Minor Pieces 46: George Archer Hooke Part 1

In January 1924 there was some big news for chess players in the Richmond area. A new chess club, the Barnes Village Chess Club, was to be formed.

Richmond Herald 12 January 1924

None of the names at this meeting are familiar, but they soon started playing matches against other local clubs.

Richmond Herald 21 March 1925

Here they are a year or so later, visiting their Richmond neighbours at the charming Cosy Corner Tea Rooms, as well as entertaining Ashford, who may well have travelled by train on the Waterloo line, but not stopping at Whitton or North Sheen: those stations were only opened in 1930.

And, look! They have two pretty strong veterans on the top two boards, no doubt delighted when a new club opened on their doorstep.

Here they are again, more than forty years earlier, playing again on the top two boards for the City of London Chess Club Knight Class in a match against Oxford University.

The Chess Monthly 1883

Messrs Hooke and Taylor were playing in the Knight Class of the City of London Chess Club: they’d have received odds of a knight when playing master strength opponents in the club handicap tournament. The Morning Post (4 December 1882) reported: “The result was a surprise to both parties, and appeared to puzzle the winners just as it did the losers.”

Mr Hooke’s opponent was the very interesting Charles Dealtry Locock, who will surely feature in a future Minor Piece. Mr Taylor faced George Edward Wainwright, a familiar name to Minor Piece readers. (Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4)

This wasn’t the first appearance of Mr Hooke in the chess news. His first appearance was in the 11th Counties Chess Association Meeting at the Manor House Hotel, Leamington in October 1881, where he played in the second class section, winning this game. You can click on any move in any game in this article for a pop-up window.

Bowley, Albert Alexander
Hooke, George Archer
Counties Chess Ass 2nd Class Leamington
October 1881
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.e4Perrin,F1…e52.Nf3d63.d4f54.dxe5fxe45.Ng5d56.e6And now Nc3 would win.6…Bc5Hoping for …Qf6. C41: Philidor Defence.7.Nf7Qf6
12345678abcdefgh
8.f4N
12345678abcdefgh
8.Qxd5?Bxf2+9.Ke29.Kd1?Bxe610.Qxb7Kxf7−+9…Bxe6!10.Qd8+Kxf78.Qe2Bxe69.Nxh8Nc6=8.Be3Bxe39.fxe3Predecessor:8.Qe2Bxe69.Nxh8Nc610.c3O-O-O11.Be3d412.cxd4Nb413.Qd2Bxd414.Qxb4Bxb20-1 (27) Mason,J-Field,O New York (Otis Field’s) 1868 EXT 2017 [Perrin,F]8…exf3!−+Black has a decisive advantage.9.Qxd5fxg2?Black goes for the king.10.Bxg2
12345678abcdefgh
10…Bxe6!11.Qxc5±Bxf711…Nd712.Qxc7Bxf712.Bxb7?
12345678abcdefgh
This bishop pair is nice.
12.Bg5+−Qe6+13.Kd212…Nd713.Qe3++−Ne7Strongly threatening …Qh4+.14.Bxa8O-O
12345678abcdefgh
15.Bg215.Qf4!+−Rxa815…Qa616.Be416.Qxf6Nxf617.Nc315…Nf5?15…Re8keeps the pressure on.16.Nc3Nf517.Qxe8+Bxe816.Qf2Don’t blunder16.Qxa7?Qe5+17.Be3Nxe3−+Don’t go for16.Qe4?Re817.Qxe8+Bxe8−+16.O-O+−Nxe317.Rxf6Nxc218.Rc6Nxa119.Rxc716…Re8+17.Kf1
12345678abcdefgh
17…Ne5?17…Bc4+!−+18.Kg1Re219.Bd5+Kh820.Bxc4Rxf221.Kxf2Qh4+22.Kg2Qe4+23.Kg1Qd4+24.Kg2Qe4+25.Kf2Qxh118.Nc3?18.h3=Ng3+19.Kg118…Ng4−+( -> …Ng3+)19.Qc5Weighted Error Value: White=2.23/Black=1.80 Black mated in 3 moves: Ng3+. Source: Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News 31 December 18810–1

The up-and-coming Joseph Henry Blake from Southampton shared first place in the second class section with George E Walton from Birmingham. The information as to where Hooke finished and how many points he scored seems not to be available. The first three places in the top section were filled by members of the clergy: Charles Edward Ranken, John Owen and William Wayte.

Earlier in 1882 he’d beaten Captain Mackenzie in a simul. He’d also travelled to Manchester for the 12th Counties Chess Association Meeting, where he finished fourth in Class 2 with a score of 7½/11. Here, then, was an ambitious and fast improving young player, keen to play whenever the opportunity arose.

By 1884 George Hooke and John Taylor had both graduated to Class 3 (pawn and two moves). In this match they met a team from Cambridge University.

The Chess Player’s Chronicle 16 Apr 1884

Mr Hooke again faced an interesting opponent in John Neville Keynes, the father of economist and Bloomsbury Group member John Maynard Keynes. By contrast, Mr Taylor’s opponent, Rev William Pengelly Buncombe, spent much of his life as a missionary in Japan.

Let’s deal quickly with Mr Taylor. John H Taylor was Irish, born in County Westmeath in 1853, and, by profession a railway accountant, a not uncommon occupation at the time. He was active in the City of London Chess Club in the 1880s and 1890s but seemed to drop out of chess until the Barnes Village club opened its doors, when, in retirement, he threw himself into their activities, right up to the end of his life in 1937.

Richmond Herald 13 February 1937

Mr Hooke was rather stronger, and rather more interesting. He’s most famous for a game he lost against the aforementioned Mr Blake, which has been much anthologised, often with the missed brilliancy on move 9 substituted for the actual conclusion, and often also with an incorrect year. Here’s its first appearance in print.

Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News 22 September 1888

And here it is for you to play through yourself.

Blake, Joseph Henry
Hooke, George Archer
Casual Game: London
1888
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.e4ChessBase II1…e52.Nf3d63.Bc4f54.d4
12345678abcdefgh
4…Nf6NPredecessor:4…fxe45.Ng5d56.Bb3Be77.h4c68.dxe5Bxg59.Bxg5Qd710.Nc3Qg411.Qd4Be612.Nxe4dxe413.Bxe6Qxe61-0 (22) Allen,H-Gilberg,C Brooklyn (Brooklyn CC) 1869 EXT 2017 [ChessBase II]5.Nc3exd46.Qxd4
12345678abcdefgh
C41: Philidor Defence.
6.Nxd4+−fxe47.Qe26…Bd7?6…Nc67.Qe3fxe47.Ng57.e57…Nc6?7…Qe7+−8.Bf7+Ke7
12345678abcdefgh
9.Qd5?9.Qxf6+!!Kxf69…gxf610.Nd5#10.Nd5+Ke511.Nf3+Kxe412.Nc3#9…h6!10.Bg6Ne5Prevents Qf7+.11.b3?11.Be3Qb812.Qb311…hxg5??11…Qc8−+and all is fine.12.Nf7Nxg613.Nxh8Nxd514.Nxd5+Ke815.Nxg6fxe412.Qxe5++−dxe512…Be6+−13.Qb513.Ba3c5+−13…f414.Qxg5Kd713.Ba3+Ke614.exf5#Weighted Error Value: White=2.05/Black=2.111–0

You’ll observe that the annotator, not having the benefit of Stockfish 15 to consult, mistakenly refers to Blake’s 11th move as a very fine move. It was a creative try which worked over the board, but Hooke could have won by playing, amongst other moves, 11… Qc8 or Qb8, making room for his king on d8. I’ve always found the 9. Qxf6 variation particularly attractive, with the knights returning to f3 and c3 to deliver mate.

Joseph Henry Blake was another prominent figure with a very long chess career, the latter part of which took place in Kingston. With any luck he’ll be the subject of some Minor Pieces in future.

George Archer Hooke was born in Chelsea on 28 February 1857, the third of twelve children of William Hooke and Harriet Sanders, six of whom tragically died before reaching the age of 20.

Here, from the family archives, is a photograph of William.

The family are elusive in the 1861 census, but in 1871 we find William working as the manager of a furniture depository living in the Parish of St George’s Hanover Square with his wife and eight children. They have no servants living in, which suggests the family was not especially wealthy.

By 1881 they’re at a different address, but still in the same parish. William seems to be in very much the same job. There are six children at home, along with a granddaughter. George, still living at home, is working as a 3rd Class Clerk in the Seamen’s Registry Office of the Board of Trade. He would remain there for the rest of his working life.

It must have been round about that time that he joined the City of London Chess Club, having learnt the game from his father at the age of about 12. He would soon join the North London Chess Club as well.

Moving into the middle of the 1880s, here’s a game from a match between the City of London and St George’s Chess Clubs, in which he faced the Hon Horace Curzon Plunkett, MP, rancher, agricultural reformer and uncle of writer and chess player Lord Dunsany. (He was ranching in Wyoming at the time: this must have been one of his visits back to London.) As the game was unfinished at the call of time it was adjudicated by Zukertort. His verdict was a draw, but Stockfish 15 disagrees, thinking Hooke had a winning position.

Hooke, George Archer
Plunkett, Horace Curzon
St George's v City of London
January 1885
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.Nf3e62.d4d53.e3Nf64.c4c55.Nc3Nc66.Be2Be77.b3b68.Bb2O-O9.Rc1Bb710.O-ORc8A13: English Opening: 1…e6.11.h3a612.Bd3?12.dxc5±cxd5 is the strong threat.12…Bxc513.cxd5Nxd514.Nxd5Qxd515.Qxd5exd516.Rfd112…Bd6?12…cxd413.exd4dxc414.bxc4Nb413.Kh1?13.dxc5stays ahead.13…Bxc514.cxd513…Bb8?13…cxd414.Nxd4Nxd415.exd4Bf414.Ne214.dxc5!?dxc415.Bxc414…Ne715.dxc5dxc415…Rxc5keeps more tension.16.b4Rc817.Bxf6gxf618.c5e516.Rxc4Black must now prevent Bxf6.16…Rxc517.Bxf6gxf618.Qc2Rxc419.Qxc4Don’t go for19.Bxh7+?Kh820.bxc4Bxf321.gxf3f522.Bxf522.Rd1?Qc7−+22…Nxf5−+19…Qd620.Rd1Ng6
12345678abcdefgh
Threatens to win with …Bxf3.
21.Bc2Qe7Hoping for …Rc8.22.Be4Bc823.Ned4f524.Bc224.Nc6!?Qb725.Bd3=24…Qf625.e4fxe425…Bb7!?26.exf5
12345678abcdefgh
26…Rc8!=
26.Bxe4Strongly threatening Nc6.26…Rd827.Rc1Bf428.Re1b529.Qc6Kg730.g3Be531.Ne2Ne732.Qb6Nd533.Bxd5Rxd534.Kg2Rd335.Qc6Bc336.Nxc3?36.Nf4+−Bd737.Qb736…Rxc337.Qe4Bd7?37…h6=38.Ne5Weighted Error Value: White=0.83/Black=1.01. An unexpected result. Adjudicated a draw by Zukertort. Stockfish thinks White’s winning. Source: Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News 21 February 1885½–½

In August that year he played in the 15th Counties Chess Association Meeting in Hereford, playing in Class 1A where he shared first place with his former antagonist Charles Dealtry Locock.

The parallel Class 1B tournament was won by George Edward Wainwright, and the two Georges then contested a 14-game match in London, with George H winning by the odd point. This match wasn’t well reported: it’s not clear whether it was a formal play-off match to decide the winner of the Hereford tournament or purely a friendly encounter.

In this league game against an anonymous opponent Hooke brought off a neat finish, giving up a rook to force checkmate in the ending.

Hooke, George Archer
Unknown
North London v Ludgate Circus
October 19, 1885
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.e4e52.Nf3Nc63.d4exd44.Nxd4Bc55.Be3Qf66.c3Nge77.Qd2O-OWith the idea …d5.8.Nb5C45: Scotch Game.8…Bxe39.Qxe3
12345678abcdefgh
Black must now prevent Nd2.
9…a6NPredecessor:9…d510.Nxc7Rb811.exd5Nf512.Qf4g513.Qe4Bd714.Qc2Qe5+15.Be2Nce71-0 (52) Rynd,J-MacDonnell,G Dublin 188410.Nxc7White is better.10…Rb811.Nd2Qd6?11…b5±is a better defense.12.Qg3Ne5
12345678abcdefgh
13.Nc4!Nxc413…Qxc714.Nxe514.Bxc4Qxg315.hxg3b516.Bd3Bb717.O-O-OBc2 is the strong threat.17…g6?17…Rfc8was called for.18.Bc2+−Rfd819.Nd519.Rd619…Nxd520.exd5d621.g4Rbc822.Rh6Kg723.g5Hoping for f4.23…Rh824.g4?& White is more active.24.f4±24…f6?
12345678abcdefgh
24…Rc4=25.gxf6+!Not25.f4fxg526.fxg5Rce8=25…Kxh6?
12345678abcdefgh
25…Kxf6+−26.f4Rcf826.f4!White mates.26…Bxd527.Rd2Bg228.Rxg2Rc529.Rh2+Rh530.g5#Weighted Error Value: White=0.41/Black=0.86 Source: Hackney Mercury And North London Herald, October 31, 18851–0

In an 1886 match between City of London and St George’s, he encountered one of the Fighting Reverends, Rev William Wayte, who had been one of England’s strongest players back in the 1850s. (You might notice that his Wikipedia page quotes from The Even More Complete Chess Addict, by M Fox and R James.) This time no adjudication was required: George managed to grind out a win with an extra pawn in a rook ending. Towards the end of his life, he mentioned a win against Wayte from 1885 as one of the games that gave him most pleasure: I presume he intended this one, even though the year doesn’t quite tally.

Hooke, George Archer
Wayte, William
St George's v City of London
March 4, 1886
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.e4e52.Nf3Nc63.d4exd44.Nxd4Bc55.Be3Qf66.c3Nge77.Qd2a68.Be2C45: Scotch Game.Much weaker is8.Bg5Qe58…d5
12345678abcdefgh
9.Nxc6N9.exd5feels hotter.9…Nxd510.Bg5Qg611.Bd3Predecessor:9.exd5Bxd410.cxd4Nxd511.Nc3Be612.O-Oh613.Ne4Qg614.Nc5Nd815.Rac1O-O1-0 (72) Blackburne,J-Hruby,V Vienna 18829…Bxe310.Qxe3White has an edge.10…Qxc611.exd5Qxd512.O-OQe613.Qf3O-O14.Nd2Bd715.Rfe1Bc616.Qg3Qh617.Nf3Nd518.Nd4Bd719.Bf3c620.Bxd5cxd521.Re5Bc6?21…Qd6±22.Nf5+−Qf6
12345678abcdefgh
23.Ne7+23.Nxg7!Kh824.Nh523…Kh824.Nxd5Bxd525.Rxd5Rad826.Rxd8Rxd8Endgame KQR-KQR27.Qc7Qd628.Qxd6Rxd6KR-KR29.Kf1Rd230.b3Kg831.Ke1Rc232.c4Black must now prevent Rd1.32…Kf833.Rd1And now Rd2 would win.33…Ke734.Rd2Rc3
12345678abcdefgh
34…Rc1+±35.Ke2Ke635.Ke2?35.Re2+Kd736.Kd235…b536.cxb5axb537.Rd5Rc2+38.Kf3Rxa239.Rxb5Rb240.g4h641.h4g642.Kg3Rb143.f3Rd144.Kf4Strongly threatening b4.44…Rd4+?44…Kf6±45.Ke5+−Rd346.Rb7+Kf847.f4Only move:47.Ke4+−Rc348.b447…Kg748.f548.b4!?48…Re3+49.Kf4Rh349…Re1±is tougher.50.fxg6White is clearly winning.50…Kxg651.h5+Kg752.b4Rh153.Rc7Rb154.Rc4Kf655.Ke4Less strong is55.Rc6+Ke7±55…Rd156.Rd4Re1+57.Kd5Weighted Error Value: White=0.51/Black=0.76 Source: Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News 27 March 18861–0

In the same year, 1886, George won a share of the brilliancy prize for this game in the City of London Chess Club Handicap Tournament against an opponent who got stuck in the mud adopting an unusual defence: we’d now call it a Hippopotamus.

Hooke, George Archer
Stevens, Samuel John
City of London Handicap Tournament
1886
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.e4b62.d4g63.Bd3Bg74.Nf3Bb75.Nc3e66.Be3B00: Queen’s Fianchetto Defence, Nimzowitsch Defence.6…Ne7
12345678abcdefgh
7.Qd2N& White is more active.Predecessor:7.Ne2O-O8.Ng3f59.Qd2fxe410.Nxe4Bxe411.Bxe4d512.Bd3Nf513.O-O0-1 (30) Robey,J-Mongredien,A London 18627…O-O8.h4White is clearly better.8…c59.Bh69.dxc5bxc510.h510.Bxc5d6±10…Qb6±9…cxd410.Bxg7Kxg711.Nxd4f5?11…Nbc612.Ndb511…h5±12.h5+−Strongly threatening hxg6.12…f413.Ncb5e513…Nec614.Nf3Qf615.hxg6hxg614.Qb4Nbc615.Nxc6Nxc616.Qa3Qg517.h6+Kh818.Nd6Qxg2?18…Nd819.O-O-ORab819…Rfb8?20.Qb3Nd821.Nf7+Kg822.Nxd8+19…Qxf220.Nxb7Qe3+21.Kb1f320.Nxb7Qxf221.Nd6Nd421…Qe3+22.Kb1f322.Nc4b523.Qe7Ne6Against Qg7+24.Nxe5Qd425.Nxd7?25.Nf7+Kg826.Ng525…Rbe826.Qa326.Qxe6Rxe627.Nxf8Re828.Bxb528.Nxg6+hxg629.Bxb5Qe3+30.Kb1Rb828…Qe3+29.Kb1Rxf826…Qxd727.Bc4!Nd4
12345678abcdefgh
27…Qe728.Bd5?28.Bf1!+−is the precise move to win.28…Ne2+29.Kb1b4?
12345678abcdefgh
29…Qc7±might work better.30.Qxb4?30.Qd3!+−30…Rb8?30…Qe7±31.Qd2Ng331.Qc431.Qd2+−is more deadly.31…f3aiming for …Qd6.32.Qd3?32.Rhf1+−32…Qe7…g5 is the strong threat.33.Qe3Threatens to win with Rhf1.33…Qb4?33…g5=and Black has nothing to worry.34.Bb3Black must now prevent Rhf1. The board is on fire.34…a5?34…Qb635.Qg5Qf635.Qg5?White is out for blood.Weaker is35.Rd7Qb636.Qxb636.Qg5Qf636…Rxb6±35.Rhf135…Qxe435…Rbe836.Qxa5Intending Qc7 and mate.36…Rfc8Against Qc736…Rbe837.Rhf1Qe737.Qg5Rb6Against Qf6+37…Rf8+−38.Rhf1Qf438.Rd8+Qe839.Qe5+Weighted Error Value: White=0.96/Black=1.28 Source: Illustrated London News 28 August 18861–0

In 1886 Hooke took part in the Amateur Championship of the 2nd British Chess Association Congress in London, scoring an outstanding success. Walter Montagu Gattie won with a score of 15/18, and George Archer Hooke featured in a three-way tie for second with Antony Alfred Geoffrey Guest and George Edward Wainwright. Unfortunately, few of the games from this tournament have been published.

Although most of the games took place during the summer, it was only concluded in October, by which time George was involved in another tournament. This was the British Chess Club 2nd Class Tournament in which he again finished in second place. His score of 3½/5 left him half a point behind Scottish champion Daniel Yarnton Mills. Here’s their game, which resulted in a draw.

Mills, Daniel Yarnton
Hooke, George Archer
British Chess Club 2nd Class Tourney
October 1886
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.e4ChessBase II1…e52.Nf3Nc63.Nc3Nf64.Bb5Bc55.O-Od66.d4exd47.Nxd4Bd78.Bxc6bxc6
12345678abcdefgh
9.Bg5NPredecessor:9.Nf5Bxf510.exf5O-O11.Be3Bxe312.fxe3d513.Qf3Re814.Rad1Qe715.Rd3Nd716.Qg3Nc51-0 (46) Newham,W-Gunsberg,I London 1883 EXT 2003 [ChessBase II]9…h610.Bh4g5C48: Four Knights: 4 Bb5, replies other than 4…Bb4.11.Bg3h5…h4 is the strong threat.12.e5& White is more active.12…h4White is better.13.exf6Qxf614.Re1+Kf8
12345678abcdefgh
15.Be5dxe5
12345678abcdefgh
16.Ne4!Pair of Knights!16…Qe717.Nxc5Qxc518.Nb318.Nf3!?Bg4
12345678abcdefgh
19.Nxe5!Bxd120.Nd7+Kg721.Nxc5Bxc222.Re7=
18…Qe719.Qe2f6Black has some pressure.20.Rad1Be621.Nd4Bd522.c4White has compensation.22…Bf723.b3Bh5Inhibits Qf3.24.Nf3Kg724…h3keeps more tension.25.Qe4Qe626.Nd4Qg425.Qe3Bxf326.Qxf3Qe627.Qe3Rhe828.Rd2Re728…Kg6feels hotter.29.h3a630.Qc5a529.Red1a529…a6is interesting.30.h3e431.Rd8Rxd832.Rxd8Qe530.a4Rb831.h3g432.hxg4Qxg433.Rd4exd433…Qg5!?34.Qe2f534.Qxe7+The position is equal.34…Kg635.f3Qf4aiming for …Qe3+.36.Qd7c5Threatens to win with …Qe3+.37.Re1Inhibits Qe3+. Black must now prevent Re4.37…Rxb338.Qe8+Weighted Error Value: White=0.32/Black=0.34 With a draw by perpetual check. Source: Morning Post 18 October 1886½–½

Handicap tournaments were a big feature of every competitive chess club at the time, and for many years later. Perhaps they should be revived. They worked something like this.

The players were grouped into classes according to playing strength. If you played someone one class below you, you played Black without your f-pawn. Against someone two classes below you and you were again Black without your f-pawn, but White got to play two moves at the start of the game. Against an opponent three classes below you, you’re White but playing without your queen’s knight. and, against an opponent four classes below you you’re again White and this time without your queen’s rook.

Here’s how George Hooke defeated a player two classes below him who foolishly launched a kamikaze attack right from the opening rather than playing solid, sensible moves. (We start the game with the white pawn already on e4.)

Staniforth, Henry Smallpage
Hooke, George Archer
City of London CC Handicap Tournament
1886
Annotated by Tactical Analysis 5.2 (1s)
1.d4White is winning.1…d62.Bd3Nc63.e5White wants to mate with Qh5+.3…Nxd44.Qh5+4.c3+−Nf55.Nf34…g6=5.Bxg6+hxg66.Qxg6+6.Qxh8?is the wrong capture.6…Nxc2+7.Ke2
12345678abcdefgh
7…Qd7!8.Qxg8Qg4+9.Nf3Be6−+
6…Kd7…c5 is the strong threat.7.Qg4+Ne68.Nf3Black must now prevent Nd4.8…Qe89.Nd4But not9.Ng5Qg610.Qxe6+Qxe611.Nxe6Kxe6−+9…Qf710.O-OKe811.exd6cxd612.Re1
12345678abcdefgh
12…Nh6!13.Qe4Nxd414.Qxd4
12345678abcdefgh
14…Ng4!15.Bf415.f3Ne515…e515…Bg716.Qd2Bxb216.f3?
12345678abcdefgh
16.Bg316…Be7!−+Black is clearly winning.17.Qc317.Qd2Qxf417…Qxf418.fxg4Qxh2+19.Kf2Rf8+20.Ke2Bxg4+21.Kd2Bg5+Black took control after the opening. Weighted Error Value: White=1.28/ Black=0.19 (very precise) Source: Illustrated London News 25 September 18860–1

By now, it seems that, while George Archer Hooke continued to play regularly in matches and club tournaments, he no longer had the time to travel to places like Manchester and Hereford for congresses. Perhaps his work with the Board of Trade was taking up more of his time: as a young man of considerable abilities approaching his 30th birthday he would doubtless have been promoted by now.

Perhaps there was another reason as well.

Here he is, on August 27 1889, now aged 32, marrying 34 year old Ellen Farmer at All Saints Church, Fulham, right by Putney Bridge. Congratulations to the happy couple!

And here, for now, we’ll leave George Archer Hooke, a strong amateur chess player, a high-flying civil servant and now a married man who would waste little time starting a family.

You already know that he was still playing chess in the 1920s so there’s lots more to tell.

You’ll find out what happened next in the second instalment of the story of George Archer Hooke, coming very soon to a Minor Piece near you.

 

Acknowledgements and sources:

ancestry.co.uk
findmypast.co.uk
Wikipedia
EdoChess (George Archer Hooke’s page here)
BritBase
chessgames.com
Chess Notes (Edward Winter)
Chess Scotland
Hooke Family History (many thanks to Graham Hooke)
Brian Denman
Gerard Killoran

 Save as PDF

5 thoughts on “Minor Pieces 46: George Archer Hooke Part 1”

  1. A game where it seems, Black undersandably preferred to remain anonymous.

    [Event “North London vs Ludgate Circus”]
    [Site “?”]
    [Date “1885.10.19”]
    [Round “?”]
    [White “Hooke, George Arthur”]
    [Black “Mr. ?”]
    [Result “1-0”]
    [ECO “C45”]
    [Opening “Scotch: Blackburne attack”]

    1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5 5. Be3 Qf6 6. c3 Nge7 7. Qd2 O-O 8.
    Nb5 Bxe3 9. Qxe3 a6 10. Nxc7 Rb8 11. Nd2 Qd6 12. Qg3 Ne5 13. Nc4 Nxc4 14. Bxc4
    Qxg3 15. hxg3 b5 16. Bd3 Bb7 17. O-O-O g6 18. Bc2 Rfd8 19. Nd5 Nxd5 20. exd5 d6
    21. g4 Rbc8 22. Rh6 Kg7 23. g5 Rh8 24. g4 f6 25. gxf6+ Kxh6 26. f4 Bxd5 27. Rd2
    Bg2 28. Rxg2 Rc5 29. Rh2+ Rh5 30. g5# {Hackney Mercury And North London Herald,
    October 31, 1885 Page 3} 1-0

    1. Many thanks Gerard. Do you have anything from later in Hooke’s career? I have a lot of games from the 1890s (mostly losses) plus his cable match game from 1903, but nothing else from the 20th century. It seems he kept his scoresheets: I’ve just asked his great grandson if he knows what happened to them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.