Tag Archives: 2023

Remembering GM Daniel (“Abe”) Yanofsky OC QC (25-iii-1925 05-iii-2000)

BCN remembers GM Daniel Yanofsky OC QC (25-iii-1925 05-iii-2000)

From The Encyclopedia of Chess (Robert Hale, 1970 & 1976)by Anne Sunnucks:

YANOFSKY, Daniel Abraham (1925- )
International Grandmaster (1964), Canadian Champion in 1941, 1943, 1945, 1947,1953, 1959, 1963 and 1965, British Champion in 1953. Abe Yanofsky, was born in Brody, Poland, on 26th March 1925. His parents were Russian and had left their native country a few months earlier on their way to Canada, to which they were emigrating. They eventually arrived at their destination when Yanofsky was 8 months old.

When he was 8 Yanofsky saw a chess set in a shop window and persuaded his father to teach him the game. He joined Winnipeg Jewish Chess Club and when he was 11 his obvious talent was noticed by Bernard Freedman, Treasurer of the Canadian Chess Federation, who was visiting Winnipeg. Freedman was responsible for Yanofsky playing in his first tournament a few months later in Toronto. Yanofsky arrived in Toronto determined to get as much chess as possible and put his name down for three tournaments: the Junior Boys’ Championship, which was to be played in the morning; the Senior Boys’ Championship, which was to be played in the afternoon; and the Major Championship, which was to be played in the evening. He withdrew from the Junior Boys’ Championship after 1 round at the request of the organisers, who realised that he was far too strong for that event, and went on to win both the other events.

Daniel Yanofsky playing Max Euwe in 1946 at the Staunton Memorial, Groningen
Daniel Yanofsky playing Max Euwe in 1946 at the Staunton Memorial, Groningen

This was the first of a number of successes which to his selection as a member of the Canadian team to play in the Chess Olympiad at Buenos Aires in 1939, where on 2nd board he scored 84.4 per cent and attracted the notice of the World Champion, Alekhine, who spent many hours going over Yanofsky’s games with him.

Daniel Yanofsky, 1946
Daniel Yanofsky, 1946

On his return to Canada Yanofsky had to divide his time between earning a living, completing his education and playing chess. Before joining the Royal Canadian Naval Volunteer Reserve in 1945, Yanofsky graduated from the University of Manitoba with a Bachelor of Science degree, and, apart from his victories in the Canadian Championship, won lst prize at Ventnor City 1942 and the United States Open Championship the same year.

After his discharge from the Navy Yanofsky played at Groningen 1946 and came 14th out of 20. However his score included a win against Botvinnik and a 50 per cent score against the five top Russian players. After Groningen he ‘played in Switzerland, Spain, England, Denmark and Iceland before returning to Canada. His main successes were 2nd
at Barcelona 1946; lst at Reykjavik 1947 and 2nd at Copenhagen 1947.

Back in Canada, Yanofsky enrolled at Manitoba Law School and played little chess until he had graduated in 1951, having won the University Gold Medal in Law and five scholarships. He decided to do a post-graduate course in Law at Oxford University and left for England later that year. In 1952 he was awarded the Viscount Bennett Scholarship as the most outstanding law student in Canada by the Canadian Bar Association.

From the 1952 Ilford Congress (30 May - 2 June) and originally published in BCM, July 1952, page 187. (l-r) : Harold Israel, Alan Phillips, Bob Wade, Otto Friedman, Abe Yanofsky, Alfred William Bowen and Harold Meek. Thanks to John Saunders and Leonard Barden
From the 1952 Ilford Congress (30 May – 2 June) and originally published in BCM, July 1952, page 187. (l-r) : Harold Israel, Alan Phillips, Bob Wade, Otto Friedman, Abe Yanofsky, Alfred William Bowen and Harold Meek. Thanks to John Saunders and Leonard Barden

[pgn]
[Event “English County Championship Final”]
[Site “London”]
[Date “1952.11.29”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Friedman, Dr. O.”]
[Black “Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “E91”]
[Annotator “Harry Golombek”]
[PlyCount “76”]
[EventDate “1952.11.29”]
[EventType “game”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[SourceTitle “BCM, 1953, page 2”]
[WhiteTeam “Middlesex”]
[BlackTeam “Oxfordshire”]

{[%evp 0,76,31,30,28,-9,35,35,45,45,58,46,33,34,24,32,61,49,79,64,95,83,96,71,64,43,46,51,53,73,176,154,142,146,167,146,144,109,215,-50,48,73,73,73,73,-97,-97,-181,-155,-170,-116,-49,-41,-58,16,16,31,-37,114,-19,-43,-59,-59,-55,-29,-51,-51,-153,-164,-202,-229,-264,-204,-201,-343,-532,-669,-913,-913]} {This game does not appear in Megabase 2023 or chessgames.com etc. It was culled from British Chess Magazine, Volume LXXIII (73, 1953), Number 1 (January), page 2, game #11,203.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 (3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. Nf3 c5 {in which form was played by Barden in the present match.}) 3… Bg7 4. e4 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. Be2 c5 {This comparative novelty is not mentioned in M.C.O. In Chess Archives Euwe refers to the move as a Yugoslav innovation (see elsewhere). In any case Black’s idea is to play …Nc6, …Qa5, and …a6 and …Qb4. There is hardly sufficient evidence for a final judgment on the system; it would appear Black’s game is difficult to play, but he has undeniable practical chances in the complications that easily arise.} 7. O-O Nc6 8. d5 Na5 9. h3 {A necessary prelimary to his next move} ({A promising alternative plan is} 9. a3 {to be followed by Rb1, Qc2, if necessary, and b4}) 9… a6 10. Be3 Rb8 {[#]} 11. Qc2 $146 (11. Nd2) 11… Bd7 {Playing for …b5} 12. a4 Ne8 13. Ra3 Qb6 {This loses valuable time} ({better was the immediate} 13… Qc7 $142) 14. Rb1 (14. b4 $2 Qxb4 15. Rb1 Qxa3 16. e5 dxe5 17. Bc1 Qb4 $19 {When White’s win of the queen is a pyrrhic victory}) 14… Qc7 15. b4 cxb4 16. Rxb4 b6 17. Qb1 f5 18. Nd2 $2 {Here I personally feel that White misses his way; in the ensuing complications the game appears touch and go for a long time but analysis suggests it is really is on Black’s favour.} ({After the simple line} 18. Bxb6 Rxb6 19. Rxb6 fxe4 20. Nxe4 Nxc4 21. Bxc4 Qxc4 {White may possibly not be able to winbut at least he should escape loss.}) 18… b5 19. axb5 f4 20. bxa6 ({As Dr. Friedman suggested afterwards,} 20. Bxf4 Rxf4 21. bxa6 Ra8 {falls to be considered here but the threats of …Qc5 and …Bd4 are hard to meet in this line too.}) 20… fxe3 21. Rxb8 exd2 22. Rb7 {Despite appearences it is doubtful that White has a satisfactory line here and this tricky move is apparently his best chance.} ({If} 22. Qb4 Bd4 23. Rxa5 Bxc3 {etc}) ({SF suggests} 22. Nd1 Bd4 23. Ra2 $18) 22… Qc5 ({If Black plays} 22… Nxb7 23. axb7 Nf6 24. Ra8 Rb8 25. Rxb8+ Qxb8 26. Qb6 $11 {he has a difficult game, in spite of his extra peice and could even lose.}) 23. Nd1 Qxa3 24. Rxd7 {[#]} Nf6 {This wins all right} ({but} 24… Bd4 {decides more quickly with the threat of …Rxf2, which follows even if 25 a7.}) {Both players were under severe time-pressure from hereabouts till the control on move 40.} 25. Rxe7 Nb3 26. a7 Nc5 27. Qb8 Ncd7 28. Qc7 Qc5 29. Rxd7 Nxd7 30. Qxd7 Ra8 31. h4 Rxa7 32. Qe8+ Bf8 33. h5 $2 $19 (33. Qe6+ {is better though Black must now win in the end. SF claims position to be level!} Kg7 34. e5 dxe5 35. Qxe5+ Kg8 36. Qf4 $11) 33… Re7 34. Qa4 Rxe4 35. Ne3 Qd4 36. hxg6 hxg6 37. Qc2 Bh6 38. Bd3 Bxe3 {White resigns. A most exciting game, very difficult for both players. I (HG) must acknowledge my debt in my notes to post-mortem analysis by the players.} 0-1
[/pgn]

While in England Yanofsky added to his chess reputation by winning the British Championship in 1953 and tying for 1st prize at Hastings in the same year.

Yanofsky with Edward Lasker at the 1952/3 Hastings Congress, They are studying a (then) new line of the Marshall Ruy Lopez pioneered by Oxford don Sir Theodore Tylor.
Yanofsky with Edward Lasker at the 1952/3 Hastings Congress, They are studying a (then) new line of the Marshall Ruy Lopez pioneered by Oxford don Sir Theodore Tylor.

Since then he has played regularly for Canada in Chess Olympiads since 1954.

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

From The Oxford Companion to Chess (OUP, 1984) by Hooper and Whyld:

YANOFSKY, DANIEL ABRAHAM (1925- ), Canadian player. International Grandmaster (1964), international Arbiter (1977). He was born in Poland of Russian parents who took him to Canada when he was eight months old; his childhood was spent in Winnipeg where he learned the moves of the game when he was 8 and improved so rapidly that at the age of 14 he was selected to
represent Canada in the Buenos Aires Olympiad 1939; In this event he made the highest percentage score at second board (+12=3 — 1), In 1941 he came equal first with H. Steiner in the US Open Championship, won the title on tie break, and also won the Canadian Championship (for the first of eight times). After the Second World War Yanofsky played in several tournaments including the Saltsjöbaden interzonal 1948, in which he shared eleventh place.

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

He then began law studies, completing them so brilliantly that he was offered five scholarships for postgraduate work. He chose Oxford, While in England he won, with case, the British Championship 1953, Returning to Winnipeg he became a successful lawyer active in civic politics. His chess career took second place although he found time to play in several tournaments and in many Olympiads from 1954. Yanofsky wrote of his early life in Chess the Hard Way! (1953); he excelled in the endgame and there are many examples in this book of his prowess in this phase.

Chess the Hard Way!, Daniel Yanofsky, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, 1953.
Chess the Hard Way!, Daniel Yanofsky, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, 1953.

The second edition (1996) of Hooper & Whyld reduces DAFs entry to a mere five lines!

From The Encyclopedia of Chess (Batsford, 1977) by Harry Golombek (but written by Nathan Divinski):

A Canadian grandmaster, Yanofsky was born in Poland, came to Canada in 1926 and was raised in Winnipeg. He played 2nd board for Canada in the 1939 Olympiad and won his first (of eight) national titles in 1941, dethroning the eight-time champion Maurice Fox, Yanofsky had wins at Ventnor City 1942, The US Open 1942 and was =1st at Hastings 1953.

Tournament Crosstable for Hastings Christmas Congress, 1952/53 Premier
Tournament Crosstable for Hastings Christmas Congress, 1952/53 Premier

He won the British Championship in 1953, 1.5 points ahead of the field:

Tournament crosstable for British Championship, 1953 at Hastings
Tournament crosstable for British Championship, 1953 at Hastings

Yanofsky tied for 4th in the 1957 Dallas tournament and became a grandmaster in 1964.
At Groningen 1946 Yanofsky beat Botvinnik in their individual game. He has led many of the Canadian Olympiad teams.

Yanofsky is a lawyer with post-graduate studies at Oxford. He edited Canadian Chess Chat for several years and is active in civil politics.

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

He is an expert on the Ruy Lopez and the French Defence, though his strongest point is his endgame play.

[pgn]
[Event “Ventnor City”]
[Site “Ventnor”]
[Date “1942.06.26”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham”]
[Black “Pinkus, Albert Sidney”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D61”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “127”]
[EventDate “1942.06.20”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “USA”]
[SourceTitle “HCL”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “2”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,91,19,31,14,30,28,-14,4,11,30,17,14,19,51,19,26,17,39,37,70,63,83,77,85,82,87,66,60,62,62,49,42,37,29,21,15,7,7,11,10,1,17,2,33,30,29,39,31,28,23,26,21,21,21,23,24,22,22,19,18,13,8,7,8,10,10,7,19,11,19,30,29,15,55,0,8,11,26,31,29,21,27,7,6,9,9,9,20,17,22,29,29,75]} 1. d4 {ChessBase} Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 Be7 5. Bg5 O-O 6. e3 Nbd7 7. Qc2 c6 8. a3 Re8 9. Rd1 Nf8 10. Bd3 dxc4 11. Bxc4 Nd5 12. Bxe7 Qxe7 13. O-O ({Relevant:} 13. Ne4 Nf6 14. Ng3 b6 15. O-O Bb7 16. e4 Red8 17. e5 Ne8 18. Ne4 c5 19. dxc5 Bxe4 20. Qxe4 Qxc5 21. b4 Qc7 22. Bb5 Rxd1 23. Qxa8 Rd8 24. Qe4 Qc8 25. Nd4 Nc7 26. Nc6 Qa8 27. Ne7+ Kh8 28. Bc6 Qb8 29. Qf3 Ng6 30. Qxf7 Nxe5 31. Qh5 Nd5 32. Bxd5 exd5 33. f4 Nc4 34. Nc6 g6 35. Qg5 {1-0 Hamming,A-Evers,J Den Haag Keusbeker-09 The Hague 1941 (3)}) 13… b6 {[#]} 14. Rc1 $146 ({Predecessor:} 14. Ne2 Bb7 15. e4 Nf6 16. Ng3 Red8 17. Rfe1 Rac8 18. Qb3 Qc7 19. Qa2 c5 20. d5 b5 21. Bxb5 exd5 22. e5 Ne4 23. Nxe4 dxe4 24. Nd2 Rxd2 25. Rxd2 Qa5 26. b4 Qxb5 27. bxc5 Qxc5 28. Qb2 Ba8 29. Rdd1 Qe7 30. Qd4 h6 31. Qd6 Qxd6 32. Rxd6 Ng6 33. e6 fxe6 34. Rxe6 Kf7 35. Ra6 Rc7 36. Rb1 Ne7 37. h4 Nc8 38. Rb5 Bb7 39. Rf5+ Kg8 40. Re6 Ne7 41. Rf4 Bd5 42. Rd6 Rc8 43. Ra6 Rc1+ {0-1 Capablanca,J-Thomas,G Christmas Congress 1934/35-15 Premier Hastings White Rock Pavilion (2)}) 14… Bb7 15. Bd3 Rec8 16. Nxd5 exd5 17. Bf5 Rc7 18. b4 g6 19. Bd3 Ne6 20. Qb2 Rac8 21. Be2 c5 22. bxc5 bxc5 23. dxc5 Nxc5 24. Qb4 Ne6 25. Qxe7 Rxe7 26. Rxc8+ Bxc8 27. Rc1 Rc7 28. Rxc7 Nxc7 29. Nd4 Bd7 30. Kf1 Kf8 31. Ke1 Ke7 32. Kd2 Kd6 33. Kc3 f6 34. Kb4 Be8 35. Bb5 Bf7 36. a4 Be6 37. Nb3 Bc8 38. Nd4 Be6 39. Bd3 Bd7 40. h4 Ne6 41. Bb5 Nxd4 42. exd4 Bc8 43. Bd3 f5 44. f4 Be6 45. g3 Bd7 46. Bb5 Bc8 47. Be2 Kc6 48. h5 gxh5 49. Bxh5 Kb6 50. a5+ Kc6 51. Be8+ Kd6 52. Kb5 Ke7 53. Bh5 Kd6 54. Be2 Bb7 55. Bd3 Bc8 56. Bc2 h6 57. Bd3 Bd7+ 58. Ka6 Kc7 59. Kxa7 Bc8 60. Bc2 h5 61. Bd1 Kc6 62. Ba4+ Kc7 63. Be8 Be6 64. a6 1-0
[/pgn]

From Chess Facts and Fables, Edward Winter, McFarland Publishing, 2006, page 91:

Yanofsky’s Prize

From page 39 of Chess the Hard Way! by D.A.Yanofsky (London, 1953), comes this passage regarding the 1939 Olympiad in Buenos Aires:

“By winning the next two games I scored 9.5 points out of a possible 10 and was awarded a silver cigarette holder inscribed : “Mejor Jugador del Torneo” (best player of the tournament)”

Times have certainly changed, as it is hard to imagine that organisers today would offer a 14-year old boy anything smacking of smoking.  (3003).

 

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CXXIX (120, 2000), Number 4 (March), pp. 223 (presumably by) John Saunders we have this obituary:

DANIEL ABRAHAM YANOFSKY

Obituary of “Abe” Yanofsky (26 iii 1925 – 5 iii 2000)

ABE YANOFSKY has died in Winnipeg after a long illness. Born in Poland, he emigrated to Canada with his family when eight months old. Learning the moves at eight, Yanofsky lost his first three games to his father but next day scored his first chess victory. He was already an acknowledged chess prodigy at 11, giving simultaneous displays and winning the championship of Manitoba at the age of 12. His big break came at the age of 14 when he was selected to play for Canada at the 1939 Buenos Aires Olympiad, achieving an 85% score, including a famous win over Dulanto which moved world champion Alekhine to watch all his remaining games in the tournament.

[pgn]
[Event “Olympiad-08 Preliminaries A”]
[Site “Buenos Aires”]
[Date “1939.08.30”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham”]
[Black “Dulanto, Alberto Ismodes”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C10”]
[Annotator “Max Berchtenbreiter,Chessbase”]
[PlyCount “55”]
[EventDate “1939.08.24”]
[EventType “team-tourn”]
[EventRounds “7”]
[EventCountry “ARG”]
[SourceTitle “HCL”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “2”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “Canada”]
[BlackTeam “Peru”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “CAN”]
[BlackTeamCountry “PER”]

{[%evp 0,55,34,28,40,23,31,30,69,32,23,24,32,37,25,17,17,32,63,41,48,37,44,51,46,39,36,15,83,3,139,118,118,139,110,112,254,179,244,295,321,329,308,285,878,898,916,931,931,974,950,1093,29981,29984,29985,29986,29995,29996] With this game Yanofsky caught the attention of the chess world. The final combination also caught the eye of World Champion Alexander Alekhine who invited the 14-year old Yanofsky to analyse the game with him. And with his strong performance on board 2 (84.4 +12 =3 -1 according to Walter Árpád Földeák (WAF) in Chess Olympiads, Corvina Press, 1966) for Canada (John Stuart Morrison was top board) Abe Yanofsky made a name for himself in Buenos Aires.} 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 dxe4 {[WAF] According to Alekhine, the contemporary view of this variation needed to be thoroughly revised, for he two Bishops that Black has in the main line do not compensate for White’s greater freedom of action.} 5. Nxe4 Nbd7 ({[WAF] The best continuation for Black is} 5… Be7 6. Bxf6 Bxf6 {followed by developing the knight to c6.}) 6. Nf3 Be7 7. Nxf6+ Nxf6 8. Bd3 c5 9. dxc5 Qa5+ 10. c3 Qxc5 11. O-O O-O {[#]} 12. Re1 $146 ({Relevant:} 12. Qc2 Kh8 13. Rad1 b6 14. Qa4 Bb7 15. Qh4 Bxf3 16. Bxf6 Qh5 17. Qxh5 Bxh5 18. Bxe7 Rfe8 19. Be4 Bxd1 20. Bxa8 Bh5 21. f3 Rxe7 22. Rd1 g5 23. Kf2 f5 24. Bc6 Kg7 25. b4 e5 26. Rd6 Bf7 27. Bd7 f4 28. a4 e4 29. fxe4 Rxe4 30. Rc6 Rc4 31. Rxc4 Bxc4 32. Bb5 Be6 {½-½ Janowski,D-Maroczy,G Wien Imperial Jubilee Vienna 1898}) 12… Rd8 13. Ne5 {[#]} b6 $2 {[%csl Ga8] Black seems to lack a sense of danger. Black is not yet fully developed but opens another diagonal. Moreover the rook on a8 is a “lose piece” and might easily fall victim to a double attack. Yanofsky uses Black’s error to launch a strong attack.} (13… h6 $142 $16 {[WAF] was essential} 14. Bf4) 14. Bxf6 ({Maybe immediately} 14. Qf3 {was even stronger. White wins at least an exchange} Rb8 (14… Rd5 15. Bc4 Bb7 16. Bxd5 Bxd5 17. Qf4) 15. Bxh7+ Nxh7 (15… Kxh7 16. Bxf6 Bxf6 17. Qh5+ Kg8 18. Qxf7+ Kh7 19. Re3 $18) 16. Qxf7+ Kh8 17. Ng6#) 14… Bxf6 (14… gxf6 15. Qh5 Rxd3 16. Qxf7+ Kh8 17. Nxd3 Qd6 18. Re3 $18) 15. Bxh7+ {the typical sacrifice} Kf8 (15… Kxh7 16. Qh5+ Kg8 17. Qxf7+ Kh7 18. Re3 Qxe5 (18… Qxe3 19. fxe3 Bxe5 20. Qh5+ Kg8 21. Qxe5 $18) 19. Rh3+ $18 {mating}) 16. Qh5 {White is a pawn up but keeps the initiative} (16. Qf3 Bb7 $1 17. Qxb7 Bxe5 $16) 16… Bxe5 17. Rxe5 Qc7 18. Be4 Bb7 {Now White has a number of winning moves. Young Yanofsky concludes with a nice finish!} 19. Bxb7 Qxb7 20. Qh8+ Ke7 21. Qxg7 Rg8 {[#] [WAF] Black had gone this far with his calculations; his fourteen-year old opponent, however, had penetrated still further into the secrets of the position.} {[MB] At first sight it would appear that White has blundered. However, he has a strong counter:} 22. Rxe6+ Kxe6 23. Re1+ {Black’s king is exposed and will be mated.} Kd6 24. Qf6+ Kc5 25. Re5+ Kc4 26. b3+ Kd3 27. Qd6+ Kc2 28. Re2+ 1-0
[/pgn]

In 1941 Yanofsky won the first of eight Canadian Championships.

 

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

After war service in the navy, he played in a number of tournaments in Europe, defeating Botvinnik in a game at Groningen 1946.

[pgn]
[Event “Staunton Memorial”]
[Site “Groningen”]
[Date “1946.09.02”]
[Round “15”]
[White “Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham”]
[Black “Botvinnik, Mikhail”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C99”]
[Annotator “Max Berchtenbreiter,ChessBase”]
[PlyCount “105”]
[EventDate “1946.08.13”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “19”]
[EventCountry “NED”]
[SourceTitle “MCL”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,105,16,28,52,10,5,-1,15,-8,4,-6,22,7,1,1,1,-27,-18,-14,-1,-8,21,-8,21,-10,-9,-6,32,14,25,26,30,28,30,13,6,10,11,9,9,-15,-17,-21,-27,-66,-64,-88,-40,-39,-34,-38,-36,-25,-26,-25,-32,-58,-57,-87,-77,-77,-87,-83,-98,-98,-95,-136,-131,-117,-109,-97,-105,-50,-38,-44,0,-15,79,89,89,81,75,77,86,80,83,83,108,101,124,91,171,177,202,198,299,224,423,539,539,536,1374,29984,29987,29988,29989,29990]} 1. e4 {ChessBase} e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Qc7 12. Nbd2 cxd4 13. cxd4 Nc6 14. d5 (14. Nb3 {main line} a5 15. Be3 a4 16. Nbd2 Nb4 17. Bb1 Bd7 18. a3 Nc6 19. Bd3 $14) 14… Nb4 15. Bb1 {16.a3 winning b4} a5 $8 16. Nf1 (16. a3 Na6 17. b4 $5) 16… Bd7 (16… Na6 $6 {Rabinovich-Flohr,S/Leningrad-Moscow/1939/}) 17. Bd2 $5 {[#]} (17. N3h2 Rfc8 18. Ne3 g6 19. Bd2 Na6 20. Qf3 Qd8 21. b3 Kg7 22. Nhf1 h5 $10 {Stein,L-Reshevsky,S/Mar del Plata/1966/}) (17. a3 Na6 18. b3 {a2}) 17… Rfc8 $146 ({Relevant:} 17… Na6 18. Bc2 Nc5 19. g4 h5 20. N3h2 hxg4 21. hxg4 Nh7 22. Ng3 Bg5 23. Kg2 g6 24. Bxg5 Nxg5 25. Qd2 Qd8 26. f4 Nh7 27. fxe5 dxe5 28. Nf3 Qf6 29. g5 Qf4 30. Qxf4 exf4 31. Ne2 Bg4 32. Nxf4 Bxf3+ 33. Kxf3 Nxg5+ 34. Kg4 Ngxe4 35. Bxe4 Nxe4 36. Kf3 Nd6 37. Re7 Rfe8 38. Rd7 Nc4 39. Rb7 Rab8 40. Rxb8 Rxb8 41. b3 Nd6 42. Ke3 Rc8 43. Kd4 Kf8 44. Nd3 Nf5+ 45. Ke5 Ke7 46. Nf4 Rc3 47. d6+ {0-1 Ahues,C-Samarian,S Europa-Meisterschaft Wertungsturnier Munich 1942 (5)}) 18. Bxb4 $5 {double edged ? Yanofsky} (18. a3 Na6 (18… Nc2 19. Bxc2 Qxc2 20. Qxc2 Rxc2 21. Bc3 Rc8 22. Ne3 R2xc3 23. bxc3 Nxe4 24. a4 $1 bxa4 25. c4 $16) 19. b4 $14) 18… axb4 $44 { a-file} 19. Bd3 Bd8 {d8-b6} 20. Qd2 (20. Ne3 $6 Qb7 21. Qd2 Ba5) (20. Qb3 $142 Qa5 21. a3 $5) 20… Qa5 21. Ne3 $15 {e3-c2xb4} b3 $1 22. a3 (22. Qxa5 $2 Bxa5 23. Red1 bxa2 24. Rxa2 Bb6 $15) (22. axb3 $2 Qxa1 23. Rxa1 Rxa1+ 24. Kh2 Rcc1 $17) 22… Qa4 23. Nd1 b4 24. Ne3 bxa3 25. Rxa3 Nxe4 26. Qd1 (26. Rxa4 Nxd2 27. Rxa8 Nxf3+ 28. gxf3 Rxa8 $17) 26… Qb4 27. Rxb3 Qa4 28. Bc2 Nc5 29. Rc3 Qb4 30. Qb1 g6 $17 31. Rc4 Qb7 32. b4 Na6 (32… Na4 $142) 33. Rxc8 Rxc8 34. Bd3 $1 Nxb4 $2 (34… Rb8 $142) (34… Bb5 $142 35. Re2 (35. Bc2 Rb8 (35… f5 {f4})) (35. Rd1 Bxd3 36. Qxd3 Nxb4 37. Qb3 Rb8 38. Rb1 Qc7 39. Qa4 $15) 35… Bxd3 36. Qxd3 Nxb4 37. Qb1 Qa6) (34… f5 $2 35. g4 e4 36. Bxa6 Qxa6 37. Nd4 $13) 35. Re2 $1 Ba5 $2 $19 (35… Rc3 {Fine} 36. Bc4 Ra3 37. Kh2 e4 38. Nd4 (38. Qxe4 $2 Na6 $10) 38… Bf6 39. Nc6 Ra4 40. Ng4 Bg7 41. Qb3 Bxc6 42. dxc6 Qxc6 43. Bxf7+ Kf8 44. Bg8 d5 45. Bxh7 $18) (35… Rc1+ 36. Qxc1 Nxd3 $14) (35… e4 $1 36. Bxe4 $10 {Kmoch}) 36. Rb2 Rb8 37. Nd2 Qa7 (37… Bb5 38. Bc4) 38. Ndc4 Qc5 $2 {For a long time Yanofsky had been doing rather well against the future World Champion but now he has to defend a slightly worse position. However Botvinnik too, was not perfect and 38…Qc5 is a tactical error.} (38… Kg7 {and the bishops give Black slightly the stronger position.}) 39. Nxa5 $1 Qxa5 40. Nc2 $1 {White regains the piece and remains a pawn up.However, the position is still complicated.} Nxd3 $8 41. Rxb8+ Kg7 42. Ne3 Qd2 43. Qf1 Nc5 44. Qd1 Qc3 $6 $18 (44… Qxd1+ $142) 45. Rb6 Ba4 (45… Ne4 46. Qb1 Bf5 (46… f5 $2 47. Rb7) 47. g4 Nxf2 48. Nxf5+ gxf5 49. Kxf2 $18) 46. Qf3 { 47.f5+} Qe1+ 47. Kh2 f5 $4 {Botvinnik wants to drum up counterplay but this provokes a mating attack by White!} 48. Rxd6 (48. Nxf5+ gxf5 49. Qg3+ Kf7 50. Qh4 $18) 48… f4 (48… Bd7 49. Nc4 f4 50. Qa3 Qxf2 51. Nxe5 $18) 49. Nf5+ $1 Kf7 (49… gxf5 50. Qh5 $18) 50. Qg4 Ne4 (50… Qe4 51. Qh4 Qxf5 52. Qxh7+ Ke8 53. Rxg6 Nd7 54. Rg8+ Nf8 55. Qxf5 $18) 51. Qh4 gxf5 52. Qxh7+ Ke8 53. Qg8+ {[53…e7 54.e6+ f8 55.d8+ g7 56.g8+ h7 57.g6#] With this game Yanofsky finally established himself as a top player. The later fame of his opponent is only one reason it is the most famous game of the Canadian.} 1-0
[/pgn]

Later that year he finished second to Najdorf in Barcelona, and then fourth at Hastings L94617. Other continental tournaments followed, including the Saltsjöbaden Interzonal of 1948. He returned to Canada where he was an outstanding law student, returning to Europe in 1951 to embark on a post-graduate law course at University College, Oxford, the funding being subsequently supplemented by his winning a $1,000 scholarship for being the most outstanding Canadian law student of 1952.

Yanofsky finished second at the I951/2 Hastings Premier, and took part many other UK competitions, crowning his UK-based period by winning the 1953 British Championship at Hastings: he scored a (then) record 9.5/11 despite a first round loss to DM Horne. In 1953 he also published an account of his chess adventures entitled Chess The Hard Way!

He returned to Canada to establish a successful career as a lawyer and politician in Winnipeg, though finding time to play in national championships and 11 Olympiads between 1939 and 1980. He edited Canadian Chess Chat for a number of years.

How to Win End Games, D.A. Yanofsky, Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd., 1957
How to Win End Games, D.A. Yanofsky, Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd., 1957

He became the British Commonwealth’s first FIDE grandmaster in 1964 (ed: although some might claim that Jacques Mieses was the first)

100 Years of Chess in Canada, D. A. Yanofsky, Chess Federation of Canada, Winnipeg., 1967

[pgn]
[Event “Dallas”]
[Site “Dallas”]
[Date “1957.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham”]
[Black “Reshevsky, Samuel Herman”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C97”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “103”]
[EventDate “1957.??.??”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “14”]
[EventCountry “USA”]
[SourceTitle “MCL”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,103,31,18,38,24,28,9,16,3,-1,2,24,-11,0,-9,-6,-25,-18,-14,-5,4,3,3,28,-30,35,-9,15,14,51,58,31,-22,-1,-9,3,0,0,-1,-1,-8,-4,-41,-21,-33,-32,-54,26,-103,30,27,173,192,191,187,170,133,133,154,162,155,175,142,184,181,190,215,258,225,362,583,634,288,336,202,196,207,222,177,181,224,248,182,200,200,204,209,209,225,393,389,383,510,701,728,1213,1256,1254,1270,29993,29994,29997,29998,29999,-30000]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d6 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Qc7 12. Nbd2 Bd7 13. Nf1 Rfe8 14. Ne3 g6 15. dxe5 dxe5 16. Nh2 Be6 17. Qf3 Rad8 18. Nhg4 Nxg4 {[#]} 19. Nxg4 $146 ({Relevant:} 19. hxg4 Nc4 20. Nd5 Bxd5 21. exd5 Nb6 22. Rd1 Rd6 23. Be3 {½-½ Lombardy,W-Reshevsky,S Match Reshevsky-Lombardy +1-0=5 New York 1956 (5)}) 19… Bxg4 20. hxg4 Rd7 21. Kh2 c4 22. Rh1 Qd8 23. b4 Nc6 24. Qe3 Qc7 25. Kg1 f6 $2 {[#]} (25… Bf8 26. Qh3 f6 $14) 26. Rxh7 $1 Bf8 27. Rxd7 Qxd7 28. Qf3 Be7 29. a4 Rd8 30. Be3 Qe6 31. Rd1 Kf7 32. Rd5 Rb8 33. g5 Rb7 34. gxf6 {[#]} Bxb4 $2 (34… Bxf6 35. Bc5 $18) 35. axb5 axb5 36. Bg5 Bf8 37. Qd1 b4 38. cxb4 Nxb4 39. Rd8 Nxc2 40. Qxc2 Qc6 41. Rd5 Bc5 42. Rxe5 Bd4 43. Re7+ Rxe7 44. fxe7 Qb5 45. e5 Bxe5 46. Qe4 Bd6 47. g4 c3 48. Qf3+ Ke6 49. Qf6+ Kd7 50. e8=Q+ Kxe8 51. Qe6+ Kf8 52. Bh6# 1-0
[/pgn]

 

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

Leonard Barden reveals:

We lived in the same house in Oxford for a year, but never played or analysed together during all that time, as Dan’s focus was entirely on his academic work and his then pregnant wife, Hilda.

On March 26th, 2020 Chessbase published this article by Max Berchtenbreiter

Here is his Wikipedia entry.

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

Here is a bullet pointed list of achievements compiled by David Cohen

A similar listing to the above from the Chess Federation of Canada web site

DAYs chessgames.com listing

 

Daniel Yanofsky
Daniel Yanofsky

Opening Repertoire: Queen’s Gambit Declined: Tarrasch

Here is the publishers blurb from the rear cover:

“The Tarrasch Variation of the Queen’s Gambit Declined is a fierce counter-attacking line arising after 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 c5. In this variation Black gains free and easy piece play but in return usually has to accept the structural weakness of an Isolated Queen’s Pawn (IQP).

In the early development of chess theory this line was somewhat frowned upon due to the vulnerability of the IQP. However, Siegbert Tarrasch, after whom the opening is named, famously declared that, “he who fears an Isolated Queen’s Pawn should give up chess”. The Tarrasch has had many powerful adherents over the years including the legendary Garry Kasparov who made much use of it in the early part of his career.

In this book Cyrus Lakdawala guides the reader through the complexities of the Tarrasch and carves out a repertoire for Black, based on a modern treatment popularised by the Russian grandmaster Daniil Dubov. He examines all aspects of this highly complex opening and provides the reader with well-researched, fresh, and innovative analysis.

Each annotated game has valuable lessons on how to play the opening and contains instructive commentary on typical middlegame plans. * A complete repertoire for Black to counter 1 d4. * The question and answer approach provides an excellent study method.”

About the author:

IM Cyrus Lakdawala
IM Cyrus Lakdawala

“Cyrus Lakdawala is an International Master, a former National Open and American Open Champion, and a six-time State Champion. He has been teaching chess for over 40 years, and coaches some of the top junior players in the U.S.”

As with every recent Everyman Chess publication high quality paper is used and the printing is clear. Each diagram is clear as is the instructional text. Figurine algebraic notation is used throughout. The usual and reliable formatting from Brighton-based typesetter IM Byron Jacobs is employed.

The diagrams do not have a “to move” indicator or any kind of caption so you will need to work out for yourself how they relate to the text that they are embedded in. However, this is fairly obvious.

There is a helpful Index of Variations and an Index of completed games.

The table of contents is:

Opening Repertoire: Queen's Gambit Declined: Tarrasch, Cyrus Lakdawala, Everyman Chess (16 Jan. 2023), ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1781946961
Opening Repertoire: Queen’s Gambit Declined: Tarrasch, Cyrus Lakdawala, Everyman Chess (16 Jan. 2023), ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1781946961

Before we continue it is worth taking a look at the pdf extract which includes the Contents, Preface and pages 87 – 108.

Everyman (and Cyrus) kicks-off in Chapter 1, The Classics  with its most welcome trait of laying out the historical development of an opening by detailing twelve significant games including this old favourite from 1969:

[pgn]
[Event “World-ch26 Spassky-Petrosian +6-4=13”]
[Site “Moscow”]
[Date “1969.04.21”]
[Round “4”]
[White “Petrosian, Tigran V”]
[Black “Spassky, Boris Vasilievich”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “D34”]
[Annotator “Bulletin”]
[PlyCount “82”]
[EventDate “1969.04.14”]
[EventType “match”]
[EventRounds “23”]
[EventCountry “URS”]
[SourceTitle “MainBase”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “2”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,82,5,-41,-19,-29,-16,-16,68,32,41,30,30,11,14,28,27,5,35,5,27,24,24,26,32,14,19,35,22,14,18,12,11,9,3,8,17,10,11,1,4,4,23,0,3,22,28,43,48,0,19,18,32,32,21,33,28,-7,-26,-16,-6,0,0,0,0,7,0,7,-28,-32,9,-30,-21,-21,0,-68,-44,-260,-332,-328,-350,-691,-716,-723,-773]} 1. c4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. g3 Nf6 7. Bg2 Be7 8. O-O O-O 9. Bg5 cxd4 10. Nxd4 h6 11. Be3 Bg4 {[#]} 12. Nb3 $146 ({Relevant:} 12. Rc1 Ne5 13. b3 Qd7 14. f3 Bh3 15. Qd2 Bxg2 16. Kxg2 a6 17. Na4 Ba3 18. Nb6 Bxc1 19. Rxc1 Qd6 20. Nxa8 Rxa8 21. Qc2 Re8 22. Bf2 Rd8 23. Qc7 Qxc7 24. Rxc7 Rd7 25. Rc8+ Kh7 26. Be1 Ng8 27. Bb4 Ne7 28. Bxe7 Rxe7 29. Kf2 Kg6 30. h3 Nd7 31. Rc7 b6 32. Nc6 Re6 33. Rxd7 Rxc6 34. Rxd5 Kf6 35. Ke3 Ke6 36. Rd4 Rc2 37. a4 Rc3+ 38. Rd3 Rc1 39. h4 g5 40. hxg5 hxg5 41. Kd4 Kd6 {1-0 Bielicki,C-Kuettner,U World U20-ch05 Final A Muenchenstein/Basel 1959 (2)}) 12… Be6 13. Rc1 Re8 14. Re1 Qd7 15. Bc5 $1 Rac8 16. Bxe7 Qxe7 17. e3 Red8 18. Qe2 Bg4 $1 (18… d4 19. Nxd4 Nxd4 20. exd4 Rxd4 21. Nb5 Rxc1 22. Nxd4 $1) 19. f3 (19. Qf1 Ne4 20. Ne2) 19… Bf5 20. Rcd1 Ne5 21. Nd4 (21. Nxd5 Rxd5 22. Rxd5 Nxd5 23. e4 Nd3 $1) 21… Bg6 (21… Bd7 22. f4 Bg4 23. fxe5 $1) 22. Bh3 Rc4 $5 23. g4 (23. f4 h5 24. Qf1 Nc6 25. g4 Nxg4 26. Nxd5 Rxd5 27. Qxc4 Qh4 $1) (23. Qf1 Qb4) 23… Rb4 24. b3 (24. f4 Nc4 { d6}) 24… Nc6 25. Qd2 Rb6 26. Nce2 $2 (26. Na4) 26… Bh7 27. Bg2 Re8 28. Ng3 Nxd4 29. exd4 Re6 30. Rxe6 Qxe6 31. Rc1 Bg6 32. Bf1 $2 (32. Kf2 $1) 32… Nh7 33. Qf4 Nf8 34. Rc5 (34. Qe5 $1) 34… Bb1 $1 35. a4 Ng6 36. Qd2 Qf6 37. Kf2 (37. Rc1 Nh4) 37… Nf4 38. a5 (38. Rc3 Ne6) 38… Bd3 $1 39. Nf5 (39. Qc3 Qh4 40. Kg1 Bxf1 41. Rc8 Bb5 $1) 39… Qg5 $1 {[ 40…h3+]} 40. Ne3 Qh4+ 41. Kg1 Bxf1 (41… Bxf1 42. Nxf1 (42. Kxf1 Qh3+ 43. Kf2 Qxh2+ 44. Ke1 Rxe3+) 42… Re2) 0-1
[/pgn]

We very much like this feature of Everyman books and long may it continue!

In reviewing books from this author it is traditional to discuss his “Marmite” annotation style. In general, we are presented with a grammar and vocabulary rich narrative that gives you the impression that the author is coaching you one-to-one with a mixture of humour and superlatives. There is never a dull moment with his chatty style, of that we can be sure!

For example in discussing Larsen-Kasparov, Brussels, 1987

[pgn]
[Event “Brussels”]
[Site “Brussels”]
[Date “1987.04.20”]
[Round “8”]
[White “Larsen, Bent”]
[Black “Kasparov, Garry”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “D34”]
[WhiteElo “2565”]
[BlackElo “2735”]
[Annotator “Kasparov,Garry”]
[PlyCount “86”]
[EventDate “1987.04.10”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “BEL”]
[EventCategory “14”]
[SourceTitle “CBM 002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1988.02.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1988.02.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,86,25,23,29,-11,21,19,22,31,23,10,30,7,7,10,22,24,35,17,11,15,41,0,0,0,1,8,63,-34,-41,-41,-56,-52,-8,11,0,-16,-16,-37,-6,-6,-33,-10,-10,-12,-7,-14,0,0,13,0,0,-25,-34,-54,-55,0,40,35,40,0,0,-63,0,-85,-82,-186,-214,-290,-283,-311,-289,-277,-284,-288,-266,-261,-270,-270,-271,-271,-279,-275,-292,-290,-286,-298,-364]} 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. Nc3 e6 4. g3 d5 5. cxd5 exd5 6. d4 Nc6 7. Bg2 Be7 8. O-O O-O 9. Be3 c4 (9… Ng4 10. Bf4 Be6) 10. Ne5 h6 $1 {[#]} 11. Qa4 $146 (11. Qc2 Bd6 12. f4 Ne7 13. f5 Nc6 $1 14. Nxc6 bxc6) (11. b3 cxb3 12. Nxc6 bxc6 13. axb3 a5 $1 14. Qc2 Ba6 15. Na4 Bb5) (11. h3 Be6 12. Nxc4 dxc4 13. d5 Nxd5 14. Nxd5 Bf6 $1) ({Relevant:} 11. b3 Qa5 12. Na4 cxb3 13. Qxb3 Nxe5 14. dxe5 Ne4 15. Rfd1 Rd8 16. Nb6 axb6 17. Bxb6 Qa4 18. Bxd8 Bxd8 19. Qxd5 Bf5 20. Rd4 Qa7 21. Bxe4 Bb6 22. Rd3 Bxf2+ 23. Kg2 Bxe4+ 24. Qxe4 Re8 25. Rf1 Bc5 26. Rd7 Qxa2 27. Rfxf7 Bf8 28. Qf5 b5 29. e6 {1-0 Hjartarson,J (2505)-Westerinen,H (2390) Nordic-ch Gjovik 1985}) 11… a6 $1 $11 12. Nxc6 bxc6 13. b3 (13. Qxc6 Bd7 14. Qb7 Rb8 15. Qxa6 Ra8 16. Qb7 Rb8) 13… Rb8 $1 14. bxc4 (14. Qxc6 Bd7 15. Qxa6 Ra8 16. Qb7 Rb8) 14… Rb4 15. Qd1 (15. Qxc6 $4 Bb7 $19) 15… Rxc4 16. Na4 (16. Qd3 a5 $1 {[%cal Yc8a6]} 17. Nd1 Qb6 $1 18. Rb1 Rb4) 16… Bf5 $1 (16… Qa5 17. Nb2 $1 {[%csl Ra5,Rb4,Rc3][%cal Ye3d2]}) 17. Nb2 (17. Rc1 $143 Rxc1 18. Qxc1 (18. Bxc1 Qa5 19. Bd2 Qb5 20. Nc3 Qc4 $36) 18… Qa5 $1 $15) 17… Rc3 18. Rc1 $6 (18. Bd2 $1 Rc2 (18… Ra3 $2 19. Na4 $1 Ne4 20. Bxe4 Bxe4 21. Bc1 $16) 19. Nd3 Bxd3 (19… Rc4 20. Ne5 $1 $18 {[%csl Rc4]}) 20. exd3 Rb2 21. Bc3 Rb5 (21… Rb7 22. Qa4 $1 $14) 22. a4 Rb7 $11) (18. Nd3 $5 $11) 18… Rxc1 19. Qxc1 Qa5 (19… Qb6 20. Qc3 Qb5 21. Nd3 Ne4 22. Qc2) 20. Qxc6 Qxa2 (20… Rc8 21. Qb7 Rc7 22. Qb8+ Rc8 23. Qb7 $11) 21. Nd3 Be4 $1 (21… Qxe2 $2 22. Nf4 Qc4 23. Nxd5 $1) (21… Bxd3 22. exd3) 22. Bf3 a5 23. Nc5 Bxf3 24. exf3 Re8 25. Nd7 $6 Rd8 26. Nxf6+ (26. Ne5 a4 27. Qb7 Re8 28. Rc1 a3 29. Rc8 Rxc8 30. Qxc8+ Bf8 31. Qb7 Qc2 $1 32. Qxf7+ Kh7 33. Qxf8 a2 34. Nf7 a1=Q+ 35. Kg2 Ng8 $19) 26… Bxf6 27. Qb6 $2 (27. Rc1 a4 28. Rc5 a3 29. Ra5 $1 Qb1+ 30. Kg2 Be7 $1 (30… a2 $2 31. Qa6 $1) 31. Ra7) 27… a4 28. Bxh6 (28. Rc1 $142) 28… a3 29. Bc1 (29. Be3 Qb2 $1 30. Qxb2 axb2 31. Rb1 Rb8 32. Kf1 Be7 33. Ke2 Ba3 34. Bd2 Rc8 35. Kd1 f5 $1 36. g4 g6) 29… Rc8 30. h4 (30. Qa5 Be7 $1 $19) 30… Rc3 31. Be3 (31. Bg5 Qb2) (31. Kg2 Qe2) 31… Qc2 $1 $19 32. Qa5 (32. Rc1 Qxc1+ $1 33. Bxc1 Rxc1+ 34. Kg2 a2) 32… a2 33. h5 Be7 34. Qa8+ Bf8 35. h6 Ra3 36. Qxd5 a1=Q 37. hxg7 Bxg7 38. Qd8+ Bf8 39. Rxa1 Rxa1+ 40. Kg2 Qh7 41. Qg5+ Qg6 42. Qh4 Rd1 43. g4 f6 0-1
[/pgn]

after Larsen’s 37 hxg7! Cyrus writes:

Exercise (critical decision): Even the serpent from the Garden of Eden would be impressed by Larsen’s talent for manipulative deception. His last move a good practical try in an objectively lost position. Should Black play 37…Bxg7, 37…Be7. or 37…Qaa2?”

Indeed, some reviewers become so distracted by the authors idiosyncratic style that they forget to review the content of the book!

The USP (“Unique Selling Point” for our younger readers) of this foray into Tarrasch land is to promote an alternative and albeit more active deployment of Black’s King’s bishop to c5 instead of the traditional e7. This nuance was first campaigned with success by Carl Schlecter versus Milan Vidmar at Budapest 1912 a year after becoming a novelty / TN from Georg Salwe who first punted it at Karlovy Vary in 1911. Since Netanya 2019 Daniil Dubov has played this line with success along with other notables such as Nodirbek Abdusattorov, Dommaraju Gukesh and Dennis Wagner to name but a few.

We must be grateful to the author for choosing to name this variation after Dubov rather than say Abdusattorov (!) but we think we could all appreciate a Wagner Variation / Cycle or two!

So, the Dubov Variation is:

[fen cal=Gf8c5] r1bqk2r/pp3ppp/2n2n2/2bp4/3N4/2N3P1/PP2PPBP/R1BQK2R w KQkq – 0 1 [/fen]

which is, in turn an offshoot of the highly popular and reliable anti-IQP Rubinstein Variation (6.g3).

Chapter Two dispenses (via Games 13 – 15) with Whites various ninth move alternatives before focussing in Chapter Three on 9 Nxc6 (seven games) followed by the more critical 9 Nb3 (nine games) in Chapter Four.

To complete Black’s Dubov-based Tarrasch repertoire there is a nine game treatment via Chapter Five of the so-called Symmetrical Variation:

[fen cal=Gb8c6] r1bqkb1r/pp3ppp/2n1pn2/2pp4/2PP4/2N1PN2/PP3PPP/R1BQKB1R w KQkq – 0 1 [/fen]

followed by an examination of the popular 6 Bg5 line:

[fen cal=Gc1g5] r1bqkbnr/pp3ppp/2n5/2pp2B1/3P4/2N2N2/PP2PPPP/R2QKB1R b KQkq – 0 1 [/fen]

and then positions resulting from White capturing on c5. Lastly the author tidies up by discussing the usual move order issues caused by White delaying development of the Queen’s knight.

Looking at the increasing popularity of the Dubov Variation this book is about as topical as one can get and its likely there will a gradual shift from …Be7 to …Bc5 and eventually this will filter down from the top to less giddy heights.

A constant theme of the book is learning through reinforcement of ideas and the solving of multiple combinational, tactical and positional understanding exercises.

Is there a final verdict on this line? No, and even if there was I would encourage you to obtain this book to find out!

As a taster here is a very recent smooth performance from Dubov himself:

[pgn]
[Event “Chess.com Rapid Wk11 Swiss”]
[Site “Chess.com INT”]
[Date “2022.04.23”]
[Round “8”]
[White “Kovalenko, Igor”]
[Black “Dubov, Daniil”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “D33”]
[WhiteElo “2674”]
[BlackElo “2711”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “64”]
[EventDate “2022.04.23”]
[EventType “swiss (rapid)”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “USA”]
[SourceTitle “CBM 207 Extra”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2022.05.31”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2022.05.31”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,64,19,-12,-9,-12,28,28,14,8,16,14,18,18,14,14,26,25,24,31,31,37,34,35,10,1,-2,-2,4,-8,20,22,19,-8,5,-13,26,0,0,0,0,-50,-38,-50,-7,-67,-65,-81,-77,-120,-102,-107,-134,-102,-115,-137,-141,-137,-85,-219,-281,-269,-275,-643,-664,-29999,-30000]} 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 c5 3. Nf3 e6 4. g3 d5 5. cxd5 exd5 6. d4 Nc6 7. Bg2 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Bc5 9. Nb3 Bb6 10. O-O ({Relevant:} 10. Na4 O-O 11. Nxb6 axb6 12. Nd4 Re8 13. O-O Nxd4 14. Qxd4 Rxe2 15. Be3 Rc2 16. Rfc1 Rxc1+ 17. Rxc1 Bd7 18. Qxb6 Qxb6 19. Bxb6 Rxa2 20. Bd4 Bc6 21. b4 Ra4 22. Bxf6 gxf6 23. b5 Bxb5 24. Bxd5 Bc6 25. Bxc6 bxc6 26. Rxc6 Kg7 27. Kg2 Ra2 28. Kg1 Ra1+ 29. Kg2 Ra2 30. Kg1 Ra1+ 31. Kg2 Ra2 {½-½ Giri,A (2777)-Carlsen,M (2855) Meltwater Tour Final chess24.com INT rapid 2021 (6.3)}) 10… d4 11. Na4 O-O 12. Bg5 Re8 13. Nxb6 axb6 14. Re1 {[#]} Ra4 $146 ({Predecessor:} 14… Be6 15. Bxc6 Bxb3 16. Qxb3 {½-½ Flom,G (2477)-Greenfeld,A (2507) ISR-chT Israel 2021 (3.2)}) 15. a3 h6 16. Bd2 Ra8 17. e4 Nd7 18. Bf4 Nf8 19. Rc1 Be6 20. h3 Qd7 21. Kh2 Rad8 22. Na1 Ng6 23. Bd2 Nge5 24. Rf1 Nc4 25. f4 f6 26. Rb1 d3 27. Rf2 Nd4 28. Bc3 Ne2 29. Bd2 Qd4 30. Rf1 Ne3 31. Nb3 Nxf1+ 32. Bxf1 Qg1# 0-1

[/pgn]

Enjoy!

John Upham, Cove, Hampshire, 26th February, 2023

John Upham
John Upham

Book Details :

  • Paperback : 304 pages
  • Publisher:  Everyman Chess (16 Jan. 2023)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10:1781946965
  • ISBN-13:978-1781946961
  • Product Dimensions: 17.3 x 1.7 x 23.8 cm

Official web site of Everyman Chess

Opening Repertoire: Queen's Gambit Declined: Tarrasch, Cyrus Lakdawala, Everyman Chess (16 Jan. 2023), ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1781946961
Opening Repertoire: Queen’s Gambit Declined: Tarrasch, Cyrus Lakdawala, Everyman Chess (16 Jan. 2023), ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1781946961

Remembering Raaphy Persitz (26-vii-1934 04-ii-2009)

We remember Raaphy(i) Persitz who passed away on Wednesday, February 4th, 2009.

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CXXIX (129, 2009), Number 3 (March), pp. 130-134 by John Saunders we have this detailed obituary:

Raaphy Persitz

A tribute to a great friend of British chess, by John Saunders

Raphael Joseph Arie (Raaphy) Persitz (26 vii 1934, Tel Aviv – 4 ii 2009, Tel Aviv)

28th December 1955: Israeli chess player Raaphy Persitz in play at the International Chess Congress at Hastings. (Photo by Folb/Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)
28th December 1955: Israeli chess player Raaphy Persitz in play at the International Chess Congress at Hastings. (Photo by Folb/Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)

Raaphy Persitz, one of the strongest players resident in Britain in the 1950s and 1960s and also one of BCM‘s most popular contributors, has died aged 74. Raaphy was born in Tel Aviv, the grandson of Shoshana Persitz (1893-1969), a publisher who became an early member of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament. Raaphy became Israel’s first junior champion in 1951 and shortly afterwards came to study PPE (Philosophy, Politics and Economics) at Oxford University where he was a member of their very strong chess team and a close friend of Leonard Barden and others.

Raaphy Persitz (26-vii-1934 04-ii-2009). 26 year-old Raaphy Persitz at the 1960 Leipzig Olympiad playing on board four for Israel. He scored +6, =2, -4.
Raaphy Persitz (26-vii-1934 04-ii-2009). 26 year-old Raaphy Persitz at the 1960 Leipzig Olympiad playing on board four for Israel. He scored +6, =2, -4.

One of his most publicised feats was to win his Varsity match game and also a county match against Hugh Alexander on the same day (see the May 1954 or March 2004 issues of the magazine for further details). Raaphy played three times in the Varsity match and also represented England in three Students Olympiads in the mid-1950s. He represented Israel in the 1960 Leipzig Olympiad on board four, and also played twice in the Hastings Premier, in 1955-56 and 1968-69, the latter being his swansong in competitive chess as he turned his attention to a career in banking which took him first to Switzerland and eventually to his home town of Tel Aviv. As a player his best result was probably finishing third behind Reshevsky and Szabo at the first major international tournament held in Israel, Haifa/Tel Aviv 1958.

[pgn]
[Event “Christmas Congress 1955/56-31 Premier”]
[Site “Hastings”]
[Date “1956.01.04”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Persitz, Raaphi”]
[Black “Penrose, Jonathan”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C41”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “65”]
[EventDate “1955.12.28”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[SourceTitle “MCD”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1999.07.01”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,65,19,38,25,7,75,61,61,49,73,66,59,38,43,42,60,58,63,50,75,46,71,47,
29,36,48,-15,-26,-13,-26,-42,-32,-31,-22,-26,-3,-28,-48,-35,-20,-32,40,61,80,
-20,18,-1,9,-73,-46,-131,-142,-109,-36,-74,-62,-93,-30,9,51,8,67,67,67,20,120,
63]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Nbd7 5. Bc4 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. h3 c6 8.
a4 Qc7 {[#]} ({Relevant:} 8… b6 9. Qe2 a6 10. d5 c5 11. Bd3 Ne8 12. Nd1 Nc7
13. Ne3 Re8 14. Nf5 Nf8 15. c4 Rb8 16. Bd2 a5 17. Rae1 Ng6 18. g3 Bf6 19. Qd1
Ne7 20. b3 Rb7 21. Kg2 Na6 22. Qc1 Nb4 23. Bb1 Kh8 24. Ne3 g6 25. Ng4 Ng8 26.
Nxf6 Qxf6 27. Ng1 Qg7 28. f4 f6 29. Nf3 Rbe7 30. fxe5 dxe5 31. Nh4 Rd8 32. Kh2
h6 33. g4 Kh7 34. Re3 Na6 35. Rg3 Nc7 36. Kg2 Ne8 37. Nf3 Nd6 38. h4 {Roehrich,
E-Rellstab,L Hamburg 1952 1-0 (69)}) 9. Bg5 $146 ({Predecessor:} 9. Re1 h6 10.
dxe5 dxe5 11. Nh4 Re8 12. Qf3 Nf8 13. Nf5 Be6 14. Nxe7+ Qxe7 15. Bf1 Ng6 16.
Be3 Kh7 17. a5 Nh4 18. Qg3 Ng6 19. f3 Nh5 20. Qf2 Ngf4 21. Kh2 g5 22. g3 Ng6
23. Bxa7 Rg8 24. Bc5 Qf6 25. Be3 Qg7 26. Red1 Nf6 27. Rd6 Ne8 28. Rd2 Nf6 29.
Be2 Nf8 30. b4 h5 31. Rad1 g4 32. fxg4 hxg4 33. h4 Ng6 34. Kg1 Nh5 35. Na4 Raf8
36. Nc5 Bc8 37. Nd7 Bxd7 38. Rxd7 Nf6 {Matanovic,A-Porreca,G Belgrade 1952 1-0}
) 9… Re8 10. Re1 Nf8 11. Bh4 Be6 12. Qe2 Nh5 13. Bxe6 Nxe6 14. d5 Nef4 15.
Qe3 cxd5 16. exd5 Bxh4 17. Nxh4 Qe7 18. Nf3 f5 19. Kh2 Qd7 20. Rad1 e4 21. Nd4
Re5 22. Nde2 g5 23. Rg1 Kh8 24. f3 exf3 25. Qxf3 g4 26. Qf1 Ng6 27. Rd3 f4 28.
Nd4 Ng3 29. Qd1 Rh5 30. Ne6 gxh3 31. gxh3 Rh4 32. Ne2 Ne5 33. Nxg3 1-0
[/pgn]

Despite giving up competitive play, Raaphy never lost his love of the game and remained an avid reader of magazines and follower of the game until the end of his life. And, of course, he remained a perceptive and humorous writer on the game though his output was much lower than in the 1950s. The news of his death came as a particular shock to me as, only a couple of weeks previously, he had sent me a fax saying how moved he had been by the tribute I had writ- ten to Bob Wade in the January 2009 issue of BCM. That was typical of his kindness to wards me which dated back to when I took my first tottering steps as BCM editor in 1999. We never actually met in person but spoke occasionally on the telephone and exchanged faxes (Raaphy didn’t seem to communicate by email).

Raaphy Persitz (26-vii-1934 04-ii-2009)
Raaphy Persitz (26-vii-1934 04-ii-2009)

As a long-time reader of the magazine I had enjoyed his Student’s Corner column contributions. The column had been initiated by Abe Yanofsky in the early 1950s and Raaphy had inherited it in 1958. I was particularly delighted when, in 2004, after I had written about his 1954 feat in winning his Varsity match game and a county match against English number one CHO’D(Hugh) Alexander on the same day, Raaphy consented to write another column (which appeared in the May 2004 issue of BCM). I never succeeded in getting him to write another one but it was such a pleasure to have him write for the magazine during my spell as editor.

[pgn]
[Event “County Match, Oxon v Gloucester”]
[Site “Swindon ENG”]
[Date “1954.03.27”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Persitz, Raaphy”]
[Black “Alexander, Conel Hugh”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “C47”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “79”]
[EventDate “1954.??.??”]
[SourceTitle “BCM, May 1954, -age 151”]
[Source “‘Cabbage Heads a”]
[WhiteTeam “Oxfordshire”]
[BlackTeam “Gloucestershire”]

{[%evp 0,79,28,28,28,13,25,5,8,-17,37,33,22,2,75,57,57,57,47,36,91,58,60,29,39,
22,40,83,83,24,51,41,74,79,76,76,74,74,74,69,69,37,37,30,38,0,7,10,52,-46,52,
33,-10,-21,27,15,34,19,14,116,117,80,95,-102,56,56,60,194,200,196,204,0,7,0,
259,268,287,290,288,288,504,523]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 Bb4 5.
d5 Ne7 6. Nxe5 O-O 7. Qd4 Bxc3+ 8. bxc3 {[#]} Re8 $146 ({Relevant:} 8… d6 9.
Nf3 Re8 10. Be2 c5 11. Qd3 Ng6 12. Bg5 h6 13. Bxf6 Qxf6 14. g3 Bh3 15. Nd2 b5
16. Rb1 a6 17. f4 Qe7 18. Kf2 f5 19. Bf3 Qf6 20. Rhe1 Ra7 21. exf5 Rxe1 22.
Rxe1 Bxf5 23. Be4 Bxe4 24. Nxe4 Qf8 25. Ng5 hxg5 26. Qxg6 Rf7 27. Qxg5 Rf5 28.
Qg6 Rf6 29. Qe8 Qxe8 30. Rxe8+ Kf7 31. Ra8 Rf5 32. Rxa6 Rxd5 33. Ke2 Ke6 34.
Ra5 Rh5 35. h4 Kd5 36. Rxb5 Kc4 37. Rb3 Rh8 38. a4 {Cortlever,N-Milner Barry,P
London 1952 1-0}) 9. Bg5 Nf5 10. exf5 d6 11. f4 dxe5 12. fxe5 Qxd5 13. O-O-O
Qxd4 14. cxd4 Ne4 15. Bh4 Nc3 16. Rd3 Nxa2+ 17. Kb2 Nb4 18. Rf3 a5 19. c3 Nd5
20. Bc4 c6 21. g4 b5 22. Bd3 Bd7 23. g5 c5 24. Rhf1 a4 25. Be4 Bc6 26. g6 a3+
27. Ka1 cxd4 28. gxf7+ Kxf7 29. e6+ Kg8 30. cxd4 Ra4 31. Rg1 Rxd4 32. f6 Rxe4
33. f7+ Kf8 34. fxe8=Q+ Kxe8 35. Bf2 b4 36. Bc5 Rxe6 37. Rf8+ Kd7 38. Rxg7+ Ne7
39. Bxb4 Bd5 40. Rff7 1-0

[/pgn]

(Regarding the above game there is a note from Sally Simpson on chessgames.com as follows:

Raaphi Persitz agreed to play for Oxford v Cambridge in London and also on the same day for Oxon v Gloucester in a county match in Swindon.

This is the second game, he won both games.

Be aware that Bruce Hayden in ‘Cabbage Heads and Kings’, which is where I got this game from, mentions this but also added that these games took place on the same day as the 1954 Grand National (won by Royal Tan). This is wrong as the Grand National that year was run on the 10 April.

I think that maybe Bruce saw the score of the games with the two games a day story in a Sunday newspaper covering Saturdays Grand National and perhaps got the dates mixed up.

)

The fax he sent me on 7 January 2009 seems particularly poignant now but it is a good example of Raaphy’s kindness and self-deprecating humour. Here is the full text:

“Dear John, I was moved by your wide-ranging obituary of Bob Wade in the BCM[January 2009, p34l. I dare say you did justice to his contributions and devotion to chess, spanning well over half a century. I have several pleasant recollections of conversations and over-the-board encounters with Bob. One such tussle, a hard-fought draw, was reproduced by Bob, with comments (in the Student’s Corner) in a book containing his eventful games.

[pgn]
[Event “Christmas Congress 1968/69-44 Premier”]
[Site “Hastings”]
[Date “1969.01.02”]
[Round “6”]
[White “Persitz, Raaphi”]
[Black “Huebner, Robert”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E82”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “55”]
[EventDate “1968.12.28”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 1999”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,55,19,31,14,-14,43,38,37,33,33,10,9,21,31,23,50,27,18,21,51,55,45,38,
34,27,7,-2,-2,13,-9,-14,59,21,11,14,31,24,17,-8,-7,-16,-48,-48,-42,-48,0,-1,7,
5,10,28,41,-20,183,202,29993,29994]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5.
f3 O-O 6. Be3 b6 7. Bd3 a6 8. Qd2 c5 9. d5 e6 10. Nge2 ({Relevant:} 10. dxe6
Bxe6 11. Bh6 Bxh6 12. Qxh6 Nbd7 13. Nh3 Ne5 14. O-O-O b5 15. Ng5 Qe7 16. Be2 b4
17. Nd5 Bxd5 18. Rxd5 Rfd8 19. Rhd1 Nc6 20. f4 Nd4 21. Bf3 Qf8 22. Qxf8+ Kxf8
23. R5xd4 cxd4 24. e5 dxe5 25. fxe5 Rdc8 26. exf6 Rxc4+ 27. Kd2 Rc5 28. Ne4 Ra5
29. Kd3 Rxa2 30. Rb1 a5 31. Rc1 Rxb2 32. Rc7 Rb3+ 33. Kd2 Rb2+ 34. Kd1 d3 35.
Ng5 Kg8 36. Rxf7 Ra6 37. Rg7+ Kf8 38. Nxh7+ {1-0 (38) Szabo,L-Najdorf,M Mar
del Plata 1962}) 10… exd5 11. exd5 Nbd7 {[#]} 12. O-O $146 ({Predecessor:}
12. Ng3 Re8 13. O-O Ng4 14. Bg5 f6 15. Bf4 Nge5 16. Be2 f5 17. Bg5 Nf6 18. Bh6
Bh8 19. Rfd1 Ra7 20. Rab1 Nf7 21. Be3 h5 22. Bf1 h4 23. Nge2 Nh5 24. Nf4 Nxf4
25. Bxf4 Bd4+ {0-1 (25) Tamburini,M-Botvinnik,M Leipzig 1960}) 12… Ne5 13. b3
Nxd3 14. Qxd3 b5 15. Rae1 Qa5 16. Ng3 Rb8 17. Bd2 Qb6 18. Nce4 Nxe4 19. fxe4 a5
20. Bc3 bxc4 21. bxc4 Bxc3 22. Qxc3 Qb2 23. Qxa5 Qd4+ 24. Kh1 Rb2 25. e5 Qxc4
26. e6 Qb4 27. Qc7 Ba6 28. Qxf7+ 1-0
[/pgn]

Another, somewhat less felicitous, recollection harks back to a game we contested at Ilford, where, in extreme time trouble, I blithely played Rxh7+, expecting …Qxh7, but overlooking the simple …Kxh7, leaving me a whole rook down with no compensation, whereupon I duly resigned. What impressed me at the time was the lightning speed with which Bob reacted to my ill-fated blunder – as if it were nothing but inevitable…

With warmest wishes for a healthy,
happy, fruitful 2009. Raaphy.”

I had hoped to publish the above as a Letter to the Editor but, sadly, it must now appear as part of Raaphy’s obituary. The draw with Bob Wade referred to in the fax was played in Dublin in 1962 and featured in Student’s Corner in BCM in the December 1966 issue on page 356. It seems appropriate to reproduce the game here in tribute to these two recently departed and much-loved chessplayers.

Notes by Persitz

Unlike the majority of games that have, over the years, appeared in the Student’s Corner, the following dour struggle between Bob Wade (White) and myself (Black), from Dublin, 1962, is in no way outstanding: it does not contain any brilliant combinations; it is not a positional masterpiece; it is certainly not devoid of mistakes. Nor is it amusing, or original, or of theoretical interest or particularly instructive. Yet (with the aid of the interspersed comments) it ought to give the student a pretty shrewd and realistic idea of the stuff competitive chess is made of: the endless number of laborious variations that have to be examined; the annoying little threats that must be attended to; the treacherous pitfalls to be sidestepped; the technical hurdles to be surmounted; the frustrating little details, indifference to which may be fatal; in brief, the drudgery that has become part and parcel of contemporary tournament practice, without which success is unimaginable.

[pgn]
[Event “Dublin”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1962.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Wade, Robert Graham”]
[Black “Persitz, Raaphy”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[Annotator “Raaphy Persitz”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “5rk1/1p4bp/1pn1p1p1/3pPp2/r2P4/7P/PP2BPP1/R1BR2K1 w – – 0 19”]
[PlyCount “54”]
[EventDate “1962.??.??”]
[SourceTitle “BCM, 2009, p.131”]

{[%evp 0,1,-80,-94] [#] White’s position does not inspire much confidence:} {
After 40 minutes reflection, White hits upon a drastic solution which displays
a profound understanding of the position.} 19. b4 $1 {The idea behind this
remarkable move is a simple as the move itself is startling: since White’s
central pawns exercise a cramping influence on Black’s king’s flank, he will
go out of his way to hold on to them, even if this involves jettisoning both
his queenside pawns. Black’s b-pawn will be subjected to a frontal attack
along the b-file.} ({the straightforward} 19. Be3 {, to protect the hanging
d-pawn, will not do because of} f4 20. b3 Rb4 {etc}) ({whilst if} 19. Bb5 {
simply} Rxd4) 19… Nxb4 $2 {Frittering away most of his advantage.} ({
Admittedly neither} 19… Rxb4 20. Ba3 Rxd4 21. Bxf8) ({nor} 19… Nxd4 20.
Rxd4 Bxe5 21. Bb2 Bxd4 22. Bxd4 Rxb4 23. Rd1 {yields Black any superiority.}) (
{But the tranquil} 19… Rfa8 {does} {For example} 20. a3 Rxb4 21. Be3 (21.
axb4 Rxa1) 21… Rb2) 20. Bb5 $1 (20. a3 $2 Nc2) 20… Rxa2 $2 {Unnecessarily
jeopardising the black kinght., thus handing over the initiative to White.} ({
The safe course is} 20… Raa8 21. a4 Nc6 (21… Rfc8 $2 22. Bd7) ({or} 21…
Kf7 22. Ba3)) ({Less good is} 20… Nc2 $2 21. Bxa4 Nxa1 22. Bb2 Ra8 23. Bd7
Nc2 24. Bxe6+ Kf8 25. Bxd5 {when White’s connected passed pawns carry the day.}
) 21. Rxa2 ({After} 21. Rb1 Nc6 (21… Na6 $2 22. Bd7) 22. Bxc6 bxc6 23. Rxb6
Rc2 {White does not appear to have enough for his minus pawn.}) 21… Nxa2 22.
Bd2 Ra8 {[#] The text move is aimed at rescuing the knight} ({Black had
originally intended to follow up 20…Rxa2? with} 22… Kf7 $2 {preparing for
23…Rc8-c2 (which is not feasible right away on account 23.Bd7).} {but he had
not noticed that White would trap the displaced knight by means of} 23. Ra1 Ra8
24. Bd3 {etc.}) 23. Rb1 ({If} 23. Ra1 Bf8 24. Bd3 Ra3 25. Bb1 {and the rescue
completes} {by way of} Nc1 $1) 23… Kf7 24. Bd7 $2 ({If} 24. Be2 {then either}
Rc8 ({or} 24… Ra4 {suffices} 25. Bd1 ({or} 25. Rxb6 Rxd4 26. Rxb7+ Kg8 27.
Rb8+ (27. Rb2 Ra4) (27. Be3 Rb4 28. Ra7 Nc3) 27… Kf7 28. Rb7+ Kg8 29. Rb8+ {
with a draw by repetition of moves.}) 25… Rxd4 26. Rb2 Nc3 $1) 25. Rxb6 Rc2 {
etc}) ({More promising is} 24. Rb2 $1 {with Rc2 and Rc7 to follow whereupon
Black would find it extremely difficult to avoid the loss of his weak e-pawn.})
24… Ke7 (24… Ra6 25. Bc8) 25. Rxb6 (25. Bb5 Rc8 $1 26. Bg5+ Kf7 27. Bd7 (
27. Rb2 Nc3 $1) 27… Rc7) 25… Kxd7 (25… Bxe5 26. Bxe6 Bxd4 27. Bg5+ Bf6
28. Bxf6+ Kxf6 29. Bxd5+ {which peters out into a draw.}) 26. Rxb7+ Kc6 {
The king is destined to play a leading part in the ending.} 27. Rxg7 {The game
now enters a new and tricky phase. White’s king is out of play, but so is
Black’s knight.} Ra4 (27… Kb5 {, in order to answer} 28. Re7 (28. Rxh7 Kc4
29. Be3 {and White’s h-pawn becomes dangerous.} (29. Rg7)) 28… Ra6 {, is too
slow.}) 28. Re7 (28. Rxh7 {tends to favour Black} {i.e.} Rxd4 29. Bg5 Rd1+ 30.
Kh2 d4) ({Worse is} 28. Be3 Nc3 29. Rxh7 (29. Re7 $142) 29… f4 $1 30. Bd2
Ne2+ 31. Kf1 Nxd4 $17) 28… Rxd4 29. Rxe6+ Kb5 {[#]} 30. Be3 {Setting Black a
discreet pitfall:} Re4 (30… Rd1+ 31. Kh2 d4 32. Rd6 d3 (32… dxe3 33. Rxd1)
(32… Kc5 33. Bxd4+ $1) 33. e6 {and White wins.}) 31. Rb6+ Kc4 32. Rc6+ Kd3 (
32… Kb5 $2 33. Rc5+) 33. e6 Nc3 {The knight returns from the cold.} ({instead
} 33… d4 {loses outright to} 34. Rd6) 34. Rd6 ({If} 34. Bc5 Ne2+ (34… d4
35. Rd6 Nb5 36. Rb6 Kc4 37. Bf8 d3) (34… Re1+ 35. Kh2 Ne4 36. Be3 f4 37. e7
fxe3)) 34… f4 {warding off 35.Bg5 and denying the white king of access to
the flight square g3.} 35. Bc5 ({The alternative is} 35. Bb6 {(threatening 36
Bd8, 37 e7, 38 Rf6 and 39 Rf8 etc.)} Re1+ 36. Kh2 Re5 37. Bd8 Ne4 38. Rd7 {
with a draw after} Rxe6 (38… Nxf2 39. Bh4 Ne4 40. e7 g5 41. Rxd5+ Rxd5 42.
e8=Q gxh4 43. Qf7 {being advantageous to White.}) 39. Rxd5+) 35… Re1+ 36. Kh2
Kc4 ({abstaining from} 36… Ne4 $2 37. Rxd5+ Kc4 {which goes down to} 38. Re5
$1) 37. Bb6 {angling for Bd8 followed by e7, Rf6-f8 and e8=Q.} Ne4 38. Rd7 (38.
Rc6+ Kb5 39. e7 {would lead to disaster after} Nd2) ({Likewise, if} 38. Ba5 $2
Ra1 {menacing three white pieces}) ({if} 38. Rd8 Ng5) 38… Nd2 {attacking the
e-pawn and threatening mate in three moves.} ({To} 38… Nf6 {White retorts not
} 39. Rd6 ({nor} 39. Rc7+ Kb5 40. Bd4 Rxe6) ({but} 39. Re7 {with a level
position.}) 39… Ne8 40. Rc6+ Kb5) 39. Ba5 {Making the draw inescapeable.}
Nf1+ 40. Kg1 ({Of course, if} 40. Kh1 $4 Ng3+ {and mates next move; which goes
to show that other things being equal, double check causes more damage than
discovered ones.} 41. Kh2 Rh1#) 40… Nd2+ 41. Kh2 Nf1+ ({On} 41… Rd1 {
White’s safest course is} 42. g4 {, when Black does not appear to have
anything more promising than} (42. Bxd2 Rxd2 {favours Black}) ({whilst the
consequences of} 42. h4 h5 {are obscure.}) 42… Nf3+ 43. Kg2 Nh4+ 44. Kh2 Nf3+
{drawing by perpetual check.}) (41… Re2 42. e7) 42. Kg1 Ra1 {A last, albeit
harmless, gesture.} 43. g4 Nd2+ {and a draw was agreed in anticipation of} ({
The careless} 43… fxg3 $2 44. Kg2 Rxa5 {would invite White to queen his
passed pawn after} 45. e7 Ra8 46. Rd8 Ra7 47. e8=Q) 44. Kg2 (44. Kh2 Nf3+ 45.
Kg2 Nh4+ {and so on.}) 44… f3+ 45. Kh2 ({if} 45. Kg3 {he gets the worst of
the ending after} Ne4+) 45… Nf1+ {and so on and so forth.} 1/2-1/2
[/pgn]

Raaphy Persitz Tributes

Leonard Barden: Raaphy was probably my best friend at Oxford – certainly so among chessplayers. We played hundreds of blitz games in the junior common room at Balliol and later for some months in 1957 we shared a London flat, analysing Russian championship games over breakfast. He was a wonderful man to know, bright, witty, gentle, sympathetic and knowledgeable.

Leonard Barden (centre) with Raaphi Persitz, JB Sykes, OI Galvenius and DM Armstrong, Ilford, May, 1953
Leonard Barden (centre) with Raaphi Persitz, JB Sykes, OI Galvenius and DM Armstrong, Ilford, May, 1953

A tribute by Amatzia Avni: Ordinary people have a mixture of good qualities and bad ones. After 20 years of friendship with the late Raaphy Persitz I can attest that he was a distinct type: one sided, positive-only; pure gold.

I first met him in 1989. I had just written my first chess book (in Hebrew) and was searching for someone to write me an introduction. The word was that Persitz was back in town, after long years abroad. Having seen glimpses of his amazing linguistic skills, I contacted him and he agreed immediately. He didn’t know me, hadn’t read a single sentence of the book, yet he didn’t hesitate: “yes, sure, I’ll be glad to”.

That was typical Persitz: always ready to help, unconditionally. The introduction, needless to say, was a sheer delight, a class or two above the rest of the book. In later years he gave me a hand several times polishing my texts and making them more reader-friendly to English-speaking readers. Somehow he seemed to know what I wished to express better than I did. His suggestions enabled me to convey my meaning in a clear and precise manner.

Raaphy was modest and reserved. Once I called him and realized he was upset. “My mother had passed away some weeks ago,” he said. I was puzzled why he didn’t tell me the sad news at the time. “I didn’t want to bother you” was his reply.

A couple of years ago I stumbled upon Bruce Hayden’s old book Cabbage Heads and Chess Kings. One of the book’s chapters was headed “Raaphy Persitz star or comet?”. I learned that, in the 1950s, Persitz gained bright victories in England, against Penrose, Alexander, Milner-Barry and others. Searching a Chessbase database I found out that he also done battle with some out- standing international players. Yet, in all our meetings and hundreds of hours of conversation, he never said a thing about that!

Persitz was a master of understatement. I learned that if I wrote “very fine” or “extremely strong”, the ‘very’ and ‘extremely’ would fly out of the window. If I made a firm stand on a certain issue, he would add “probably”, “apparently’ or “it may be argued that”, because it was indeed only an opinion, not a fact. Over time, following his line of thought made me improve the way I expressed myself and thought about chess.

Persitz’s distinctions in chess, in linguistics and in journalism are evident to anyone who ever read his chess books and articles. He also excelled at economics, but I am unqualified to comment on this.

God bless you, Raaphy. I feel privileged to have known you. Amatzia Avni.

Here is his Wikipedia entry

Happy Birthday IM Andrew Horton (15-i-1998)

Andrew Horton at the 2014 Team Chess Challenge at Imperial College. Courtesy of John Upham Photography
Andrew Horton at the 2014 Team Chess Challenge at Imperial College. Courtesy of John Upham Photography

BCN wishes Happy Birthday to IM Andrew P Horton (15-i-1998)

Andrew became a FIDE Master in 2015 and an International Master in 2018 following the 89th FIDE Congress 2018, 26 Sep – 6 Oct, Batumi, Georgia.

Andrew represents the 3Cs club in the Manchester League and in the Four Nations Chess League (4NCL) (as well as Wood Green) and, in addition, Wotton Hall, Durham City (during his University years) and Northumberland CA for county matches.

Andrew made regular appearences at the Delancey UK Chess Challenge and was placed 1st in the 2014 Terafinal, Challengers section.

Andrew Horton, Challengers C, 1st, 2014, UKCC Terafinal
Andrew Horton, Challengers C, 1st, 2014, UKCC Terafinal

In 2021 Andrew was invited and played in the London Chess Classic at the Cavendish Conference Centre.

IM Andrew Horton at the London Chess Classic, 2021
IM Andrew Horton at the London Chess Classic, 2021

Andrew’s ECF standard play rating at January 2023 is 2452K.

Birthday Greetings IM Shreyas Royal (09-i-2009)

FM Shreyas Royal at the London Chess Classic, 2021 courtesy of John Upham Photography
FM Shreyas Royal at the London Chess Classic, 2021 courtesy of John Upham Photography

BCN sends birthday wishes to IM Shreyas (known as “Shrey” by his friends) Royal born on Friday, January 9th, 2009. “Hallelujah” by Alexandra Burke was number one in the UK hit parade.

Shreyas attended The Pointer School in Blackheath, London, SE3 whose motto is “The Lord is my Shepherd”. Currently Shreyas is home schooled.

In October 2021 BCN secured an interview with Shreyas via his father Jitendra and below is mostly from that interview:

BCN: What caused his initial interest in chess and at what age?

His initial interest in chess was capturing or as he used to call it ‘eating’ pieces but as he grew more mature, he loved that there were so many possibilities in chess, so much still left to explore! At the Age of 6 he learnt and got an interest in chess.

BCN: Has Shreyas had any chess teachers or coaches?

  1. Jyothi Lal N. with a peak of 2250 FIDE but is very knowledgeable and helped from just above beginner to 1800. He was Shreyas’s first coach.
  2. Meszaros Gyula (Julian) who was an IM with a peak of 2465 FIDE and was an endgame master which helped him from 1800-2100.
  3. His Current Coach is GM John Emms with a peak of around 2600 FIDE, he is an expert in many fields such as Positional Play, Openings, Strategic chess etc and has also made a big impact on how to prepare against opponents. He had helped him from 2100-2300 so far in just under a year!

BCN: Which chess clubs and/ or Teams does Shreyas represent?

He represents SV Erkenschwick from Germany and Wasa SK from Sweden for online events as he has joined them during the pandemic. He started his 4NCL career with KJCA Kings in January 2019 but now mainly represents Wood Green which he has played for in online events in and will also represent them in the upcoming 4NCL weekends.

His first appearance in Megabase 2022 comes from the 2015 British Under-8 Championship in Coventry, the eventual winner being Dhruv Radhakrishnan.

Progress from those early days has only been interrupted by school examination breaks and the Covid pandemic:

FIDE Rating progress chart for FM Shreyas Royal
FIDE Rating progress chart for FM Shreyas Royal

In August 2016 in Bournemouth Shreyas scored an impressive 6/6 to win the British Under-8 Championship.

Shreyas Royal at the 2016 UKCC Delancey Terafinal in Loughborough courtesy of John Upham Photography
Shreyas Royal at the 2016 UKCC Delancey Terafinal in Loughborough courtesy of John Upham Photography

BCN: What was his first memorable tournament success?

This was the 2016 European Schools Under-7 championship where he was runner-up without any preparation or work on chess!

Shreyas Royal at the 2016 UKCC Delancey Southern Gigafinal in Reading courtesy of John Upham Photography
Shreyas Royal at the 2016 UKCC Delancey Southern Gigafinal in Reading courtesy of John Upham Photography

In September 2017 Shreyas travelled to Mamaia in Romania and after nine hard fought rounds tied for first place with 8/9 in the European Youth Chess Championship, Under-8 with Giang Tran Nam (HUN, 1561).

In 2021 Shreyas was awarded the FM title by FIDE:

FIDE FM Certificate for Shreyas Royal
FIDE FM Certificate for Shreyas Royal

BCN: Which chess players past & present are inspirational for him?

  1. Magnus Carlsen, world champion and broke many FIDE records also is an inspiration for most of this generation. He likes his slow grinding and almost winning from any opening or ending. This is his favourite player of all time.
  2. Garry Kasparov played brilliant attacking chess and calculated like a machine.
  3. Bobby Fischer played a similar style to Kasparov but was more talented than both Magnus and Kasparov in his opinion as he worked all by himself at a time in the USA when chess was not so popular while for the Russians, they had brilliant coaches and had one good player after the other. He rates him a bit lower because Fischer quit competitive chess a bit too early and could not reach the heights he was worthy of.
  4. Alireza Firouzja
  5. Fabiano Caruana

BCN: What are his favourite openings with the White pieces?

He plays 1.d4 pretty much all the time.

MegaBase 2020 has 294 games with 1.d4 and one solitary 1.g3 from March 2021. The 1.d4 games feature main line Queen’s Gambit / Catalan type positions championing 5.Nge2 against the King’s Indian Defence and the exchange variation against the Grunfeld.

BCN: and what are his preferred defences as the second player?

Really depends on what they play, against every opening he has got one or two lines which he enjoys equally.

Megabase 2022 informs us that Shreyas defends the main line Closed Variation of the Ruy Lopez and main line Giuoco Piano. Previously he essayed the Sicilian Najdorf.

BCN: Does he have any favourite chess books?

Not really as he is not such a big fan of chess books, but he likes My 60 Memorable Games by Bobby Fischer. Fundamental Chess Endings and Encyclopedia of Chess Combinations.

BCN: Which tournaments are planned for 2022?

We have pencilled in a couple of norm and Open (France, Spain, Germany etc.) tournaments in European countries.

BCN: What are his favourite subjects outside of chess?

His favourite subjects outside chess are Science, History, Maths with Science as his favourite, History as his second favourite and Maths as his third favourite.

BCN: Does Shreyas play any physical sports?

He does Football, Cricket and a bit of Lawn Tennis.

BCN: What are his plans and aspirations for the future?

To become a world chess champion one day, but it’s very expensive to even get to the level of IM! Currently we are looking for sponsors who can help support Shreyas to get there.

Here is his personal website.

In late December 2021 Camberley Chess Club had Shreyas as their weekly Zoom meeting guest speaker.

and finally three of SRs favourite games:

[pgn]
[Event “British Chess Championship Major Open”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2018.08.05”]
[Round “9”]
[White “Royal, Shreyas”]
[Black “Jayawarna, Nugith”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E70”]
[WhiteElo “1927”]
[BlackElo “2013”]
[Annotator “Shreyas Royal”]
[PlyCount “57”]
[SourceTitle “Jitendra”]

{[%evp 0,57,19,17,14,-9,41,45,31,44,44,2,7,2,6,12,41,26,65,-13,27,39,44,41,87,
75,50,46,63,46,82,51,168,230,230,231,258,262,258,149,433,213,161,441,522,195,
500,527,501,169,1531,1211,1221,1268,1296,1314,1336,1370,1375,1397]} 1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nge2 {This is the Kings Indian Defence Kramer
variation} O-O 6. Ng3 e5 7. d5 c6 {I think c6 is a side-line whereas the main
line goes} (7… Nbd7 8. Be2 a5 9. h4 h5 10. Bg5 Qe8 $1 $14 (10… Nc5 $2 {
remember not to fall into this trap} 11. Bxh5 $3 {An astonishing move} gxh5 12.
Nxh5 {With pressure and an initiative} Kh8 13. Qf3 Bg4 14. Qxf6 Bxh5 15. Qxd8
Raxd8 16. Bxd8 Rxd8 17. f3 f5 18. exf5 e4 19. g4 Bf7 20. g5 Bxc3+ 21. bxc3 Bh5
22. fxe4 Re8 23. Kd2 Nxe4+ 24. Kc2 Ng3 25. Rhe1 Be2 26. f6 Kh7 27. Rg1 Re3 28.
Rae1 Kg6 29. Kb2 Nh5 30. Rgf1 Bxf1 31. Rxe3 Bxc4 32. Re7 Bxd5 33. Rxc7 Bc6 34.
f7 Kg7 35. g6 Nf4 36. h5 Ne6 37. Rc8 Nf8 38. Rxf8 Kxf8 39. h6 {1-0 (39) Ward,C
(2423)-Storey,C (2245) Coventry 2015})) 8. Be2 a6 {[#]} ({Relevant:} 8… cxd5
9. cxd5 Nbd7 10. Be3 a5 11. O-O Nc5 12. f3 Bd7 13. Nh1 Qb8 14. a4 Rc8 15. Nf2
h5 16. Bb5 Kh7 17. Nd3 b6 18. Nxc5 bxc5 19. Qd2 Rc7 20. b3 Rb7 21. Bc4 Ng8 22.
Rab1 Qd8 23. f4 exf4 24. Bxf4 Qe7 25. e5 dxe5 26. d6 Qe8 27. Be3 f5 28. Bxc5
Nf6 29. Nd5 Nxd5 30. Bxd5 Bc6 31. Rfc1 Bxd5 32. Qxd5 Rab8 33. Rd1 Rd7 34. Ba3
e4 35. Rbc1 Qe5 36. Qxe5 Bxe5 37. Rc7 Rbd8 38. Rxd7+ {Bologan,V (2640)-Kozul,Z
(2613) Doha 2016 1-0}) 9. dxc6 $146 (9. O-O b5 10. Bg5 Bb7 11. Qd2 {might of
been better despite allowing b5}) ({Predecessor:} 9. O-O cxd5 10. cxd5 Nbd7 11.
Re1 b5 12. b4 Nb6 13. a4 bxa4 14. Nxa4 h5 15. Bg5 Rb8 16. Bxh5 Nbd7 17. Qd2
gxh5 18. Nxh5 Kh7 19. Ra3 Rh8 20. Rf3 a5 21. Nxg7 Kxg7 22. Bxf6+ Nxf6 23. Qg5+
Kf8 24. Rxf6 Rxb4 25. Nc3 Qc7 26. h4 Bh3 27. Re3 {1-0 (27) Bocharov,D (2610)
-Kokarev,D (2628) Vladivostok 2016}) 9… bxc6 $6 {maybe he might of been
intending d5} (9… Nxc6 {[%cal Gc6d4] I think is better}) 10. Bg5 h6 11. Be3
Qc7 12. Qd2 {[%cal Ge3h6]} h5 13. O-O Be6 14. Rad1 Rd8 15. f4 Ng4 $4 {the
losing blunder} (15… exf4 {is an improvement in my opinion} 16. Bxf4 Nbd7)
16. f5 $1 Nxe3 17. Qxe3 $18 Bc8 $4 (17… Qa7 18. c5) 18. fxg6 fxg6 19. Qg5 Kh7
$6 {[#]} 20. Bxh5 $3 (20. Nxh5 $1 {also wins} Bh6 (20… gxh5 21. Bxh5 Qa7+ 22.
c5 Qxc5+ 23. Kh1 Rd7 24. Qg6+ Kg8 25. Qe8+ Kh7 26. Bg6+ Kh6 27. Bf5) 21. Nf6+
Kg7 22. Qg3) 20… gxh5 21. Nxh5 Ra7 {[#]} 22. Rf6 $1 Qb6+ (22… Bxf6 23.
Nxf6+ Kh8 24. Qg8+) 23. Kh1 Re7 24. Rdf1 (24. Rg6 {is mate in six!} {as follows
} Kh8 25. Nf6 Qc7 26. Qh5+ Bh6 27. Rxh6+ Kg7 28. Qg6+ Kf8 29. Rh8#) 24… Qc7
25. Rh6+ Bxh6 26. Nf6+ Kh8 27. Qxh6+ Rh7 28. Nxh7 Qxh7 29. Qf6+ 1-0
[/pgn]

and from more recent times:

[pgn]
[Event “First Saturday IM July 2021”]
[Site “Budapest, Fortuna u. 4. St. G”]
[Date “2021.07.27”]
[Round “2.4”]
[White “Royal, Shreyas”]
[Black “Ilincic, Zlatko”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E11”]
[WhiteElo “2168”]
[BlackElo “2395”]
[Annotator “Shreyas Royal”]
[PlyCount “95”]
[EventDate “2021.??.??”]
[SourceVersionDate “2018.06.03”]

{[%evp 0,95,19,31,14,-14,-11,0,31,34,64,65,61,30,46,45,45,42,73,34,54,28,18,26,
45,50,48,40,39,41,36,26,37,39,58,43,39,16,19,17,22,9,17,9,22,-9,29,24,41,23,
119,119,130,126,212,208,256,229,200,221,222,222,222,222,224,139,167,157,206,
205,206,207,206,240,237,204,253,282,295,284,299,286,317,313,323,334,380,403,
438,451,483,493,488,524,545,511,520,556]} 1. d4 {this is my first win against
a grandmaster in OTB chess and is a brilliant positional game} Nf6 2. c4 e6 3.
Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Bd2 c5 5. Bxb4 cxb4 6. a3 {this was part of my preparation, I had
played him 2 times before with g3 and a delayed a3 but with no success, he
would always prepare a different line against it so this time I needed to get
him out of his comfort zone} bxa3 7. Rxa3 O-O 8. Nc3 d6 9. e3 ({Relevant:} 9.
e4 Nc6 10. Be2 b6 11. O-O Bb7 12. d5 Nb4 13. Nd4 e5 14. Nf5 g6 15. Nh6+ Kg7 16.
Qd2 Qe7 17. Qg5 Bc8 18. h4 Nc2 19. Ra2 Nd4 20. Bd3 Qd8 21. f4 Nd7 22. Nf5+ Nxf5
23. exf5 Nc5 24. Bb1 Qxg5 25. hxg5 gxf5 26. fxe5 dxe5 27. Bxf5 a5 28. Bc2 Bd7
29. Raa1 Rac8 30. Rae1 Rfe8 31. Re3 e4 32. Bxe4 Re5 33. Ref3 Nxe4 34. Rxf7+ Kg6
35. Nxe4 Rxe4 36. Rxd7 Rcxc4 37. Rd6+ Kxg5 38. Rxb6 Re2 {Banikas,H (2599)
-Cordova,E (2592) Chess.com INT 2020 1/2-1/2 (61)}) 9… b6 (9… Nc6 10. Be2
e5 11. O-O Bg4 {is the the most popular and probably one of the best ways to
play against it}) 10. Be2 Bb7 11. O-O a6 {this structure was not the greatest
way to deal with this} 12. b4 $1 {I had seen some structures similar like
this, when preparing and realized we needed to make use of our queenside
majority} Nbd7 13. Qb1 {[#] I was just asking myself, where do I want my
pieces? It can really help improve your chess if you care about pieces and
always want to improve them, the arrows showed what I wanted my setup to be
like} Qc7 $146 ({Predecessor:} 13… Qb8 14. Rd1 Rc8 15. e4 a5 16. Rb3 axb4 17.
Rxb4 Ra3 18. Rc1 Ra5 19. d5 e5 20. Nd2 Ra8 21. Na4 Qc7 22. Nxb6 Nxb6 23. Rxb6
Rcb8 24. Rc2 Nd7 25. Rb4 Bc8 26. Rcb2 Rxb4 27. Rxb4 g6 28. Nb3 Kg7 29. Bg4 Nc5
30. Bxc8 Nxb3 31. Rxb3 Qxc8 32. Rc3 Ra4 33. Qf1 Qc5 34. Rc1 Ra2 35. g3 h5 36.
Qe1 Rb2 37. h4 Ra2 38. Kf1 Kf6 39. Rc3 Kg7 40. Qe3 Qxe3 41. fxe3 Kf6 42. c5
dxc5 43. Rxc5 {Parligras,M (2601)-Anton,T (2412) Calimanesti Caciulata 2017 1/
2-1/2}) 14. Rc1 Rfc8 15. Nd2 Qb8 {[#]} 16. f3 $1 {Not only is it important to
improve your pieces but it is also important to make your opponent’s pieces
unhappy. I just blunt is potentially dangerous bishop especially when he gets
his queen to a8 it also stops some nasty Be4 or ne4 when my knight gets to b3}
Rc7 (16… d5) 17. b5 a5 18. Na4 Qf8 19. Rac3 Rac8 20. Nb3 e5 {if he just sits
there and waits I just play R3c2 (to stop Nd5 when c5 happens) and c5} 21. Qb2
$1 {this is a fantastic move because it brings my queen back to the king with
Qd2 and stops some potential Qe3+, it also protects my e2 bishop. When the
queen is far away from the king it can be dangerous} Qe7 22. Qd2 g6 23. R3c2 h5
24. c5 $1 {and finally, after a lot of manoeuvring I get my c5 break in} exd4
$2 (24… dxc5) 25. c6 $18 dxe3 26. Qd1 Nc5 27. Nxb6 Rd8 28. cxb7 Rxb7 29. Nd5
$1 Nxd5 30. Qxd5 Nxb3 31. Qxb3 d5 32. Rc8 d4 33. Qd3 Qd7 34. R8c6 Rdb8 $2 (
34… Kg7) 35. Qc2 (35. R1c5) 35… Kg7 36. Qc5 Rd8 37. Qe5+ Kg8 38. Bc4 Qf5
39. Qxf5 gxf5 40. Bd3 $18 {[#]} f4 41. Kf1 Kg7 42. R1c5 a4 43. Ra6 Re8 44. Ke2
h4 45. Rxa4 h3 46. gxh3 Rh8 47. Rxd4 Rxh3 48. Rxf4 {Probably my best game of
all time} 1-0
[/pgn]

and finally:

[pgn]
[Event “Vezerkepzo IM Aug 2021”]
[Site “Budapest, Fortuna u. 4. St. G”]
[Date “2021.08.23”]
[Round “3.3”]
[White “Royal, Shreyas”]
[Black “Rohit, S.”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E01”]
[WhiteElo “2296”]
[BlackElo “2268”]
[Annotator “Shreyas Royal”]
[PlyCount “53”]
[EventDate “2021.08.21”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[EventCountry “HUN”]
[SourceTitle “Jitendra”]
[SourceDate “2018.06.03”]
[SourceVersionDate “2018.06.03”]

{[%evp 0,53,19,9,42,-10,-16,0,-3,-37,13,6,29,25,20,13,57,36,38,38,52,58,58,72,
72,14,61,23,54,62,58,58,66,52,45,54,78,25,117,123,110,110,146,37,30,44,51,49,
55,13,217,159,236,245,1807,839]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. g3 Bb4+ 5. Bd2
({Relevant:} 5. Nbd2 O-O 6. Bg2 b6 7. O-O Bb7 8. Ne5 a5 9. Qc2 a4 10. Rd1 Bd6
11. cxd5 exd5 12. Ndc4 h6 13. Bf4 Re8 14. Rac1 Na6 15. a3 Bf8 16. Ne3 c5 17.
Nf5 cxd4 18. Nc6 Qd7 19. Bh3 Kh8 20. Ne5 Rxe5 21. Bxe5 Ne4 22. Bxd4 Rc8 23. Qd3
Nac5 24. Qe3 Kh7 25. Bxc5 Nxc5 26. Qf3 d4 27. Rxd4 Qe8 28. Qe3 Qc6 29. f3 Re8
30. Qf2 g6 31. Ne3 Qf6 32. Ng4 Qg7 33. Rcd1 h5 34. Ne3 Nb3 {Dubov,D (2702)
-Carlsen,M (2862) chess24.com INT 2020 1-0}) 5… Bd6 6. Nc3 $5 {This was all
part of my preparation as last time I got some equal Stonewall against him,
this line avoids the stonewall and is tricky to play against as black. Black
needs to very accurate to still get a slightly worse position} O-O (6… c6 $6
7. Qc2 $16 {[%cal Ge2e4,Ge1c1] and now we open the centre and try to
long-castle}) 7. Bg5 c6 8. Bg2 Nbd7 (8… h6 9. Bxf6 Qxf6 10. O-O Qd8 11. c5
Bc7 12. e4 {[%cal Gb2b4] is the main line if he knew I was going to play this,
Nc3 is not so common but effective. Even here we are better because of our
space, centre and better pieces. Our idea now is to do some minority attack})
9. e4 $1 dxe4 10. Nxe4 {[#]} Bc7 $146 {this was not the right square to move
the bishop to, the best move was Bb4+ but even if he did not see that I would
expect Be7 as the pin became very nasty} (10… Bb4+ 11. Nc3 {and once we
fully develop our better pieces and space will give us an advantage}) ({
Predecessor:} 10… Bb4+ 11. Nc3 h6 12. Bf4 Ne4 13. Qc2 Nxc3 14. bxc3 Be7 15.
O-O b6 16. Rfe1 Bb7 17. Rad1 Re8 18. h4 Qc8 19. Bh3 Nf8 20. Ne5 Bd6 21. Qd2 Qc7
22. Bg2 {1/2-1/2 (22) Cordova,E (2571)-Nyzhnyk,I (2665) Saint Louis 2019}) 11.
O-O h6 12. Bh4 $1 Qe7 ({No need to be scared of} 12… g5 $2 13. Nfxg5 $1 hxg5
14. Bxg5 {[%cal Gd1f3,Ga1d1,Gd4d5,Gf1e1] and the pin will be nasty, along with
an exposed king}) 13. Re1 {[%cal Ge1e7] put the rook in line in with the queen
is a normally a good idea} Qb4 $2 {he collapses, but on the other there was
not much better to do because of the pin and I may get some d5 in later} 14.
Nxf6+ Nxf6 15. Bxf6 gxf6 16. Qc1 $1 Kg7 17. c5 $1 {this was a really nice move
because normally when the queen is away from the king the king is in MASSIVE
danger and just before I get along with my attack, I cut of her communications
with the king} Bd8 18. Qf4 Qa5 19. Qg4+ Kh7 20. Qh5 Qc7 21. g4 Kg7 {[#]} 22.
Re3 $1 {I have a lot time and can just slowly improve my pieces, another good
principle is when attacking try to bring in as much pieces as possible} Qd7 23.
Rd1 $1 Bc7 24. Rdd3 $1 b6 $2 {[#] this was not so stupid because he can’t just
sit and wait but on the other hand he could of just turned his prophylactic
brain on… I am now preparing a killer blow} (24… Rh8 {was better}) 25. g5
$3 {I had prepared this move from when I played Rd1} hxg5 (25… fxg5 26. Nxg5
Bf4 27. Rg3 $1) 26. Nxg5 Re8 (26… Rh8 {he thought this would work but…} 27.
Nxe6+ $1 Qxe6 (27… fxe6 28. Rg3+ Bxg3 29. Rxg3+ Kf8 30. Qxh8+ Ke7 31. Rg7#)
28. Rg3+ Bxg3 29. Rxg3+ Kf8 (29… Qg4 30. Rxg4+ Bxg4 31. Qxg4+ Kf8 32. Bxc6)
30. Qxh8+ Ke7 31. Re3) 27. Bxc6 $1 1-0
[/pgn]

FM Shreyas Royal at the London Chess Classic, 2021 courtesy of John Upham Photography
FM Shreyas Royal at the London Chess Classic, 2021 courtesy of John Upham Photography

From September 9-14, 2022, Shreyas achieved his first IM norm at the Mindsports GM Tournament in London and earned his second norm, along with a joint 3rd, at the Hit-A-Open Tournament in Slovenia between September 16-22, 2022

At the 4th FIDE Congress of 2022 Shreyas was awarded the IM title and his FIDE standard play rating stands at 2456.

Most recently he has achieved his first GM norm.

Further background here from Leonard Barden.

Happy Birthday GM Daniel Fernandez (05-iii-1995)

BCN wishes Happy Birthday to GM Daniel Fernandez who at 26 is currently England’s youngest Grandmaster. The previous GM title holder was Jonathan Hawkins in 2014 making two in seven years.

Daniel Howard Fernandez was born in Stockport, Manchester on Sunday, March 5th 1995.  “Think Twice” by Celine Dion was top of the UK hit parade.

Daniel started playing chess at the age of seven (after his father taught him the rules) and at this time attended King’s School, Harpenden.  His first chess club was Little Heath which became the ECF Small Club of the Year in 2015. They play in the Potter’s Bar area and include IM John Pigott in their membership.

At Little Heath Chess Club Daniel was coached by Mark Uniacke (who worked extensively on the early chess engine HIARCS).

Daniel went up to Queen’s College, Cambridge to read mathematics and left to become a Data Analyst at Mu Sigma Inc. He can speak several languages (including Serbian!) and works as a translator when opportunities arise.

He currently lives in Australia offering coaching and writing chess books (for Thinkers Publishing) and columns for Chessbase. In his spare time (!) Daniel is studying for The Master of Complex Systems degree at The University of Sydney.

Daniel’s first ECF graded game was rapidplay on July 5th 2003 in the SCCU Junior Under-14 Final.

His first standard play game was in August 2003 at the Edinburgh based British Under-8 Championship.

Daniel Fernandez
Daniel Fernandez

Daniels ECF grading profile demonstrated rapid improvement :

ECF grading profile for Daniel Fernandez
ECF grading profile for Daniel Fernandez

On August 13th 2004 in Scarborough Daniel became British Under-9 Champion sharing the title with Daniel Hunt & Saravanan Sathyanandha.

The Fernandez family relocated to Singapore in August, Daniel attending the Anglo-Chinese School in Singapore. He was swiftly recruited into the Singapore Chess Federation’s (SCF) National Junior Squad. Also in that squad were Danielle Ho and Howard Chiu (remember this for later!).

Barely three weeks after his Scarborough triumph on September 4th 2004 Daniel played his first FIDE rated game in the 5th Asian Under-10 Championship organised by the ASEAN Chess Confederation. His performance in this event was rewarded with a FIDE Master title in 2005. Because he was no longer active in English events the ECF had the unusual scenario of having a ten year old FIDE Master with a published grade of ~120!

In typically modest fashion Daniel confesses  that he did not “deserve” the FM title at this time and that it was the consequence of the strong position of the ASEAN and SCF organisations  within world chess. At the same event Wesley So gained his FM title in the Under-12 section.

FM Daniel Fernandez
FM Daniel Fernandez

Another interesting consequence of the relocation was that when Daniel returned to England in 2012 his last published grading went from ~ 120 to ~230!

One of the motivations of  returning to England was to obtain the necessary entrance requirement to study mathematics at Cambridge. This he did by studying for A-levels at Manchester Grammar School.

Daniel with IM Jovan Petronic during the 2010 world juniors in Chotowa, Poland | Photo: Diana Mihajlova
Daniel with IM Jovan Petronic during the 2010 world juniors in Chotowa, Poland | Photo: Diana Mihajlova

Consequently Daniel’s FIDE rating profile also showed a fast pace of development:

FIDE rating profile for Daniel Fernandez
FIDE rating profile for Daniel Fernandez

Sydney 2009 and Sydney 2010 both provided IM norms with the third one coming from Kuala Lumpar 2010 and with these Daniel became an International Master in 2010 the title being confirmed at the 3rd quarter Presidential Board Meeting 2010, 24-25 July 2010, Tromso in Norway.

IM Daniel Fernandez, 100th British Championships, Round 5, Torquay. Courtesy of John Upham Photography
IM Daniel Fernandez, 100th British Championships, Round 5, Torquay. Courtesy of John Upham Photography

He won the Budapest Sarkany Tournament in 2014 as follows:

Full Crosstable from Budapest Sarkany Tournament, 2014.
Full Crosstable from Budapest Sarkany Tournament, 2014.

earning his first GM norm in the process.

IM Daniel Fernandez, 101st British Championships, Aberystwyth. Courtesy of John Upham Photography
IM Daniel Fernandez, 101st British Championships, Aberystwyth. Courtesy of John Upham Photography

BCN asked Daniel for three of his favourite games. The first one is this Polish Defence game from 2015 played at the Visma Arena in Vaxjo, Sweden. First we have the crosstable showing that Daniel earnt his second GM norm from this event.

Full Crosstable for Vaxjo, Visma tournament in Sweden, 2015.
Full Crosstable for Vaxjo, Visma tournament in Sweden, 2015.

and here is the game:

[pgn]
[Event “Vaxjo Visma GM”]
[Site “Vaxjo”]
[Date “2015.06.27”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Smith, Axel”]
[Black “Fernandez, Daniel Howard”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B00”]
[WhiteElo “2452”]
[BlackElo “2447”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “86”]
[EventDate “2015.06.24”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “SWE”]
[EventCategory “10”]
[SourceTitle “CBM 167 Extra”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2015.09.14”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2015.09.14”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,86,63,13,126,116,101,97,97,97,84,96,96,57,79,51,50,52,38,58,82,70,93,
31,-1,-22,-19,-35,-16,-50,29,-1,0,-22,-36,-36,-36,-92,-81,-92,-84,-82,-73,-104,
-95,-79,-36,-33,-51,-74,-42,-51,-51,-91,-86,-99,-91,-87,-87,-82,-105,-100,-127,
-111,-148,-160,-139,-127,-136,-254,-164,-257,-259,-257,-309,-663,-691,-933,
-153,-747,-809,-824,-875,-986,-1014,-2303,-2794,-29999,-30000]} 1. d4 b5 {
The Polish Defence as used by Spassky against Petrosian.} 2. e4 a6 3. Nf3 {
When is it the right time for White to play a4?} Bb7 4. Bd3 e6 5. O-O c5 6. c3
d6 ({more common is} 6… Nf6 7. Re1 Be7 8. Bg5) 7. Re1 Nd7 8. Nbd2 Qc7 {
A rare choice but must be reasonable.} (8… Be7 9. Nf1 Ngf6 10. Ng3 O-O 11. h3
Qc7) 9. a4 $18 {[#] and eventually we get the thematic break against …b5 The
engines are complimentary of White’s position.} c4 10. Bb1 $6 {This would
appear to be a strange decision.} (10. Bf1 {Maintaining the presssure on
Black’s pawns must be superior.}) 10… Be7 11. Nf1 {You’d imagine that b3 at
some point would make sense leaving the pressure on c4.} Ngf6 12. Ng3 O-O 13.
h4 Rfe8 14. h5 {White seems to be struggling to find a decent plan.} e5 15. Nf5
Bf8 16. axb5 axb5 17. Rxa8 Rxa8 18. Nd2 g6 $1 {If Black can expell the knight
on f5 then probably he is better.} 19. hxg6 hxg6 $17 20. Ne3 Bg7 {Strong
pointing e5 further.} 21. d5 Nc5 {[#] Black is gaining the upper hand.} 22.
Ng4 Bc8 23. Nxf6+ Bxf6 24. Qf3 Bg5 25. Nf1 Qe7 26. Ne3 Nb3 27. Bc2 Nxc1 28.
Rxc1 {Black can now really dominate the dark squares.} Ra2 29. b3 Qa7 30. bxc4
bxc4 31. Qe2 {[#]} Bg4 $1 {Ouch! Perhaps White had missed this shot?} 32. Qe1
Bxe3 33. fxe3 Qa3 $1 {and it is all over bar the shouting…} 34. Kh2 (34. Rb1
Rxc2 35. Rb8+ Kg7 36. Qh4 Qc1+ (36… Bh5 37. Qe7 Qc1+ 38. Kh2 Rxg2+ $1 39.
Kxg2 Qd2+ 40. Kg3 Qe1+ 41. Kh2 Qe2+ 42. Kh3 Qf1+ 43. Kh4) 37. Kh2 Bh5) 34…
Kg7 35. Qf1 Be2 $1 36. Qe1 Qb2 37. Bb1 Ra1 38. Rc2 Qxb1 (38… Qxc2 $1 {
is more efficient} 39. Bxc2 Rxe1) 39. Qxe2 $2 (39. Qxb1 Rxb1 40. Rxe2 {is a
better defence.}) 39… Qg1+ 40. Kg3 Re1 41. Qf2 Rxe3+ $1 42. Kg4 Qd1+ 43. Kg5
Qh5# 0-1
[/pgn]

and during the 2015/15 4NCL season Daniel obtained his final GM norm playing for Wood Green.

In March 2015 he made his first of three Varsity match appearences for Cambridge re-uniting with Danielle Ho and Howard Chiu (remember those names from earlier?).

Daniel won the 10th Jessie Gilbert Memorial in 2017:

Full Crosstable from the 2017 10th Jessie Gilbert Memorial
Full Crosstable from the 2017 10th Jessie Gilbert Memorial

and also in 2017 Daniel was awarded the Grandmaster title at the 88th FIDE Congress 2017, 7-15 October, Goynuk, Antalya, Turkey.

On March 11th Daniel represented Cambridge in the 135th Varsity Match at the RAC Club in Pall Mall.  According to chess24.com ‘IM Daniel Fernandez, playing board 2 for Cambridge, was awarded the Brilliancy Prize by GM Ray Keene in consultation with McShane and Speelman, for his “high-class swindle” after recovering from a bad blunder.’ See here for details.

GM Daniel Fernandez, 2019 British Championships, Torquay. Courtesy of John Upham Photography
GM Daniel Fernandez, 2019 British Championships, Torquay. Courtesy of John Upham Photography

In 2018 Daniel ventured into the world of book writing when Thinker’s Publishing released The Modernized Caro-Kann on September 8th 2018.  This was a repertoire book for Black based around the Smyslov Variation :

[fen]r1bqkbnr/pp1npppp/2p5/8/3PN3/8/PPP2PPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

and was reviewed in this place favourably and quickly established Daniel as a significant author.

The Modernized Caro-Kann, Daniel Fernandez, Thinkers Publishing, 2018
The Modernized Caro-Kann, Daniel Fernandez, Thinkers Publishing, 2018

From the rear cover we have:

“GM Daniel Fernandez (born 1995) has been an active and accomplished player for several years. He represented his native Singapore twice at Olympiads (2010 and 2012) before transferring to the English chess federation. There, he won the national classical titles at U-18 and U-21 levels and worked to become a Grandmaster while simultaneously studying at Cambridge. The Caro-Kann was instrumental in his quest for that title. Currently, Daniel is known in the chess scene not only as a solid player, but also as a mentor figure to younger English players, as a producer of well-received commentary and analysis, and as a multilingual chess coach. This is his first book.”

From January 2019 we have this interesting encounter between Gawain Jones and Daniel from the annual 4NCL meeting of Guildford and Wood Green:

[pgn]
[Event “BCF-chTa 1819 (4NCL)”]
[Site “Daventry”]
[Date “2019.01.13”]
[Round “4.13”]
[White “Jones, Gawain C B”]
[Black “Fernandez, Daniel Howard”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[ECO “B12”]
[WhiteElo “2691”]
[BlackElo “2465”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “124”]
[EventDate “2018.11.10”]
[EventType “team-tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “ENG”]
[SourceTitle “CBM 188 Extra”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2019.02.26”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2019.02.26”]
[SourceQuality “1”]
[WhiteTeam “Guildford”]
[BlackTeam “Wood Green”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “ENG”]
[BlackTeamCountry “ENG”]

{[%evp 0,124,21,36,69,63,74,50,56,34,45,48,52,37,37,37,46,8,46,16,76,62,52,40,
40,13,13,29,32,28,16,22,24,9,9,14,15,11,11,-15,33,8,42,8,-4,-4,0,0,-14,0,0,-63,
-75,-75,-21,-61,-23,-91,-96,-75,-106,-110,-113,-111,-111,-111,-111,-111,-111,
-111,-111,-111,-78,-102,-123,-119,-124,-122,-122,-128,-128,-125,-82,-62,-92,
-111,-102,-130,-126,-123,-137,-182,-142,-164,-127,-127,-127,-127,-122,-202,
-196,-196,-209,-204,-173,-242,-218,-303,-244,-244,-244,-244,-242,-222,-98,-98,
-89,-87,-57,-52,-26,-31,-9,-13,-11,-8,-8]} 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. h4 h5
5. Bd3 (5. c4) 5… Bxd3 6. Qxd3 e6 7. Bg5 Qb6 8. Nd2 Ne7 (8… c5) 9. Ngf3 Qa6
10. c4 Nf5 11. O-O Bb4 12. b3 Nd7 13. Rfd1 O-O 14. a3 $146 (14. Nf1) 14… Bxd2
15. Rxd2 Nb6 16. c5 Qxd3 17. Rxd3 Nd7 $11 18. b4 {[#]} b6 $1 19. Rc1 $6 (19.
Rb3 f6) 19… Rfc8 {Black now proceeds to outplay his higher rated opponent.} (
19… bxc5 20. bxc5 Rfb8 $17) 20. Bd2 f6 21. Re1 Kf7 22. g3 bxc5 23. bxc5 Rcb8
24. Bf4 Rb2 25. Rdd1 Rb3 26. Kg2 a5 27. a4 Ra7 28. Re2 Rab7 29. Ra2 Rc3 30.
Raa1 Rbb3 31. Nd2 Rb2 32. exf6 gxf6 33. Nf3 Rbb3 34. Nd2 Rb4 35. Nf3 Rcc4 36.
Rab1 Kg6 37. Bd6 Rxb1 38. Rxb1 Nxd4 39. Nxd4 Rxd4 40. Rb6 Ne5 41. Bxe5 fxe5 42.
Rxc6 Kf6 {[#]} 43. Ra6 $2 (43. Rc8 Rxa4 44. Rf8+ Ke7 45. Rh8 e4 $19) 43… Rxa4
$19 {Black has the upper hand.} 44. f3 d4 45. Ra7 Ra2+ 46. Kf1 Ra3 47. Kf2 e4
48. fxe4 Ke5 49. g4 hxg4 50. h5 Rf3+ 51. Kg2 Kxe4 {Surely Black is winning?}
52. c6 Rc3 53. Rc7 d3 ({Better is} 53… Kd5 {but White’s h-pawn is little
concerning.}) 54. h6 d2 55. Rd7 Rxc6 $6 (55… Rd3 56. Rxd3 Kxd3 57. c7 d1=Q
58. c8=Q Qf3+ 59. Kg1) 56. h7 Rc8 $6 {Sadly this lets the win slip.} ({Better
was} 56… Rc2 57. Kf1 d1=Q+ 58. Rxd1 Rh2) 57. Rxd2 Rh8 58. Rd7 Kf5 59. Kg3 a4
60. Rf7+ Ke5 61. Kxg4 a3 62. Ra7 a2 {and the position is drawn.} 1/2-1/2
[/pgn]

With the White pieces Daniel has played  a wide range of first moves but the majority move by far is 1.e4. His choice versus the Najdorf is some eclectic : sometime ago 6. Rg1 was the favourite and now 6.a4 is preferred.

[fen]rnbqkb1r/1p2pppp/p2p1n2/8/3NP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R1BQKBR1 b KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

Against 1…e5 Daniel offers a main line Ruy Lopez.

What does a Caro-Kann expert play against the Caro-Kann? Nowadays the Two Knights Variation is employed!

As the second player he plays the Sicilian Najdorf as well as the Caro-Kann plus an equal mixture of the Grünfeld and King’s Indian Defences.

In 2019 Daniel was interviewed by Edwin Lam on behalf of ChessBase : fascinating reading!

In the same year Daniel joined IM Adam Taylor’s venture Making Grandmasters.

Our final games is from July 2019 :

[pgn]
[Event “Gent Eastman op 42nd”]
[Site “Gent”]
[Date “2019.07.22”]
[Round “6”]
[White “Fernandez, Daniel Howard”]
[Black “Michiels, Bart”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “A03”]
[WhiteElo “2466”]
[BlackElo “2563”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “63”]
[EventDate “2019.07.20”]
[EventType “swiss”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “BEL”]
[SourceTitle “CBM 191 Extra”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2019.09.30”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2019.09.30”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,63,19,-30,-33,-42,-34,-34,-35,-26,-27,-27,-5,-28,-2,5,14,-30,-62,-77,
-39,-90,-40,-79,-59,-73,-56,-52,-37,-37,-38,-105,44,60,63,56,98,17,60,3,86,32,
61,68,65,66,96,95,118,109,136,153,132,211,211,202,269,280,383,424,450,477,542,
539,782,836]} 1. f4 d5 2. b3 {Larsen would have been proud!} Nf6 3. Bb2 Bf5 4.
Nf3 e6 5. e3 h6 {Black creates a luft on h7 for his light squared bishop.
Otherwise with a knight on e5 combined with a h-pawn push Black could get into
trouble. You might not think it but …h6 scores best for Black and is
labelled “Hot” by Megabase 2020.} (5… Be7 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O c5 8. Ne5 h6 9.
d3 {is a more usual way to proceed.}) 6. h3 (6. Be2 Be7 7. O-O O-O 8. Ne5 Nbd7
9. d3 Nxe5 10. Bxe5 Nd7 11. Bb2 Bf6 12. d4 c5) {The first appearence for this
TN.} 6… a5 $146 7. g4 Bh7 {As facilitated by h6….} {Now pause the video….
} 8. Bxf6 $5 {I bet you did not predict this capture and nor did I!} Qxf6 9. d4
a4 (9… c5) 10. bxa4 g5 $1 11. fxg5 hxg5 $17 {I’d give Black the nod here but
only just.} 12. Bd3 {[#]} Bd6 (12… Nc6 {would take advantage of White’s lack
of control of b4 and is a bit awkard to meet. Black threatens ….Nb4}) 13. Ke2
{an ugly requirement with the h-file open. This is needed so as White may
re-capture on d3 with the queen.} Nd7 (13… Bxd3+ 14. Qxd3 Nc6) 14. Bxh7 Rxh7
15. c4 dxc4 16. Nbd2 Qg6 17. Nxc4 Ke7 18. Qb1 (18. Qb3) 18… Qxb1 (18… Rxa4
{seems natural}) 19. Rhxb1 Rxh3 20. Nxg5 Rh2+ 21. Kd3 Ra7 ({Why not} 21… Rxa4
{I don’t understand.}) 22. Ne4 $1 $18 {[#] white is getting on top.} Nf6 $2 23.
Nxf6 Kxf6 24. a5 $1 {black must be regretting leaving this pawn on and is
definately worse now.} Bf8 25. Rb5 Rf2 26. a4 Bh6 27. Rh1 Kg6 28. Rhb1 b6 29.
Ne5+ Kh7 30. Rh1 f6 31. Nc6 Ra6 32. Rbh5 {and Black resigned.} 1-0
[/pgn]

Daniel’s most recent publication is The Modernized Modern Defence from Thinker’s Publishing:

The Modernized Modern Defence, Daniel Fernandez, Thinker's Publishing, 2021
The Modernized Modern Defence, Daniel Fernandez, Thinker’s Publishing, 2021

and BCN has been told that Daniel has a book in the pipeline about the Tata Steel 2021 tournament at Wijk aan Zee.

And here it that book!

Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2021, Daniel Fernandez, Thinker's Publishing, 14 Feb. 2022, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9464201420
Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2021, Daniel Fernandez, Thinker’s Publishing, 14 Feb. 2022, ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9464201420

Remembering Nancy Elder MBE (25-v-1915 04-iii-1981)

BCN remembers Nancy Elder MBE who passed away on Wednesday, March 4th 1981, i.e. forty years ago in Perth, Western Australia.

Nancy Conchar Gordon was born on Tuesday, May 25th 1915. On the same date was born Robin Day in High Wycombe who went on  to design the polypropylene stacking chair.

Nancy was born in Kirmabreck, Kirkcudbrightshire in the Dumfries and Galloway council area of Scotland.

In the 1939 register Nancy was living at 18 Thornton Avenue, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5DJ with a married couple, William Furnish (a railway time keeper) and Gertrude Furnish who performed unpaid domestic duties. Presumably Nancy was their lodger.

18 Thornton Avenue, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5DJ
18 Thornton Avenue, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5DJ

Her occupation was given as a teacher of music and physical training. At this time she was single at the age of twenty-four.

In the mid-1940s Nancy relocated from Manchester to Dundee where she continued her teaching career at Dundee High School. During that time she encouraged and coached a number of players some of whom represented Scotland.

In 1950 in Tealing, Angus, Scotland Nancy married David Livie Elder. They had a daughter Christine who played chess as a junior. Tealing has a strong connection with the Elder family.

According to Alan McGowan (Chess Scotland): “She was the main instigator in forming both the Schools’ and Primary League in Dundee, and she assisted in the organisation of the Dundee 1967 International Centenary Tournament.”

When she passed away Nancy was living at 39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, DD2 1RJ :

39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, DD2 1RJ
39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, DD2 1RJ

Her passing was reported in the Dundee Courier and Advertiser  on March 6th 1981 as follows :

Nancy Elder dies after heart attack on flight

Mrs Nancy Elder 39 Whitefauld Road, Dundee, a former music teacher at Dundee High School and one of Scotland’s best known chess players, has died after taking ill on a flight to Australia.

She was off for a long holiday which she planned to spend with relatives and friends from the world of international chess, but, after suffering a heart attack on a plane from Singapore, had been in intensive care in Perth, Western Australia.

Her daughter Christine, a primary school teacher in Tighnabruaich, received daily telephone reports on her mother’s condition from a cousin and, at the weekend, heard that she was improving gradually.

The shock news of her mother’s death came late on Wednesday night.

Mrs. Elder, who went into semi-retirement recently, has been to the fore in chess for about 35 years at local, national and international levels.

Nancy Elder MBE. Source : Milos Petronic
Nancy Elder MBE. Source : Milos Petronic

She has represented her country five times, having taken part in the chess Olympiad in Yugoslavia in 1963 and 1973, in Israel in 1976, in Buenos Aires in 1978 and in Malta last year.

Buenos Aires Olympiad 1978. From left: Morag McGhee, Nancy Elder, Owen Hindle, Kathleen Hindle and Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Buenos Aires Olympiad 1978. From left: Morag McGhee, Nancy Elder, Owen Hindle, Kathleen Hindle and Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

She turned down the chance to take part on three other occasions.

Haifa Olympiad 1976 - Scotland v Switzerland. From left: Nancy Elder, Kathleen Hindle, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Haifa Olympiad 1976 – Scotland v Switzerland. From left: Nancy Elder, Kathleen Hindle, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

She was awarded the MBE for her services to chess in 1974.

She was President of Dundee Chess Club, chairman of the congress committee of the Scottish Chess Association and on the council of the Scottish Junior Chess Association.

Self-taught

She started playing chess during her school days with her brother and the two of them were more-or-less self taught.

It wasn’t until after the Second World War that she received any sort of coaching, by which time she had established her own style.

She retired on April 14th last year after 24 years in the music department of Dundee High School, where she specialised in teaching the oboe.

She continued to teach privately.

Dundee Courier and Advertiser, March 6th 1981
Dundee Courier and Advertiser, March 6th 1981

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CI (101, 1981), Number 6 (June), pp. 219-220 we have this obituary from Bernard Cafferty :

“Nancy C. Elder, MBE, died in Perth, Western Australia on March 4th 1981. Mrs. Elder had recently retired after a lifetime of teaching, her last post being in Dundee. I well remember her account of teaching under difficult conditions in World War 2 in Manchester. 15 Scottish Women’s Champion (the record for the event which she set-up at Troon in 1980).

Prizegiving at the 1966 Scottish Championships. From the left: Michael Fallone, Nancy Elder, W.P. McColl, President of Dundee Chess Club, Kathleen Patterson, Gerald Bonner. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Prizegiving at the 1966 Scottish Championships. From the left: Michael Fallone, Nancy Elder, W.P. McColl, President of Dundee Chess Club, Kathleen Patterson, Gerald Bonner. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

Mrs Elder was a regular competitor in the British Women’s Championship (sometimes in rivalry with her daughter Christine) and showed her playing strength with a score of 5.5/12 on board two for Scotland at the Women’s Chess Olympiad, Malta, 1980.

Malta Olympiad 1980 Left-right: Kathleen, Rosie Giulian, Owen Hindle (Team Captain), Nancy Elder, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland
Malta Olympiad 1980 Left-right: Kathleen, Rosie Giulian, Owen Hindle (Team Captain), Nancy Elder, Lynne Houston. Courtesy of Chess Scotland

I am sure she will be best remembered though for her decades of effort in the organising of chess in Scotland, particularly for juniors and in schools, in recognition of which she was awarded the MBE, the only such honour ever given for services to chess ‘north of the border’ as Alan Borwell puts it in his Newsflash obituary.”

[pgn]
[Event “British CF-53 Women”]
[Site “Sunderland/ Tyne and Wear”]
[Date “1966.08.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Elder, Nancy Conchar”]
[Black “Moore, Gillian A”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B73”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “71”]
[EventDate “1966.08.08”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “GBR”]
[SourceTitle “EXT 1999”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “1998.11.16”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,71,19,31,72,53,51,40,38,35,42,42,41,21,45,40,44,31,38,44,43,35,37,37,
56,37,60,54,156,124,220,183,183,139,160,91,90,96,101,80,101,0,5,0,6,0,1,16,1,5,
21,25,38,2,28,0,37,8,42,20,45,6,202,261,285,366,920,931,29993,29994,29995,
29996,29997,29998]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2
g6 7. Be3 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. h3 {A choice of Smyslov and Kudrin.} ({A more
modern way to proceed is} 9. Nb3 Be6 10. f4 Qc8 11. Kh1 Rd8 12. Bf3 Bc4 13. Rf2
e5 14. Rd2 Qe6 15. fxe5 Nxe5 16. Nd4 Qe7 17. b3) 9… a6 (9… Bd7 10. Qd2 Rc8
11. f4 a6 12. Rad1 b5 13. a3 Qc7) 10. Qd2 Qc7 11. f4 Rd8 12. Rad1 Nxd4 13. Bxd4
e5 $2 $146 {[#] The only game to feature this position.} (13… Be6) 14. Bxe5
$18 Qb6+ 15. Kh2 (15. Bd4 {Appears more natural.}) 15… Be6 16. Bxf6 (16. Bd4)
16… Bxf6 17. Nd5 {White immediately seeks exchanges.} Bxd5 18. Qxd5 Rac8 19.
Bc4 Qc7 20. Bb3 (20. Bd3) 20… Bxb2 21. a4 Qe7 {Black has equalised after the
earlier blunder.} 22. Rf3 Rc5 23. Qd3 Rc3 24. Qe2 Rdc8 25. Rxc3 Bxc3 26. Rd3
Kf8 27. Qf3 Bb4 28. g4 Rc5 29. Kg2 h6 30. Kf1 {[#]} f5 $2 {after all of
Black’s efforts lashing out is not a good idea.} (30… b5 {was reasonable.})
31. gxf5 gxf5 32. Qh5 $1 {and Black is busted.} fxe4 33. Qxh6+ Qg7 34. Qxd6+
Qe7 35. Qh6+ Qg7 36. Rd8+ {and Black resigned.} 1-0
[/pgn]

Chess Scotland award the Nancy Elder Cup annually for an individual competition for “club level” players.

We are grateful to Helen Milligan who told BCN :

My most memorable incident was when I refused to play in the Scottish Ladies at the annual Congress, preferring to try to improve my chess by playing in the Open section (really the B-Grade, below the Championship proper). I got given a piece of Nancy’s mind for that – she did not approve!

Here are her playing records from the Olympiads.

Here is a potted biography from Chess Scotland.

Remembering CGM Adrian Hollis (02-viii-1940 26-ii-2013)

BCN remembers CGM Adrian Hollis who passed away in Wells, Somerset on Tuesday, February 26th 2013  at the age of seventy-two.

Adrian Swayne Hollis was born in Bristol, Avon on Friday, August 2nd 1940. During this critical period the Luftwaffe was wisely extending its Battle of Britain targets to include Britain’s airfields. Furthermore, Bristol was bombed heavily between June 1940 and May 1944. The longest period of regular bombing, known as the ‘Bristol Blitz’ began in autumn 1940 and ended the following spring. The first bombs of the Bristol Blitz fell at around 6 pm on Sunday 24 November 1940.

Adrian was the only child of MI5 director general Roger Henry Hollis KB CBE (later to become Sir Roger Hollis) and Evelyn Esme Hollis (née Swayne) who was Roger’s first wife. Roger was from Wells and Evelyn from Burnham-on-Sea and they were married on July 17th 1937 in Wells Cathedral with Evelyn’s father performing the ceremony.

Adrian won a scholarship in classics to Eton College and then went up to Keble College, Oxford where he took a first in mods and greats. Whilst at Keble Adrian represented Oxford in four varsity matches between 1959 and 1962. Indeed, his support for varsity matches was maintained for many years attending a large number into and beyond the Lloyds Bank era. Stalwart organiser Henry Mutkin would always be sure to extend an invitation.

In 1961 Adrian become the youngest ever West of England Champion at the age of 21.

Adrian met Margaret Mair Cameron Edwards in 1967 at St. Andrew’s University where he taught Classics and she taught German. They married in the parish of St. Leonards in St. Andrews and had two daughters, Jennifer Margaret M (b. 1974) and Veronica Swanye (b. 1977) and a son, Michael David C.

He was the Games Editor for the British Correspondence Chess Association (BCCA) resigning in 1969.

In 1984 Adrian was forced to endure allegations against his father by Chapman Pincher (in CPs book Too Secret too Long) that Sir Roger had been a Soviet spy / mole. These allegations were demonstrated to be false. He may well also have been aware of allegations against his friend and chess mentor Graham Mitchell earlier in 1963. Ironically, it was Adrian’s father who initiated the investigation into Graham. Again, the rumours were shown to be unfounded.

Adrian became a director of the company Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies Limited on the September 1st 1996 and resigned on May 12th 2007. He was also a Vice President of the West of England Chess Union (WECU).

Between 2003 and 2007 (according to the Electoral Roll) Adrian lived at 63, Bainton Road, Oxford, OX2 7AG :

63, Bainton Road, Oxford, OX2 7AG
63, Bainton Road, Oxford, OX2 7AG

and following his retirement (and the time of the 2008 electoral roll) Adrian had moved to Pound House, Southover, Wells, BA5 1UH :

Pound House, Southover, Wells, BA5 1UH
Pound House, Southover, Wells, BA5 1UH

Adrian has written many learned papers and has had two books published :

Fragments of Roman Poetry C.60 BC-Ad 20, AS Hollis, Oxford University Press, 2007
Fragments of Roman Poetry C.60 BC-Ad 20, AS Hollis, Oxford University Press, 2007

and

Ovid Metamorphoses VIII (Schools Edition): Bk. 8, AS Hollis. Oxford University Press, 2008
Ovid Metamorphoses VIII (Schools Edition): Bk. 8, AS Hollis. Oxford University Press, 2008

During his time at Keble College, Adrian engaged with and mentored many chess players including Jonathan Rowson (1996), David Norwood (1988), Julian Way, David Goodman (1977) and Dharshan Kumaran (1993).

CGM Adrian Hollis
CGM Adrian Hollis

Julian was a personal student of Adrian’s and was kind enough to tell us :

I do remember Adrian well. He could quote Latin verse ad infinitum. He was an expert on Ovid.
In terms of chess he had a huge pile of Informators in his study still in their cardboard packaging. He was very kind to me and insisted I play above him for Keble in the intercollegiate matches.

I gave him a copy of Developments in the Orthodox QGD which I had written in 1987. He was quite taken back when I didn’t want any money for it. He seemed to have quite a lot of respect for me.

I once asked him why he had given me a place at Oxford. He replied that he couldn’t have rejected someone with my passion and enthusiasm.
I kept in touch with Adrian until his passing. He gave me a lovely reference when I resumed my studies in 2007 at Kingston University.
I remember him as a kind and unassuming man. He became a lifelong friend.

CGM Adrian Hollis
CGM Adrian Hollis

From British Chess (Pergamon Press, 1983) Botterill, Levy, Rice and Richardson :

“I was born on August 2nd, 1940, educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford and now teach Classics at Keble College, Oxford. I learned the moves at the advanced age of thirteen from a cousin* who himself could have made a good chess player had he not been seduced by Philosophy and brain-teasers; all that remains in the mind from these encounters is a vision of perpetually losing my rooks to fianchettoed bishops.

*We are grateful to John Clarke who informed us that

“The cousin would have been Martin Hollis, who contributed the “Tantaliser” column to the New Scientist for many years. I always enjoyed his puzzles, which for me at any rate were at just the right level of difficulty – neither trivial nor totally impossible.”

Adrian Hollis. Source : The Potter Memorial
Adrian Hollis. Source : The Potter Memorial

My first ever tournament was the London Boys’ Championship 1956-7. In the opening round fate allotted me Black against David Rumens. As it happened, the brochure included a game of his from the previous year in which he had answered 1.d4 with 1…Nc6, quite enough, in my opinion, to condemn him utterly.

[fen]r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/8/3P4/8/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq – 0 1[/fen]

(Ed: The above position did not impress Adrian hugely.)

This view seemed confirmed when within twelve moves of an advance French I was two pawns up. Then, however, aided by my over confidence he worked up a fierce attack, and I just escaped with a draw. Nevertheless, I won the tournament; an opponent remarked how quickly I played my moves.

Thereafter the game was never so easy, but I did reasonably, well, winning the championships of the British Universities, West of England and East of Scotland, and playing for England quite regularly during the 1960s (including 7.5/12 in six Anglo-Dutch matches).

Leonard Barden, Henry Mutkin, Adrian Hollis and Bob Wade observe Nick Ivell vs Ken Regan at the 1983 Varsity match
Leonard Barden, Henry Mutkin, Adrian Hollis and Bob Wade observe Nick Ivell vs Ken Regan at the 1983 Varsity match

The high spot of my over-the-board chess was the series of World Student team championships from 1960 to 1964 in glamorous places (Leningrad, Helsinki, Mariánské Lázně, Budva and Cracow); most enjoyable of these being Budva, 1963 where one could bathe every day in the Adriatic and I won the (?) gold medal on Board 1 with 7.5/9., the year after Spassky (this must look good in the records, unless they happen to reveal that for the first time in preliminary and final sections, and that England did not qualify for the top final).

[pgn]
[Event “Paignton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1966.09.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Black “Beach, Richard A”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E63”]
[Annotator “BCN”]
[PlyCount “35”]
[SourceTitle “BCM, 1966, page 289, game”]

{[%evp 0,25,61,14,28,-9,54,37,37,18,25,20,27,19,18,29,45,2,38,27,5,20,14,3,7,
-4,24,-17]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3 O-O 5. Bg2 d6 6. O-O Nc6 7. Nc3
a6 8. b3 Rb8 9. Bb2 b5 10. cxb5 axb5 11. d5 Na5 12. Nd4 b4 13. Nb1 $11 {[#]} (
13. Na4 e5 14. Nc2 Bd7 15. Ne3 Bh6 16. Bc1 Bxa4 17. bxa4 b3 18. Bd2) 13… e6 (
13… e5) 14. a3 bxa3 15. Rxa3 c5 $2 ({Correct was} 15… e5 16. Rxa5 exd4 17.
Ra3 $16) 16. dxc6 {[#]} {Black punted} Nc4 $2 {but had missed} 17. Qc1 $1 $18 (
{Black was hoping for} 17. bxc4 Rxb2 18. Nc3 $18) 17… Bh6 18. Qxc4 $1 {
and Black resigned} 1-0
[/pgn]

My best chess was probably played at Mariánské Lázně, 1962, where in successive rounds I had favourable draws with Radulov and Hort, coming close to beating the latter. Ironically, I was awarded the British Master title after I had virtually retired from over-the-board chess.

[pgn]
[Event “Paignton”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1966.09.??”]
[Round “3”]
[White “Hartston, William Roland”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “A05”]
[Annotator “Hollis, Keene & BCN”]
[PlyCount “80”]
[SourceTitle “The Spectator, 20th April”]

{[%evp 0,18,19,-22,0,-31,-9,-5,9,-19,-25,-22,-34,-17,-10,5,21,21,31,5,13]} {
This game appeared in The Spectator, April 20th, 2013 as part of an obituary
from Ray Keene. The original source was British Chess Magazine, 1966, page 302,
game #14,225.} 1. g3 Nf6 2. Bg2 d5 3. Nf3 g6 4. b4 {ASH : This set-up, in fact
a primitive form of the Reti, has been patronised recently by Smyslov, among
others. RDK : This set-up, a form of the Reti, has been championed by,
amongst others, Vassily Smyslov.} Bg7 5. Bb2 O-O 6. O-O a5 ({BCN : Nowadays}
6… c6 7. d3 a5 8. a3 axb4 9. axb4 Rxa1 10. Bxa1 Qb6 11. c3 Nbd7 12. Nbd2 e5
13. e4 Re8 {is the modern (2020) continuation.}) 7. b5 ({ASH :} 7. a3 {, or}) (
{even} 7. c3 {came into consideration here.}) 7… c5 $146 {BCN : This was the
first game to feature this position.} 8. d3 (8. bxc6 {ASH: was quite possible.}
) 8… b6 $146 {BCN : This is the only recorded game with this move.} 9. c4 e6
{ASH : Black decides to maintain a pawn centre, without worrying if the pawns
should hang. RDK : Black decides to create a pawn centre without worrying if
the pawns will end up hanging.} 10. Qc2 Bb7 11. Nbd2 Nbd7 {[#]} 12. e3 {
RDK : White has to prevent … d4 and … e5.} Qc7 13. Rad1 ({ASH : Harston
later preferred RDK: Hartston later preferred} 13. Rac1 Rad8) 13… Rad8 14.
Qb1 e5 {ASH : Somewhat risky, but the only way to progress. RDK : Somewhat
risky, but the only way to make progress.} 15. cxd5 Nxd5 16. Nc4 Rfe8 17. Qa1
f6 18. Rc1 Nf8 19. d4 exd4 20. exd4 Ne6 21. Rfd1 {[#]} Ndf4 $1 $17 {ASH :
Seizing his chance. This sacrifice is necessary because the central position
is beginning to look rickety, and appears to be sound. White has terrible
weaknesses and his queen is marooned far away. RDK : Seizing his chance.
This sacrifice is necessary because the central position is beginning to look
rickety. The sacrifice looks sound as White has terrible weaknesses and his
queen is miles away.} 22. gxf4 Nxf4 23. Ne3 (23. Bh1 Qd7 {ASH : is too slow.})
(23. d5 {ASH : Might be a shade better – see next note.}) 23… Nxg2 $19 24.
Kxg2 Be4 $1 (24… Qf4 {ASH : is also possible but the win would not be so
easy after} 25. d5 Rxd5 26. Rxd5 Bxd5 27. Nxd5 Qg4+ {ASH : etc}) 25. Nf1 Qf4
26. Rc3 cxd4 27. Rcd3 Rd5 28. Qc1 Qg4+ 29. Ng3 Rf5 30. h3 {ASH : There is
nothing better} Bxf3+ 31. Kh2 Rh5 32. Rxf3 Qxf3 33. Nxh5 {ASH : The rest is
straightforward} Qxf2+ {RDK : Now it’s straightforward for Black.} 34. Kh1
Qf3+ 35. Kg1 gxh5 36. Bxd4 Qg3+ 37. Kh1 Qxh3+ 38. Kg1 Qg4+ 39. Kh1 Rc8 40. Qd2
Rd8 {and White resigned.} 0-1
[/pgn]

In 1964 I decided that henceforth for me ‘serious’ chess would mean correspondence, while OTB became a pleasant social activity. My introduction to the postal game had been made about 1955 by a colleague of my father’s, International Master Graham Mitchell, to whom I owe an enormous debt for the patience and kindness with which he played a series of games, bearing with me when I lost interest in worsening positions. The switch to postal play was caused by a number of factors, negative and positive : an impending move to Scotland, where there was less OTB chess, frustration at constantly spoiling good positions through mistakes in time pressure – on the other hand a feeling that correspondence chess should suit an academic temperament, and a particularly fascinating game played in 1963-4 with Michael Haygarth (see below) on which I spent so much time and energy that I almost feared it would ruin my post-graduate exams.

[pgn]
[Event “County Correspondence Championship”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “1963.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Haygarth, Michael John”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B78”]
[Annotator “ASH & British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “106”]
[SourceTitle “British Chess, page 104”]
[WhiteTeam “Yorkshire”]
[BlackTeam “Somerset”]

{[%evp 0,20,19,38,40,41,66,77,66,55,55,20,70,53,40,34,30,28,47,32,47,-3,30]} 1.
e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Bc4 (
8. Qd2 Nc6 9. O-O-O d5 10. exd5 Nxd5 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Bd4 e5 13. Bc5 Be6 14.
Ne4 Re8 15. h4 h6 16. g4 Qc7 17. g5 h5 18. Bc4 Red8 19. Qf2 {is modern
practise.}) 8… Nc6 9. Qd2 Bd7 10. h4 (10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. h4 h5 13.
Bg5 Rc5 14. Kb1 b5 15. g4 hxg4 16. h5 Nxh5 17. Nd5 Re8 18. Rxh5 gxh5 19. Qh2
Rxd5 20. Bxd5 Qb6 21. Qxh5 e6 22. Bb3) 10… Rc8 {ASH : At that time people
always played the queen’s rook to c8. Later it became the custom to play …
Qa5 and …Rfc8. Later still fashion swung back.} 11. Bb3 Ne5 (11… h5 12.
O-O-O Ne5) 12. Bh6 {ASH : Of all the attacking possibilities, White chooses a
relatively ineffective one.} ({The modern way is} 12. O-O-O h5 13. Bg5 Rc5 14.
Kb1 b5 15. g4 hxg4 16. h5 Nxh5 17. Nd5 Re8 18. Rxh5 gxh5 19. Qh2 Rxd5 20. Bxd5
Qb6 {transposes to a previous line.}) 12… Nc4 {ASH : A nice little finesse.}
13. Bxc4 Bxh6 ({more usual is} 13… Rxc4 14. Bxg7 Kxg7 15. h5 Qa5 16. hxg6
fxg6 (16… hxg6 $4 17. Qh6+ Kg8 18. Qh8#) 17. O-O-O) 14. Qxh6 ({Believe it or
not,} 14. Bxf7+ $4 Kg7 $1 {ASH : Resigns, has actually occurred in an
international (over-the-board!) tournament. BCN : It was, in fact, Zuidema
– Lee, Zurich Junior, 1964.} (14… Kxf7 $2 15. Qxh6) (14… Rxf7 $2 15. Qxh6
$14)) 14… Rxc4 15. O-O-O Rxc3 16. bxc3 Qa5 {ASH : Black has carried out his
exchange sacrifice under unusually favourable circumstances.} 17. Kb2 Rc8 {[#]}
18. Rd3 ({ASH : In a later game (British Correspondence Championship 1965-6).
S.Milan played against me} 18. Qd2 Rc4 19. Nb3 {, keeping more active chances
(the game was drawnin 50 moves).}) 18… Bb5 19. Nxb5 {The exchange of minor
peices suite Black.} (19. Qg5 Rc5 {would be ingenious but not better.}) 19…
Qxb5+ 20. Ka1 Rc5 21. Rb1 Qa6 22. Qc1 Ra5 23. Rb2 b6 24. Qb1 Nd7 25. Rb4 Ne5
26. Re3 Nc4 {[#] ASH : Black’s knight has reached ideal squares, and for the
next few moves makes the White rooks dance to his tune.} 27. Rd3 Rc5 28. Qe1
Ra5 29. Qb1 Ne5 30. Re3 ({ASH : Not} 30. Rd5 Rxd5 31. exd5 Qe2 {and White’s
position collapses.}) 30… Rc5 31. Rb3 b5 32. Qd1 Qc6 33. Qd4 Nc4 34. Rd3 a5
35. g4 {ASH : Natural, but in the end providing a target.} a4 36. Rb4 Ne5 37.
Re3 Qc8 $1 38. Kb1 {[#] ASH : Something must fall so White decides to return
the exchange.} h5 $1 39. gxh5 Nc6 40. Qd3 Nxb4 41. cxb4 Rxh5 42. e5 {Unable to
protect his weaknesses, White tries to break out.} Rxe5 43. Rxe5 dxe5 44. Qxb5
Qc3 45. Qxa4 Qxf3 46. b5 e4 47. b6 e3 48. Qb3 Qf1+ 49. Kb2 e2 50. b7 e1=Q 51.
b8=Q+ Kh7 52. Q8b6 Qc1+ 53. Kc3 Qcf4 {White resigns. A remarkable position,
with four queens on the board. Material is level, but the exposed White king
is helpless. This game was played just before I left Oxford to teach in
Scotland (where, at that time, over-the-board chess was not so strong as it
has since become), and it was to a great extent responsible for turning my
main interest to postal chess.} 0-1
[/pgn]

In 1964-5 I qualified for the British Championship by winning a candidates’ section with 100%, and then competed three times in the British Championship itself (1965-6, 1966-7, 1970-71), winning on each occasion (the first time jointly with S. Milan) and remaining unbeaten. International play also proved successful, and I soon collected the two norms necessary for the IM title (Ed: awarded in 1970).

Linda Brownson (Newnham & Basildon), left, playing Maria Eagle (Pembroke & Formby) being observed by John Nunn, Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek posing for the obligatory "staring at the board" picture for the 1981 Varsity Match sponsored by Lloyds Bank.
Linda Brownson (Newnham & Basildon), left, playing Maria Eagle (Pembroke & Formby) being observed by John Nunn, Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek posing for the obligatory “staring at the board” picture for the 1981 Varsity Match sponsored by Lloyds Bank.

The first chance for the Grandmaster title came on Board 1 in the Seventh Olympiad final. Despite a rare loss with the White pieces(my only defeat with white for a stretch of 15 years), things went well, including a lucky win against the reigning World Champion, Horst Rittner, and the enticing prospect beckoned if only I could beat the Russian Moiseyev. He held a slight advantage since the opening, but I thought I saw the chance of tempting him to an incorrect sacrifice. Back came his move; he had indeed made the sacrifice and the envelope burnt a hole in my pocket during an important meeting (my mind was elsewhere). After a mere two days’ thought I sent my reply. The post between England and the USSR takes about a month for the return trip. Soon after posting my move, as I was walking from the Ashmolean Museum to Keble, just passing the front gate of St. John’s, the realisation of what I had overlooked hit me, and there followed an inexorable wait for the death blow which I now saw only too clearly.

[pgn]
[Event “olm7 fin B1 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1972.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Moiseev, Oleg Leonidovich”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “E42”]
[Annotator “British Chess News”]
[PlyCount “93”]
[EventDate “1972.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,93,19,-12,-10,-23,0,4,26,26,26,20,30,41,41,41,32,38,67,43,48,32,19,14,
28,16,17,9,46,57,71,70,67,56,71,42,26,27,26,31,36,23,32,33,40,21,37,38,47,34,
82,-2,4,-15,-7,-14,-5,-5,-10,-5,0,4,7,7,10,15,0,-92,13,19,44,45,144,110,106,91,
182,173,190,190,190,190,203,172,241,248,248,248,422,422,568,710,797,1015,29989,
29990]} 1. c4 Nf6 2. d4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. Nge2 d5 6. a3 Bxc3+ (6…
cxd4 7. axb4 dxc3 8. Nxc3 $11) 7. Nxc3 cxd4 8. exd4 dxc4 9. Bxc4 Nc6 10. Be3
O-O 11. O-O b6 12. Qd3 Bb7 13. Rad1 Qd7 (13… h6 $1) 14. Bg5 Nd5 {FS 239:
Taimanow: Schw. steht aussichtsreich Moissejew: +=} 15. Nxd5 exd5 16. Ba2 Rae8
17. Bb1 f5 {Taimanow: Schw. steht aussichtsreich~Moissejew: += B FS 239:
notwendig, aber schwaecht e5} 18. b4 Nd8 19. Bf4 (19. b5 Ne6 (19… Nf7) (19…
Nf7 {FS 239})) 19… Bc6 20. Rfe1 Bb5 21. Qd2 Bc4 22. Be5 Re6 (22… Nf7 23. f4
) 23. Re3 Rg6 24. Rf3 (24. f4 {notwendig, aber schwaecht e5}) 24… Nf7 25. Bf4
(25. Bxf5 Nxe5 {J 3c7, a6 ‘!’ FS 239.} 26. Bxd7 Nxf3+) (25. Rxf5 Nxe5 26. Rxe5
(26. Rxf8+ Kxf8 27. dxe5 Rxg2+) 26… Rxg2+ 27. Kxg2 Qg4+ $1) 25… Nd6 26.
Bxd6 $2 Rxd6 27. Re1 Re6 28. Rxe6 Qxe6 29. Re3 Qf6 30. f4 $1 {FS 239: gegen
f5-f4} g6 31. Re5 Kf7 32. Qe3 {FS 239: P g4} a5 {[#]} 33. g4 axb4 (33… fxg4 {
remis} 34. f5 $11) 34. gxf5 bxa3 35. Qxa3 Qh4 36. fxg6+ hxg6 37. Bxg6+ Kg7 {
‘?’ FS 239.} (37… Kxg6 {gegen f5-f4} 38. Rg5+ Qxg5+ (38… Kf7 39. Qa7+) 39.
fxg5) (37… Kg8 {J g4} 38. Qg3 Rxf4 (38… Qxf4 $6 39. Bf7+ $1) 39. Bf7+ Kxf7
40. Rf5+ Rxf5 41. Qxh4 Be2 {J 5e6}) 38. Qa7+ Kxg6 (38… Kg8 39. Qd7 $2) 39.
Rg5+ Qxg5+ (39… Kf6 40. Qg7+ Ke6 41. Re5+ Kd6 42. Qxf8+ $2) 40. fxg5 Rf4 41.
Kg2 Rg4+ 42. Kf3 Rxg5 43. Qxb6+ Kh5 44. Qe6 Bd3 45. Kf4 Be4 46. Qe8+ Rg6 (46…
Kh4 47. Qe7) (46… Kh6 47. Qh8+ Bh7 48. Qxh7+) 47. Qe5+ 1-0
[/pgn]

So no Grandmaster title, but Great Britain still took the bronze medals, and I scored 6/9 (+5=1-2).

Bob Wade, Harry Golombek and Adrian Hollis observe Penny Coxon (Newnam) and Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda's) during the 1983 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank
Bob Wade, Harry Golombek and Adrian Hollis observe Penny Coxon (Newnham) and Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda’s) during the 1983 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank

Another opportunity came when the British Postal Chess Federation organised a tournament (1974-6) in memory of its former secretary RJ Potter.  This started inauspiciously for me with a heavy defeat at the hands of Grandmaster Endzelins of Australia., a country which has so far provided my least favourite opposition (not only is the postage extremely expensive, but my score to date is 0/2).

Adrian Hollis (far right) as Club President of the 1985 Oxford team of Peter Wells, Karl Bowden, Anita Rakshit, Kenny Shovel, IM Colin McNab, IM Jon Levitt, FM Neil Dickinson and FM John Hawksworth
Adrian Hollis (far right) as Club President of the 1985 Oxford team of Peter Wells, Karl Bowden, Anita Rakshit, Kenny Shovel, IM Colin McNab, IM Jon Levitt, FM Neil Dickinson and FM John Hawksworth

From The Potter Memorial, Ken Messere, Chess (Sutton Coldfield), 1979 we have this potted biography from Ken Messere :

The Potter Memorial, Ken Messere, Chess (Sutton Coldfield), 1979
The Potter Memorial, Ken Messere, Chess (Sutton Coldfield), 1979

“Adrian Hollis is 36, was educated at Eton and Oxford, has written two books on the poet Ovid and is a Fellow and Tutor in Classics at Keble College, Oxford. He is a British Master at over the board chess and has been Champion of British Universities, West of England and East Scotland.

In 1964, he went to teach at St. Andrews University where his wife, Margaret, taught German. They were married and moved to Keble College in 1967 and now have two daughters. Jennifer is nearly five and Veronica is two.

Adrian began to concentrate on correspondence chess in 1964 and won the British Correspondence Chess Championship jointly in 1966 and outright in 1967 and 1971. He won the I.M. title in 1970 and his fine score of 6/9 on top board for Great Britain in the I.C.C.F. VIIth Correspondence Chess Olympiad Final contributed to the team’s winning the bronze medal in this event.”

and now back to Adrian’s British Chess article…

Thereafter my fortunes improved; one opponent accepted too trustingly some faulty analysis by Szabo in Informator (for a while it seemed that the Hungarian might earn me not one but two points). The East German Dr. Baumbach failed to find an improvement in a line with which I had been successful in the Seventh Olympiad Final.

Also, I had a win with the Black pieces against the Russian Kopylov. The result was a score of 9/12 (+8=2-2), which sufficed for the grandmaster title and first place half a point ahead of the Finn Kauranen.

Since then I have played quite well on second board behind Keith Richardson in the Eighth Olympiad Final (+5=7-0), and very badly indeed (scoring just about 50% in the Heilimo Memorial Tournament organised from Finland (I was much impressed by the strength of the Finnish players, most of whom I had not encountered before). Having twice narrowly failed, I would still like to qualify for the Final of the Individual World Championship. Of course life becomes increasingly busy, but the examples of Hugh Alexander and Graham Mitchell encourage me to believe that one can continue to play well at postal chess longer than over-the-board. So perhaps around the year 2000, when the children are grown up….”

Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek observer Andrew Dyson (Trinity) having played 1.d4 versus IM William Watson (Merton) during the 1984 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank
Adrian Hollis and Harry Golombek observer Andrew Dyson (Trinity) having played 1.d4 versus IM William Watson (Merton) during the 1984 Varsity match sponsored by Lloyds Bank

[pgn]
[Event “olm7 fin B1 corr”]
[Site “ICCF corr”]
[Date “1972.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Black “Florian, Tibor”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “D76”]
[Annotator “Averbakh/Hollis/Howell & BCN”]
[PlyCount “121”]
[EventDate “1972.??.??”]
[EventType “team (corr)”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[SourceTitle “Corr 2002”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceVersion “1”]
[SourceVersionDate “2002.05.23”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,121,18,26,36,-22,54,32,37,19,27,28,30,3,26,19,17,42,20,13,27,31,31,31,
19,24,27,11,47,61,50,85,90,77,66,63,67,54,73,53,40,43,55,36,46,65,45,46,49,49,
48,54,48,69,83,93,102,102,103,112,98,89,114,100,99,91,98,98,94,79,79,82,90,87,
91,85,91,82,78,76,96,101,96,75,100,91,92,103,118,118,118,118,118,118,121,139,
179,182,206,240,191,212,205,205,205,192,192,192,192,183,192,104,155,96,96,96,
100,527,537,28911,29983,29984,29985,29986]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3
d5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Bg2 O-O ({ASH : It is rather more challenging for Black to
postpone castling, and to organise an immediate attack on White’s d-pawn with}
6… Nb6 7. Nc3 Nc6) 7. O-O Nb6 8. Nc3 Nc6 9. d5 Na5 ({ASH : I have never yet
found an opponent to accept the pawn with} 9… Bxc3 $6 {too risky to accept P}
10. dxc6 Bg7 11. Qc2 bxc6 12. Rd1 Bf5 13. Qb3 Qe8 14. Nd4 Bd7 15. Qc2 {BCN :
is a typical line.}) 10. Bf4 c6 11. dxc6 {ASH : Such are the subtleties of
transposition that, although occasionally played before, this line does not
appear in the Grunfeld books of Hartston or Richardson and Boyd.} Nxc6 ({
ASH : In Olympiad VIII Finals (1977) Dr. S. Aarseth (Norway) played against me
} 11… Qxd1 12. Rfxd1 Nxc6 13. Nd2 $1 Bf5 (13… Be6 {Hollis}) 14. Rac1 Rac8
15. Nde4 Nc4 16. b3 Na3 $6 (16… N4e5 {wastes two tempi}) 17. Nd5 Rfe8 (17…
Kh8 18. Nxe7 $1 Nxe7 19. Bd6) 18. Bg5 Kf8 (18… f6 $5 {although Hollis says
it “hardly appeals”}) 19. Nxe7 Nxe7 20. Nd6 b6 (20… Rxc1 21. Bxc1 {xNa3}) 21.
Nxc8 Bxc8 22. Bxe7+ Kxe7 23. Rc7+ Kf6 24. Bc6 Rf8 25. Rxa7 Nc2 26. Be4 $18 {
Hollis-Aarseth, corr-CCOL8 fin 1975-77}) 12. Qc1 e5 13. Be3 {13 Rd1 was theory
but why drive Black Q where she wants to go?} Nd4 {An outpost which cannot be
maintained.} 14. Rd1 Be6 15. Nxd4 exd4 16. Bxd4 Bxd4 17. e3 Bxe3 18. Qxe3 $14 {
[#] ASH : So White emerges with a small but clear advantage (better placed
pieces, pressure on the b-pawn and on the Black squares).} Qe7 19. Ne4 Bd5 20.
Qc5 Qxc5 21. Nxc5 Bxg2 22. Kxg2 Rac8 $6 {ASH : A difficult decision. Black
surrenders a pawn for some counterplay.} ({ASH : He might have had better
chances of a draw with the passive} 22… Rab8 {better drawing chance despite}
23. Nd7 Nxd7 24. Rxd7 {not sufficient to win}) 23. Nxb7 Rc2 24. b4 Re8 25. Rd8
Rxd8 26. Nxd8 Na4 27. a3 Rc3 28. Re1 Kf8 29. Re5 Rc7 30. h4 h6 31. Ra5 Nc3 32.
Ra6 {threat Nc6 forces play} Rd7 33. Nc6 Rd6 34. a4 Nxa4 35. Rxa4 Rxc6 36. Rxa7
Rc3 37. b5 Rb3 {See page 80 in Essential Chess Endings by Howell.} 38. Rb7 Kg7
39. b6 h5 {This move produces a model endgame as analysed by Hollis etc. [#]
cf ending in Portisch-Petrosian [INF 17-0568] after Portisch’s 47th move.
White plan is to play K to d-file, Black captures f-pawn but then K goes to
c-file and R cannot return behind passed P (only works with b-pawn)} ({Hollis
suspected Black should have played} 39… g5 $5 {not fearing h4-h5}) 40. Kf1 {
The general case of a draw is threatened but not overturned. Averbakh
“Comprehensive Chess Endings” vol 5 (Pergamon ed) analyses both the Hollis and
Portisch endgames (see pp291-292)} Rb2 41. Ke1 Kf6 {As White threatens to
support the advance of his passed P with his K, it is very important for Black
to seek counterplay on the other wing – Averbakh} 42. f3 Rb3 43. Kd2 Rxf3 44.
Kc2 {ASH : The idea is realized.} Rf5 $2 (44… Ke6 $2 45. Rc7 $1 (45. Re7+ $6
Kxe7 46. b7 Rf5 47. b8=Q {hard to see how White can win}) 45… Rf5 {see game})
(44… Rxg3 $6 45. Rc7 $1 {Howell wrongly attributes this move to Hollis but I
don’t find it in Hollis’ notes. Averbakh claims as his?} (45. Rxf7+ Kxf7 46. b7
{Hollis said this may win as Pg6 weak but Averbakh gives:} Rg2+ $1 47. Kc3 Rg3+
48. Kc4 Rg4+ 49. Kc5 Rf4 $1 50. b8=Q Rf5+ 51. Kd6 Kg7 $1 {“Black creates an
impregnable fortress” – Averbakh}) 45… Rg2+ $140 46. Kb3 Rg1 47. Kb2 Rg2+ 48.
Rc2 $1 Rg4 49. Rc3 Rxh4 50. Ka3 Re4 51. b7 Re8 52. Rc8 Re3+ 53. Kb2 Re2+ 54.
Kc3 Re3+ 55. Kc2 Re2+ 56. Kd3 Rb2 57. b8=Q Rxb8 58. Rxb8 Kf5 59. Rf8 f6 60. Ke3
g5 61. Kf3 $18 {Averbakh}) (44… Re3 $3 {is the right plan:} 45. Rc7 Re8 46.
b7 Rb8 {Hollis thought White could now win:} 47. Kd3 Kf5 $1 48. Rxf7+ Kg4 49.
Rf4+ $1 Kxg3 50. Rb4 {[#]} g5 $1 {The saving move not considered in Hollis
article, but later discovered by Russian analysts. Black creates a
countervailing passed pawn.} (50… Kh3 $2 51. Ke2 $1 Kg3 (51… Kg2 52. Rb3) (
51… Re8+ 52. Kf2 Rf8+ 53. Ke3 Rb8 54. Kf3 {as in main line}) 52. Ke3 Kh3 53.
Kf3 Rf8+ 54. Ke4 Rb8 55. Ke5 $18) 51. hxg5 h4 52. g6 (52. Ke2 h3 53. Kf1 h2 54.
Rb3+ Kf4 55. Kg2 Kxg5 $11) 52… h3 53. g7 h2 54. Rb1 Kg2 $11 {Averbakh}) 45.
Rc7 Rb5 46. b7 {“The outwardly active position of Black R prevents his K from
approaching the pawns” – Averbakh} Ke6 (46… Kf5 {according to Fine’s recipe
(idea 47 Rxf7+? Kg4) but..} 47. Kc3 $1 {threat 48 Rxf7+ Kg4 49 Rf4+ and 50 Rb4;
prevents …Kg4 by same idea} f6 $140 (47… Kg4 48. Rc4+ $1 Kxg3 49. Rb4 Rxb7
50. Rxb7 Kxh4 (50… f5 51. Rg7) 51. Rxf7 Kg3 52. Kd2 g5 53. Ke1 $18) 48. Kc4
Rb1 49. Rc5+ Kg4 50. Rb5) 47. Kc3 f6 48. Kc4 Rb1 49. Kc5 Kf5 50. Rd7 $1 $18 {
prevents Kg4 and threatens Rd5+ followed by either Rd6+ or Rd4+ and then
inserting R on b-file} Rc1+ 51. Kd6 Rb1 52. Kc7 Rc1+ 53. Kd8 Rb1 54. Kc8 Kg4
55. Rd6 g5 56. Rxf6 gxh4 57. gxh4 Kxh4 58. Rg6 $1 Kh3 59. Kc7 {According to
Howell, Black resigned here but Hollis gives further moves, see e.g. ‘British
Chess’ pp105-107} Rxb7+ 60. Kxb7 h4 61. Kc6 {ASH : It would be extremely rash
to claim this ending as a theoretical win. The outcome nearly always depends
on a single tempo, and may be swayed by secondary factors (e.g. it proved
vital in the above for White’s rook to be on the seventh rather than the
eighth). But at least this game can be added to the example for future
research. Perhaps this is the kind of problem that one day computers might be
able to solve.} 1-0
[/pgn]

From British Chess Magazine, Volume CXXXIII (133, 2013), Number 4 (April), pp.194-5 we have this obituary written by James Pratt :

Adrian Swayne Hollis (2 viii 1940 Bristol – 26 ii 2013 Wells), British Master and Correspondence Grandmaster (1976), three times British Correspondence Champion, has died. He played most of his OTB chess as a young man, finishing seventh equal at the British Aberystwyth, 1961, when he beat, amongst others, A.R.B. Thomas and former champion, Alan Phillips. He gave future champion, Jonathan Penrose, a tough fight in the last round before conceding the half-point. He played in the Hastings Premier, 1962/3 and emerged with a plus score in the Anglo-Dutch matches. He was an occasional reviewer for BCM.

From the 1985 Varsity Match : Laura Cohen (Newnham), Brian Reilly (BCM), Bill Hartston (Cambridge), Adrian Hollis (Oxford), Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda's), Leonard Barden (The Guardian etc) and Bob Wade (BCF)
From the 1985 Varsity Match : Laura Cohen (Newnham), Brian Reilly (BCM), Bill Hartston (Cambridge), Adrian Hollis (Oxford), Anita Rakshit (St. Hilda’s), Leonard Barden (The Guardian etc) and Bob Wade (BCF)

It was, of course, in the realm of postal player that he shone most brightly!

In 1966 we see him playing board two for England, below Slade Milan, and, two years later, Adrian scored 9/12 in a World Postal Qualifier, narrowly missing a place in the final. In 1971 he won the British Correspondence Championship, easily outdistancing a tough field. He played top board for England in the 1972-7 Olympiad. In 1974-6 he won the Reg Potter Memorial. In the ninth Olympiad – 1982-5 – Adrian Hollis was undefeated on board two. And England took the Gold Medal!

[pgn]
[Event “Alekhine mem-A corr9196”]
[Site “corr”]
[Date “1991.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Gipslis, Aivars P”]
[Black “Hollis, Adrian Swayne”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B81”]
[Annotator “Hawkes”]
[PlyCount “64”]
[EventDate “1991.??.??”]
[EventType “tourn (corr)”]
[EventRounds “12”]
[SourceTitle “Corr Nr. 1”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “1997.09.01”]
[SourceVersion “2”]
[SourceVersionDate “2000.04.19”]
[SourceQuality “1”]

{[%evp 0,64,32,37,46,50,80,80,71,47,43,38,82,21,81,78,77,54,60,63,69,68,77,41,
27,22,70,6,6,3,12,33,18,-2,3,-47,-62,-45,-59,-59,-70,-53,-53,-108,-27,-27,-1,
-116,-143,-148,-88,-204,-180,-252,-271,-247,-199,-231,-468,-531,-562,-531,-638,
-660,-627,-704,-510]} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. g4
a6 (6… Nc6 7. g5 Nd7 8. Be3 Nde5 9. Be2 a6 10. f4 Nxd4 11. Qxd4 Nc6 12. Qd2
b5 13. Bf3 Qa5 14. O-O Be7 15. Qf2 Rb8 16. Ne2 O-O 17. Bg2 Re8 18. c3 Bd7 19.
Rfd1 Qd8 20. Rd2 Bf8 21. Rad1 $14 {Haag-Penrose, 9 Olympiad}) (6… Be7 7. g5
Nfd7 8. Be3 Nc6 9. Rg1 Nb6 10. Qd2 O-O 11. f4 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 e5 13. Be3 d5 14.
fxe5 Bb4 15. O-O-O Be6 16. Rg3 Na4 17. Bd4 Bxc3 18. Bxc3 Nxc3 19. Rxc3 dxe4 20.
Qf4 Qb6 21. Qxe4 Rac8 22. Rxc8 Rxc8 23. Kb1 g6 24. Bd3 $6 Rd8 $1 {0-1 (43)
Palciauskas-Bang, Axelson mem.}) 7. g5 Nfd7 8. Bg2 (8. Be3 b5 9. a3 Bb7 10. h4
Be7 11. Qd2 Nc6 12. f4 h6 13. Bg2 hxg5 14. hxg5 Rxh1+ 15. Bxh1 Nxd4 16. Qxd4 e5
17. Qd2 exf4 18. Bxf4 Ne5 19. O-O-O Nc4 20. Qg2 Qa5 21. Nd5 b4 $1 {1/2-1/2 (44)
Franzen-Hollis, 10 Olympiad bd.2}) (8. h4 b5 9. a3 Nb6 10. Be3 N8d7 11. h5 Bb7
12. Rh3 $1 Ne5 13. g6 Nbc4 $2 14. Bxc4 Nxc4 15. gxf7+ Kxf7 16. Qg4 Qe7 $2 (
16… Qd7) 17. Bg5 Qd7 18. Nd5 $1 Ra7 19. Rf3+ Ke8 20. Nc7+ $1 {1-0
Kauranen-Estrin, 10 world ch. final}) 8… b5 (8… Nc6 9. f4 h6 10. h4 hxg5
11. hxg5 Rxh1+ 12. Bxh1 Qb6 13. Nf3 g6 14. Qd2 Qc7 15. b3 b5 16. Bb2 Bb7 17.
O-O-O O-O-O 18. Nh2 Nb6 19. Ng4 d5 20. e5 d4 21. Ne4 Nd5 22. Qf2 Qa5 23. Nd6+
Bxd6 24. Bxd5 Bc5 $1 {1/2-1/2 Khasin-Walter, 8 world ch. final}) 9. f4 b4 10.
Nce2 Bb7 11. h4 Nc5 12. Ng3 g6 13. b3 Bg7 14. Bb2 O-O 15. Qd2 Qb6 16. O-O-O a5
17. Nde2 Bxb2+ 18. Kxb2 a4 19. Nc1 axb3 20. cxb3 Nc6 21. h5 Qa5 22. Kb1 {[#]}
Na7 $1 23. Qb2 Nb5 24. Ka1 Nc3 25. Rd2 Ra7 26. Rh2 Rfa8 27. Bf3 Qc7 28. Rc2
Nxa2 29. Nxa2 Rxa2+ 30. Qxa2 Rxa2+ 31. Kxa2 Qa5+ 32. Kb1 Qa3 {Hawkes} (32…
Nxb3 $4 33. Ra2 Qc5 34. Rhc2 Qg1+ 35. Kb2 Qxg3 $4 36. Ra8+ $1 Bxa8 37. Rc8+ Kg7
38. h6# {(Hollis)}) 0-1
[/pgn]

Obituary from Raymond Keene in The Specatator

Obituary from Kenneth Shelton in The Independent

Obituary from ? in The Times

Obituary from John Rhodes in The Chess Improver

Obituary from Bob Jones of Keverel Chess.

Wikipedia article.