant, 2001, 0-1.}) 12… Nf8
$2 {“With a knight on f8 I cannot be mated”, as Larsen is fond of saying. But
here it is more important that Black loses control over e5.} (12… Bf8 {
to be followed by …Rb8, …b5 and …Bb7 seems a better scheme of
development. With the rooks on d8 and b8 Black must beware of White’s little
tactic e5 dxe5 Nc6 forking the rooks. But in most cases Black should get at
least one pawn and fair value for the exchange.}) 13. f4 $16 Rb8 14. Rad1 Bd7
15. e5 (15. g4 d5 16. e5) 15… Ne8 {[#]} 16. Nf5 $1 {A familiar trick in the
Sicilian} Ng6 ({if} 16… exf5 17. Nd5 $18) 17. Nxe7+ Nxe7 18. Ne4 d5 19. Nd6
$1 Qa5 $2 (19… Bc6) 20. Qh5 (20. g4) 20… Nxd6 21. exd6 Nf5 22. g4 Nxd6 {[#]
} ({Of course not} 22… Ne3 $4 23. Qe5 $18 {with a double attack on g7 and e3}
(23. Qg5 {is crushing also} g6 24. Qf6 d4 25. Bxd4 e5 26. fxe5 Nxg4 27. Qxf7+
Kh8 28. e6+ Ne5 29. Qf6+ Kg8 30. Bxe5 {and its mate in 6.})) 23. f5 $1 Qxa2 24.
Be5 (24. fxe6 Bxe6 25. Qe5) 24… Ne8 {Giving up the exchange does not help
much.} (24… Bb5 25. Rf2 {[%cal Gd1a1] threatening Ra1} Qa5 26. fxe6 {wins
quickly}) 25. fxe6 Bxe6 26. Bxb8 Rxb8 27. Qe5 $1 Rc8 28. Bxd5 Nf6 29. Bxe6 Re8
30. Bxf7+ Kxf7 31. Rxf6+ $1 1-0
[/pgn]

From The Encyclopedia of Chess (BT Batsford, 1977) by Harry Golombek :

“British international master and ten times British Champion, Penrose was born in Colchester and came from a chess-playing family.

Lionel Sharples Penrose, FRS (11 June 1898 – 12 May 1972)
Lionel Sharples Penrose, FRS (11 June 1898 – 12 May 1972)

His father and mother (Margaret)  both played chess and his father, Professor Lionel Sharples Penrose, in addition to being a geneticist of world-wide fame, was a strong chess-player and a good endgame composer. Jonathan’s older brother Oliver, was also a fine player.

Oliver Penrose FRS FRSE (born 6 June 1929) is a British theoretical physicist
Oliver Penrose FRS FRSE (born 6 June 1929) is a British theoretical physicist

Roger Penrose won the Nobel prize for physics in 2020.

Roger Penrose. Nobel Laureate
Roger Penrose. Nobel Laureate

Shirley Hodgson (née Penrose) is a high flying geneticist.

Prof. Shirley Hodgson
Prof. Shirley Hodgson

Jonathan learnt chess at the age of four, won the British Boys championship at thirteen and by the time he was fifteen was playing in the British Championship in Felixstowe in 1949.

Press agency caption for photograph above
Press agency caption for photograph above
Press agency caption for photograph above
Press agency caption for photograph above

A little reluctant to participate in international tournaments abroad, he did best in the British Championship which he won a record number of times, once more than HE Atkins. He won the title consecutively from 1958 to 1963 and again from 1966 to 1969.

Boy Chess Champion. New York Times photo shows 14 year old J. Penrose 14 year old by chess champion of Britain, in play at the British Chess Championships at Bishopsgate Institute today. He has had great success in the tournament so far, beating men far above his age and experience. 2nd September 1948. Photograph by Reginald Webster
Boy Chess Champion. New York Times photo shows 14 year old J. Penrose 14 year old by chess champion of Britain, in play at the British Chess Championships at Bishopsgate Institute today. He has had great success in the tournament so far, beating men far above his age and experience. 2nd September 1948. Photograph by Reginald Webster
Press agency caption for photograph above
Press agency caption for photograph above

He also played with great effect in nine Olympiads. Playing on a high board for practically all the time, he showed himself the equal of the best grandmasters and indeed, at the Leipzig Olympiad he distinguished himself by beating Mikhail Tal, thereby becoming the first British player to defeat a reigning World Champion since Blackburne beat Lasker in 1899.

ARB Thomas and Jonathan Penrose at the Hastings Congress of 1950/1951
ARB Thomas and Jonathan Penrose at the Hastings Congress of 1950/1951

[pgn]
[Event “Olympiad-14 Final A”]
[Site “Leipzig”]
[Date “1960.11.08”]
[Round “11”]
[White “Penrose, Jonathan”]
[Black “Tal, Mikhail”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “A65”]
[Annotator “Knaak,R”]
[PlyCount “77”]
[EventDate “1960.10.28”]
[EventType “team-tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “DDR”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 1999”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “England”]
[BlackTeam “Soviet Union”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “ENG”]
[BlackTeamCountry “URS”]

{[%evp 0,77,14,29,8,5,0,0,58,58,90,90,99,98,98,98,92,41,71,54,67,47,50,50,60,
17,11,11,11,29,25,-24,26,32,78,97,133,100,113,100,96,82,124,87,113,107,150,179,
179,220,220,229,229,229,269,201,201,201,201,201,206,205,252,252,252,252,308,
319,432,402,479,480,534,549,866,881,888,888,895,895] Jonathan Penrose war
Jahre lang einer der führenden englischen Spieler. 1979 spielte er seine
letzten Partien, die auch von der Mega Datenbank erfasst sind; seine
Schachlaufbahn war damit aber noch lange nicht beendet, denn nun stieg er im
Fernschach zur absoluten Weltspitze auf. Doch im Nahschach wird sein Name wohl
für immer mit dieser einen Partie von der Schacholympiade in Leipzig verknüpft
sein. Die Sowjetunion war auf einem Triumpfmarsch sondergleichen – jedes
einzelnen Match wurde gewonnen und bis zur letzten Runde gab es auch keine
einzige Niederlage in einer Einzelpartie, bis eben zu dieser.} 1. d4 $1 {
Penrose war ein e4-Spieler und warf Tal nun aus der Vorbereitung.} Nf6 2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 c5 {Tal will den vollen Punkt. Objektiv ist Ben-Oni aber leider
minderwertig.} 4. d5 exd5 5. cxd5 g6 6. e4 d6 7. Bd3 Bg7 8. Nge2 O-O 9. O-O {
Ich spiele diesen Aufbau selbst und glaube an ihn. Weiß wird das Feld g4 mit
h2-h3 schützen und steht dann schon zu f2-f4 bereit. Schwarz krankt an seiner
Raumnot – ein Zug wie Bg4 steht hier nicht zur Verfügung.} a6 {Alternativen
wie Na6-c7 und erst dann a6 sowie auch 9…b6 gelten heute als
aussichtsreicher. RR: Diese aus schwarzer Sicht pessimistische Einschätzung
gilt seit dem Buch von John Watson über die Ben-Oni-Verteidigung nicht mehr.
Viel mehr scheint der Aufbau mit 9…a6 sogar am besten zu sein.} 10. a4 Qc7
11. h3 Nbd7 12. f4 Re8 13. Ng3 c4 14. Bc2 Nc5 (14… Rb8 $1 15. Be3 Nc5 {
ist die Hauptvariante.}) 15. Qf3 (15. Be3 Nfxe4 16. Ncxe4 Nxe4 17. Bxe4 f5 18.
Qe2 fxe4 19. f5 $13) 15… Nfd7 ({Schwarz sollte} 15… Rb8 {spielen, um
möglichst schnell b5 durchzusetzen. Nach} 16. e5 dxe5 (16… Nfd7 17. Nce4 Nxe4
18. Nxe4 dxe5 19. f5 $36) 17. fxe5 Rxe5 18. Bf4 Nfd7 {erhält Schwarz Spiel für
die Qualität.}) 16. Be3 b5 17. axb5 Rb8 18. Qf2 axb5 {Das nun folgende
Bauernopfer ist zum Standardverfahren für diesen Stellungstyp und die ganze
Variante mit Ld3 und Sge2 geworden.} 19. e5 $1 dxe5 20. f5 $1 (20. fxe5 Rf8 21.
d6 Qc6 22. Nce4 Bxe5 $13) 20… Bb7 21. Rad1 Ba8 $2 ({Es gibt eine Grundregel
bei dieser Bauernstruktur: Wenn Schwarz den “störenden” Bauern e5 zurückopfern
kann, sollte er es auch tun.} 21… e4 $1 {mit unklarer Stellung; Schwarz kann
z.B. nach Bf4 immer ganz gut die Qualität opfern, weil der Bg7 dann noch mehr
zum Riesen wird.}) 22. Nce4 $16 {Ein Traumfeld für jeden Springer.} Na4 $6 {
Verliert glatt.} 23. Bxa4 bxa4 24. fxg6 fxg6 25. Qf7+ Kh8 26. Nc5 Qa7 27. Qxd7
(27. Nge4 $1) (27. Rf2 $1 {droht Springerabzug}) 27… Qxd7 28. Nxd7 Rxb2 29.
Nb6 Rb3 30. Nxc4 Rd8 31. d6 Rc3 32. Rc1 Rxc1 33. Rxc1 Bd5 34. Nb6 Bb3 35. Ne4
h6 36. d7 Bf8 37. Rc8 Be7 38. Bc5 Bh4 39. g3 1-0
[/pgn]

Jonathan Penrose vs Mikhail Tal, Leipzig Olympiad, 1960, 1-0, Modern Benoni
Jonathan Penrose vs Mikhail Tal, Leipzig Olympiad, 1960, 1-0, Modern Benoni

A deep strategist who could also hold his own tactically, he suffered from the defect of insufficient physical stamina and it was this that was to bring about a decline in his play and in his results. He collapsed during a game at the Ilford Chess Congress, and a year later, at the Siegen Olympiad of 1970, he had a more serious collapse that necessitated his withdrawal from the event after the preliminary groups had been played. The doctors found nothing vitally wrong with him that his physique could not sustain.

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6mlebk_34c[/embedyt]

He continued to play but his results suffered from a lack of self-confidence and at the Nice Olympiad of 1974 he had a wretched result on board 3, winning only 1 game and losing 6 out of 15.

Darga V Penrose 29th December 1955: Klaus Darga of Germany in play against Britain's Jonathan Penrose during the International Chess Congress at Hastings. (Photo by Folb/Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)
Darga V Penrose
29th December 1955: Klaus Darga of Germany in play against Britain’s Jonathan Penrose during the International Chess Congress at Hastings. (Photo by Folb/Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)

Possibly too his profession (a lecturer in psychology) was also absorbing him more and more and too part less and less in international and national chess.

Jonathan Penrose
Jonathan Penrose

Yet, he had already done enough to show that he was the equal of the greatest British players in his command and understanding of the game and he ranks alongside Staunton, Blackburne, Atkins and CHO’D Alexander as a chess figure of world class.”

Here is his Wikipedia entry

From The Oxford Companion to Chess by Hooper & Whyld :

“The leading English player during the 1960s, International Master (1961), International Correspondence Chess Master (1980), lecturer in psychology. Early in his chess career Penrose decided to remain an amateur and as a consequence played in few international tournaments. He won the British Championship from 1958 to 1963 and from 1966 to 1969, ten times in all (a record); and he played in nine Olympiads from 1952 to 1974, notably scoring + 10=5 on first board at Lugano 1968, a result bettered only by the world champion Petrosyan.

IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE
IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE

In the early 1970s Penrose further restricted his chess because the stress of competitive play adversely affected his health.”

The second edition (1996) adds this :

“He turned to correspondence play, was the highest rated postal player in the world 1987-9, and led the British team to victory in the 9th Correspondence Olympiad.”

[pgn]
[Event “olm8 fin B4 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1977.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Penrose, Jonathan”]
[Black “Tompa, Janos”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B48”]
[Annotator “Andrew Martin & BCN”]
[PlyCount “61”]
[EventDate “1977.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “12”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,59,19,38,40,41,41,32,50,22,81,63,88,56,68,60,55,48,91,78,64,64,36,62,
41,29,56,56,50,30,34,3,32,38,18,31,48,48,41,40,90,31,30,51,183,-72,-72,177,164,
164,160,310,262,262,275,253,253,299,726,726,29991,29992]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3.
d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 {The Sicilian Kan or Paulsen} 5. Nc3 {It’s a matter of
taste between this} ({and} 5. c4 {although in correspondence play the more
lively alternative is generally preferred.}) 5… Qc7 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. Be3 Nf6 8.
O-O Ne5 ({Alternatives are} 8… Nxd4 9. Bxd4 Bc5) ({or} 8… b5) 9. Be2 $1 {
Perfectly justified by the fact that Black is wasting time with his knight.
White withdraws in order to kick back with f4.} ({9.Be2! is a clear
improvement on} 9. h3 {, which does rather weaken the king position for no
other reason than to prevent the illusory threat of Ng4.}) 9… b5 10. f4 Nc4
11. Bxc4 Qxc4 12. e5 {[#]} Nd5 ({Some thought must have been given to the
complicated alternative} 12… b4 {which gives White a dangerous attack but
nothing clear.} {A sample line illustrates the difficulty Black would face is}
13. Qf3 {[%cal Gf3a8]} (13. exf6 bxc3 14. b3 Qd5 15. fxg7 Bxg7) 13… Rb8 (
13… bxc3 $1 14. Qxa8 cxb2 15. Rab1 Nd5 16. Bf2 Bb4 17. Qb8) 14. exf6 bxc3 15.
b3 Qc7 16. f5 Bb7 17. Bf4 d6 18. Qe3 e5 19. fxg7 Bxg7 20. f6 $1 {Perhaps he
could survive such a position but the king would be trapped and uncomfortable
on his central perch.}) 13. Nxd5 Qxd5 14. Qe2 Bb7 15. Rad1 Qe4 {It is
essential for the black queen to remain in the centre to try and inhibit the
white attack by keeping active.} ({To that end grabbing material with} 15…
Qxa2 {would be equivalent to suicide; after} 16. b3 $1 {shutting off the white
square escape followed quickly by f5 White would have a winning attack.}) 16.
Qf2 Be7 17. f5 Bh4 $146 (17… O-O $2 18. f6 $18) (17… O-O-O 18. Rd3 {
[%cal Gd3c3]}) 18. Qd2 {[%cal Gf1f4] threatening Rf4 and a double capture on e6
} Qd5 19. c3 h5 {[%cal Gh5h3] attempting to get the pawn to h3. a very slow
procedure which is rapidly punished.} ({better was} 19… Bd8 20. a4 {keeping
the black king centralised.}) 20. a4 $1 {Stopping any thoughts of queenside
castling and weakening Black’s hold on the critical white squares.} Be7 21.
axb5 Qxe5 $2 {[#]} (21… axb5 22. fxe6 dxe6 23. Qf2 O-O-O $16) 22. Nc6 $1 dxc6
23. Qd7+ Kf8 24. Bd4 $18 Bc8 ({If} 24… Qb8 25. fxe6 f6 26. Bxf6 {wins}) 25.
Qxc6 Qb8 26. fxe6 f6 27. Bc5 $1 {[%cal Gd1d8]} Bxe6 28. Bxe7+ Kf7 ({If} 28…
Kxe7 29. Rfe1 Qc8 30. Rd6 $18 (30. Rxe6+ Qxe6 31. Qb7+ Kf8 32. Qxa8+ $18)) 29.
Bxf6 {An excellent final stroke.} gxf6 30. Rd7+ {and Black resigned.} {If} Bxd7
31. Qxf6+ {is a quick mate.} 1-0
[/pgn]

Here is a discussion about Jonathan on the English Chess Forum

From The Encyclopedia of Chess (Robert Hale, 1970 & 1976) by Anne Sunnucks :

“International Master (1961) and British Champion in 1958 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969.

Jonathan Penrose was born in Colchester on 7th October 1933, the son of Professor LS Penrose, the well-known geneticist, who was also a strong player and composer of endgame studies.

The whole Penrose family plays chess and Jonathan learned the game when he was 4. At the age of 12 he joined Hampstead Chess Club and the following year played for Essex for the first time, won his first big tournament, the British Boys’ Championship, and represented England against Ireland in a boy’s match, which was the forerunner of the Glorney Cup competition, which came into being the following year.

By the time he was 17 Penrose was recognised as one of the big hopes of British Chess. Playing in the Hastings Premier Tournament for the first time in `1950 – 1951, he beat the French Champion Nicholas Rossolimo and at Southsea in 1950 he beat two International Grandmasters, Effim Bogoljubov and Savielly Tartakower.

Penrose played for the British Chess Federation in a number of Chess Olympiads since 1952. In 1960, at Leipzig, came one of the best performances of his career, when he beat the reigning World Champion, Mikhail Tal. He became the first British player to beat a reigning World Champion since JH Blackburne beat Emmanuel Lasker in 1899, and the first player to defeat Tal since he won the World Championship earlier that year. Penrose’s score in this Olympiad was only half-a-point short of the score required to qualify for the International Grandmaster title.

IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE
IM Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE

His ninth victory in the British Championships in 1968 equalled the record held by HE Atkins, who has held the title more times than any other player.

Penrose is a lecturer in psychology at Enfield College of Technology and has never been in a position to devote a great deal of time to the game. He is married to a former contender in the British Girls Championship and British Ladies’s Championship, Margaret Wood, daughter of Frank Wood, Hon. Secretary of the Oxfordshire Chess Association.

Again from British Chess : “In updating this report we find striking evidence of Penrose’s prowess as a correspondence player. Playing on board 4 for Britain in the 8th Correspondence Chess Olympiad he was astonishingly severe on the opposition, letting slip just one draw in twelve games! Here is one of the eleven wins that must change the assessment of a sharp Sicilian Variation.”

 

[pgn]
[Event “olm8 corr7384”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1973.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Penrose, Jonathan”]
[Black “Krantz, Kjell Erik”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B33”]
[Annotator “George Botterill & Hugh Myers”]
[PlyCount “53”]
[EventDate “1973.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[SourceTitle “Myers”]
[Source “Myers”]
[SourceDate “2012.11.12”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2012.11.12”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “England”]
[BlackTeam “Sweden”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “ENG”]
[BlackTeamCountry “SWE”]

{[%mdl 41472][%evp 0,53,38,17,41,46,37,22,21,42,22,35,30,61,21,-2,-6,-6,10,-7,
-7,-10,-16,-1,-14,3,6,-16,-5,-13,-11,6,-4,-4,-16,45,29,41,63,0,13,38,13,61,59,
67,84,97,94,299,291,294,294,308,300,294]} 1. e4 {Myers Botterill} c5 2. Nf3 e6
3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Bf4 e5 8. Bg5 a6 9. Na3 Be6 10.
Nc4 Rc8 11. Bxf6 gxf6 12. Ne3 Ne7 13. Bd3 Qb6 14. O-O Qxb2 {Larsen} (14… Bh6
15. Ned5 Nxd5 16. exd5 Bd7 17. Qh5 Bg7 18. Rab1 h6 19. Kh1 O-O 20. f4 Rc7 21.
Qf3 Bc8 22. Qg3 Kh8 23. Qf2 Qxf2 24. Rxf2 b5 25. a4 b4 26. Na2 a5 27. c3 bxc3
28. Nxc3 Rc5 29. Rd1 Bb7 30. Bb5 Kg8 31. g3 Rd8 32. Kg1 Kf8 33. Kf1 Ke7 {
1/2-1/2 Koch,H-Bergmann,H/corr 1989/}) (14… Rg8 15. Ncd5 Bxd5 16. Nxd5 Nxd5
17. exd5 h6 18. a4 (18. c3 Rc7 19. Rb1 Qa5 20. a4 Kd8 21. c4 f5 22. b4 Qb6 23.
Be2 f6 24. a5 Qa7 25. Re1 Rcg7 26. Bf1 f4 27. b5 axb5 28. Rxb5 Rc7 29. Qd3 Rg5
30. h4 Rgg7 31. Qf5 Rgf7 32. Be2 f3 33. Bxf3 Rxc4 34. Qe6 {1-0 Miettinen,
K-Pickett,C/corr ICCF 1995/}) 18… Rc7 19. Qf3 Qxb2 20. Qxf6 Qd4 21. Rad1 Qg4
22. g3 h5 23. Rde1 Be7 24. Qh6 Qg5 25. Qxg5 Bxg5 26. Rb1 Ke7 27. Rb2 a5 28.
Rfb1 Rb8 29. Ba6 Bd2 30. Bxb7 Rc4 31. Bc6 Rxb2 32. Rxb2 Rb4 33. Ra2 Bc3 34. Ra3
Bd4 35. Rd3 h4 36. Kg2 hxg3 37. hxg3 Bc5 38. Rb3 {1/2-1/2 Fishbein,A-Agdestein,
E/Stavanger 1989/}) (14… Qc6 15. a4 Kd8 16. Qf3 f5 17. Ned5 f4 18. a5 Rg8 19.
h3 f5 20. Nb6 Rc7 21. Kh1 Bf7 22. Qd1 Rg5 23. Rg1 h6 24. Qd2 Bh5 25. exf5 Nxf5
26. Be4 Qe8 27. Ncd5 Rcg7 28. Ra4 Nd4 29. Nxf4 Bf7 30. Bxb7 Qb5 31. Be4 Qxb2
32. Nfd5 Bxd5 33. Nxd5 Qb7 34. Rb4 Qc8 35. Rgb1 Nb5 36. c4 Na3 37. R1b3 Nxc4
38. Qc3 Nb6 39. Rxb6 Qxc3 40. Rxc3 Kd7 41. Rb8 {1-0 Conde,J-Jordaan,W/corr
2003/}) (14… Bg7 15. Ncd5 Bxd5 16. exd5 O-O 17. Qh5 Ng6 18. Nf5 Rc7 19. Rae1
Re8 20. Re3 Nf4 21. Qg4 Ng6 22. h4 Qxb2 23. h5 Qxa2 24. hxg6 fxg6 25. Nxd6 f5
26. Nxf5 gxf5 27. Qxf5 Qxd5 28. Be4 Qd6 29. Qxh7+ Kf8 30. Rf3+ Rf7 31. Rxf7+
Kxf7 32. Qh5+ Kf8 33. Rd1 Qe7 34. Rd3 Bf6 35. Rf3 Qg7 36. Rg3 Qh8 37. Qf5 Rd8
38. Rh3 Qg7 39. Rh7 Qg5 40. Rh8+ Ke7 41. Rh7+ Kf8 42. Qe6 Rd1+ 43. Kh2 Qf4+ 44.
g3 Qxf2+ 45. Kh3 Bg7 46. Qc8+ {1-0 Borngaesser,R-Gelzenleichter,S/Dortmund op
1987/}) 15. Ncd5 Bxd5 16. exd5 (16. Nxd5 $5 Nxd5 17. exd5 Qd4 (17… Rc7 18.
Qf3 Ke7 19. Qe3 h5 20. a4 Bh6 21. Qa7 Bd2 22. Rab1 Qd4 23. Qxd4 exd4 24. Rb3
Ba5 25. Rfb1 b6 26. Rd1 Rc5 27. Bxa6 Rxd5 28. Bc4 Re5 29. Rxd4 Re1+ 30. Bf1 Rc8
31. c4 Ra1 32. g3 Rc5 33. Rd5 Rxd5 34. cxd5 Rxa4 35. Re3+ Kf8 36. h4 Rd4 37.
Rd3 Rxd3 38. Bxd3 Kg7 39. f3 Be1 40. Kg2 Kh6 41. Kh3 {1/2-1/2 Dickl,E-Kammer,R/
Saarlouis op 1999/}) 18. Qf3 (18. c4 Bh6 19. Re1 Ke7 20. Re4 Qc3 21. Rb1 Rc7
22. Qf3 Bf4 23. Re2 h5 24. Rc2 Qd4 25. c5 Rxc5 26. Rxb7+ Kf8 27. Rxc5 Qxc5 28.
g3 Bg5 29. h4 Kg7 30. hxg5 Qc1+ 31. Kg2 Qxg5 32. Qf5 {1-0 Grabics,M-Gosztola,I/
HUN 1998/}) 18… Bg7 (18… Ke7 19. Rab1 Rc7 20. Rb3 Bh6 21. Rfb1 b5 22. Rb4
Qc5 23. a4 Bd2 24. Rh4 Bg5 25. Rg4 h5 26. Re4 Qxd5 27. axb5 axb5 28. h4 Bd2 29.
Rxb5 Qa8 30. Qe2 Bc3 31. Rc4 Rhc8 32. Rxc7+ Rxc7 33. Be4 Qa1+ 34. Kh2 Qe1 35.
Qxe1 Bxe1 36. Kg1 Rc4 37. Bf5 Rf4 38. Bh3 Bxf2+ 39. Kh2 Rxh4 40. g3 Rc4 41.
Rb7+ Kf8 42. Bf5 Rc3 43. Rb3 Bxg3+ 44. Kh3 Rxb3 45. cxb3 Be1 46. b4 Bxb4 47.
Kh4 d5 48. Kxh5 Ke7 49. Kg4 Kd6 50. Kf3 {0-1 Bely,M-Brinck Claussen,B/Hastings
ENG 1963/}) (18… h5 19. Rab1 b5 20. a4 Qg4 21. Qxg4 hxg4 22. axb5 axb5 23.
Rxb5 Rh5 24. Rb7 Be7 25. Ra1 e4 26. Bxe4 Re5 27. f3 f5 28. Bd3 gxf3 29. gxf3
Rxd5 30. Raa7 Re5 31. f4 Re1+ 32. Kf2 Bh4+ 33. Kg2 Re7 34. Bxf5 Rxb7 35. Rxb7
Rc4 36. Kf3 Be1 37. Bd3 Rb4 38. Ra7 Bd2 39. f5 Bc3 40. Be4 Be5 41. h4 Rb1 42.
h5 Rf1+ 43. Ke2 Rf4 44. Bc6+ Kf8 45. h6 Kg8 46. Bd5 Kh7 47. Rxf7+ Kxh6 48. c4
Kg5 49. Be6 Bd4 {1/2-1/2 Lakos,N-Horvath,S/HUN 1997/}) 19. a4 h5 20. Rfd1 Qc5
21. Rab1 Rc7 22. Rb3 Qa5 23. Qe4 Ke7 24. Rdb1 Rb8 25. Rb6 Qd2 26. g3 a5 27. h4
Bf8 28. Qf5 Qh6 29. R1b5 Qg6 30. Qxg6 fxg6 31. Bxg6 Bh6 32. Rxa5 Rg8 33. Bxh5
Rxg3+ 34. fxg3 Be3+ 35. Kg2 Bxb6 36. Rb5 Bc5 37. Bg6 b6 38. a5 bxa5 39. Rxa5
Kf8 40. Kf3 Kg7 41. Bd3 Rb7 42. Ra8 Rb1 43. Rd8 Ra1 44. Kg4 Ra7 45. Kf5 Re7 46.
Be4 {1-0 Lang,J-Wohlleben,M/corr 1998/}) (16. Rb1 Qd4 17. Nxd5 Nxd5 18. exd5
Rc7 19. Re1 Ke7 20. c4 Bh6 21. Qf3 b6 22. Re4 Qc5 23. Qh5 Bd2 24. Rg4 Be3 25.
Kh1 Qa3 26. Qf5 h5 27. Re4 Bc5 28. f4 Rh6 29. Ree1 Rg6 30. Rf1 Bd4 31. fxe5
dxe5 32. Rbd1 Qxa2 33. Qf3 Rh6 34. Rde1 Qd2 35. Bb1 Rxc4 36. d6+ Kxd6 37. Qb7
b5 38. Bf5 Qc3 39. Qxf7 Kc6 40. Qf8 Qd2 41. Rb1 h4 42. Qc8+ {1-0 Tsenkov,
L-Veloso Fargnoli,R/corr IECG 2006/}) 16… Qd4 (16… Rc7 17. a4 Qd4 18. Qf3
Qf4 19. Qe2 f5 20. g3 Rg8 21. Rfb1 Qg5 22. Bxa6 f4 23. Rxb7 Rxb7 24. Bxb7 Bh6
25. Nf1 Nf5 26. c3 Qh4 27. Rb1 Qh3 28. Bc6+ Ke7 29. Rb7+ Kf6 30. Bd7 Rg5 31.
Qe4 fxg3 32. hxg3 Rh5 33. a5 Bf4 34. Qg2 Qg4 35. gxf4 Qxf4 36. Bxf5 Rxf5 37.
Ng3 Rg5 38. Rb4 Qc1+ 39. Kh2 Kg7 40. Qf3 Kg6 41. Rg4 h6 42. a6 {1-0 Mainka,
R-Kammer,R/Saarlouis op 1998/}) 17. Rb1 $5 {[#] This seems to be much more
dangerous for Black} ({than the immediate} 17. Qf3 Qf4 18. Qh3 e4 (18… Qh6 $5
19. Qg4 Qf4 20. Qxf4 exf4 21. Nf5 Nxf5 22. Bxf5 Rc7 23. Rfe1+ $14) (18… Bg7
$5 19. Rab1 b5 20. a4 e4 {[%cal Gf6f5]} 21. Rb4 $1 $14 {Myers}) 19. g3 Qf3 20.
Nc4 exd3 21. Nxd6+ Kd8 22. Nxf7+ Ke8 23. Nd6+ Kd8 24. Nf7+ Ke8 25. Nxh8 Qf5 26.
g4 Qxd5 27. cxd3 Bg7 28. Qxh7 Kd7 29. Rfe1 Rg8 30. Rab1 b5 31. Ng6 Nc6 32. Nf4
Qf7 33. Qf5+ Kc7 34. Rbc1 Bf8 35. Rxc6+ Kxc6 36. Re6+ Kb7 37. Qd5+ Ka7 38.
Rxa6+ Kxa6 39. Qxf7 Rxg4+ 40. Kf1 Rxf4 41. Qxf8 {1-0 Lombardy,W-Markland,P/
Nice FRA 1974/}) (17. Qh5 $5 Rc7 (17… Nxd5 18. Qf3 Rc5 19. Rab1 b5 20. Nxd5
Qxd5 21. Qxd5 Rxd5 22. a4 bxa4 23. Rb8+ Ke7 24. Rb7+ Ke8 25. Rb8+ Ke7 26. Rb7+
Ke8 27. Rb8+ Kd7 28. Rfb1 Rd4 29. R1b7+ Kc6 30. Rxf7 a3 31. Ra8 Ra4 32. Rfa7 d5
33. Bxa6 Kc5 34. Rd7 a2 35. Rxd5+ Kb6 {0-1 Guzek,H-Roelens,R/corr 1995/}) (
17… Rg8 18. Rab1 Rc7 19. Rfd1 Qf4 20. g3 Qh6 21. Qe2 Qh3 22. Rb4 Qd7 23. Qf3
Bh6 24. Nf5 Bf8 25. Nxe7 Kxe7 26. Bf5 Qd8 27. Rdb1 Qa8 28. a4 Bh6 29. Qb3 Bd2
30. Rxb7 Ba5 31. Rxc7+ Bxc7 32. Qb7 Qb8 33. Rb3 Rd8 34. Qc6 {1-0 Brzeski,
M-Roszkowski,R/Grodzisk Mazowiecki POL 2007/}) 18. Rfd1 Qf4 19. g3 Qg5 20. Qf3
f5 (20… Qh6 21. Ng4 Qg5 22. Nxf6+ Kd8 23. Nxh7 Qh6 24. Qxf7 Bg7 25. Qe6 Ng8
26. Bg6 Nf6 27. Nxf6 {1-0 Roberts,A-Adair,D/corr 1993/}) 21. Nxf5 Nxf5 22. Bxf5
Bg7 23. Rab1 Qf6 (23… O-O 24. Rb6 Qe7 25. Rdb1 Re8 26. R1b4 h6 27. Bd3 Rd8
28. Qf5 Kf8 29. h4 Rdd7 30. Qh7 a5 31. Ra4 Rc5 32. Rg4 Qf6 33. Bf5 Rdc7 34.
Rxd6 {1-0 Nemeth,A-Hogye,I/corr 1990/}) 24. Kg2 b5 25. Rb4 O-O 26. a4 Rc5 27.
axb5 Rxb5 28. Rxb5 axb5 29. Rb1 Rb8 30. Rb4 Qd8 31. Bd3 h6 32. h4 Ra8 33. Rxb5
Rb8 34. c4 Qc7 35. Qe4 Kf8 36. Qe3 Ke7 37. Be4 Rxb5 38. cxb5 Qc4 39. b6 Qb4 40.
Kh2 Kd8 41. Kh3 Bf8 42. Kg4 Qd4 43. Kf5 Qa4 44. Kg4 f5+ 45. Kxf5 Qd7+ {1/2-1/2
Popovic,P-Matulovic,M/Vinkovci 1982/}) 17… Rc7 $1 ({The natural} 17… b5 {
would be countered by} 18. a4 $1 {(Botterill) breaking up the black queenside.}
Bh6 ({If then} 18… Qxa4 19. Ra1 {followed by Rxa6}) 19. Qf3 Qf4 20. Qh3 $16)
18. Qf3 (18. g3 Bh6 19. Qf3 Bxe3 20. fxe3 Qxd5 21. Qxf6 O-O 22. Rb4 e4 23. Bxe4
Qh5 24. Rxb7 Rxb7 25. Bxb7 Ng6 26. Qxd6 Qg5 27. Qd4 Rd8 28. Qe4 a5 29. c4 Kg7
30. Bd5 Rd7 31. Rf5 Qd8 32. Qd4+ f6 33. g4 h6 34. g5 hxg5 35. Rxg5 Rd6 36. Rg3
Qb8 37. Qe4 f5 38. Qxf5 Rf6 39. Qd3 Qb2 40. Rf3 Rxf3 41. Bxf3 Qa1+ 42. Qd1 Qxa2
43. Qd4+ Kh6 44. c5 a4 45. c6 a3 46. Be4 Qe6 47. Bd5 Qf5 48. e4 Qg4+ 49. Kf1
Qf3+ 50. Ke1 Qh1+ 51. Kd2 Qxh2+ 52. Kc1 a2 53. Qa1 Ne5 54. Qxa2 {1/2-1/2
Arnason,A-Jonasson,B/Reykjavik ISL 1984/}) (18. a3 Bh6 19. Rb4 Qc3 20. Rc4 Rxc4
21. Nxc4 Nc8 22. Qh5 b5 23. Qxh6 bxc4 24. Qxf6 Rf8 25. Bf5 Ne7 26. Rb1 Nxf5 27.
Qxf5 Kd8 28. Qf6+ Kd7 29. h4 Qxc2 30. Rb7+ Kc8 31. Qe7 Qc1+ {1/2-1/2 Roux,
O-Rouzaud,P/Montigny Le Bretonneux 2004/}) 18… Qf4 (18… Bg7 $1 19. Rb3 O-O
20. Nf5 Qf4 21. Qxf4 exf4 22. Nxd6 Rd8 23. Rxb7 Nxd5 24. Rxc7 Nxc7 25. Ne4 Nd5
26. Rb1 f5 27. Ng5 h6 28. Nh3 Nc3 29. Rb6 Nxa2 30. Nxf4 Nc1 31. Rxa6 Be5 32. g3
Bxf4 33. gxf4 Nxd3 34. cxd3 Kg7 35. Ra3 Rd4 36. Rc3 Rxf4 37. Rc4 Rg4+ 38. Rxg4+
fxg4 39. Kg2 Kf6 40. Kg3 Kg5 {1/2-1/2 Achilles,E-Schuster,P/corr 1996/}) (18…
f5 19. Nxf5 Nxf5 20. Bxf5 Bg7 21. Be4 b5 22. Qg4 Bf6 23. Qf5 Rg8 24. a4 b4 25.
Rfd1 Qc4 26. c3 Ke7 27. cxb4 Rb8 28. Bd3 Qa2 29. Ra1 Qb3 30. Bxa6 Rxb4 31. Rac1
Rc3 32. Bb5 {1/2-1/2 Geenen,M-Prasad,D/Novi Sad 1990/} Bh4) 19. Qe2 (19. Qxf4
exf4 20. Nc4 (20. Nf5 Nxd5 21. Be4 Nc3 22. Rxb7 Rxb7 23. Bxb7 a5 24. Bc6+ Kd8
25. Re1 Kc7 26. Be8 d5 27. Bxf7 Bc5 28. Ng7 Rb8 29. Ne8+ Kd8 30. Nxf6 Rb2 31.
Nxd5 Rxc2 32. Rf1 Ne2+ 33. Kh1 Bxf2 34. Rd1 Kc8 35. a4 Kb7 36. Bh5 Nc3 37. Nxc3
Rxc3 38. Bf3+ Kc7 39. Rf1 h6 40. Be2 Be3 41. g3 fxg3 {0-1 Jung,T-Mueller,B/
corr GER 1998/}) 20… Nxd5 21. Na5 Nc3 22. Rb6 Be7 23. Nxb7 O-O 24. Nxd6 Bxd6
25. Rxd6 Nxa2 26. Rxa6 Nb4 27. Rxf6 Nxd3 28. cxd3 Rd8 29. Rxf4 Rxd3 30. g3 Rd2
31. Ra1 Rd6 32. Kg2 Kg7 33. Ra8 h6 34. h4 Rb7 35. Rf5 Rc6 36. Rf4 Rd6 37. h5
Rd5 38. g4 f5 39. gxf5 Rf7 40. f6+ Kh7 41. Rh4 Rxf6 42. Ra7+ Kh8 43. f4 Rff5
44. Kf3 Rxh5 {1/2-1/2 De Groot,K-Noire,E/corr IECG 2003/}) 19… e4 $2 $146 {
[#]} (19… Nc8 20. c3 e4 21. Nd1 f5 22. f3 Qe5 23. fxe4 fxe4 24. Bxe4 Bg7 25.
Rf5 Qe7 26. Qg4 Be5 27. Bd3 h5 28. Qe4 Bg7 29. Qf3 Kd8 30. c4 Qe1+ 31. Bf1 Re7
32. Qd3 Qa5 33. Qc2 Bd4+ 34. Kh1 Rhe8 35. Nf2 Re1 36. Nd3 R8e2 37. Qb3 Rxb1 38.
Qxb1 Qxa2 39. Qxb7 Re7 40. Qb4 Qa1 41. c5 a5 42. Qb5 h4 43. Nf4 Bf6 44. cxd6
Nxd6 45. Qb8+ Nc8 {1/2-1/2 Bussmeyer,H-Zeltwanger,A/corr 1998/}) (19… Bh6 20.
Nc4 Nc8 21. Rb4 Qg5 22. Ne3 f5 23. Nxf5 Qd2 24. Nxd6+ Nxd6 25. Qxe5+ Kd7 26.
Rb6 Ne8 27. Qxh8 Be3 28. Bf5+ {1-0 Ghinda,M-Tseitlin,M/Pernik 1978/}) (19…
Bg7 $5) (19… Rg8 $5) (19… f5 $5) 20. Bxa6 $1 bxa6 21. Rb8+ $1 (21. Qxa6 $1
f5 22. Rb8+ Nc8 23. Rxc8+ Rxc8 24. Qxc8+ $18) 21… Nc8 {Botterill: It is easy
to see that the piece sacrifice is amply justified by the fact that Black’s
king’s rook and king’s bishop canot communicate with the other side of the
board.} (21… Rc8 22. Rxc8+ Nxc8 23. Qxa6 Kd8 24. Rb1 $18) 22. Qxa6 Kd8 23.
Rfb1 Qe5 {[%cal Ye5c3]} 24. Rxc8+ $1 Rxc8 25. Qa5+ Ke8 (25… Rc7 26. Rb8+ Kd7
27. Qb5+ Rc6 28. Qxc6+ Ke7 29. Qe8#) 26. Qa4+ Kd8 27. Rb7 (27. Rb7 Qe7 {
leading to a disastrous endgame.} ({If} 27… Rc7 28. Rb8+ Rc8 29. Qa5+ Kd7 30.
Rb7+ {and mates shortly.} Ke8 31. Qa4+ Kd8 32. Qd7#) (27… Qa1+ 28. Nf1 Rc7
29. Rb8+ Rc8 30. Qa5+ Kd7 31. Rb7+ Ke8 32. Qa4+ Kd8 33. Qd7#) 28. Rxe7 {
Botterill} Bxe7 29. Qxe4 Rb8 30. f3 Rb5 31. Nf5 Rb1+ 32. Kf2 Re8 33. Qa4 h6 34.
Qa5+ Kc8 35. Qa8+ Kd7 36. Qa7+ Kd8 37. Ng7 Rf8 38. Ne6+ fxe6 39. dxe6 Kc8 40.
Qxe7 $18 {Myers}) 1-0
[/pgn]

Penrose was awarded the O.B.E. for his services to chess in 1971.”

Penrose was Southern Counties Champion for 1949-50.

In 1983 Jonathan became England’s fifth Correspondence Grandmaster (CGM) following Keith Richardson, Adrian Hollis, Peter Clarke and Simon Webb.

Sadly, there is no existent book on the life and games of Jonathan Penrose : a serious omission in chess literature.

Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE
Dr. Jonathan Penrose OBE

Remembering IMC James Adams (04-ix-1921 27-vii-2013)

IMC James Adams (04-ix-1921 27-vii-2013)
IMC James Adams (04-ix-1921 27-vii-2013)

BCN remembers IMC James Adams who passed away aged 91 on July 27th, 2013 in Worcester Park, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey.

James Frederick Adams was born on September 4th, 1921 in Lambeth. His parents were James J Adams (DoB: 10th October 1884) who was a plumber’s mate and Lucy M Adams (née Ayres, DoB: 22nd December 1886). He had an older brother who was William A Adams who was also a plumber’s mate and and Uncle George T (DoB: 8th March 1882) who was the plumber who presumably had many mates.

At the time of the 1939 register James was a telephone operator.

The Adams family lived at 52, Broadway Gardens, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 4EE (rather than 001 Cemetery Lane)

52, Broadway Gardens, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 4EE
52, Broadway Gardens, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 4EE

From CHESS, 1991, March, page 91 we have:

“Whatever Happened to Human Effort?

I am giving up postal chess after 57 years for the reason that, like Jonathan Penrose and recently Nigel Short, I am increasingly disturbed over the increase in the use of computers in correspondence play. It is impossible to prove but one has the feeling that many opponents see nothing wrong in using a machine and I see no pleasure in having to bash one’s brains out against a computer. I am happy in the knowledge that I won my FIDE IM title long before dedicated chess computers were ever heard of. I shudder to think of the proliferation in the use of computers in a competition like the World CC Championship. I don’t wonder that Penrose objects.

Unfortunately, this is the sort of thing against which it is impossible to legislate. The BCCA has banned their use but it doesn’t mean a thing.

The latest monstrosity is where Kasparov plays a match against another GM and both are allowed to use computers whilst the game is in progress. To me, this is absolutely shocking. Dr. Nunn admits to the use of computers in the compilation of one of his books and I see that even ordinary annotators use a programme like Fritz to assist with their notes to a game. What happened to human effort?

Anyway, I have about five postal games left in progress and when they are finished I will call it a day.

Jim Adams
Worcester Park, Surrey

So who was Jim Adams?

From British Chess (Pergamon Press, 1983) Botterill, Levy, Rice and Richardson we have this:

The smoke-laden atmosphere of the chess rooms of St. Bride’s Institute, in the heart of the City of London, could hardly be considered a positive encouragement to any ambitions to become an International Master, but certainly this was so in my case. Let me explain the sequence of events.

Face-to-face, or over-the-board chess, had been my main interest since my war-time days as a member of the Civil Defence. Passing time between air-raids led to the adoption of many pastimes and an absorbing game such as chess was ideal. Fortunately for me, one of my ambulance station colleagues was a very fine player named A. F. (Algy) Battersby, later to become General Secretary of the British Correspondence Chess Association.

He had spent the greater part of the First World War playing chess in the Sinai Desert and, with his tremendous experience, he brought to the game strategical ideas and tactical skills that, in those early days, were well beyond my comprehension.

Arthur Frank Battersby, BIRTH 2 JUN 1887 • Brixton, Surrey, England  DEATH 11 APR 1955 • Surrey, England
Arthur Frank Battersby, BIRTH 2 JUN 1887 • Brixton, Surrey, England DEATH 11 APR 1955 • Surrey, England

‘Algy’ was kind enough to say some years afterwards that I was ‘the best pupil he ever had’, but whether this was true or not, he certainly passed on to me the theoretical groundwork that was to be so useful to me in later years. Among other books, he encouraged me to purchase the Nimzowitch classic My System, with the kindly warning that I would not understand it at first reading but would perhaps get some grasp of the ideas at a second or third attempt.

My System was a revelation to me and proved to be the greatest help to an understanding of the game that I had ever received. Up to my fortuitous meeting with ‘Algy’, my games had been of a simple tactical nature. Pieces were left en prise, oversights and blunders were the order of the day and an actual checkmate came as a surprise not only to the loser but often to the winner as well!

To win a game through sheer strength of position was completely unknown to me, but ‘Algy’ and Nimzowitch changed all that! Under their combined influence my general playing strength improved enormously and I was soon second only to ‘Algy’ in such tournaments as were held in my home town of Mitcham, where the local chess club was revived after the war.

Our club soon attracted a few strong players and we played regularly in county competitions and, later, the London Chess League. During those years chess was an absolute joy to me and all my spare time was spent at the local club or at chess matches, whilst Saturday afternoons were spent at the now defunct Gambit Chess Room, in Budge Row, where I passed countless hours playing chess, pausing only to order light refreshment from the indefatigable ‘Eileen’, a waitress of somewhat uncertain age who almost certainly regarded all chess players as raving lunatics!

The ‘Gambit’ could never have been a viable commercial proposition on what we bought and it was eventually thought necessary to introduce a minimum charge depending on the time of day. Gone for ever were the days when one could spend the entire evening playing chess, analysing, or having a crack at the local Kriegspiel experts, all for the price of two cups of tea and the occasional sandwich. Sadly, it all disappeared in the aftermath of the
war.

By 1950 I had become Match Captain of the Mitcham Chess Club and, of course, responsible for arranging various matches. Getting a team together was not difficult as the club membership was quite large for such a lowly club. The playing standard too was surprisingly high and whilst I, myself, was fortunate enough to win the club championship several times it was never easy.

On one occasion a ‘friendly’ match had been arranged with the BBC and all was well until a ‘flu epidemic a few days before the date of the match laid most of the Mitcham players low. On the morning of the match I was left with five players for a 1O-board match! As it was only a ‘friendly’ and in order to avoid disappointing all concerned I took myself off to the Gambit and recruited a few of the ‘regulars’ to help us out. It must be remembered that most of the strongest players in London frequented the ‘Gambit’ and since those pressganged into service were extremely strong players it seemed only courteous to give them the honour of playing on the top five boards, leaving the Mitcham ‘stars’ who, coincidentally, were our usual top board players, to bring up the rear.

Now this composite team, in my judgement, was probably good enough to win the London League A Division and it was no surprise when we won 10-0. Only a friendly indeed! Any Match Captain would have given his queen’s rook for such a team but, whilst the BBC players were warned beforehand of the composition of our team, they were not amused and further matches were not arranged!

Mr A Corish (right), receives the Chess Champion cup from Mr J Adams. 18th September 1958 from the Merton Advertiser, Photographer unknown.
Mr A Corish (right), receives the Chess Champion cup from Mr J Adams. 18th September 1958 from the Merton Advertiser, Photographer unknown.

Round about this time I was playing regularly in London League matches, nearly all of which were held at St. Bride’s Institute, where my story began. A non-smoker myself, I found the conditions intolerable. The place seemed to be completely airless and Government warnings about the dangers of smoking did not exist! not exist! Consequently, the entire playing area was reminiscent of the Black Hole of Calcutta! Always susceptible to headaches, I began to return home physically ill after every match. If this was playing chess for pleasure then something was wrong!

Mr A Corish (right), receives the Chess Champion cup from Mr J Adams. 18th September 1958 from the Merton Advertiser, Photographer unknown.
Mr A Corish (right), receives the Chess Champion cup from Mr J Adams. 18th September 1958 from the Merton Advertiser, Photographer unknown.

However, salvation was at hand. Ever since the war I had been playing a few games by post under the auspices of the BCCA (British Correspondence Chess Association ), and my somewhat traumatic experiences at St. Bride’s were beginning to make postal chess a far more attractive way of playing the
game. And so my chess career started all over again!

My correspondence chess activities up to the 1960s were not particularly successful, although I had managed to win three Premier Sections and finish
equal third in the British Correspondence Championship of 1962-63. However, during that time a group of BCCA players, of whom I was one, were
becoming somewhat dissatisfied with the Association’s attitude towards international chess and eventually a splinter group formed a rival organization which became known as the British Correspondence Chess Society.

The BCCS was, almost from the start, internationally orientated and it was possible to play foreign players, many of master strength. With strong opposition it seemed easier to improve and my first real success came in the Eberhardt Wilhelm Cup in 1966-67 when I was able to obtain the lM norm giving me a half=master title. However, gone were the days when a superficial analysis was enough before posting a move, which even if it was not the best, was generally good enough to hold one’s own with even the best of British CC players at that time. Fortunately for British chess, the situation is now vastly different and the strongest British CC players are recognized as being among the best in the world.

The Eberhardt Wilhelm Cup consisted of players all of master or near-master strength and it was in one of the games I played in this tournament that I played probably the most surprising move of my life.

[pgn]
[Event “Eberhardt Wilhelm Cup”]
[Site “Correspondence”]
[Date “1967.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “John F Adams”]
[Black “E Ott”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B18”]
[Annotator “James Adams”]
[PlyCount “39”]
[EventDate “1967.??.??”]
[SourceTitle “British Chess, page 13”]
[WhiteTeam “England”]
[BlackTeam “Hungary”]

{[%evp 0,39,19,38,60,60,55,40,50,35,39,46,55,55,38,26,27,18,22,36,31,28,62,31,
18,19,24,15,19,5,66,26,30,38,38,18,30,17,34,210,203,204]} {This game appears
on page 13 of British Chess, Pergamon Press.} 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4.
Nxe4 Bf5 5. Ng3 Bg6 6. h4 h6 7. Nf3 Nd7 8. h5 Bh7 9. Bd3 Bxd3 10. Qxd3 Qc7 11.
Bd2 Ngf6 12. O-O-O e6 13. Kb1 O-O-O 14. c4 c5 15. Bc3 cxd4 16. Nxd4 {[#] So
far this is all “book” and whilst White has more space in the centre, Black’s
position is quite sound and he can look forward to a good game. The normal
move for Black is now 16…a6 which also has the recommendation of the World
Champion Botvinnik. My opponent had the quite laudable idea of saving a
“tempo” and clearly did not fear Nb5 by White. Unfortunately for him there was
a gigantic flaw in his reasoning.} Bc5 $6 $146 ({Relevant:} 16… a6 17. Qe2
Bd6 18. Nf1 Nc5 19. Nb3 Nxb3 20. axb3 Qb6 21. Nd2 Bc5 22. f4 a5 23. Be5 Qc6 24.
Rhf1 Bb4 25. f5 Bxd2 26. Bxf6 gxf6 27. Rxd2 Rxd2 28. Qxd2 Rd8 29. Qxa5 Qxg2 30.
Qa8+ Kc7 31. Qa5+ Kc8 32. Qa8+ Kc7 33. Qa5+ {1/2-1/2 (33) Reshevsky,S-Sherwin,
J New York 1966}) 17. Nb5 (17. Qe2) 17… Qb6 $2 ({Much better was} 17… Qf4
$11 18. Qd2 Qxd2 19. Rxd2) 18. b4 $18 a6 ({Black had undoubtedly seen all this
and also seen that} 18… Bxf2 {would lose to} 19. Nd6+ Kb8 20. Nxf7) 19. bxc5
Nxc5 {Black must have awaited my next move with some complacency.} 20. Qd6 $3 (
20. Bd4 axb5 21. Qe3 bxc4+ 22. Kc2 Rd5 {with full equality. Unhappily for his
dreams I had prepared a move which he had obviously not anticipated.}) 1-0
[/pgn]

To win the full IM title involved getting one more IM norm and happily for my prospects, I was selected for the British team in both the Olympiad Preliminary of 1972 and the European Team Championships of 1973.

Although I was trifle unlucky to miss the IM norm by half a point in the European Championship I finally clinched the coveted IM title in the Olympiad Preliminary which, although starting a few months before the European tournament, went on so long that I was in suspense long after the European games finished.

[pgn]
[Event “olm8 qual GP3 B6 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1973.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Adams, James F”]
[Black “Butnaru, Corneliu”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B96”]
[Annotator “James Frederick Adams”]
[PlyCount “57”]
[EventDate “1973.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “Great Britain”]
[BlackTeam “Rumania”]

{[%evp 0,55,19,29,40,40,80,76,70,26,29,26,61,47,68,14,46,51,76,79,79,9,-22,-17,
0,0,0,-5,27,4,132,-41,45,172,248,253,253,274,274,260,256,263,263,275,260,245,
262,255,283,273,439,544,483,494,568,578,600,643]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4
4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 b5 8. e5 dxe5 9. fxe5 Qc7 10. Qe2 ({
If now} 10. exf6 Qe5+ {recovers the piece with a good game}) 10… Nfd7 11.
O-O-O Bb7 12. Qg4 {A promising pawn sacrifce} Qxe5 $6 (12… Nxe5 $2 13. Nxe6
Nxg4 14. Nxc7#) (12… Qb6 13. Be2 Nxe5 14. Qh3 Nbd7 15. Rhe1 $16) 13. Bd3 (13.
Bxb5 axb5 14. Rhe1 h5 15. Qh4 Qc5 16. Qg3 Bc6 $15) (13. Be2 Bc5 14. Rhe1 Bxd4
15. Rxd4 Nc6 16. Rd2 $16) 13… Nf6 $2 {Losing} ({Relevant:} 13… h6 14. Bh4
g5 15. Nxe6 h5 16. Qxg5 Bh6 17. Rhe1 fxe6 18. Bg6+ Kf8 19. Rf1+ Kg8 20. Bf7+
Kh7 21. Bg6+ Kg8 22. Bf7+ Kh7 23. Bg6+ {1/2-1/2 (23) Dueball,J-Kerr,B Skopje
1972}) 14. Bxf6 {[#]} Qxf6 $146 ({Predecessor:} 14… gxf6 15. Bf5 Qe3+ 16. Kb1
h5 17. Nxe6 Qxe6 18. Qd4 Nc6 19. Qd7+ Qxd7 20. Bxd7+ Ke7 21. Bxc6 Bxc6 22.
Rhe1+ {1-0 (22) Kogan-Kotenko,G corr 1971}) 15. Rhe1 $18 (15. Nxe6 $1) 15… h5
{[#]} 16. Nxe6 $18 {It is interesting to note that ex-World Champion M. Tal
played this same sacrifice a few months later in a simultaneous display at
Teeside.} (16. Qg3 $18) 16… hxg4 ({Tal’s opponent, fearful of the great man,
declined the sacrifice by} 16… Be7 {but after} 17. Bxb5+ {had to resign.}
axb5 18. Nc7+ Kf8 19. Rd8+ Bxd8 20. Re8#) {My opponent, unfettered by such
considerations of invincibility, decided to say “Show me”.} 17. Bxb5+ Ke7 {
In this position I now spent hours upon hours of simply delightful analysis.
Surelt there was a forced mate? But it was not to be found and so….} (17…
axb5 {Obviously not} 18. Nc7#) 18. Nxf8+ Qe6 ({or} 18… Kxf8 19. Re8#) 19.
Nxe6 fxe6 20. Bc4 Rh6 21. Nd5+ Bxd5 22. Rxd5 Nd7 23. Rg5 Kf6 {After all the
blood and thunder White is a pawn up and proceeds to win another.} 24. Rxg4
Rxh2 25. Rxe6+ Kf5 26. Reg6 Nf8 27. Bd3+ Ke5 {Black has been driven into a
mating net.} 28. R4g5+ {and Black resigned} {For, if} Kd4 ({whilst} 28… Kf4 {
leads to} 29. Rf5+ Ke3 30. Rg3+ Kd4 31. c3#) 29. Kd2 $1 {and mates} 1-0
[/pgn]

One of my most interesting games in the European Team Championship of 1973 was against F. Grzeskowiak, himself an IM and a feared attacking player.

[pgn]
[Event “EU-chT1 qual 2-08 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1973.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Grzeskowiak, Felix”]
[Black “Adams, James F”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “C99”]
[Annotator “James Fredeick Adams”]
[PlyCount “90”]
[EventDate “1973.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,90,19,31,34,25,34,15,18,-10,2,-5,24,-4,4,7,0,-46,-16,-9,-7,-7,2,17,23,
-23,-11,-18,27,0,27,46,41,44,40,55,45,17,29,26,8,14,41,27,12,8,13,-12,6,-26,
-35,-88,-89,-43,-44,-84,-31,-82,-31,-34,-18,-87,-87,-89,-97,-75,0,-95,-129,
-147,-114,-114,-107,-207,-194,-182,-231,-269,-141,-257,-108,-216,-166,-253,
-304,-291,-476,-476,-456,-475,-501,-581,-695]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4.
Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d6 9. h3 Na5 {Chigorin Variation}
10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Qc7 12. Nbd2 cxd4 13. cxd4 Nc6 14. a3 Bd7 15. Nb3 ({Relevant:
} 15. Nf1 Rfc8 16. Bb3 Be8 17. Ng3 g6 18. Bg5 Nd7 19. Bxe7 Nxe7 20. Qd2 Nc6 21.
Qh6 Nf8 22. Nf5 gxf5 23. exf5 Nd8 24. Re4 Nde6 25. Rg4+ {1-0 (25) Gutierrez
Castillo,J-Henao,R Medellin 1972}) 15… a5 16. Be3 a4 17. Nbd2 Rfc8 18. Bd3 {
[#]} Qb7 $146 {at the time in correspondence chess} ({Predecessor:} 18… Qb8
19. Nf1 Na5 20. Rc1 Rxc1 21. Qxc1 Nb3 22. Qc2 Bd8 23. dxe5 dxe5 24. Bg5 Nh5 25.
Bxd8 Qxd8 26. Ne3 Rc8 27. Qb1 Nd4 28. Qd1 Nb3 29. Bc2 Be6 30. Qxd8+ Rxd8 31.
Nxe5 Nf4 32. Nf3 h6 33. h4 Bc4 34. g3 Ne6 35. Rd1 Rc8 36. Bxb3 Bxb3 37. Rd2 Rb8
38. Ne5 b4 39. axb4 Rxb4 40. f3 Rb5 41. Nd5 a3 42. bxa3 Ra5 43. Ne7+ Kf8 44.
N7c6 Rxa3 45. Rd7 Ra1+ 46. Kf2 Ra2+ 47. Ke3 Kg8 48. Rxf7 {Watzl,L-Madsen,S
ICCF corr 1950 1-0}) 19. Qe2 exd4 20. Nxd4 Ne5 21. Bc2 $146 Nc4 22. Bg5 {
Setting a little trap} Rc5 ({so that if} 22… Nxb2 23. Rab1 Nc4 24. Nxc4 Rxc4
25. Qxc4 {and wins.}) {It must be remembered here that, in order to get the IM
title, I had to play for a win in practically every game and Black’s aggressive
play from now on should be viewed in that context.} 23. f4 {I had hoped for
tis natural reply which, however, leaves the white king dangerously exposed
and gives Black many tactical chances.} Nxd2 24. Qxd2 Qa7 {threatening …Rxc2!
} 25. Kh1 h6 $1 {At the right time.} 26. Bxf6 ({White cannot play} 26. Bh4 {
because of} Nxe4 $1 {and so is forced to concede Black the two bishops, thus
greatly enhancing my attacking prospects.}) 26… Bxf6 27. Bd1 Rac8 28. Rb1 d5
{Although allowing} 29. e5 {this move opens up more lines for the deadly
bishops.} Bh4 30. Rf1 Rc4 31. Ne2 Bf5 32. Ra1 ({I had expected} 32. Rc1 {
here to try to exchange a pair of rooks but Black is obviously well on top in
any case.}) 32… Qd7 33. Kh2 d4 {With complete command of the c-file, two
beautifully-placed bishops, a lurking, menacing queen plus a pawn with the
Nimzowitsch “lust to expand”, Black has an easily won game.} 34. b3 axb3 35.
Bxb3 d3 $1 {Black can afford to give up the exchange but White declines with
thanks!} 36. Ng1 Rc3 37. Bd1 Be7 $1 {Black hammers at White’s many weaknesses
and forces White’s pieces into awkward positions.} 38. Qb2 Rc2 $1 {Played with
hardly any thought. If the exchange sacrifice does not work here there’s no
justice!} 39. Qb3 Qd4 {Grzeskowiak is in terrible trouble and at last decides
to win some material in the hopes of salvaging something from the position.
but it is all too late now!} 40. Bxc2 Rxc2 41. Rab1 Be6 42. Qxb5 Bd5 43. Rf3 ({
The attempt to preserve material by} 43. Nf3 {would soon lose} {after} Qxf4+
44. Kh1 Qg3 45. Rg1 (45. Ne1 Bxg2+ {etc}) 45… Bxf3 {and it is all over.})
43… Bxf3 44. Nxf3 Qf2 45. Rg1 ({If} 45. Ne1 {Black soon wins by} Qxf4+ 46.
Kh1 Qf1+ 47. Kh2 Re2 {for if now} 48. Qxd3 Rxg2+ {wins the queen.}) 45… Qxf3
{and White resigned. A most satisfactory win.} 0-1
[/pgn]

Here is a discussion of James Adams on the English Chess Forum initiated by Matt Mackenzie (Millom, Cumbria)

Here is his entry on the ICCF web site.

Here is his entry from chessgames.com

39 Games of James Adams (27) of thirty nine of his games.

The Iron English

The Iron English, Richard Palliser & Simon Williams, Everyman Chess, 2020, ISBN-13 : 978-1781945803
The Iron English, Richard Palliser & Simon Williams, Everyman Chess, 2020, ISBN-13 : 978-1781945803

Here is the publishers blurb from the rear cover :

Grandmaster Simon Williams was taught the English Opening at the age of six and 1 c4 was his weapon of choice until long after he became an International Master. For this new work, he teamed up with acclaimed theoretician International Master Richard Palliser to explore his old favourite. 1 c4 remains an excellent choice for the club and tournament player. This book focuses on the set-up popularised by the sixth world champion, Mikhail Botvinnik, the so-called Botvinnik formation with 2 Nc3, 3 g3, 4 Bg2, 5 e4 and 6 Nge2.

This system is compact but still aggressive and rewards an understanding of plans and strategies rather than rote memorisation of moves. In Opening Repertoire: The Iron English leading chess authors Simon Williams and Richard Palliser guide the reader through the complexities of this dynamic variation and carves out a repertoire for White.

They examine all aspects of this highly complex opening and provide the reader with well-researched, fresh, and innovative analysis. Each annotated game has valuable lessons on how to play the opening and contains instructive commentary on typical middlegame plans.

and. from the publisher, about the authors :

IM Richard Palliser
IM Richard Palliser

“Richard Palliser is an International Master and the editor of CHESS magazine. In 2006 he became joint British Rapidplay Champion and in 2019 finished 3rd in the British Championship. He has established a reputation as a skilled chess writer and written many works for Everyman, including the bestselling The Complete Chess Workout.”

GM Simon Williams
GM Simon Williams

“Simon Williams is a Grandmaster, a well-known presenter and a widely-followed streamer, as well as a popular writer whose previous books have received great praise. He is much admired for his dynamic and spontaneous attacking style.”

As with every recent Everyman Chess publication high quality paper is used and the printing is clear. Each diagram is clear as is the instructional text. Figurine algebraic notation is used throughout.

The diagrams do not have a “to move” indicator or any kind of caption so you will need to work out for yourself how they relate to the text that they are embedded in. However, this is fairly obvious.

The book consists of nine chapters :

  1. Key Ideas for White
  2. Kickstarter: An Outline of the Iron English Repertoire
  3. English Versus King’s Indian
  4. The Modern: 1.c4 g6 and 1…d6
  5. Other Fianchetto Defences
  6. The Reversed Sicilian
  7. The Symmetrical English
  8. The Mikenas Attack
  9. Other Lines (1…c6/1…e6)

Opening books are becoming thicker and more imposing year on year and at 464 pages this recent offering from Everyman Chess is no exception. Any book with the involvement of Richard Palliser deserves, without doubt, to be paid special attention to and complimenting him is the h (and now f) pawns favourite advocate Grandmaster, Simon Williams.

Having two authors with contrasting playing styles (we felt) would lead to interesting recommendations rather in the vein of “Good cop, bad cop”. We will leave you to decide which might be which!

In essence this book (and the strongly associated Chessable course) is a complete repertoire for White based around the English Opening.

In the BCN office one of our favourite English Opening books is the 1999 classic “The Dynamic English” by Tony Kosten

The Dynamic English, Tony Kosten, Gambit Publications, 1999, ISBN 1 901983 14 5
The Dynamic English, Tony Kosten, Gambit Publications, 1999, ISBN 1 901983 14 5

which is of a mere 144 pages and of even smaller physical dimensions. A timeless classic in our opinion.

The Iron English is the first (we think) book (in the English language) to provide a complete repertoire around the Botvinnik flavour of the English in which White clamps or strongpoints the d5 square with an early e4 thus:

[fen csl=Ge4]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/2P1P3/2N3P1/PP1PNPBP/R1BQK2R b KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

or even more simply

[fen csl=Ge4]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/2P1P3/8/PP1P1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

and this solid generic structure is advocated against almost all of Black’s reasonable and unreasonable defences.

Chapter One provides sample games (mainly from the authors) to give an idea of what White should be striving to achieve and Chapter Two outlines the repertoire.

In order to benefit from the chapters following these two  should probably be read more than once. One of the reasons for this is the huge complexity of the transpositional possibilities and move orders. The end-of-book Index of Variations helps the reader to navigate their way through the mire of variations and following that is an Index of Games bringing up the rear.

The style of presentation is friendly and very, very chatty (Alan Carr is nowhere to be seen you’ll be pleased to learn)  and presumably driven by the same material’s presentation as part of a Chessable course.

To get a feel of this style here are sample pages to whet your appetite and here is a example extracted game from Chapter One:

[pgn]
[Event “1: Cappelle-la-Grande”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1995.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Williams, S.”]
[Black “Locatelli, V.”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “A26”]
[Annotator “Simon Williams & Richard Palliser”]
[PlyCount “59”]
[EventDate “1995.??.??”]
[SourceTitle “OR: The Iron English”]
[Source “Everyman Chess”]
[SourceDate “2021.02.01”]

{[%evp 0,59,23,4,13,-32,23,1,14,19,11,-22,-10,8,-13,-16,-5,-26,-6,-77,25,52,65,
65,90,88,106,103,88,61,116,75,85,95,104,73,95,87,109,100,131,137,175,157,155,
153,160,113,160,180,466,473,751,753,844,943,965,969,1237,1238,1267,1300]
Cramping the King’s Indian:} 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d6 3. g3 g6 {Black decides to go
for a King’s Indian set-up after all.} ({Instead,} 3… e5 4. Bg2 Nbd7 5. d3
Be7 {would resemble the Old Indian. After} 6. e4 {Black looks a little cramped
and our favourite f4 advance might well occur.}) 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. e4 {There are
several different ways of handling the English, but naturally we advocate
setting up that Botvinnik formation.} e5 6. Nge2 Nc6 7. O-O O-O 8. f4 $5 (8. d3
{is our recommended move order, but the young Simon liked the immediate, bold
advance of Freddie.}) 8… Be6 {Routine development, just as you might expect
at club level.} (8… exf4 $1 9. gxf4 Nh5 {is somewhat more challenging. Black
prepares to gain space of his own with …f5 and} 10. f5 $2 Qh4 {would leave
White looking rather overextended.}) 9. Nd5 $6 ({White should still go} 9. d3 {
, when Black might well elect to prevent f5 with} Qd7 {. but we also can’t
resist pointing out that} 10. f5 $5 ({Now} 10. Nd5 {looks sensible;}) 10… gxf5 11. Bg5 {is a very interesting pawn sacrifice. If Black takes
on e4, White wins material, so} Ne8 {seems necessary, when} (11… h6 $2 12.
Bxf6 Bxf6 13. exf5 Bxf5 14. g4 $1 {wins a piece – a tactical motif worth
remembering}) 12. exf5 Bxf5 13. Nd5 {leaves White with a certain grip and
compensation for the pawn; Qd2 will follow and quite possibly Ne2-c3-e4.}) 9…
Ne8 $2 {[#] Far too meek. King’s Indian players always want to free their
f-pawn to go …f5, but Black won’t be able to because of our set-up.} ({
Much better was} 9… Bg4 {, making good use of Black’s grip on the d4-square,
which is the one downside to the Botvinnik formation.}) 10. f5 $1 {Put that in
your pipe and smoke it!} Bd7 (10… Bxd5 11. cxd5 {is almost never a trade to
worry about. After} Nd4 ({or} 11… Ne7 12. d3 {, when} c6 {is a break for
freedom, but after} 13. dxc6 bxc6 14. g4 $1 {White is much better; Ng3 follows
and Black is in grave danger of being squashed to death on the kingside}) 12.
Nxd4 exd4 13. d3 {White has a pleasant advantage. Black’s pawn on d4 is
something of a dead point, merely blunting his own bishop, in contrast to
which White has control, a space advantage, the two bishops and, yes, g4-g5
may follow.}) 11. d3 {Having made such a gain of space, it’s high time to
develop the remaining pieces.} f6 {This is ugly;} ({but so is the best the
engines can suggest,} 11… h6 12. Be3 g5 {. Just look at that bishop on g7!
Indeed, with Black devoid of counterplay and so cramped it might make sense
for White to switch operations and expand with} 13. b4 {. Note that while our
Botvinnik set-up does leave the f-pawn free to advance, we are by no means
committed to kingside play, but can also advance on the queenside and
sometimes even in the centre.}) 12. Be3 Ne7 13. Nxe7+ ({Simon remembers also
being tempted by} 13. g4 {;}) ({and} 13. d4 $5 {looks very nice too for White
with Qb3 next up.}) 13… Qxe7 14. Qd2 g5 $2 {Black wrongly thinks that Bh6 is
a threat. That is often a plan to swap off one of Black’s best pieces, but
here the entombed bishop on g7 cannot be seen as one.} (14… c6 {was a try
for some counterplay, but after} 15. g4 Nc7 16. Ng3 {White retains control and
might even ready Harry,}) ({while} 14… c5 15. g4 ({a good case can even be
made for} 15. b4 $5) 15… a6 16. h4 $1 b5 17. Ng3 Rb8 18. g5 {is a very
instructive line. Naturally Black doesn’t want to take on f5 or g5, but he is
just in huge trouble in any case, as shown by} Nc7 19. Rf2 Rb7 20. Raf1 {
. The pressure grows against f6 and} Ne8 21. fxg6 $1 {(only now, with all
White’s pieces perfectly aligned)} hxg6 22. h5 {decisively rips open lines:
for example,} fxg5 ({or} 22… gxh5 23. g6 {followed by Nxh5 or even Nf5 and
Qe2}) 23. Rxf8+ Bxf8 24. hxg6 Qg7 25. Qf2 Be7 26. Nf5 Bxf5 27. Qxf5 {and Black
collapses on the light squares.}) 15. g4 $1 {Preventing any notion of …h5
while freeing g3 for the knight.} Rf7 16. h4 $1 ({It was again possible to
switch focus with} 16. b4 {, but with Black so tied up, Simon couldn’t resist
involving Harry.}) 16… h6 (16… gxh4 $2 17. Rf3 {will regain the pawn with
a mighty attack after Rh3.}) 17. hxg5 hxg5 {[#]} (17… fxg5 {might have been
more obstinate, but still looks great for White after} 18. Bf3 Nf6 19. Ng3 {
. Bolder readers will no doubt be looking at ideas of Kg2, Rh1 and a sacrifice
on g5 here; calmer ones will notice how tied up Black is, so why not open a
second front on the queenside as White?}) 18. Kf2 $1 {Centralising the king,
not for the endgame, but to allow the rooks access to the h-file.} c6 19. Rh1
Nc7 20. Rh3 Rff8 21. Rah1 Kf7 22. Ng3 {This is a dream Botvinnik position.
White has a handy space advantage and just look at Black’s lack of
coordination and counterplay. Simon recalls he was very happy here, and no
wonder.} Rh8 23. Nh5 $1 {Keeping pieces on and Black bottled up.} Bh6 24. d4 {
Levering open the second front;} ({but we’re not sure now how Simon resisted}
24. Nxf6 $1 {, and if} Qxf6 25. Rxh6 Rxh6 26. Bxg5 {and it’s all over.}) 24…
c5 $2 {Desperation.} (24… exd4 25. Bxd4 Ne8 26. Nf4 $1 {is one neat way to
invade;}) ({and} 24… Bg7 {actually fails to prevent} 25. Nxf6 $1 {and –
boom! After} Bxf6 (25… Qxf6 26. Bxg5 {traps the black queen}) 26. Rh7+ Bg7
27. Bxg5 Qe8 28. f6 {White wins material while decisively opening lines.}) 25.
dxc5 dxc5 26. Nxf6 $1 {Simon was never going to miss this for long.} Bxf5 27.
exf5 Rad8 28. Nd5 e4 29. Nxe7 Rxd2+ 30. Bxd2 1-0
[/pgn]

which provides for engaging instruction (if you like that sort of thing!).

Quite correctly, the content is dominated by the King’s Indian (73 pages), Reversed Sicilian (102 pages) and 100 pages on 1. c4 g6 and 1.c4 d6 lines. Clearly a wealth of material and probably most suited to someone who already plays the English but not the Botvinnik System. Taking up the English for the first time via this book (and/or the course) could well be somewhat daunting and not for the faint hearted.

Each of chapters Three – Nine adopts the now familiar Everyman format of example games delivering the theoretical discussion. Thirty-three games are dissected in detail including six of SKWs.

In the BCN office we always like to see how we would fair defending “against the book” and since we play the slightly offbeat 1.c4 c6 we turned to page 440 for Theory 9A (!).

[fen]rnbqkbnr/pp1ppppp/2p5/8/2P5/8/PP1PPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

where we won our internal wager that White would be advised to play 2.e4 and transpose into a Pseudo-Panov (called the Steiner Variation in Win with the Caro-Kann) rather than to a Slav. So, how did the “game” go?

1.c4 c6; 2. e4 d5; 3.cd: cd:; 4. ed: Nf6; 5.Nc3 Nxd5; 6.Bc4!?

[fen csl=Gc4]rnbqkb1r/pp2pppp/8/3n4/2B5/2N5/PP1P1PPP/R1BQK1NR b KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

which is a little off the beaten track (but easily met) with 6…Nb6; 7.Bb3 Nc6; 8.Nf3 Bf5; 9. d4 e6; 10 0-0, Be7; 11.a4 Na5 12. Ba2 0-0; 13.Qe2 and instead of the move suggested (13…Rc8) we played 13…Nc6! with a totally playable position.

[fen csl=Gc6]r2q1rk1/pp2bppp/1nn1p3/5b2/P2P4/2N2N2/BP2QPPP/R1B2RK1 w KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

The text suggests that someone who plays 1…c6 could be unfamiliar with a transposition to the Caro-Kann. Yes, they may well be but more likely this is a forlorn hope.

Anyway, this recreational digression is not really germane to the main thrust of the book…

In summary, this book is a major piece of work by Richard Palliser and Simon Williams that adds considerable material to the increasingly popular Botvinnik English.

In a sense the Botvinnik English is a kind of very grown-up London System and Colle Opening approach to playing with the White pieces (i.e. a system approach) and a welcome addition to White’s armoury.  Anyone wishing to take it up will find this book to be a reliable and friendly companion.

John Upham, Cove, Hampshire, 29th April, 2021

John Upham
John Upham

Book Details :

  • Paperback : 464 pages
  • Publisher: Everyman Chess (1 Oct. 2020)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1781945802
  • ISBN-13: 978-1781945803
  • Product Dimensions: 17.3 x 1.7 x 23.8 cm

Official web site of Everyman Chess

As is fairly common these days, the book has been migrated to the Chessable platform. Here are reviews of that course.

The Iron English, Richard Palliser & Simon Williams, Everyman Chess, 2020, ISBN-13 : 978-1781945803
The Iron English, Richard Palliser & Simon Williams, Everyman Chess, 2020, ISBN-13 : 978-1781945803

ECF Official Chess Yearbook 2021

ECF Official Chess Yearbook 2021
ECF Official Chess Yearbook 2021

From the publisher:

“Thanks to the efforts of a dedicated team of people within the English Chess Federation, the ECF Yearbook 2021 is now available in PDF form via this link – https://www.englishchess.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Yearbook-2021-complete-medres.pdf *

The printed version will follow in a little while; it will be free to Platinum members of the ECF and may be purchased (while stocks last) for £15.50 by ECF members in all other categories [online form to follow].

Special thanks go to IM Richard Palliser at CHESS Magazine, Dr John Upham at British Chess News, Director of Home Chess Nigel Towers, compiler Andrew Walker and to our determined team of proof readers – Dagne Ciuksyte, Roger Emerson, Stephen Greep, James Muir, Mike Truran and John Upham.”

End of blurb.

One thing I failed to predict for 2021 (amongst numerous others) was having a hardcopy of the ECF Yearbook to review. I was not sure there would be a yearbook of any kind based on a lack of material to report combined with an impending fear of the hardcopy version being deprecated.

At this juncture I feel it appropriate for the Yearbook to (correctly) quote (but often misquoted) Samuel Langhorne Clemens (aka Mark Twain if you didn’t know otherwise) that

Samuel Langhorne Clemens (aka Mark Twain)
Samuel Langhorne Clemens (aka Mark Twain)

The report of my death was an exaggeration

A Yearbook of English chess was “first published sometime between 1904 and 1913” but not by the BCF. The first BCF Yearbook may well have appeared in the 1930s but the jury remains unclear. BCF Yearbooks continued up until 2005 and then became the ECF Yearbook in 2006 which suggests at least 90 odd editions. The events (or rather the lack of events!) after March 2020 led myself to believe we would not see an ECF Yearbook until 2022 if at all!

Despite all this Private Frazer style doom and gloom

Private Frazer : We're doomed, Doomed!
Private Frazer : We’re doomed, Doomed!

and thanks to the good offices of Andrew Walker (ECF Webmaster) we not only have a Yearbook but, dare I say it,  we have an excellent one with more pages than the previous year! So, (as they frequently say on television) how did they do that?

The Contents are divided into 15 sections viz:

  1. Report of the Board to Council
  2. Strategy and Business Plan
  3. New Initiatives – GoMembership / Queen’s Gambit Scheme
  4. Chess in Prisons
  5. John Robinson Youth Chess Trust
  6. The Chess Trust
  7. The ECF Academy
  8. ECF and Other Awards
  9. Home News 2020 – from CHESS Magazine
  10. Events around England
  11. Nigel Tower’s Online Chess Report
  12. Off the Wall
  13. Mark Rivlin (and Tim Wall) – the interviews
  14. Remembering -from British Chess News
  15. Endgame Studies / Chess Problem News

Being a Yearbook the overall layout would normally include formal content that you might be forgiven for leaving for the ubiquitous “rainy day”. Perhaps we should update that and leave things for a “sunny day”?

ECF CEO, Mike Truran OBE kicks-off with the year’s positives and he immediately thanks those who carried largely unpaid work on behalf of English chess and the ECF.

Gone are the lengthy (dare I say tedious?) lists of officials, Title holders, Past Champions and all the other content which is largely unchanged year-on-year. Most of this information has been migrated on-line and may be found on the ECF’s satellite Resource web site. This makes complete sense since this location may be maintained throughout the year rather than being cast in stone (or rather paper).

This is followed by an itemised list of the ECFs Strategy and Business plan which contains many laudable and worthy statements of intent some of which, at least, will hopefully eventually be brought to fruition.

I won’t go through every section but I would like to pick out a few  highlights. It was gratifying to read of a small army of volunteers whose efforts were recognised with various awards including Bude Chess Club and the Hull International Congress.

Winner of ECF Book of the Year was no surprise whatsoever and justly deserved. It was a pleasure to read of those who had become FIDE Arbiters : we badly need such persons if we are to run sufficient FIDE rated events to cater for the increasing demand especially since England has recently abandoned the Clarke Grading system and replaced it with an Elo style rating system. I could always mention the Netflix phenomenon of Walter Tevis’s Queen’s Gambit but I won’t. I mentioned it once(?) and I think I got away with it.

So, we have covered 8 out of 15 sections as we turn to page 27. Its going to be a thin one for 2021 surely? Not so. Thanks to CHESS Magazine we have reports covering 43 pages of home news reported by the much loved magazine launched in 1935 for 1/- (a shilling which is 5 new pence for those born post February 15th 1971) by BH Wood. Within these pages we have 16 annotated games from the pages of the aforesaid publication. BHW would have been most proud that his magazine was doing its bit for 2020 as it did during the Second World War.

Events Around England runs to 32 pages of more familiar content such as reports of the Four Nations Chess League (4NCL), the ECF Counties Championship, Hastings International Congress and so on and so forth with that well-known “English” event, Gibraltar making a welcome appearance thanks to the reporting of John Saunders.

Now at page 101 (and less than half-way through) you might think what else can there be to report?

Indeed and at this point the ECF’s new Director of Home Chess, Nigel Towers, steps up to the plate and offers 15 pages reporting of the largest growth sector for the English chess scene, (no not discussions of ratings versus gradings) but, chess played on-line (as some might call it The InterWeb)  including the scores of eight games.

Tim Wall continues our journey adding a lighter and more humorous touch with a veritable potpourri of musings on various topics including absent minded cats, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (aka Lenin), Arthur Ransome and a modern resurrection (with the joie de vivre) of Howard Staunton via HSs enjoyable Twitter feed. Who is the person behind the account? Answers on a postcard to….

Not to be outdone, the ECF’s Newsletter compiler and editor, Mark Rivlin conspired with the aforementioned young Timothy to bring us a gathering of lockdown interviews with the great and good including Danny Gormally, Shreyas Royal, Lorin D’Costa, James and Jake. If you want to know who James and Jake are (and I do now!) then purchase the Yearbook!

The largest (58 pages) section for 2020 could leave me facing charges of nepotism… British Chess News was delighted to be invited to provide content and twelve biographies of some of the most significant contributors to English chess. These names include Harry Golombek OBE, Hugh Alexander CBE, Vera Menchik, Tony Miles and Fred Yates. I won’t comment on the articles veracity but leave that for you to discover.

The final section, and one of my favourites, is that of the Studies Editor of British Chess Magazine, Kent based Ian Watson. Ian provides the best new studies of 2020 and reflects on the life of one of England’s foremost composers, Dr. Richard K Guy.

As a taster, here is Ian’s contribution.

At 209 pages we have reached the end. The English Chess Federation have done a splendid job in getting this Yearbook produced and published in challenging circumstances. Long may the tradition continue!

John Upham, Cove, Hampshire, 20th April, 2021

John Upham
John Upham

Book Details :

Official web site of English Chess Federation

ECF Official Chess Yearbook 2021
ECF Official Chess Yearbook 2021

Happy Birthday (Arthur) John Roycroft (25-vii-1929)

(Arthur) John Roycroft
(Arthur) John Roycroft

We are delighted to offer (Arthur) John Roycroft best wishes on his birthday, this day (July 25th) in 1929.

John was born in Hendon, London and his mother’s maiden name was Banks.

AJR aged 9, courtesy of the BCPS web site.
AJR aged 9, courtesy of the BCPS web site.

John moved to Brighton and then evacuated to Calcot, North Wales and returned to Brighton when the threat of war had subsided.

He married Betty in 1961 and they had a son and a daughter and now have several grand children.

He claimed that he had never suffered a common cold.

John is Platinum Life Member of the English Chess Federation and an “ECF Supporter”.

The Chess Endgame Study
The Chess Endgame Study

“From The Oxford Companion to Chess (Oxford University Press, 1984) by David Hooper and Ken Whyld :

English study composer and author, International Judge of Chess Compositions (1959), Computer systems analyst.

In 1965 he founded EG, a quarterly publication which became the world’s first and only long-running magazine devoted wholly to studies.

His Test Tube Chess (1972), the best English language guide to the art of studies., was revised and republished as The Chess Endgame Study (1981).

Test Tube Chess, AJ Roycroft, Faber and Faber Limited, 1972, ISBN 0 571 09573 9
Test Tube Chess, AJ Roycroft, Faber and Faber Limited, 1972, ISBN 0 571 09573 9

Studies are commonly classified by means of the GBR code of which he was co-inventor.”

From The Encyclopedia of Chess (Robert Hale, 1970 & 1976) by Anne Sunnucks :

“FIDE Judge of Endgame Studies. Born on 25th July 1929. Founder of the Chess Endgame Study Circle in London in March 1965.and its quarterly magazine EG, the first and only publication exclusively devoted to the composed chess ending. Roycroft who is a computer systems analyst and lives in London, has composed about 20 endgame studies.”

AJ Roycroft

“EG” July 1965

[fen]5B2/8/7N/1pK5/2p5/2Rbn3/1k6/8 w – – 0 1[/fen]

Solution :
1.Bg7 Kb1; 2.Nf6 b4; 3.Kxb4 Kb2 4.Bh8 Nc2+; 5.Ka4 Kxc3 6.Ne4++

Video Chess Event (See caption below)
Video Chess Event (See caption below)
Video Chess Caption
Video Chess Caption

AJR won the BCF President’s Award in 1995.

Here is AJRs Wikipedia entry

Here is AJR talking about himself on the BPCS web site

Here is his entry from the Chess Programming Wiki

Test Tube Chess
Test Tube Chess